About Ordering New Releases Special Offers Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press The National Academies

PDF BOOK
your price: $12.50
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $1.40
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Last Sorcerers: The Path from Alchemy to the Periodic Table (2003)
Joseph Henry Press (JHP)

Citation Manager

National Research Council. "1. The Four Elements." The Last Sorcerers: The Path from Alchemy to the Periodic Table. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003. 1. Print.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
1
bottomleft bottomright
Page
1

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 1
T::: HE R 1 TIME NTS For more than two and a half millennia, philosophers and scientists have tried to understand what the universe is made of and the principles on which it operates. Philosophers engaged in this kind of speculation in classical times, and physicists and cosmologists engage in it today. Although their methods are very different, modern scientists share the goal of the ancient philosophers: to find the key to understanding the universe. The first philosopher to theorize about such matters was Thales of Miletus, at the time, the sixth century B.C., the greatest Greek city Asia Minor. According to Thales there was one fundamental element: water, the material of which everything was made. To the modern mind, such an idea seems absurd. However, it is much more reason- able than it might appear. Lacking evidence to the contrary, it must have seemed very plausible that everything was ma(le of some primal material. And if it was, water was really not a bad can(li(late. Thales must have noted that evaporation turned water into mist and that it solidified when it froze. Aristotle suggests that Thales got 1

OCR for page 2
2 THE LAST SORCERERS the idea"perhaps from seeing that the nutriment of all things is moist and kept alive by it.... He got his notion from this fact that the seeds of all things have a moist nature, and water is the origin of the nature of moist things." Of course, Aristotle was guessing when he said that. However, it is clear that be believed that Thales had a plausible, if incorrect, idea. Thales's successor, Anaximander the exact dates of his birth and death are unknown, but he was said to have been 64 years old in 546 B.C. agreed that there was one primal material. But he (li(ln't think it was ever encountered on Earth in its pure state. According to Anaximander everything in the world was made of apeiron, a sub- stance that was infinite and eternal, and which could take on numer- ous forms, including those of all the familiar terrestrial materials. "It is neither water nor any of the so-called elements," Anaximander said, "but a nature different from them and infinite, from which arise all the heavens and the worlds within them." The last of the Miletus philosophers was Anaximenes. His dates are also uncertain, but he must have created his theory before 494 B.C. when the Persians destroyed Miletus. Apparently Anaximenes did not find Anaximander's ideas very convincing, because he maintained that the fundamental element was air. Anaximenes maintained that fire was rarefied air and that air could be condensed into all known substances. Progressive condensations successively condensed it into wind, clouds, water, and finally into earth and stone. "lust as our soul being air, holds us together," he said,"so do breath and air encompass the whole world." EMPEDOCI~E~ In classical times stories circulated about Empe(locles, a philosopher who lived in Agrigentium, in southern Sicily, around the mi(l(lle of the fifth century B.C. It was said that he performed miracles, that he could control the winds, and that he had brought a woman who had seemed dead for 30 days back to life. Empedocles was the leader of

OCR for page 3
THE FOUR ELEMENTS 3 the democratic party in his native city, and he claimed to be a god. According to legend, he died when he jumped into the crater of Mount Etna in an attempt to prove that he was a god. Whether he actually did this is uncertain, however. According to Diogenes, who related this tale, "Timaeus contradicts all these stories, saying expressly that he departed into Peloponnesus, and never returned at all, on which account the manner of his death is uncertain." Empedocles made no attempt to create a new theory of matter. Instead, he tried to reconcile the thoughts of his various predecessors. He took Thales's theory that everything was made of water and Anaximenes's idea that the primal substance was air, and added two more elements, earth and fire. Empedocles didn't believe that one kind of matter could be transformed into another. Earth couldn't be changed into water, or water into earth, for example. Thus there had to be more than one element. Empedocles didn't speak of earth, air, fire, and water as "elements," but as "the roots of all." Nevertheless, each was eternal, and they could be mixed together in varying proportions to produce the substances encountered in the terrestrial world. According to Empedocles, the elements were combined by love and separated by strife. The theory was not as mystical as it sounds. Empe(locles seems to have thought of love and strife as physical forces that could act on the particles of matter. "Love," in other wools, was a force of attraction. Empe(locles's theory of the four elements was to (laminate Western thought for nearly two and a half millennia. It wasn't until the eighteenth century that it was overthrown, because it was endorsed by Aristotle, whose authority was so great that his dogmas often impe(le(1 scientific progress. Aristotle a(l(le(1 a fifth element, of which the heavenly bodies were supposedly composed. But he agreed with Empe(locles that all earthly objects were ma(le of earth, air, fire, and water. Aristotle elaborated on the theory by assigning qualities to the four elements. Fire was hot and (fry, air was hot and moist, water was cold and moist, and earth was cold and (fry. This implied that it was

