| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2010. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
WORK AND FAMILY
Policies for a
Changing Work Force
Edited by
Marianne A. Ferber and Brigid O 'Farrell
with La Rue Allen
Pane! on Employer Policies and Working Families
Committee on Women's Employment and
Related Social issues
Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
National Research Council
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C. 1 991
OCR for page R2
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS · 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. · Washington, D.C. 20418
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board
of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National
Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences
and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures
approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of
Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Work and family: policies for a changing work force / edited by
Marianne A. Ferber and Brigid O'Farrell with La Rue Allen; Panel on
Employer Policies and Working Families, Committee on Women's
Employment and Related Social Issues, Commission on Behavioral and
Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-309-04277-1
1. Dual-career families United States. 2. Work and family
United States. I. Ferber, Marianne A., 1923- . II. O'Farrell,
Brigid. III. Allen, La Rue, 1950- . IV. National Research Council
(U.S.). Committee on Women's Employment and Related Social Issues.
Panel on Employer Policies and Working Families.
HQ536.W62 1991
306.3'6 dc20
Copyright ~ 1991 by the National Academy of Sciences
9 1 -25484
CIP
No part of this book may be reproduced by any mechanical, photographic, or electronic proce-
dure, or in the form of a phonographic recording, nor may it be stored in a retrieval system,
transmitted, or otherwise copied for public or private use, without written permission from the
publisher, except for the purpose of official use by the United States government.
Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R3
PANEL ON EMPLOYER POLICIES AND WORKING FAMILIES
MARIANNE A. FERBER (Chair), Department of Economics, University
of Illinois
LA RUE ALLEN, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland
MAXINE BACA-ZINN, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan
LOTTE BAILYN, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology
SUSAN BIANCHI-SAND, Association of Flight Attendants, AFL-CIO,
Washington, D.C.
JUNE H. BROWN, Associate Dean's Office, University of Southern
California
RICHARD V. BURKHAUSER, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public
Affairs, Syracuse University
THOMAS G. CODY, Jannotta, Bray and Associates, Inc., Washington, D.C.
PAULA S. ENGLAND, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona,
Tucson
JAMES N. MORGAN, Department of Economics, University of Michigan
PAUL M. ROMAN, Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia
WENDY W. WILLIAMS, Dean's Office, Georgetown University School of
Law
BRIGID O' FARRELL, Study Director
LUCILE DIGIROLAMO, Staff Associate
COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S EMPLOYMENT AND
RELATED SOCIAL ISSUES
JOAN A. HUBER, Dean, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences,
Ohio State University
HELEN S. ASTIN, Graduate School of Education, University of California,
Los Angeles
MAXINE BACA-ZINN, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan
WILLIAM H. CHAFE, Department of History, Duke University
DIANNE PINDERHUGHES, Department of Political Science, University
of Illinois
EUGENE SMOLENSKY, Graduate School of Public Policy, University of
California, Berkeley
ROBERT K. YIN, COSMOS Corporation, Washington, D.C.
OCR for page R4
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating soci-
ety of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedi-
cated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general
welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the
Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scien-
tific and technical matters. Dr. Frank Press is president of the National Academy of
Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter
of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding
engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its mem-
bers, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising
the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engi-
neering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and re-
search, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Robert M. White
is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of
Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in
the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Insti-
tute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its
congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own
initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Samuel O.
Thier is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sci-
ences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the
Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government.
Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the
Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of
Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the
government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Coun-
cil is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr.
Frank Press and Dr. Robert M. White are chairman and vice chairman, respectively,
of the National Research Council.
IV
OCR for page R5
Preface
The increase in dual-earner and female-headed families has led to sig-
nificant research and policy interest in the relationship between employer
policies and families. In February 1987 the National Research Council's
Committee on Women's Employment and Related Social Issues convened a
planning meeting, which included experts in the area of work and family, as
well as representatives of private industry, federal agencies, and founda-
tions, to explore the feasibility of conducting a study that would explore
these issues further. Following that meeting, the committee established the
Panel on Employer Policies and Working Families to synthesize and assess
the research on employer policies and working families, to evaluate policy
alternatives, and to assess the need for further research. Although the re-
search on many of the relevant topics is limited, analysis of the available
data and discussions with experts enabled the panel to assess the major
areas of conflict between work and family responsibilities.
