Page ii
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
Support for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CHE-9630106, the National Institutes of Health under Contract No. N01-OD-4-2139, and the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-95ER14556. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, or the U.S. Department of Energy.
International Standard Book Number 0-309-07573-4
Additional copies of this report are available from:
National Academy Press
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW
Box 285
Washington, DC 20055
800-624-6242
202-334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area)
http://www.nap.edu
Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW
NAS 273
Washington, DC 20418
202-334-2156
Copyright
2001
by the
National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
Page iii
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.
Page v
CHEMICAL SCIENCES ROUNDTABLE
RICHARD C. ALKIRE, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Chair
MARION C. THURNAUER, Argonne National Laboratory, Vice Chair
ALEXIS T. BELL, University of California, Berkeley
DARYLE H. BUSCH, University of Kansas
MARCETTA Y. DARENSBOURG, Texas A&M University
MICHAEL P. DOYLE, Research Corporation
BRUCE A. FINLAYSON, University of Washington
MICHAEL J. GOLDBLATT, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
RICHARD M. GROSS, Dow Chemical Company
ESIN GULARI, National Science Foundation
L. LOUIS HEGEDUS, Atofina Chemicals, Inc.
ANDREW KALDOR, Exxon Mobil
FLINT LEWIS, American Chemical Society
MARY L. MANDICH, Bell Laboratories
ROBERT S. MARIANELLI, Office of Science and Technology Policy
TOBIN J. MARKS, Northwestern University
JOE J. MAYHEW, Chemical Manufacturers Association
WILLIAM S. MILLMAN, U.S. Department of Energy
NORINE E. NOONAN, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
JANET G. OSTERYOUNG, National Science Foundation
NANCY L. PARENTEAU, Organogenesis, Inc.
MICHAEL E. ROGERS, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
HRATCH G. SEMERJIAN, National Institute of Standards and Technology
PETER J. STANG, University of Utah
D. AMY TRAINOR, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals
JEANETTE M. VAN EMON, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Exposure Research Laboratory
ISIAH M. WARNER, Louisiana State University
Staff
RUTH MCDIARMID, Senior Program Officer
SYBIL A. PAIGE, Administrative Associate
DOUGLAS J. RABER, Director, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
SCOTT C. JENKINS, National Research Council Intern
Page vi
BOARD ON CHEMICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY
KENNETH N. RAYMOND, Co-Chair, University of California
JOHN L. ANDERSON, Co-Chair, Carnegie Mellon University
JOSEPH M. DESIMONE, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University
CATHERINE C. FENSELAU, University of Maryland
ALICE P. GAST, Stanford University
RICHARD M. GROSS, Dow Chemical Company
NANCY B. JACKSON, Sandia National Laboratory
GEORGE E. KELLER II, Union Carbide Company (retired)
SANGTAE KIM, Eli Lilly and Company
WILLIAM KLEMPERER, Harvard University
THOMAS J. MEYER, Los Alamos National Laboratory
PAUL J. REIDER, Merck Research Laboratories
LYNN F. SCHNEEMEYER, Bell Laboratories
MARTIN B. SHERWIN, ChemVen Group, Inc.
JEFFREY J. SIIROLA, Eastman Kodak Company
CHRISTINE S. SLOANE, General Motors Research Laboratories
ARNOLD F. STANCELL, Georgia Institute of Technology
PETER J. STANG, University of Utah
JOHN C. TULLY, Yale University
CHI-HUEY WONG, Scripps Research Institute
STEVEN W. YATES, University of Kentucky
Staff
DOUGLAS J. RABER, Director
RUTH MCDIARMID, Program Officer
CHRISTOPHER K. MURPHY, Program Officer
SYBIL A. PAIGE, Administrative Associate
Page vii
Preface
The Chemical Sciences Roundtable (CSR) was established in 1997 by the National Research Council (NRC). It provides a science-oriented, apolitical forum for leaders in the chemical sciences to discuss chemically related issues affecting government, industry, and universities. Organized by the NRC's Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, the CSR aims to strengthen the chemical sciences by fostering communication among the people and organizations—spanning industry, government, universities, and professional associations—involved with the chemical enterprise. The CSR does this primarily by organizing workshops that address issues in chemical science and technology that require national attention.
The topic “Carbon Management: Implications for R&D in the Chemical Sciences” was selected by the Chemical Sciences Roundtable in response to concern that the chemical sciences community should be prepared to respond in the event that a policy decision might be implemented in the area of carbon management. The workshop, entitled Carbon Management: Implications for R&D in the Chemical Sciences, brought together leaders in chemistry and chemical engineering from government, academia, and industry to gather information and explore possible roles that the chemical sciences R&D community might play in identifying and addressing underlying chemical questions that might arise if government action were taken to regulate carbon dioxide output or fossil fuel consumption. The workshop focused not on the debate over whether we have seen anthropogenically driven climate change or what the climate change effects might be, but on how the chemical community could prepare for and react to a possible national policy of carbon management.
The chapters in this report are the authors' own versions of their presentations, and the discussion comments were taken from a transcript of the workshop. In accord with the policies of the CSR, the workshop did not attempt to establish any conclusions or recommendations about needs and future directions, focusing instead on issues identified by the speakers. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the NRC or any of its constituent units.
Alexis T. Bell and Tobin J. Marks
Workshop Organizers
Page ix
Acknowledgment of Reviewers
This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the (NRC's) Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
David C. Bonner, Rohm and Haas Company
Glenn A. Crosby, Washington State University
Joseph M. DeSimone, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University
Gregg Marland, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they did not see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Edward M. Arnett, Duke University. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the organizers and the institution.
Page xi
Contents
|
Page xii
|