OCR for page 4
4 THE LAST SORCERERS possible for one element to be transformed into another. In Aristotle's (lay it seemed a reasonable theory, one that was supporte(1 by common observations. For example, if the "cold" in water were made hot, then the water would be transformed into air. And indeed this is what appears to be happening when water is boiled. When wood was burned, smoke (air), pitch (water), ash (earth), and fire were produced. If two pieces of flint were struck together, a spark was produced that could be used to kindle a fire. Thus it seemed that the fire element must be present in rock. ALCHEMY Alchemy was born of a fusion of Greek philosophy and the Egyptian chemical arts in Alexandria, the city founded by Alexander the Great at the mouth of the Nile in 331 B.C. The Egyptians had for centuries practice(1 embalming, (lyeing, glassmaking, an(1 metallurgy, each requiring knowledge of the relevant chemical processes. There were numerous recipes, including ones for making artificial gems and false gold. Perhaps it was only natural that people steeped in Greek philosophy would think of trying to make gold when they encountered the rich Egyptian tra(lition of practical chemistry. Hadn't Aristotle said that transformations were possible? Isn't that what happened when, for example, cinnabar (mercury ore) was heated? Heating the red material, cinnabar, caused a pool of liquid metal to form. Didn't other chemical transformations take place when substances were heated, lissolve(l, melte(l, fiItere(l, an(1 crystallize(l? In one sense, the creation of alchemy represented a step back- war(l. The Egyptians ha(1 known seven metallic elements: gold, silver, copper, tin, iron, lea(l, an(1 mercury, which they associate(1 with the seven planets (Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, an(1 Saturn, respectively). The Greeks, however, failed to recognize them as (listinct elements. According to the Aristotelian theory, the metals were mixtures of the traditional four elements. This idea seemed to

OCR for page 5
THE FOUR ELEMENTS 5 support the theory that one metal could be transformed into another. All that was needed was to find the chemical procedures that would remove some of one element and add some more of another, or that would change one element into another. Alexandria was a place where many different religions and cul- tures encountered one another and where different philosophies flourished. The city was home to Greeks, Egyptians, Jews, and people who had migrated from many places in the Middle East. There were Zoroastrians, Neoplatonists, Mithraists, Christian Gnostics, and adherents of a number of other philosophies and faiths. Alexandria had sober believers in Greek rationalism and also wizards and sorcerers, mystics, astrologers, and prophets. By A.D. 300, Alexandrian alchemy had become almost entirely mystical, perhaps because the alchemists were influenced by the cur- rents of mystical thought they encountered, perhaps because attempts to transform base metals into gold had failed. One suspects that the latter played at least some role. It is certainly easier to dwell on the idea of the spiritual gold in one's soul than to follow long complex procedures in an attempt to actually make the metal. At one time scholars believed that the Roman Emperor Diocletian decreed in A.D. 292 that all alchemical books be burned and that the alchemists be expelled from Egypt. But this story is probably apocryphal. At the time, alchemy was unknown in the Roman west. In any case, no decrees were needed. Alexandrian intellectual culture was past its prime by then, and alchemy simply participated in the (recline. After Constantine proclaimed Christianity to be the official cult of the Roman Empire around A.D. 330, the Christians sought to eradicate pagan philosophies, inclu(ling alchemy. Most likely they would have succee(le(1 if members of a heretical Christian sect, the Nestorians, had not preserved alchemical writings. After Nestorius, the leader of the sect, was excommunicated around A.D. 430, he fled to Syria with his followers. The Nestorians took as many pagan manu- scripts and books with them as they could and kept them in the mon-

OCR for page 6
6 THE LAST SORCERERS asteries they founded. Around A.D. 500 the Nestorians were expelled from Syria. They moved on to Persia, where they founded schools and translated Hellenistic writings into Syrian. One of the subjects taught in their schools was alchemy. ARAB I ~ SCHEME The years 640 to 720 were an era of Muslim conquests. At the end of the period, the Islamic empire stretched from Spain to Egypt and from North Africa to Persia. The Muslims engaged in wars of expan- sion, not in religious war. They didn't seek to convert the peoples they conquered. Although non-Muslims were taxed, they were permitted to exercise their religions freely. Unlike Christians, who wanted to eradicate pagan philosophy, Muslims had great respect for learning. Muslim rulers patronized scholars, whatever their religion, and had Greek and Syrian texts translated into Arabic. Thus Arab scholars gained knowledge of the thoughts of Plato, Aristotle, and other philosophers and also of alchemy. It was the Muslims who gave alchemy its name. The word is derived from the Arabic alchymia. al is the Arabic definite article; words beginning with those two letters, such as alcohol and algebra, are generally of Arabic origin. The exact meaning and origin of chymia are uncertain. It used to be thought that it derived from Them, the ancient name of Egypt. However, recent scholars have cast doubt on this idea. The Arabs were not much interested in the mystical accretions that alchemy had acquired. They pursued it in a more ([own-to-earth manner, as the early Alexan(lrian alchemists had (lone. Thus, centuries later, alchemy reached Europe as a collection of chemical recipes and techniques, not a set of esoteric doctrines. It is in Arabic alchemy that two concepts that were to become central to European alchemy are encountered for the first time: the Philosopher's Stone and the elixir of life. The Philosopher's Stone was a substance reputedly able to transform base metals into gold. In spite of the name, it wasn't thought of as a stone and was often

