Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $57.50
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$49.00
Web:$44.10
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $37.50
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $2.50
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, Future Needs (2003)
Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Page
94
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, Future Needs

flux using the eddy correlation method for another trace gas. Uncertainty in the determination of eddy diffusivity is a major source of uncertainty in the flux gradient methods (Lapitan et al., 1999). Like other micrometeorological methods, flux gradient techniques are subject to uncertainties associated with spatial and temporal heterogeneities.

Bowen Ratio

This is an indirect technique that is based upon the surface energy budget. The Bowen ratio is the ratio of the sensible heat to the latent heat. This method does not require eddy flux measurements or stability corrections. It does require measurement of the incoming net radiation at the earth’s surface and the soil heat flux, as well as the concentration difference for the species of interest, along with concurrent flux and difference measurements of temperature, humidity, or other trace species. The Bowen ratio method fails under conditions of low energy availability such as during the night or during periods of precipitation. Like all of the micrometeorological methods, the Bowen ratio technique is subject to errors associated with the chemical and micrometeorological sensors and the spatial and temporal variability of fluxes within the source area of interest.

The Box Model

As opposed to the above micrometeorological techniques, the box model method works over smaller areas of fetch and so may be more applicable for some AFOs than the micrometeorological techniques discussed above. The method is a direct technique requiring no empirical relationships. In it, an imaginary box is constructed around some measurement volume so that the transfer of mass into and out of the walls of the box is measured (Shaw et al., 1998). In the most common configuration for flux measurements, the vertical profile of both the horizontal wind speed and the species concentration must be sampled through the entire downwind plume. The height of the plume, and thus the height to which sampling must be conducted, will depend on the atmospheric stability. The mass balance method assumes steady-state conditions, homogeneous horizontal winds, no other internal sources or sinks of the species of interest, and zero or known background concentrations. The box method is not suitable for highly reactive gases such as ammonia that may be rapidly deposited on surfaces. Other problems include disturbing the soil or vegetation to be measured (such as increasing the temperature) and thereby perturbing the rate of emissions. Also where turbulence or fast photochemistry strongly influence emissions or ambient concentrations, box methods must be used with caution.

Dispersion Modeling

In this method, upwind and downwind concentration measurements are made, and the emission rate is back-calculated from a dispersion simulation, usually based on a Gaussian dispersion algorithm, making assumptions regarding the

Page
94