| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2010. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Nutrient Requirements of Sheep Sixth Revised Edition, 1985 Subcommittee on Sheep Nutrition Committee on Animal Nutrition Board on Agriculture National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1985
OCR for page R2
Page ii
National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20418
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was established by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and of advising the federal government. The Council operates in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy under the authority of its congressional charter of 1863, which establishes the Academy as a private, nonprofit, self-governing membership corporation. The Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in the conduct of their services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. It is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. The National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine were established in 1964 and 1970, respectively, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences.
This study was supported by the Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, by the Agricultural Research Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, by Agriculture Canada, and by the American Feed Industry Association.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Main entry under title:
Nutrient requirements of sheep.
(Nutrient requirements of domestic animals) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. SheepFeeding and feeds. 2. SheepFeed utilization efficiency. I. National Research Council (U.S.). Subcommittee on Sheep Nutrition. II. Series. SF376.N85 1985 636.3'0852 85-21562 ISBN 0-309-03596-1
First Printing, October 1985 Second Printing, January 1992 Third Printing, November 1992
Copyright © 1985 by the National Academy of Sciences
No part of this book may be reproduced by any mechanical, phonographic, or electronic process, or in the form of a phonographic recording, nor may it be stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or otherwise copied for public or private use, without written permission from the publisher, except for the purposes of official use by the United States Government.
Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R3
Page iii
Preface This report is one in a series of reports entitled Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, issued under the guidance of the Committee on Animal Nutrition, Board on Agriculture, National Research Council. It was prepared by the Subcommittee on Sheep Nutrition and updates the 1975 edition of Nutrient Requirements of Sheep.
The revisions made include the following:
•
The values presented reflect new information available on sheep nutrition and are interpreted by the committee into useful form.
•
The concentrations of nutrients in the diet for a specific stage of production are similar for all weights of sheep and include the ratio of concentrate to forage that would conventionally be fed.
•
Specific diets and nutrient requirements are presented for ewe lambs during various stages of production.
•
The energy requirements and energy concentration of the diet of ewes in the last 4 to 6 weeks of gestation with an expected lambing rate of 130 to 150 percent are reduced somewhat from the values reported in the 1975 edition of this report.
•
The nutrient requirements and nutrient concentrations of the diet during the last 4 to 6 weeks of gestation for ewes with an expected lambing rate of 180 to 225 percent are a new addition and are distinctly different from requirements for ewes with lower lambing rates.
•
The expected growth rate of light-weight finishing lambs was substantially increased, and dietary energy concentrations were increased for all weight lambs to accommodate these higher weight gains within the constraints of limited capacity to consume dry matter.
•
Feed composition data are expressed on a dry matter basis.
•
Feeds are named in accordance with nomenclature adopted by the Committee on Animal Nutrition (United States) and the National Committee on Animal Nutrition (Canada).
•
Values for nutrient requirements are given in both the metric and English systems to broaden the application of the information.
•
More husbandry information is included than in previous editions to better serve sheep producers who rely on this information source in managing their flocks.
•
Formulas and tables have been developed to estimate energy requirements for maintenance and growth by animals of varying mature weight genotypes (see Table 3). Tables 1 and 2 were not developed from these formulas; thus, there may be some discordance between these estimates of average energy requirements.
The subcommittee wishes to express appreciation to the Committee on Animal Nutrition and most especially to Richard D. Goodrich, George E. Mitchell, Jr., and Duane E. Ullrey, whose support, encouragement, and scientific expertise contributed significantly to the completion of this report. Appreciation is also extended to Douglas E. Hogue, who served on the subcommittee during the early stages of preparing this report, and Arthur L. Pope and John E. Butcher, who reviewed an early draft and prepared comments for the subcommittee's consideration.
The subcommittee is also indebted to John A. Pino, who served as board reviewer; Margaret Benson, who provided data for consideration; and Selma P. Baron and Philip Ross, of the Board on Agriculture, for their assistance in the production of the report.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON SHEEP NUTRITION
OCR for page R4
Page iv
Subcommittee On Sheep Nutrition
ROBERT M. JORDAN, Chairman University of Minnesota
MILLARD C. CALHOUN Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, San Angelo
DONALD G. ELY University of Kentucky
DAVID P. HEANEY Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
FRANK C. HINDS University of Wyoming
DONALD E. JOHNSON Colorado State University
Committee On Animal Nutrition
DUANE E. ULLREY, Chairman, Michigan State University
FRANK AHERNE, University of Alberta
RICHARD E. AUSTIC, Cornell University
JIMMY H. CLARK, University of Illinois
RICHARD D. GOODRICH, University of Minnesota
GEORGE E. MITCHELL, JR., University of Kentucky
JAMES G. MORRIS, University of California, Davis
ROBERT R. SMITH, USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service
DALE R. WALDO, USDA, Agricultural Research Service
SELMA P. BARON, Staff Officer
Board On Agriculture
WILLIAM L. BROWN, Chairman, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
JOHN A. PINO, Vice Chairman, Inter-American Development Bank
PERRY L. ADKISSON, Texas A&M University
C. EUGENE ALLEN, University of Minnesota
LAWRENCE BOGORAD, Harvard University
ERIC L. ELLWOOD, North Carolina State University
JOSEPH P. FONTENOT, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
RALPH W. F. HARDY, Cornell University and Bio Technica International, Inc.