OCR for page 7
THE FOUR ELEMENTS 7 described as a "red earth," for example. The elixir of life, as the name implies, was something that could restore youth and prolong life. Pre- sumably it could be made from alchemical gold. But this isn't all there was to alchemy. Its more practical side included procedures to pro- duce dyes and medicines. Since the first stirrings in the alchemist's cauldron, there was always more to alchemy than the quest to make gold. Arabic alchemy was unknown in the west until the eleventh century when the first translations from Arabic into Latin were made. Two Arab alchemists were especially well known and widely read: Tabir ibn Hawan, known to Europeans as Geber, and Abu Bakr ibn Zakariwa al-Razi, known as Rhazes. Of more than 2,000 pieces of writing attributed to Jabir, most were compiled by a Muslim religious sect called the Faithful Brethren or Brethren of Purity after he died. The works are written in different styles, which would indicate that they were penned by different authors. The compilation was com- pleted around the year 1000, more than a hundred years after Tabir died. However, it has been established that the work translated into Latin under the title Summa Perfectionis was based on translations of Tabir's writing. Thus, although little is known about his life, we know something about the role Tabir played in the evolution of alchemical theory. Tabir introduced a theory, which was to influence much of later alchemy, that metals were mixtures of sulfur, mercury, and arsenic, except for gol(l, which was ma(le up of sulfur and mercury alone. The sulfur and mercury of which Tabir spoke were not the substances found in nature. They were purified essences which European alche- mists later called"philosophical sulfur" and"philosophical mercury." They were supposed to be quite unlike the common substances. For example, it was said that philosophical sulfur (li(ln't burn. According to Jabir, of all the metals, gold contained the most mercury and the least sulfur. Thus other metals could be transformed into gold if ways were found to increase their mercury content. We know somewhat more about al-Razi's life than Jabir's. He was

OCR for page 8
8 THE LAST SORCERERS a Jewish convert to Islam who became a physician and alchemist in Persia, and he wrote a text on alchemy called Secret of Secrets. While the title seems to promise something esoteric, al-Razi's book isn't like that at all; on the contrary, it is a comprehensive and practical labora- tory manual that became a valuable too] for European alchemists. The Secret of Secrets contains huge lists of chemicals and minerals and comments on their origin. It describes alchemical apparatus, including several kinds of glassware, and chemical techniques. Many of the recipes are stated so clearly that they could easily be followed and carried out in a chemical laboratory today. Unlike most alche- mists, al-Razi seems not to have regarded the transmutation of metals as the main goal of alchemy. As a physician, he emphasized the importance to medicine of knowing the chemical substances in medicine. However, the wealth of laboratory techniques described in his book proved invaluable to generations of European alchemists, whatever their goal. It is said that Al-Razi became blind in his later years, spending them in poverty because he was no longer able to practice medicine. His eyes might have been damaged by chemical fumes. Other stories about him sound a bit fanciful. According to one, a high-ranking individual (said by some to have been the Emir of Khorassan) asked al-Razi to demonstrate a procedure for making gold. When he refused, the Emir lost his temper and struck him on the head with his own book, causing him to become blind. According to another version of the story, the Emir became angry when al-Razi did attempt to make gold but failed. Curiously, this story didn't deter the gold- seeking alchemists who, over a period of centuries, pored over al- Razi's writings. EUROPEAN ALCHEMY The appearance of Arabic alchemical works in Latin translation launched European alchemy during the eleventh and twelfth centu- ries. Although the European alchemists never succeeded in making