A panel of 12 experts conducted the study. Members included scholars
with expertise in the disciplines of economics, demography, sociology, de-
velopmental psychology, social psychology, organizational behavior, and
employment and family law, as well as experts in employment policy (pub-
lic and private) and public policy related to social welfare. Within these
categories, the panel included both researchers and practitioners from man-
agement and labor. To enhance its understanding of these issues, the panel
commissioned background materials and heard presentations by and held
discussions with a wide range of experts from management, labor, and gov-
ernment, as well as scholars specializing in related areas of research. A list
of the background materials, their authors, and the experts who were con-
sulted appears in Appendix A.
v
OCR for page R6
Vl
PREFACE
In the course of conducting this study, each of the panel members took
an active role in reading drafts, writing individual sections, providing data,
working with paper authors, leading discussions, and participating in the
meetings. La Rue Allen bore primary responsibility for Chapter 3. Marianne
Ferber not only chaired the panel and guided the writing throughout the
report, but also took primary responsibility for the analysis of work and
family issues in Europe. The panel's study director, Brigid O'Farrell, also
played an important role in the project: her expertise in family and work
interaction was a valuable resource, and her part in the drafting and editing
of the report reflects a thorough understanding of complex issues. The
commission deeply appreciates all of these contributions.
Lucile DiGirolamo, the panel's staff associate, was indispensable in or-
ganizing the various activities of the panel as well as providing critical
research support, especially for Chapter 7. Excellent administrative support
was provided by several very patient support staff during this lengthy pro-
cess. We would like to thank Michelle Daniels, Carey Gellman, Lisa Sementelli-
Dann, Kasey VanNett, and Sheryle Decareau from Wheaton College.
This report has benefited from extensive review by a large number of
people. Members of the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences
and Education (CBASSE) and of the National Academy of Sciences' Report
Review Committee carefully reviewed several drafts. Joan Huber, chair,
and Gene Smolensky and Dianne Pinderhughes, members of the panel's
parent committee, provided detailed comments on successive drafts of the
report. Emily Andrews and Martha Zaslow made presentations at the panel's
meetings and reviewed specific chapters of the report. Eugenia Grohman,
assistant director for reports, and Christine McShane, commission editor,
greatly improved the clarity of this report. Susanne Stoiber, director of the
Division of Social and Economic Studies, provided extensive comments and
support. Sincere thanks to all of these readers and reviewers for their time
and effort on so important a topic.
The project would not have been possible without the generous financial
support received from the Women's Bureau of the U.S. Department of La-
bor, the Ford Foundation, the Russell Sage Foundation, the German Marshall
Fund, Aetna Life and Casualty, IBM Corporation, and the National Re-
search Council Fund, and we gratefully acknowledge them. Special ac-
knowledgment and thanks for their support and patience go to June Zeitlin
at Ford and Collis Phillips and Harriet Harper at the Department of Labor.
This study has required a great deal of hard work, mutual commitment to
the task, and respect for differing points of view. The commission is grate-
ful to the panel members for their prodigious efforts, especially those of
Chair Marianne Ferber, and trust that it has been both personally and pro-
fessionally gratifying to work together on a topic that is so vitally impor-
tant. Our hope is that the findings, conclusions, and supporting data found
OCR for page R7
PREFACE
. .
V11
in this volume will make an important contribution to helping families and
employers adjust to the ongoing changes in our society.
SUZANNE H. WOOLSEY, Executive Director
Commission on Behavioral and Social
Sciences and Education
OCR for page R8
OCR for page R9
Contents
Summary
Introduction
The Family and the Workplace
Linkages Between Work and Family
4 How Adults Cope: Dependent Care
5 Standard Employee Benefits
6 New Family-Related Benefits
7 Family-Oriented Programs in Other Countries
8 Findings and Conclusions
References
APPENDIXES
A Background Materials
B Data Needs and Research Agenda
C Biographical Sketches
Index
IX
1
7
18
42
64
87
114
155
179
202
233
237
243
247
OCR for page R10
OCR for page R11
WORK AND FAMILY
OCR for page R12