The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Investigating the Influence of Standards: A Framework for Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education
Davis, A., and Armstrong, J. (1990). State initiatives in assessing science education. In This Year in School Science 1990: Assessment in the Service of Reform. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
DeBoer, G. (1991). History of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dugger, W.E. (2000). Standards for technological literacy. The Technology Teacher,59(5), 8–13.
Dwyer, C.A. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning: Theory and Practice. Assessment in Education,5(1), 131–137.
Education Commission of the States. (1983). A 50-state survey of initiatives in science, mathematics and computer education. ECS Working Papers, No. SM-83–1. Task Force on Education for Economic Growth. Denver, CO: Author.
Education Trust. (1999a). Not Good Enough: A Content Analysis of Teacher Licensing Examinations. Thinking K-16,3(1). Washington, DC: Author.
Education Trust. (1999b). Ticket to Nowhere: The Gap Between Leaving High School and Entering College and High-Performance Jobs. Thinking K-16,3(2). Washington, DC: Author.
Education Week. (2001, January). Special Report: Quality counts 2001: A better balance: Standards, tests, and the tools to succeed. Seeking Stability for Standards-Based Education 20(17).
Fennema, E., Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T.P., and Carey, D. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal,30, 555–583.
Ferrini-Mundy, J. and Schram, T. (1997). Highlights and Implications. In Ferrini-Mundy, J. and Schram, T. (Eds.) The Recognizing and Recording Reform in Mathematics Education Project: Insights, Issues, and Implications in Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No.8. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Fuhrman, S. and Elmore, R.F. (1994). Governors and education policy in the 1990s. In R.F.Elmore and S.Fuhrman (Eds.), The Governance of Curriculum. 1994 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change,1, 5–28.
Garet, M.S., Birman, B.F., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Herman, R., and Yoon, K.S. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Glaser, R., and Silver, E. (1994). Assessment, Testing, and Instruction: Retrospect and Prospect. In L.Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Goertz, M.E. (2000). Implementing standards-based reform: Challenges for state policy. In T.Duggan and M.Holmes (Eds.), Closing the gap, (pp. 65–82). Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
Grissmer, D., and Flanagan, A. (1998). Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.