OCR for page 9
THE FOUR ELEMENTS 9 gold or the elixir of life, they did make some important discoveries. For example, in the early fourteenth century an alchemist known as the False Geber (because he called himself Geber, after his Arab predecessor) discovered how to make strong sulfuric and nitric acids. This was a significant advance. The ancients and the Arabs had known only weak acids, such as acetic acid from vinegar and lactic acid from soured milk. Unlike the weak acids, strong acids are extremely corro- sive and capable of dissolving most metals. But of course discoveries such as these were only incidental to the quest for the Philosopher's Stone, which was often (lescribe(1 by European alchemists in paradoxical ways. For example, according to the sixteenth-century work on alchemy, the Gloria Mundi, the Philosopher's Stone is . . . familiar to all men, both young and old, is found in the country, in the village, in the town, in all things created by God; yet it is despised by all. Rich and poor handle it every day. It is cast into the street by servant maids. Children play with it. Yet no one prizes it, though, next to the human soul, it is the most beautiful and precious thing upon earth, and has the power to pull down kings and princes. Nevertheless, it is esteemed the vilest and meanest of earthly things. The Gloria Mundi seems to imply that anyone who found the Philosopher's Stone would surely fad] to recognize it. Yet thousands of alchemists, some relatively unlearned and others with a vast knowI- edge of alchemical literature, continued to seek it. They pored over cryptic alchemical recipes and performed intricate experiments in their quest for the Stone, which they called the "Great Work." Alchemical literature is almost always so cryptic, and contains so much obscure symbolism, that it bowlers on the unintelligible. For example, mercury was ordinarily not referred to by its common name. Instead it might be called doorkeeper, our balm, our honey, oil, May-dew, mother egg, green lion, bird of Hermes, or any of a large number of other names. Birds flying to heaven might represent distil-

OCR for page 10
10 THE LAST SORCERERS ration, and devouring lion might mean a strong acid. Copulation or marriage might represent certain alchemical procedures. A serpent or dragon could symbolize matter in an imperfect state. There were probably many reasons for writing alchemical recipes in code. The Church frowned on the practice of alchemy so the prac- titioners must have wanted to maintain a certain amount of secrecy, which helped to avoid other dangers too. There was always the chance that some prince might demand that the alchemist produce gold, and then become very angry if the claimant couldn't. Jabir had admonished: For heaven's sake do not let the facility of making gold lead you to divulge this proceeding or to show it to any of those around you, to your wife, or your cherished child, and still less to any other person. If you do not heed this advice you will repent when repen- tance is too late. If you divulge this work, the world will be corrupted, for gold would then be made as easily as glass is made for bazaars. The message was clear: don't tell anyone how it might be done, or the gold you make might become worthless. A I,IFEI,ONC; QUEST For some of the alchemists, the search for the Philosopher's Stone became a lifelong quest. One of the more extreme examples is Bernard of Treves, who sought the Stone from the time he was 14 until his (leash at the age of 85, squandering a fortune in the process. Bernard was born into a wealthy family in either Treves or Padua in 1406. As a child he often heard stories told by his grandfather about the alchemists' quest. Bernard became fascinated with the idea of seeking the Philosopher's Stone and began an intense study of the works of the Arabian alchemists. His family approved, having no objection to making the family fortune even greater.

OCR for page 11
THE FOUR ELEMENTS The first book that Bernard discovered was al-Razi's Secret of Secrets. Setting up an alchemical laboratory, he spent four years and 800 crowns attempting to make gold. Unsuccessful, he turned to the works attributed to Jabir. By this time, news of what Bernard was doing had spread, and other alchemists flocked to him, offering their secrets and help. Neither their lore nor the writings of Tabir brought any success. But his assistants did succeed in parting him from a great deal of his money. After two years, Bernard found that he had spent another 2,000 crowns and was no nearer success. When Bernard was 20, he met a Franciscan friar who told him stories about Pope John XXII, who had supposedly practiced alchemy, amassing a fortune of 18 million florins while issuing bulls against competition from other alchemists. Bernard and the friar studied the works of two well-known alchemists, Tohannes de Rupecissa and Tohannes (le Sacrobosco, and (leci(le(1 that preparing highly (listille "spirit of wine" (alcohol) might help them achieve transmutation. They distilled the alcohol 30 times, until, as Bernard puts it, "it went off in such acridity that no glass could contain it." But again Bernard encountered only failure. The "Philosopher's Stone" that he created by this method did nothing. Bernard next applied alchemical procedures to a vast number of different materials. He described his labors as follows: Twelve or fifteen years having been consumed in this manner and innumerable monies, without benefit, after the experiments of many received ones, in dissolving and congealing common, ammo- niacal, pineal, saracen, and metallic salts, then more than a hundred times calcining them in the space of two years; also in arums of all kinds, in marcasites, blood, hair, urine, human dung and semen, animals and vegetables, in copperas, vitriols, soot, eggs, by separa- tion of the elements in an Athanor by the alembic, and the Pelican, by circulation, boiling, reverberation, ascension, descension, fusion, ignition, Cementation, rectification, evaporation, conjunction, elevation, subtilation, and commixtion: and other infinite regimens

