The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Solid-Earth Sciences and Society
with the same event may require a cometary rather than an asteroidal encounter.
Current astronomical estimates of the flux of impactors make it clear that the number of impacts recognized on most continents is improbably low. This is also true of the number of impacts recognized within the continental stratigraphic record. Thus, much remains to be done in locating and studying ancient impact craters.
STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF THE SOLID EARTH
One of the most significant advances in understanding the solid-Earth took place within the past 30 years with the general acceptance that the solid interior is in motion and that movement of the surface plates is an expression of that motion. Everyday experience suggests that rocks are solid, but geological investigations reveal that earth materials behave very differently on long time scales and on human time scales. On a geological time scale, the solid mantle behaves like a fluid and convects. It is convection, not conduction, that is the main means of heat transfer within the Earth. This is the process by which heat is most effectively transported from the deep interiors of planets.
With this realization, it was no longer possible to view earthquakes, volcanic activity, mountain belts, sedimentary basins, or the general division between oceans and continents as isolated surficial phenomena. Temperature variations within the Earth control the convection that ultimately produces the magnetic field, surface topography, and active geology. Interactions between the rigid surface plates cause earthquakes and the majority of volcanic activity and provide the stresses leading to mountain building and basin formation. The plates are driven by the slow convective processes of the mantle. There is little question that subducted oceanic crustal plates penetrate at least a third of the way through the mantle to depths of 670 km. Some lines of evidence suggest that these plates may travel all the way through the mantle to form a layer around the core. Heat flowing out of the core may disturb the thermal boundary layer separating it from the convecting mantle to produce narrow plumes of uprising solid material that produce surface volcanism in settings like Hawaii and Iceland.
The exact style of convection is a subject of active research. Advances in understanding this process are being made through three-dimensional seismic imagery, increasingly sophisticated computer models, and laboratory simulations. Several avenues of research promise major breakthroughs in understanding the thermal state and evolution of the interior. It is now clear that the surface characteristics of the Earth originate in, and are being continually modified by, a complex interplay between the mobile surface plates and the dynamic interior of the planet.
Seismic Determinations of Earth Structure
The structure of the interior has been examined in detail for over 50 years, through the application of seismology—the study of natural and artificially generated vibrations traveling through earth material. The emphasis has been on determining the variations in physical properties, especially velocity, refraction, and reflection behavior, as a function of depth. These variations reveal major changes in composition with depth. For example, the core, an iron-rich alloy, is more than four times denser than the crust, which is made mainly of aluminosilicates. Because of advances in seismic instrumentation and analysis, the interior can be viewed in three dimensions from the surface to the center. Thus, the processes underlying near-surface geological phenomena can be mapped and understood.
A primary feature of present-day models of the interior (Figure 2.2) is the asthenosphere, a region of low seismic shear wave velocity in the upper few hundred kilometers of the mantle, where materials approach their melting point and where mantle flow may be concentrated. At a 400-km depth the first of the deep mantle discontinuities in seismic wave velocity occurs, followed by an even larger discontinuity at the 670-km depth. Current debate centers on the nature of these discontinuities.
One view is that they represent phase changes in a mantle of constant composition. In this scenario the increasing pressure causes silicate minerals to convert to more dense crystal structures (Figure 2.3) with depth. Other evidence suggests that these seismic discontinuities mark more than phase transitions and may be regions where the chemical composition of the mantle changes. If only the phase and not the composition changes, the discontinuities would not necessarily be barriers to convection. If, however, the discontinuities reflect compositionally induced density differences of sufficient magnitude, they would inhibit flow across them. In this case convection would be confined to a series of layers within the Earth. These two distinct types of convection have drastically different implications for the compositional and thermal evolution of the interior.