Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Read this book online, free! Click here to proceed to linked table of contents

Letter Report Assessing the WATERS Network Science Plan

Book Cover

Status: Not for Sale

Size: 12 pages, 8.5 X 11

Publication Year:2009

PDF      

Authors:
Committee on the Review of the Water and Environmental Research Systems (WATERS) Network; National Research Council
Authoring Organizations

Description:

In 2006, the National Science Foundation (NSF) requested that the National Research Council's (NRC's) Water Science and Technology Board review and assess the adequacy of the conceptual design and planning process for NSF's proposed Water and Environmental Research Systems (WATERS) ...
Read More


Paste into your Web page:

Preview
Free Resources
Read

Full Text
Jump to this book's table of contents to begin reading online for free.

Research Tools

Web Search Builder
Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.

Reference Finder
Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Download Free

Sample PDF
Try before you buy. Download this sample PDF file to examine the quality of our PDF files and chapters.

Rights & Permissions

Reprint Permission
Request permission to license or reprint the book's content through Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink.

Request Permission to Distribute a PDF

Request Translation Rights

Questions About Rights and Permissions?

Description

In 2006, the National Science Foundation (NSF) requested that the National Research Council's (NRC's) Water Science and Technology Board review and assess the adequacy of the conceptual design and planning process for NSF's proposed Water and Environmental Research Systems (WATERS) Network. In response, the NRC formed a committee that first issued an interim report evaluating the Draft Science, Education, and Design Strategy for the WATERS Network. Subsequently, in response to requests from NSF, the statement of task for the committee was modified towards reviewing a vision-level Science Plan, and the NRC and committee agreed to provide quick advice on part two of the statement of task.

This letter report summarizes the committee's assessment of whether the Science Plan 'sets forth a vision of what could be accomplished with an observing network to transform water science and engineering research and education' and 'whether the Science Plan makes a compelling case for establishing the WATERS Network with Major Research and Facilities Construction (MREFC) funding.' These two questions are addressed individually and as part of an overall assessment as well.

Search This Book

»Find more like this book

SIGN UP FOR...

New Title Emails
Read about the newest releases and receive special offers.