OCR for page 15
THE FOUR ELEMENTS i: 15 In Prague for a time, he invited two dozen of them to a banquet and in the course of the evening announced that he could demonstrate a metho(1 for multiplying gold. Everyone who contributed a hun(lre marks, he promised, would receive a thousand when the procedure was completed. After collecting the gold from his guests, the host took them to his laboratory, where he placed the coins in a crucible along with various alchemical preparations. He placed the crucible on a fire and seized a bellows with the intention of making the fire burn hotter. Suddenly there was an explosion, which filled the laboratory with scattered live coals, smoke, and noxious fumes. At the same time the laboratory was plunged into darkness. Some of the guests soon found some candles and went back into the laboratory to see if their host was badly injured, but all they found was the broken alchemical apparatus and an open window. The Arab was gone. And of course the 2,400 marks had disappeared with him. This story might be somewhat embellished it is the kind of tale that often is but it certainly indicates that the con men of those days were not lacking in imagination. Some of the pseu(loalchemists succee(le(1 in making o~with large quantities of money. But others suffered less fortunate fates. In 1575 a woman named Marie Ziegler was roasted alive in an iron chair after failing to provide Duke Julius of Brunswick with a recipe for trans- mutation. In 1597 Georg Honnauer, who had promised to transmute iron into gold for the Prince of Wurtemberg, was caught putting gold into his crucibles. Honnauer was hanged on an iron gallows. One noble, Frederick of Wurtzburg, maintained a gilded gallows that was reserved for hanging alchemists who failed to keep their promises to make gold. On the gibbet there was the inscription, "I once knew how to fix mercury and now I am fixed myself." In 1402 England passed an act of parliament that forbade the making of gold or silver by alchemical metho(ls. The idea wasn't really to outlaw the practice but to give Henry IV, who was entitled to grant the right to make gold to certain people, a monopoly on gold making.

OCR for page 16
16 THE LAST SORCERERS Henry hoped that alchemical gol(1 might help him to pay state (lebts. In 1445 Sir Edmund Trafford and Thomas Asheton were duly granted the right to make gold, and coins were actually minted from the product they pro(luce(l. But their alchemical "gold" later prove(1 to be an alloy of mercury, copper, and gold. Medieval literature has numerous references to pseudoalchemists and satires of alchemy. For example, around 1390 Chaucer satirized the alchemists in The Canon Yeoman's Tal/e, as did the English Renaissance poet John Lyly in his comedy Gal/l/athea and Samuel Butler (the seventeenth-century English poet, not the nineteenth- century novelist of the same name) in Hudibras. One of the best-known satires is The Al/chemist, a comedy by Shakespeare's rival Ben Jonson, that targets not the pseudoalchemists but rather the gullible rich, who are so easily taken in. The play centers on the activities of Subtle, a butler who poses as an alchemist in his master's absence. With the aid of two accomplices, Face and Doll Common, Subtle swin(lles a number of people by engaging in quackery and he claims to be able to transmute gold. But of course comedies are supposed to end on a happy note. At the conclusion of the play Subtle's master returns unexpectedly, and his fraud is exposed. The character of Subtle might be based on Simon Forman, who is mentioned by name in another of Tonson's plays. Forman, born in 1552, seems to have been a me(lical quack who sol(1 love philters as a sideline. He was fined several times for pretending to cure the ill and was also sent to prison a number of times. In 1594 he began to tell fortunes and to experiment with transmutation. He attracted several wealthy customers, mostly women. Once he was asked to provide philters to the countess of Essex, who wanted to (1ivorce her husban(1 and win the love of the ear] of Somerset. These facts came out during the murder trial of a woman who had acted as a go-between on behalf of the countess. Alchemical frauds continued long after alchemy had fallen into lisrepute. In 1867 three frauds bilke(1 Emperor Franz Joseph of a sum

OCR for page 17
THE FOUR ELEMENTS 17 equal to $10,000. In 1929 a plumber named Franz Tausend swindled a number of prominent German financiers after convincing them that he could make gold from lead. When Tausend was arrested, he claimed that his method was based on modern scientific ideas and asked for a chance to demonstrate the efficacy of his methods. He was taken to the State Mint where, in the presence of the director of the Mint, some police detectives, the state's attorney, and a judge, he produced a tenth of a gram of gold from one and two-thirds grams of lead. Because Tausend and all of his chemicals and apparatus had been searched before the demonstration, it appeared that the transmutation was genuine. However the following day it was discovered that gold had been smuggled to him in a cigarette while he . · ·. was In fall. THE DAN CLERK OF DECEPTION In 1701 the 19-year-old Frederick Bottger, a German apothecary's apprentice, finding himself in need of money to continue his alchemical experiments, performed faked transmutations before some friends. If they gave him money to continue his quest, he told his onlookers, he would repay the money many times over. Bottger wasn't trying to defraud them, although that was how it turned out. He seems to have genuinely believed that he was on the verge of discovering the secret of the Philosopher's Stone. Indeed, he was so convinced that around this time he wrote to his mother assuring her that she would never lack for money again. Bottger was aware of the dangers of performing such demonstra- tions. More than one avaricious prince had meted out severe punish- ment to alchemists who claimed to be able to produce gold and then failed, so the alchemist pledged the witnesses of his transmutations to secrecy. This didn't prevent rumors from spreading, but rumors of this sort were common in those days, and in any case they didn't spread widely enough to get Bottger into trouble. But then he made a big mistake. In October 1701 his employer, the Berlin apothecary