ROGER L. MITCHELL, University of Missouri
CHARLES C. MUSCOPLAT, Molecular Genetics, Inc.
ELDOR A. PAUL, University of California, Berkeley
VERNON W. RUTTAN, University of Minnesota
JAMES G. TEER, Welder Wildlife Foundation
JAN VAN SCHILFGAARDE, USDA, Agricultural Research Service
VIRGINIA WALBOT, Stanford University
CHARLES M. BENBROOK, Executive Director
OCR for page R5
Page v
Contents 1. Introduction
1
2. Nutrient requirements and Signs of Deficiency
2
Energy
2
Terminology for Discussing Energy Values of Feedstuffs
2
Signs of Deficiency and Toxicity
3
Maintenance
4
Growth
4
Pregnancy
5
Lactation
5
NE Value of Feedstuffs
6
Gut Fill Variation
6
Environment
6
Management Considerations
7
Protein
8
Microbial Nitrogen Requirements
9
Nonprotein Nitrogen
9
Ruminal Degradation and/or Bypass of Dietary Protein
10
Amino Acids
10
Protein Deficiency and Toxicity
10
Minerals
11
Sodium and Chlorine (Salt)
11
Calcium and Phosphorus
11
Magnesium
13
Potassium
14
Sulfur
15
Iodine
15
Iron
16
Molybdenum
16
Copper
17
Cobalt
18
Manganese
19
Zinc
19
Selenium
20
Fluorine
22
OCR for page R6
Page vi
Vitamins
22
Vitamin A
22
Vitamin D
23
Vitamin E
24
Vitamin B Complex
25
Vitamins K1 and K2
25
3. Water
26
4. Nutrition Disorders
27
Enterotoxemia
27
Polioencephalomalacia
27
Pregnancy Disease
28
Urinary Calculi
28
5. Other Aspects of Sheep Nutrition
29
Pastures
29
Range Sheep
29
Flushing
30
Creep Feeding
32
Early Weaning
32
Artificial Rearing
33
Feed Additives
34
Poisonous Plants
34
Ration Alternatives
34
6. Formulating Diets for Sheep
36
7. Composition of Feeds
40
Tables
43
References
79
Index
93
OCR for page R7
Page vii
Figures and Tables Figures
1. Relationship between the energy density of empty body weight gain (NEg) and genotypic mature weight (W) as estimated by yearling ram weight
5
2. Energy density of live weight gains of large, medium, and small genotypes compared with ARC data (1980)
6
3. Daily and cumulative weight changes of a 60-kg ewe during maintenance, gestation, and lactation
7
4. Approximate daily digestible energy (DE) requirements of 65- to 70-kg breeding ewes at various production stages
8
5. The regional distribution of forages and grain, containing low, variable, or adequate levels of selenium, in the USA and Canada
21
Tables
1. Daily Nutrient Requirements of Sheep
45
2. Nutrient Concentration in Diets for Sheep
48
3. Net Energy Requirements for Lambs of Small, Medium, and Large Mature Weight Genotypes
49
4. NEpreg (NEy) Requirements of Ewes Carrying Different Numbers of Fetuses at Various Stages of Gestation
49
5. Crude Protein Requirements for Lambs of Small, Medium, and Large Mature Weight Genotypes
50
6. Macromineral Requirements of Sheep
50
7. Micromineral Requirements of Sheep and Maximum Tolerable Levels
50
8. Composition of Ewe's Milk
51
9. Vitamin E Requirements of Growing-Finishing Lambs and Suggested Levels of Feed Fortification to Provide 100 Percent of Requirements
51
10. Relative Ranking of Pasture Forages for Sheep
52
11. Range Supplements for Sheep
52
12. Suggested Creep Diets
53
13. Composition of Some Sheep Feeds
54
14. Composition of Mineral Supplements
74
15. Stage-of-Maturity Terms Used in Table 13
76
16. Weight-Unit Conversion Factors
77
17. Weight Equivalents
77
OCR for page R8
OCR for page R9
Nutrient
Requirements
of Sheep
Sixth Revised Edition, 1985
OCR for page R10