Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $43.50
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$37.00
Web:$33.30
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $28.50
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $3.60
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties (2005)
Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (BASC)

Page
15
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties

BOX 1-1
Key Definitions

Climate system: The system consisting of the atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere, determining the Earth’s climate as the result of mutual interactions and responses to external influences (forcing). Physical, chemical, and biological processes are involved in the interactions among the components of the climate system.

Climate forcing: An energy imbalance imposed on the climate system either externally or by human activities.

  • Direct radiative forcing: A climate forcing that directly affects the radiative budget of the Earth’s climate system; for example, added carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbs and emits infrared radiation. Direct radiative forcing may be due to a change in concentration of radiatively active gases, a change in solar radiation reaching the Earth, or changes in surface albedo. Radiative forcing is reported in the climate change scientific literature as a change in energy flux at the tropopause, calculated in units of watts per square meter (W m-2); model calculations typically report values in which the stratosphere was allowed to adjust thermally to the forcing under an assumption of fixed stratospheric dynamics.

  • Indirect radiative forcing: A climate forcing that creates a radiative imbalance by first altering climate system components (e.g., precipitation efficiency of clouds), which then almost immediately lead to changes in radiative fluxes. Examples include the effect of solar variability on stratospheric ozone and the modification of cloud properties by aerosols.

  • Nonradiative forcing: A climate forcing that creates an energy imbalance that does not immediately involve radiation. An example is the increasing evapotranspiration flux resulting from agricultural irrigation.

Climate response: Change in the climate system resulting from a climate forcing.

Climate feedback: An amplification or dampening of the climate response to a specific forcing due to changes in the atmosphere, oceans, land, or continental glaciers.

NOTE: Additional definitions are provided in Appendix C.

outgoing radiative energy fluxes. Global radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), as used in assessments by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is relatively easy to compute in climate models and has straightforward policy applications. However, it has important limitations when applied to radiative forcing agents not conventionally considered as such (e.g., aerosols, land-use change) or when used to measure climatic implications other than global mean temperature (e.g., regional precipitation). To address these limitations, the concept of radiative forcing needs to be expanded; that expansion is a major theme of this report.

Page
15
[ Top of Page ] [ Home ] [ Contact Us ] [ Help ] [ The National Academies Home ]