OCR for page 18
18 THE LAST SORCERERS Frederick Zorn, released Bottger from his apprenticeship. He was now a journeyman who could work for wages. During the years of his apprenticeship Zorn had always been critical of his alchemical experiments. Alchemists had been searching for the Philosopher's Stone without success for centuries, Zorn said, and added that Bottger would do better to master the preparation of medicines than pursue some hopeless quest. So when Bottger left Zorn's employ he staged yet another (remonstration for Zorn and two of the apothecary's friends, melting down some silver coins and turning them into gold. One might think that Zorn would guess that the demonstration was fraudulent. If Bottger really could make gold, he would not have had to continue apprenticeship. But apparently this (li(ln't occur to Zorn and his friends. They were convinced that the transmutation was real. And in spite of Bottger's request that they remain silent, they began to talk. Their talk aroused great interest in Bottger's feat. After all, Zorn was no impulsive youth spouting tales of another youth's demonstration. He was a leading Berlin apothecary, and his words carried weight. It (li(ln't take long before the Prussian king, Frederick I, heard about what happened in the apothecary's shop. Frederick immedi- ately summoned Zorn and questioned him about the transmutation that he had witnessed. Frederick seems to have been impressed by Zorn's account because he ordered the apothecary to return the next (lay with his former apprentice. Meanwhile he confiscate(1 the gold that Bottger had suppose(lly manufactured. When Bottger heard of the interview, he realized that this wasn't good news and immediately went into hiding. But Frederick was not to be denied. When Bottger failed to appear at his court, he offered a substantial reward for the alchemist's capture. This was enough to convince Bottger that his only recourse was to slip out of the country. Fortunately, he was able to persuade an acquaintance to hide him in a covered wagon that was being ([riven to nearby Saxony. Bottger enrolled as a medical student at the University of Wittenberg. But Frederick soon discovered his whereabouts and sent

OCR for page 19
THE FOUR ELEMENTS . 19 a detachment of troops to capture the young fugitive. But Frederick couldn't just take Bottger back to Prussia without the consent of the Saxon authorities. Doing so would damage relations with Augustus, the elector of Saxony. Besides, by now the Wittenberg authorities weren't anxious to let Bottger go. The tales of his gold making had spread, and it did little good for the Prussians to insist that the fugi- tive was just a common criminal. The Wittenberg authorities sent to the elector, asking for instructions about handling the affair. They were not answered immediately because Augustus, who was also king of Poland, was then in Warsaw. Weeks passed, during which nothing happened. The Prussians continued to (leman(1 that Bottger be given into their custody, and the Saxon officials continued to delay. Finally a message from Augustus arrived. He ordered Bottger imprisoned in Dresden, the capital city, until he revealed his method for making gold. The Saxons knew that the Prussian soldiers might become desperate and use force to seize the prisoner while he was en route from Wittenberg to Dresden so they provi(le(1 Bottger with a military escort. Meanwhile, in order to preserve the illusion that he was still in Wittenberg, Saxon sol(liers continued to stand guard outside Bottger's lodgings, and food was carried in for the next two days. IMPRISONMENT IN DRESDEN In Dresden Bottger was confined in a section of the royal castle that was equipped with a laboratory. He was given three assistants to help him pursue his quest for gold, and two members of Augustus's court were assigned to supervise the work. Bottger was allowed to talk to no one other than these five. But of course they were not his only human contacts; he also had his guar(ls. Augustus was impatient to witness a transmutation. He ordered his prisoner to send a sample of the Philosopher's Stone to Warsaw as soon as he could. This created a dilemma. Bottger could hardly admit that he didn't know how to make gold. If he did and he was not

