| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2010. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
ENG - BERING EDUCATION AND
PRACTICE IN THE UNITED STATES
~ . .
~ ng~neenng
L~frastructure
Diagrammang and
Modeling
Pane! on Engineering Infrastructure
Diagramming and Mocleling
Committee on the Education and Utilization
of the Engineer
Commission on Engineering ant!
Technical Systems
National Research Council
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C. 1986
OCR for page R2
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS ~
2101 Constitution Ave., NW
.
Washington, DC 20418
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing
Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of
the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Insti-
tute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen
for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures
approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy
of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was established by the National Academy of Sciences
in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's
purposes of furthering knowledge and of advising the federal government. The Council
operates in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy under the
authority of its congressional charter of 1863, which establishes the Academy as a private,
nonprofit, self-governing membership corporation. The Council has become the princi-
pal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy
of Engineering in the conduct of their services to the government, the public, and the
scientific and engineering communities. It is administered jointly by both Academies and
the Institute of Medicine. The National Acaclemy of Engineering and the Institute of
Medicine were established in 1964 and 1970, respectively, under the charter of the
National Academy of Sciences.
Support for this work has been provided by the National Science Foundation, the
Department of the Air Force, the Department of the Army, the Department of Energy, the
Department of the Navy, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Addi-
tionally, assistance has been provided through grants from the Eastman Kodak Company,
Exxon Corporation, the General Electric Company, the IBM Corporation, the Lockheed
Corporation, the Monsanto Company, and the Sloan Foundation.
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 85-63441
ISBN 0-309-03639-9
Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R3
Preface and
Acknowledgments
This report lay the Panel on Infrastructure Diagramming and Model-
ing forms an integral part of the overall study loy the Committee on the
Education and Utilization of the Engineer, performed under the auspi-
ces of the National Research Council. The most significant product of
this panel's effort appears as Chapter 3 "Defining the Engineering
Community" ~ in the full committee report. *
The material included in this panel report, however, goes far beyond
that found in Chapter 3 of the main committee report. In fact, the
definition of the engineering enterprise in the United States, the identi-
fication of its full infrastructure, and its subsequent description and
analysis by diagramming and modeling were fundamental to much of
the work of other panels and to that of the full committee. The defini-
tions adopted lay the panel are controversial to some, in that they per-
mit inclusion of practitioners who do not hold the academic or
professional registration credentials deemed by many as essential to
inclusion in the engineering fraternity. In adopting the definitions pre-
sented, the panel made no value judgments as to the validity of creden-
tials or the inclusion of "improperly" credentialed persons in the
engineering community. Rather, the pane! was concerned with identi-
fying all those engaged in or directly supporting the engineering enter
*Engineering Education and Practice in the United States: Foundations of Our Techno-
EconomicFuture "Washington, D.C.: NationalAcademy Press, 1985~.
. . .
111
OCR for page R4
1V
PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
prise in the United States so that a complete and proper description and
analysis of that enterprise was possible.
The Panel on Infrastructure Diagramming and Modeling originally
convened under the able leadership of Erich Bloch, now director of the
National Science Foundation NSF). Most of the difficult research and
analysis was performed under his guidance, as was the preparation of
the initial draft report. When Mr. Bloch left the panel to assume his NSF
duties, I was asked to guide completion of the report. I was able to do
that only with the assistance of Arnold R. Eshoo of IBM and William H.
Michael, Tr., overall staff director for the study. To both I owe a debt of
gratitude. Also, on behalf of both Erich Bloch and myself, I want to
thank and commend all the panel members and the staff for their out-
standing efforts. It was a pleasure to work with such a fine group of
professionals.
We also extend our appreciation to many other individuals and their
organizations for contributions to the panel's overall effort: to Bernard
T. Cullen, consultant, McBer & Company; Alan Fechter, National Sci-
ence Foundation and National Research Council; Daniel E. Hecker,
Bureau of Labor Statistics {BLSJ; and Charles Falk, Michael Crowley,
and Louis G. Mayfield of NSF.
And finally we acknowledge the following individuals who made
presentations to the panel {topic in parentheses following name):
Alan Fechter, National Research Council (Ph. D. SupplyJ
Robert C. DauffenBach, Oklahoma State University, and Tack
Fiorito, University of Iowa {Mathematical Manpower Models)
Patrick T. Sheridan, Engineering Manpower Commission (EMC Data
BasesJ
Daniel E. Hecker, Bureau of Labor Statistics GELS Data Basest
Bernard I. Cullen, McBer ~ Company Overview of Scientific and
Engineering Manpower Utilization
Tesse Smith, College Placement Council (College Placement Coun-
cil Activities)
Eugene Seeloff, Lehigh University {Lehigh University Placement
Activities)
William K. LeBold, Purdue University, and Patrick T. Sheridan, Engi-
neering Manpower Commission Trends in Engineering Enroll-
ments and Degrees Granted
P. H. Hubbard, American Electronics Association TEA Technical
EmploymentProjections, 1983-1987~
Donald G. Weinert
Acting Chairman
OCR for page R5
Pane! on Infrastructure
Diagramming and Modeling
ERICH BLOCH, Chairman; Vice-President, IBM Corporation Now
Director, National Science Foundation)
KAREN C. COHEN, Principal Research Associate, Center for
Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology
ARNOLD R. ESHOO, Program Manager, Technical Resource
Statistics, Technical Personnel Development, IBM Corporation
JOHN W. GEILS, Director, AAES/ASEE Faculty Shortage Project
(AT&T, Ret. ~
DEAN GILLETTE, Executive Director, Corporate Studies, AT&T, Bell
Laboratories {now Professor, Engineering Department, Harvey
Mudd Colleges
L. OWEN HILL, Manager, Site Resource Management, IBM East
FishLill, Hopewell function, N.Y.
