References

Abbey, C.W., V.Burke, A.Butler, C.Devere, G.Falk, T.Gabe, M.Gish, S.Harper, C.Solomon-Fears, M.A Wolfe 2000 Welfare Reform: Financial Eligibility Rules and Cash Assistance Amounts under TANF. Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Library of Congress.

Acs, G., and P.Loprest 2001 Studies of welfare leavers: Methods, findings, and contributions to the policy process in Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F. Citro, R.Moffitt and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ahn, J., D.Fogarty, S.Kraley, F.Lai, and L.Deppman 2000 A Study of Washington State TANF Departures and Welfare Reform: Welfare Reform and Findings from Administrative Data, Final Report. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Social and Health Services.


Barth, R., E.Locklin, S.Cuccaro-Alamin, and B.Needell 2001 Administrative data on the well-being of children on and off welfare. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Bass, L.E., and D.Downs 1999 What Can the SPD Adolescent SAQ Tell Us About the Well-being of Adolescents in the Aftermath of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act? Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting in New York City. Available: http://www.sipp.census.gov/spd/workpaper/paa3799.htm

Bavier, R. 1999 An Early Look at the Effects of Welfare Reform. Unpublished paper. Office of Management and Budget. Washington, DC.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition References Abbey, C.W., V.Burke, A.Butler, C.Devere, G.Falk, T.Gabe, M.Gish, S.Harper, C.Solomon-Fears, M.A Wolfe 2000 Welfare Reform: Financial Eligibility Rules and Cash Assistance Amounts under TANF. Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Library of Congress. Acs, G., and P.Loprest 2001 Studies of welfare leavers: Methods, findings, and contributions to the policy process in Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F. Citro, R.Moffitt and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Ahn, J., D.Fogarty, S.Kraley, F.Lai, and L.Deppman 2000 A Study of Washington State TANF Departures and Welfare Reform: Welfare Reform and Findings from Administrative Data, Final Report. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Social and Health Services. Barth, R., E.Locklin, S.Cuccaro-Alamin, and B.Needell 2001 Administrative data on the well-being of children on and off welfare. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Bass, L.E., and D.Downs 1999 What Can the SPD Adolescent SAQ Tell Us About the Well-being of Adolescents in the Aftermath of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act? Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting in New York City. Available: http://www.sipp.census.gov/spd/workpaper/paa3799.htm Bavier, R. 1999 An Early Look at the Effects of Welfare Reform. Unpublished paper. Office of Management and Budget. Washington, DC.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition Bloom, D. 1999 Welfare Time Limits: An Interim Report Card. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. Bollinger, C.R., and M.H.David 2001 Estimation with response error and non-response: Food stamp participation in the SIPP. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 19(2). Brady, H., S.A Grand, M.A.Powell, and W.Schink 2001 Access and Confidentiality Issues with Administrative Data. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Brauner, S., and P.Loprest 1999 Where Are They Now? What States’ Studies of People Who Left Welfare Tell Us. Paper Series A, No. A-32. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Brick, P.D. 2000 A Descriptive Review of Ten Major Surveys. Urban Institute, Washington, DC. (January 19). Burke, V., T.Gabe, M.Gish, G.Falk, C.Solomon-Fears, and K.Spar 1999 Welfare Reform: State Programs Under the Block Grant for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC.: U.S. Library of Congress. Burtless, G. 1995 The case for randomized field trials in economic and policy research. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(Spring) 63–84. Cancian, M., R.Haveman, T.Kaplan, D.Meyer, and B.Wolfe 1999 Work, earnings, and well-being after welfare. In Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, S.Danziger, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute. Cancian, M., R.Haveman, D.Meyer, and B.Wolfe 2000 Before and After TANF: The Economic Well-Being of Women Leaving Welfare. Special Report #77. Institute for Research on Poverty. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. Cantor, D., and P.Cunningham 2001 Methods for obtaining high response rates in telephone surveys. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Corbett, T., and M.C.Lennon Forthcoming Implementation Analysis: An Evaluation Approach Whose Time Has Come. Washington, DC.: The Urban Institute. Council of Economic Advisers 1997 Technical Report: Explaining the Decline in Welfare Receipt: 1993–1996. U.S. Council of Economic Advisers. URL: http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/CEA/Welfare/ 1999 The Effects of Welfare Policy and the Economic Expansion on Welfare Caseloads: An Update. Technical Report, August 3, Office of The President. Washington, DC. Cyphers, G., and S.Kinsella 2000 Harnessing the Power of Data: State TANF Agencies’ Use of Administrative Data for Policy and Program Management. Paper presented at the National Association for Welfare Research and Statistics 40th Annual Workshop. August 1, Scottsdale, AZ.