OCR for page 20
20 THE LAST SORCERERS believed, there was a good chance that he might be tortured for the recipe he didn't have. So he sent a box containing some alchemical apparatus and some mercury and other ingredients to Augustus, along with instructions for making a small quantity of gold. Bottger's instructions were followed in an experiment performed in Augustus's Warsaw palace, but ah that was produced was a metallic mass that looked nothing like gold. But this didn't discourage Augustus, who commanded that the alchemist continue to be confined while he carried out further experiments. Augustus also or(lere(1 that Bottger be allowed a more comfort- able imprisonment. The alchemist was given two rooms in Augustus's Dresden palace and allowed contact with people other than his assistants and jailers. Bottger respon(le(1 by making grandiose promises to the king. He cIaime(l, for example, that he would soon be producing large quantities of gold every month. He must have quickly regretted these promises and, fearful of the consequences if Augustus discovered he hadn't made any gold at all, he determined to escape. Because he was lightly guar(le(l, he (li(ln't find it (lifficult to slip away from the palace and make his way to a meeting place where a friend waited with a horse. He ro(le into Austria and then hea(le(1 toward Prague. But his freedom (li(ln't last long. A party of Augustus's sol(liers traced him to an inn in the town of Enns, where he had stopped to rest, took him into custody and brought him back to Dresden. He enjoyed only five days of freedom. The greedy king still believed that Bottger would eventually find a way to produce gold. After consulting with members of his court, he decided to spare the young man harsh punishment but kept him un(ler closer guard than before. But Augustus was not a man of limit- less patience. In 1705, when Bottger had been a prisoner for more than three years, Augustus (leman(le(1 that his prisoner set a (1efinite (late by which gold would be pro(luce(l. Bottger again ma(le grandiose claims. He wrote a document promising to produce gold within 16 weeks and to manufacture 2 tons of the precious metal during the following 8 days.

OCR for page 21
THE FOUR ELEMENTS 21 When Bottger failed to fulfill his promises, the king was furious and was inclined to have his prisoner summarily executed. However his advisers pointed out that doing so would cast doubts on Augustus's judgment. After all, he had spent large sums of money over a period of years financing Bottger's experiments. One of these advisers was Ehrenfried Walter van Tschirnhaus, whom the king employed to find new mineral deposits and inaugurate new manufacturing projects. One of Tschirnhaus's pet projects was finding a way to manufacture porcelain. Bottger would be an excellent candidate to continue the project when Tschirnhaus grew too old to continue the quest himself. Not only was Bottger a brilliant chemist, he was also still a young man. Tschirnhaus, on the other hand, was growing old. Augustus listened. He was an enthusiastic collector of porcelain himself. WHITE ClOI,D From the time that they first appeared in Europe during the sixteenth century, Chinese porcelain objets (['art were highly prized. Porcelain was far harder than any other ceramic material, and it exhibited a translucence that no European pottery could match. The first porce- lain pieces to arrive in Europe inevitably found their way into the treasuries of European rulers. Then, as the porcelain tra(le grew, wealthy aristocrats began collecting objects made of the precious material. Europeans potters naturally looked for ways to manufacture porcelain themselves. If they discovered the secret, the profits would be immense. However, the secret of manufacturing porcelain turned out to be as elusive as the secret of the Philosopher's Stone. The translucence of porcelain suggested to most European potters that the material must be a combination of clay and glass, and they tried using many (1ifferent combinations of glass, clay, and other materials. Some of them succeeded in producing materials that bore a superficial resemblance to porcelain, but the pottery lacked the fine- ness of Chinese porcelain. Their mistake was assuming that glass was an ingredient. It wasn't. Chinese porcelain was made by mixing white

OCR for page 22
22 THE LAST SORCERERS clay with a pulverized stone that contained feldspar and then firing objects fashioned from these materials at high temperatures. During firing the two materials fused together, producing a hard, flawless, non-porous material. When Tschirnhaus suggested that Bottger be put to work on the porcelain project, the king listened with great interest. He quickly decided that there was no reason why Bottger couldn't find a way of making porcelain while continuing his alchemical experiments. He had Bottger transported to the Albrechtsburg, a royal castle at Meissen, 9 miles from Dresden, which had ample space to set up a larger laboratory. Bottger's life at Meissen was not as comfortable as the one he enjoyed in Dresden. The Albrectsburg had been unused for some time and had been pillaged during the Thirty Years War. However, Augustus cared much less about his prisoner's comfort than about the money that a successful porcelain factory might earn. Bottger was provided with five assistants, and 24 furnaces were built in the laboratory. Samples of clay from all parts of the kingdom were sent to him. The windows of the castle were bricked up so that passersby could gain no inkling of what was going on, and Augustus ordered Bottger and his assistants not to discuss their work with any- one but the courtiers that Augustus appointed to supervise them. Bottger ma(le no attempt to produce porcelain by mixing clay and glass together. He knew that this had been tried many times and had led only to failure. Instead, he began a series of careful experi- ments in which he mixe(1 various (1ifferent clays with (1ifferent kin(ls of rock and fired them at high temperatures. Only at high tempera- tures, he realized, would the rock was be melted. Within a year, Bottger had achieved some success. He hadn't produced porcelain, but he had learned how to make a red stoneware that was finer than anything produced by other German potters. It wasn't white, and it wasn't translucent, but it was a new ceramic material. He had every reason to expect further progress. But then his work was suddenly interrupted. As king of Poland, Augustus was at war with Sweden. He had suffered a disastrous defeat,

