In Pursuit of Speed: New Options for Intercity Passenger Transport -- Special Report 233 (1991)

In Pursuit of Speed: New Options for Intercity Passenger Transport -- Special Report 233
View larger
  • Status: Final Book
In Pursuit of Speed:
New Options for Intercity Passenger Transport -- Special Report 233



TRB Special Report 233 - In Pursuit of Speed: New Options for Intercity Passenger Transport assesses the applicability of high-speed ground transportation (HSGT) technologies to meet the demand for passenger transportation service in high-density travel markets and corridors in the United States.

In certain corridors, high-speed rail could offer a means of reducing congestion at airports and on major intercity highways while serving the travel needs of a substantial number of intercity passengers. Technologies in use in Europe and Japan have already resulted in highly successful systems operating at average speeds of 125 185 mph with enviable safety records. Congress has provided limited funding for research and planning toward the deployment of magnetic levitation (maglev) technology in both the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act and the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Though still in an experimental phase, maglev trains have demonstrated speeds of 300 mph.

The committee that examined new options for high-speed rail noted a striking and important contrast between intercity train travel in Europe and Japan and the United States. Both Europe and Japan had substantial intercity rail markets before evolving to high-speed technologies; comparable service offered by Amtrak occurs in few corridors. Trains in Europe and Japan also connect directly to extensive networks of intracity transit service, whereas Amtrak passengers enjoy such interconnections in only a few cities. The committee found that high-speed train service competes most effectively with automobile and air travel in major city-pair markets of roughly 150 to 300 miles. Many such city pairs exist in Europe and Japan, which are more densely populated and cover smaller geographic areas than is the case with the United States. Rail can connect the major cities of France relatively easily, for example, but could scarcely compete with air transport between New York and Atlanta or Chicago and Los Angeles. Moreover, whereas the French and the Japanese have long histories of strong institutional commitment to and government support for passenger rail development, U.S. support for such service has been modest and wavering.

The committee that produced this report concluded that high-speed rail service is costly and that passenger revenues would be unlikely to cover its capital and operating costs in the United States. Public subsidies might be justified in some corridors because rail could divert enough passengers from crowded airports and highways, resulting in less adverse environmental impact and lower energy consumption per passenger mile. High-speed rail is relatively noisy, however, and requires long, straight alignments to achieve its high speeds; such corridors could traverse residential areas and sensitive wetlands and lead to fragmented habitats. Moreover, whether high-speed rail corridors would be any easier to build than other major transportation infrastructure is an open question.

The report recommends that USDOT develop the capacity to analyze investments in intercity travel modes and help fund the most cost-effective strategies (accounting for environmental and other external costs), regardless of mode. Aside from the special provisions made by Congress for Amtrak, however, the United States lacks an institutional mechanism to subsidize high-speed rail. Highway and aviation users are taxed to form trust funds for infrastructure improvements for these modes, but the trust funds cannot be used to subsidize rail service, even in situations where such funding may be warranted. The committee also found that conventional high-speed technologies pose much less technical risk and would cost less than proposed maglev systems, which require additional research and experimentation.


Publication Info

179 pages | 6 x 9

Table of Contents

skim chapter
Research Tools

Suggested Citation

National Research Council. In Pursuit of Speed: New Options for Intercity Passenger Transport -- Special Report 233. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1991.

Import this citation to:

Copyright Information

The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Rightslink, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Rightslink allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Rightslink you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the National Academies Press (NAP) through Rightslink:

  • Republish text, tables, figures, or images in print
  • Post on a secure Intranet/Extranet website
  • Use in a PowerPoint Presentation
  • Distribute via CD-ROM
  • Photocopy

Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses. If you have questions or comments concerning the Rightslink service, please contact:

Rightslink Customer Care
Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543
Tel: 978/777-9929

To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at 800-624-6242 for pricing.

To request permission to translate a book published by the National Academies Press or its imprint, the Joseph Henry Press, please click here to view more information.

Related Books more

More by the Transportation Research Board more