WILLIAM K. LEBOLD, Director, Educational Research and
Information Systems, Purdue University
PATRICK J. SHERIDAN, Executive Director, EMC, American
Association of Engineering Societies
ROBERT P. STAMBAUGH, Consultant, Quechee, Vermont
DONALD G. WEINERT, Executive Director, National Society of
Professional Engineers
MICHAELCROWLEY {;liaisonrepresentative~, Staff Associate,
Division of Science Resource Studies, National Science
Foundation
DANIEL E. HECKER Liaison representatives, Office of Economic
Growth and Employment, U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics
OCR for page R6
Committee on the Education and
Utilization of the Engineer
1ERRIERA. HADDAD, Chairman (IBM, Ret. ~
GEORGE S. ANSELL, Dean of Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute Now President, Colorado School of Mines)
JORDAN l. BARUCH, President, Tordan l. Baruch Associates
ERICH BLOCH, Vice-President, IBM Corporation Now Director,
National Science Foundation)
DENNIS CHAMOT, Associate Director, Department for Professional
Employees, AFL/CID
EDMUND T. CRANCH, President, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
DANIEL C. DRUCKER, Dean of Engineering, University of Illinois at
Urbana {now Graduate Research Professor of Engineering Sciences,
University of Florida at Gainesville)
FRED W. GARRY, Vice-President, Corporate Engineering and
Manufacturing, General Electric Company
JOHN W. GEILS, Director of ~ES/ASEE Faculty Shortage Project
(AT&T, Ret. ~
AARON l. GELLMAN, President, Gellman Research Associates, Inc.
HELEN GOULDNER, Dean, College of Arts and Science, Professor of
Sociology, University of Delaware
JOHN D. KEMPER, Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of California at Davis
EDWARD T. KIRKPATRICK, President, Wentworth Institute of
Technology
V1
OCR for page R7
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
ERNEST S. KUH, Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer
V11
Science, University of California at Berkeley
W. EDWARD LEAR, Executive Director, American Society for
Engineering Education
LAWRENCE M. MEAD, OR., Senior Management Consultant ~ Senior
Vice-President, Ret. I, Grumman Aerospace Corporation
M. EUGENE MERCHANT, Principal Scientist, Manufacturing
Research, Cincinnati Milacron, Inc. {now Director, Advanced
Manufacturing Research, Metcut Research Associates, Inc. J
RICHARD l. REDPATH, Vice-President, Ralston Purina Company
FRANCIS E. REESE, Senior Vice-President, Monsanto {now retired)
ROBERT M. SAUNDERS, Professor, School of Engineering, University
of California at Irvine {Chairman, Board of Governors, AAES,
19831
CHARLES E. SCHAFFNER, Executive Vice-President, Syska
Hennessy
JUDITH A. SCHWAN, Assistant Director, Research Labs, Eastman
Kodak Company
HAROLD T. SHAPIRO, President, University of Michigan
MORRIS A. STEINBERG, Vice-President, Science, Lockheed
Corporation
DONALD G. WEINERT, Executive Director, National Society of
Professional Engineers
SHEILA E. WIDNALL, Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Staff
WILLIAM H. MICHAEL, OR., Executive Director
VERNON H. MILES, Staff Officer
AMY TANIK, Administrative Assistant
COURTLAND S. LEWIS, Consultant
Government Liaison
LEWIS G. MAYFIELD, Head, Office of Interdisciplinary Research,
National Science Foundation
OCR for page R8
OCR for page R9
Contents
Executive Summary
1. Definition of Engineering
Introduction, 9
Definitions, 10
2. Forces Affecting the Engineering Community
External Influences, 13
Internal Factors, 15
Technology As a Driving Force for Change, 17
Expected Impact of Advances in Engineering and
Technology, 18
Flow Diagrams of the Engineering Community
Introduction, 21
Description of the Diagrams, 22
The Balance Equation, 28
Data Availability, 31
Major Driving Forces, 32
Limitations of the Flow Diagrams, 37
Notes, 39
1X
13
.. 21
OCR for page R10
x
4. Modeling................
Need for and Use of Models, 41
Critique of Existing Models, 41
Developing the CLUE Simulation Model, 42
Results, Self-Critique, and Likely Extensions, 44
Notes, 46
Data Bases ..................................
Overview of Data Bases, 47
Data Base Coverage, 55
Technical Characteristics, 59
Conclusions and Recommendations, 65
Notes, 66
Appendix A: The Definition of Engineering and of
Engineers in Historical Context ......
Donald G. Weinert
Appendix B: Trends in Engineering Enrollments and
Degrees Grantec! .................
William K. LeBold and Patrick i. Sheridan
Appendix C: Flow Diagrams
CONTENTS
... 41
47
.. 80
. 108
OCR for page R11
ENG - ~G EDUCA~` \~
PICKLE ~ ~ ~D SINS
OCR for page R12