The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Eduacational Assessment
National Research Council. (1999a). The changing nature of work: Implications for occupational analysis. Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance: Occupational Analysis. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1999b). Grading the nation’s report card: Evaluating NAEP and transforming the assessment of educational progress. Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress. J.W. Pellegrino, L.R.Jones, and K.J.Mitchell, (Eds.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1999c). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Committee on Appropriate Test Use. J.P.Heubert and R.M.Hauser, (Eds.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2001). Building a workforce for the information economy. Committee on Workforce Needs in Information Technology. Board on Testing and Assessment; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; and Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
New Standards™. (1997). Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning(Volume 1, Elementary school). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics and the University of Pittsburgh.
Nichols, P.D. (1994). A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessments. Review of Educational Research,64(4), 575–603.
Pellegrino, J.W., Baxter, G.P., and Glaser, R. (1999). Addressing the “two disciplines” problem: Linking theories of cognition and learning with assessment and instructional practice. In A. Iran-Nejad and P.D.Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education(Volume 24) (pp. 307–353). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Popham, W.J. (2000). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for educational leaders. Needham, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Resnick, L.B., and Resnick, D.P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B.R.Gifford and M.C.O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. Boston: Kluwer.
Rothman, R., Slattery, J.B., Vranek, J.L., and Resnick, L.B. (in press). The alignment of standards and assessments. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Graduate School of Education, University of California.
Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
Snow, R.E., and, D.F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R.L.Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement(3rd Edition), (pp. 263–330). New York: Macmillan.
Steele, C.M. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69(5), 797–811.
Steele, C.M. (1997). How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychological Association,55(6), 613–629.