OCR for page 23
THE FOUR ELEMENTS and Swedish troops were now advancing toward Dresden. Augustus ordered his most valuable possessions transported to Konigstein, an impregnable country fortress that stood on a rocky plateau above the Elbe River and was used as a prison. And of course these valuable possessions included Bottger. Augustus couldn't let his prize alchemist fall into enemy hands. Bottger remained at Konigstein for the next year. It was a time of inactivity. There was no laboratory in the castle and few ways to pass the time. In effect, he had been transferred to the eighteenth-century equivalent of a maximum-security prison. At first Bottger was not allowed to have even books, ink, or paper. When, after some time, he was given writing materials, he wrote a series of despairing letters to the king, pleading for a chance to continue his work. The political situation was too unsettled for Augustus to allow that. If Bottger was allowed to leave Konigstein, he could easily fall into the hands of the Swedes. But in 1707, Augustus abdicated as king of Poland and the Swedish forces withdrew from Saxony. Augustus soon ordered that a new laboratory be set up in Dresden, and when it was finished, Bottger was allowe(1 to leave Konigstein. However Augustus was in no mood to be told of any more failures. He informed Bottger that, if he failed to produce either gold or porcelain, he would be executed. Bottger apparently decided that he had a better chance of making porcelain than of transmuting base metals into gold in the foresee- able future. He resume(1 his series of experiments with (1ifferent com- binations of clay and minerals. A material he thought especially promising was China clay, a mineral that was mine(1 in Germany but also found in China. China clay contains feldspar, but Bottger achieved nothing with it because the temperatures that his furnaces could achieve were too low to melt the material. So he decided to try alabaster, a type of gypsum that is snow white and translucent. Bottger mixed clay and alabaster together in different ratios and found that if he used seven to nine parts of clay to one of alabaster, a hard, white, translucent material was produced. He had succeeded in making porcelain! There was, of course, much more to be done.

OCR for page 24
24 THE LAST SORCERERS Bottger's first porcelain pieces were not of the same high quality as those imported from China, and he did not yet know how to produce a glaze. However he was confident that he could perfect his techniques and eventually produce porcelain of finer quality. Augustus was pleased but he kept Bottger confined, still expecting him to find a way to make gold and intending to keep him imprisoned until he did. The alchemist was still kept in Dresden, even after a porcelain factory was set up at Meissen and he was appointed its director. Augustus made Bottger a baron in 1711, and thereafter the alchemist lived the life of an aristocratic gentleman. Nevertheless, his imprisonment continued. The king (Augustus had regained the Polish crown in 1710) had no intention of letting him go free before he found the Philosopher's Stone. Augustus relented only when Bottger became very ill in 1714. Although he was only 32, his eyesight was failing, and he began to super epileptic seizures and a consump- tive fever. Bottger's illness probably had a number of contributing causes. Ever since Augustus first imprisoned him, he had been a very heavy drinker. It was said that during the latter part of his life he rarely spent a day sober. And of course anyone who labored in an alchemical laboratory was likely to inhale poisonous fumes, especially from arsenic and mercury, which were commonly used in alchemical experiments at the time. Once he was free, Bottger's health seemed to improve, but it soon became obvious that this was an illusion. During the next few years he became increasingly weak and died in 1719 at the age of 37. He had spent more than 12 years as a prisoner and had been free only during the last 5 years of his short life. THE NEVER-ENDING QUEST Alchemy was supposedly superseded by chemistry in the eighteenth century. But alchemical practices never really died out, and today there are still people who persist in practicing the art. There are pub- lishers and book dealers who specialize in alchemical books, and there

OCR for page 25
THE FOUR ELEMENTS 25 are alchemical groups and societies. Alchemical elixirs and tinctures can be purchased on the Internet, and one can study alchemy at Paracelsus College in Australia. Modern alchemists do not always attempt to make gold. The mystical alchemy that I previously spoke of still exists today. It is caped esoteric alchemy, and it often becomes intermixed with other"new age" and mystical ideas. For example, the various Rosicrucian groups make use of alchemical concepts and mysticism, and herbal remedies are sometimes said to be made by alchemical methods. Sometimes alchemy is seen as nothing more than a path to spiritual growth. For example, one website that I consulted informed me that"the main goal of Alchemy is the creation of a spiritually complete in(livi(lual whose several components of consciousness are united, resulting in an integrated, independent, enlightened human being." In other words, it is spiritual gold that is sought. However, you shouldn't imagine that modern alchemists have given up their quest to make gold. In fact you can find recipes for doing precisely that at the following website: www.dnai.com/~zap/gold.htm.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

alchemical experiments ?>