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition Danziger, S., M.Corcoran, S.Danziger, C.Heflin, A.Kalil, J.Levine, D.Rosen, K, Seefeldt, K. Siefert,, and R.Tolman 2000 Barriers to the Employment of Welfare Recipients. Chapter 8 in Prosperity for All? The Economic Boom and African Americans, R.Cherry and W.M.Rodgers, III, eds. NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Dawid, A.P. 2000 Causal inference without counterfactuals. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95:407–424. Dehejia, R., and S.Wahba 1999 Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94:1053–1062. Downs, B.A., and L.E.Bass 1999 The Survey of Program Dynamics: A New Source of Data to Explore the Effects of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act on Adolescents. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. Available: http://www.sipp.census.gov/spd/workpaper/asa99.htm Ellwood, D. 2000 The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. National Tax Journal 53(4)(part 2):1063–1106. Ellwood, D., and M.J.Bane 1994 Understanding welfare dynamics In Welfare Realities: From Rhetoric to Reform, M.J. Bane and D.Ellwood, eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Federal Register 1999 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF): Final Rule. Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Vol. 64, No. 69. Monday, April 12. Figlio, D., and J.Ziliak 1999 Welfare reform, the business cycle, and the decline in AFDC caseloads In Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, S.Danziger, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute. Fogarty, D., and S.Kraley 2000 A Study of Washington State TANF Leavers and TANF Recipients: Findings from Administrative Data and the Telephone Survey: Summary Report. Olympia: Washington State. Fraker, T., and R.Maynard 1987 The adequacy of comparison group designs for evaluation of employment-related programs. Journal of Human Resources 22:194–227. Friedlander, D., and P.K.Robins 1995 Evaluating program evaluation: New evidence on commonly used nonexperimental methods. American Economic Review 85:923–937. Goerge, R.M., and B.J.Lee 2001 Matching and cleaning administrative data. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Gordon, A., J.Jacobson, and T.Fraker 1996 Approaches to Evaluation Welfare Reform: Lessons from Five State Demonstrations. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. Greene, W.H. 2000 Econometric Analysis. 4th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition Groves, R.M., and M.P.Couper 2001 Designing surveys acknowledging nonresponse. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Hahn, J. 1998 On the role of the propensity score in efficient semi-parametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica 66:315–332. Heckman, J., and V.J.Hotz 1989 Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower training (in applications and case studies). Journal of the American Statistical Association 84(408):862–874. Heckman, J.J., and J.A.Smith 1995 Assessing the case for social experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives Spring (9):85–110. Heckman, J.J., H.Ichimura, J.Smith, and P.Todd 1998 Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica 66:1017–1098. Heckman, J.J., H.Ichimura, and P.Todd 1997 Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies 65:261– 294. Hill, M.A., and T.Main 1998 Is Welfare Working? The Massachusetts Reforms Three Years Later. Boston, MA: Pioneer Institute. Hofferth, S., S.Stanhope, and K.Harris 2000 Exiting Welfare in the 1990s: Did Public Policy Influence Recipients’ Behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Hotz, V.J., R.Goerge, J.Balzekas, and F.Margolin, eds. 1998 Administrative Data for Policy-Relevant Research: Assessment of Current Utility and Recommendations for Development. Report of the Advisory Panel on Research Uses of Administrative Data. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research. Hotz, V.J., R.Schoeni, and N.Lim 2000 An Examination of the Reporting of Welfare Benefits and Income in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) in California Using Matched Administrative Records. Proposal to the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and the Administration for Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Hotz, V.J., and J.K.Scholz 2001 Measuring employment and income for low-income populations with administrative and survey data. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Institute for Public Affairs and School of Social Work 2000 Illinois Study of Former TANF Clients: Final Report Executive Summary. Springfield and Champaign: University of Illinois, and University of Illinois. Issacs, J., and M.Lyon 2000 A Cross-State Examination of Families Leaving Welfare: Findings from the ASPE— Funded Leavers Studies. Paper presented at the National Association for Welfare Research and Statistics, Scottsdale, AZ.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition Kalton, G., and D.Kasprzyk 1986 The treatment of missing survey data. Survey Methodology 12(1):1–16. Lalonde, R. 1986 Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data. American Economic Review 76:604–620. Little, R.J.A., and D.B.Rubin 1987 Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley. Loprest, P. 1999 Families Who Left Welfare: Who Are They and How Are They Doing? ANF Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Loprest, P., and S.Zedlewski 1999 Current and Former Welfare Recipients: How Do They Differ? DP 99–17. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Manski, C.F. 1995 Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Mathiowetz, N., C.Brown, and J.Bound 2001 Measurement error in surveys of the low-income population. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Marquis, K.H., and J.C.Moore 1990 Measurement errors in SIPP program reports. Proceedings of the Bureau of Census 1990 Annual Research Conference, 721–745. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Medley, B., M.J.Edelhoch, L.S.Martin, and Q.Lin 1999 Characteristics of Upwardly Mobile Ex-Recipients. Unpublished paper. South Carolina Department of Social Services, Columbia, SC. Meyer, B. 1995 Natural and quasi-experiments in economics Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13:151–161. Meyer, B.D., and D.T.Rosenbaum 1999 Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers, NBER Working Paper No. 7363, September. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. 2000 Making Single Mothers Work: Recent Tax and Welfare Policy and Its Effects. NBER Working Paper No. 7491. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Meyer, D., and M.Cancian 1998 Economic well-being following an exit from aid to families with dependent children Journal of Marriage and the Family 60:479–492. Michel, R. 1980 Participation Rates in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program, Part I. Working Paper 1387–02. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Moffitt, R.A. 1992 Incentive effects in the U.S. welfare system: A review. Journal of Economic Literature 30(1):1–61. 1999 The effect of pre-PRWORA waivers on AFDC caseloads and female earnings, income and labor force behavior. In Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, S.H.Danziger, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition 2001 Experienced-based measures of heterogeneity in the welfare caseload. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Mohadjer, L., and G.H.Choudhry 2001 Adjusting for Missing Data in Low-Income Surveys. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. C.Citro, R.Moffitt and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Moore, J.C., Stinson, L.L., and Welniak, E.J. 1997 Income Measurement Error in Surveys: A Review. Statistical Research Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Mueser, P., J.Hotchkiss, C.King, P.Rokicki, and D.Stevens 2000 The Welfare Caseload, Economic Growth and Welfare-to-Work Policies: An Analysis of Five Urban Areas. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. National Research Council 1991 Improving Information for Social Policy Decisions: The Uses of Microsimulation Modeling, Vol. 1, Review and Recommendations. Panel to Evaluate Microsimulation Models for Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro and E.A.Hanushek, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1992 Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research. Panel on Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research in the Combination of Information, D. Draper, D.P.Gaver, P.K.Goel, J.B.Greenhouse, L.V.Hedges, C.N.Morris, J.R.Tucker, and C.M.Waternaux, eds. Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1993a Private Lives and Public Policies: Confidentiality and Accessibility of Government Statistics. Panel on Confidentiality and Data Access, G.T.Duncan, T.B.Jabine, and V.A.de Wolf, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1993b The Future of the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Panel to Evaluate the Survey of Income and Program Participation, C.F.Citro and G.Kalton, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1995 Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance: Concepts, Information Needs, and Measurement Methods. C.F.Citro and R.T.Michael, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1999 Evaluating Welfare Reform: A Framework and Review of Current Work, Interim Report. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, R.Moffitt and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2000a Improving Access to and Confidentiality of Research Data: Report of a Workshop. Committee on National Statistics, C.Mackie and N.Bradburn, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2000b Small-Area Income and Poverty Estimates: Priorities for 2000 and Beyond. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F.Citro and G.Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2001a Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F. Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition 2001b Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency. Second Edition. Committee on National Statistics, Margaret E.Martin, Miron L.Straf, and Constance F.Citro, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Newman, K. 2001 The right (soft) stuff: Qualitative methods and the study of welfare reform. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Nusser, S.M., C.N.Fletcher, and D.G.Anderson 2000 The Iowa Survey of Program Dynamics Feasibility Study. Unpublished paper. Iowa State University. Parrott, S. 1998 Welfare Recipients Who Find Jobs: What Do We Know About Their Employment and Earnings? Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Primus, W., L.Rawlings, K.Larin, and K.Porter 1999 The Initial Impacts of Welfare Reform on the Incomes of Single-Mother Families. Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (August). Quint, Janet, K.Edin, M.L.Buck, B.Fink, Y.C.Padilla, O.Simmons-Hewitt, and M.E.Valmont 1999 Big Cities and Welfare Reform: Early Implementation and Ethnographic Findings from the Project on Devolution and Urban Change. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. Research Triangle Institute 1983 Final Report: Evaluation of the 1981 AFDC Amendments. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. Robins, J., A.Rotnitzky, and D.Scharfstein 1999 Sensitivity analysis for selection bias and unmeasured confounding in missing data and causal models. Chapter 1 in Statistical Models in Epidemiology: The Environment and Clinical Trials, M.E.Halloran and D.Berry, eds. New York: Springer-Verlag. Rosenbaum, P. 1995 Observational Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag. Rosenbaum P.R., and D.B.Rubin 1983 Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with a binary outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 11:212–218. 1983 The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55. Ruddick, M. 1996 Characteristics of Federal-State Data Collection Systems: Perspectives from Federal and State Agencies. Paper prepared for the Committee on National Statistics, Washington, DC. Safir, A., F.Scheuren, and K.Wang 2001 National Survey of America’s Families: Survey Methods and Data Reliability, 1997 and 1999. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Available: http://newfederalism.urban.org/nsaf/survey-methods.html Schoeni, R., and R.Blank 2000 What Has Welfare Reform Accomplished? Impacts on Welfare Participation, Employment, Income, Poverty, and Family Structure. Working Paper 7627. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition Singer, E., and D.Kulka 2001 Paying Respondents for Survey Participation. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. South Carolina Department of Social Services 2000 Survey of Former Family Independence Program Clients: Cases Closed During April Through September 1998. Unpublished paper, Columbia. Stevens, D. 2000 Welfare, Employment, and Earnings. Memorandum prepared for the Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, Committee on National Statistics. University of Baltimore, MD. Thornberry, O.T., and J.T.Massey 1988 Trends in United States telephone coverage across time and subgroups. Pp. 25–50 in Groves, R.M., Biemer, P.P., Lyberg, L.E., Massey, J.T., Nicholls, W.L. and Waksberg, J., (eds) Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley. Tweedie, J., and D.Reichert 1998 Tracking Recipients After They Leave Welfare: Summaries of State Follow-Up Studies. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures. Tweedie, J., D.Reichert, and M.O’Connor 1999 Tracking Recipients After They Leave Welfare. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures. UC Data 1999 An Inventory of Research Uses of Administrative Data in Social Services Programs in the United States, 1998. Berkeley: University of California. U.S. Census Bureau 1998 Survey of Income and Program Participation Quality Profile 1998, 3rd Edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics 2000 Current Population Survey Design and Methodology. Technical Paper 63. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Labor. U.S. General Accounting Office 1984 An Evaluation of the 1981 AFDC Changes: Initial Analyses. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1999a Welfare Reform: Information on Former Recipients’ Status. GAO/HEHS-99–48. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1999b Welfare Reform: Assessing the Effectiveness of Various Welfare-to-Work Approaches. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Ver Ploeg, M. 2001 Pre-exit Benefit Receipt and Employment Histories and Post-Exit Outcomes of Welfare Leavers. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research 1999 Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform. S.H.Danziger, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Wallace, G., and R.Blank 1999 What goes up must come down? Explaining recent changes in public assistance caseloads. In Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, S.Danziger, ed.. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition Weinberg, D.H., and S.S.Shipp 2000 The Survey of Program Dynamics: A Mid-Term Status Report. U.S. Census Bureau. Available: http://www.sipp.census.gov/spd/workpaper/summary10.htm#N_1_ Weiss, C., and B.Bailar 2001 High response rates for low income populations in in-person surveys. In Data Collection and Research Issues for Studies of Welfare Populations. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, C.F.Citro, R.Moffitt, and M.Ver Ploeg, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Zedlewski, S. 1999 Work Activity and Obstacles to Work Among TANF Recipients. Working Papers B-2. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Ziliak, J., D.Figlio, E.Davis, and L.Connolly 1997 Accounting for the Decline in AFDC Caseloads: Welfare Reform or Economic Growth? DP 1151–97. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.

OCR for page 161
Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition This page in the original is blank.