Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $37.50
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$32.00
Web:$28.80
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $24.50
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $4.00
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century (2005)

Page
58
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century

student, for example, about program philosophy—engineering up front, availability of team design activities, etc., and about student outcomes in terms of retention, years to degree completion and securing jobs at graduation.


14. NSF should collect and/or fund collection, perhaps through ASEE or the Engineering Workforce Commission, of comprehensive data by engineering department/school on program philosophy and student outcomes such as, but not exclusively, student retention rates by gender and ethnicity, common reasons why students leave, where they go, percent of entering freshman that graduate, time to degree, and information on jobs and admission to graduate school.

REFERENCE

Busch-Vishniac, I., and J. Jarosz. 2004. Can diversity in the undergraduate engineering population be enhanced through curricular change? Journal of Women in Science and Technology 10(3).

Page
58