Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Read this book online, free! Click here to proceed to linked table of contents

Tank Wastes Planned for On-Site Disposal at Three Department of Energy Sites:

The Savannah River Site - Interim Report

Book Cover

Status: Available Now

Size: 88 pages, 8 1/2 x 11

Publication Year:2005

Print List Price Your Price  
Order online and save 10%
PAPERBACK
ISBN-10: 0-309-09693-6
ISBN-13: 978-0-309-09693-5
$21.00 $18.90 Add to Cart
PDF      

Authors:
Committee on the Management of Certain Radioactive Waste Streams Stored in Tanks at Three Department of Energy Sites, National Research Council
Authoring Organizations

Description:
In response to a request from Congress, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) asked the National Academies to evaluate its plans for managing radioactive wastes from spent nuclear fuel at sites in Idaho, South Carolina, and Washington. This interim report ...
Read More


Paste into your Web page:

Preview
Free Resources
Read

Full Text
Jump to this book's table of contents to begin reading online for free.

Research Tools

Web Search Builder
Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.

Reference Finder
Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Download Free

PDF Summary
Download executive summary in PDF.

Rights & Permissions

Reprint Permission
Request permission to license or reprint the book's content through Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink.

Request Permission to Distribute a PDF

Request Translation Rights

Questions About Rights and Permissions?

Description

In response to a request from Congress, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) asked the National Academies to evaluate its plans for managing radioactive wastes from spent nuclear fuel at sites in Idaho, South Carolina, and Washington. This interim report evaluates storage facilities at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, with a particular focus on plans to seal the tanks with grouting. The report finds that tanks at the site do not necessarily need to be sealed shut as soon as the bulk of the waste has been removed. Postponing permanent closure buys more time for the development and application of emerging technologies to remove and better immobilize residual waste, without increasing risks to the environment or delaying final closure of the "tank farms." The report also recommends alternatives to address the lack of tank space at the site, as well as the need for focused R&D activities to reduce the amount and improve the immobilization of residual waste in the tanks and to test some of the assumptions used in evaulating long-term risks at the site.

Search This Book

»Find more like this book

SIGN UP FOR...

New Title Emails
Read about the newest releases and receive special offers.