References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., and Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education 82(4): 417–437.

Abrami, P.C., Leventhal, L., and Perry, R.P. (1982). Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research 52, 446-464.

Allen, D.E., and Duch, B. (1998). Thinking towards solutions: Problem-based learning activities for general biology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College.

Allen, D., Groh, S.E., and Allen, D.E. (Eds.). (2001). The power of problem-based learning: A practical “how-to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Alverno College Faculty. (1994).Student assessment-as-learning at Alverno College (3rd Ed.). Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College.

Ambady, N., and Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(3), 431-441.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). The liberal art of science. Washington, DC: Author.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993).Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

American Association for Higher Education. (1993). Making teaching community property: A menu for peer collaboration and peer review. Washington, DC: Author.

American Association for Higher Education. (1995). From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching—A project workbook. Washington, DC: Author.

American Association for Higher Education. (1996). Teaching, learning and technology (TLT) roundtable workbook. Washington, DC: Author.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological measurement. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

American Psychological Association. (2002). National guidelines and suggested learning outcomes for the undergraduate psychology major (draft). Washington, DC: Author.

Anderson, E., (Ed.). (1993). Campus use of the teaching portfolio: Twenty-five profiles. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., and Bloom, B.S. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, 2001. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Angelo, T.A. (1995, November). Assessing (and defining) assessment. AAHE Bulletin 48(2).

Angelo, T.A. (1999). The campus as a learning community: Seven promising shifts and seven powerful levers. In B.A. Pescosolido, and R. Aminzade (Eds), The social worlds of higher



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 128
References Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., and Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education 82(4): 417–437. Abrami, P.C., Leventhal, L., and Perry, R.P. (1982). Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research 52, 446-464. Allen, D.E., and Duch, B. (1998). Thinking towards solutions: Problem-based learning activities for general biology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College. Allen, D., Groh, S.E., and Allen, D.E. (Eds.). (2001). The power of problem-based learning: A practical “how-to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus. Alverno College Faculty. (1994).Student assessment-as-learning at Alverno College (3rd Ed.). Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College. Ambady, N., and Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(3), 431-441. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). The liberal art of science. Washington, DC: Author. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993).Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. American Association for Higher Education. (1993). Making teaching community property: A menu for peer collaboration and peer review. Washington, DC: Author. American Association for Higher Education. (1995). From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching—A project workbook. Washington, DC: Author. American Association for Higher Education. (1996). Teaching, learning and technology (TLT) roundtable workbook. Washington, DC: Author. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological measurement. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association. (2002). National guidelines and suggested learning outcomes for the undergraduate psychology major (draft). Washington, DC: Author. Anderson, E., (Ed.). (1993). Campus use of the teaching portfolio: Twenty-five profiles. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., and Bloom, B.S. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, 2001. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Angelo, T.A. (1995, November). Assessing (and defining) assessment. AAHE Bulletin 48(2). Angelo, T.A. (1999). The campus as a learning community: Seven promising shifts and seven powerful levers. In B.A. Pescosolido, and R. Aminzade (Eds), The social worlds of higher

OCR for page 128
education: Handbook for teaching in a new century (pp. 110-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Angelo, T.A., and Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Armstrong, L. (2000). Distance learning: An academic leader’s perspective on a disruptive product. Change 32(6), 20-27. Astin, A.W., Banta, T.W., Cross, K.P., El-Khawas, E., Ewell, P.T., Hutchings, P., Marchese, T.J., McClenney, M., Mentkowski, M., Miller, M.A., Moran, E.T., and Wright, B.D. (1996). Assessment forum: 9 principles of good practice for assessing student learning.Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. See <http://www.aahe.org/principl.htm>. Baker, P. (1999). Creating learning communities: The unfinished agenda. In B.A. Pescosolido, and R. Aminzade (Eds), The social worlds of higher education: Handbook for teaching in a new century (pp. 95-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Banta, T.W. (2000). That second look. Assessment Update10(4), 3-14. Banta, T.W., Lund, J.P., Black, K.E., and Oblander, F. W. (1996). Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Barr, R.B., and Tagg, J. (1999). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. In B.A. Pescosolido, and R. Aminzade (Eds.), The social worlds of higher education: Handbook for teaching in a new century (pp. 565-581). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Basinger, J. (2000, August 7). Carnegie issues broad changes in system of classifying colleges. Chronicle of Higher Education. See <http://chronicle.com/daily/2000/08/2000080701n.htm>. Baugher, K. (1992). LEARN: The student quality team manual.Nashville, TN: LEARN. Bernstein, D.J. (1996, Spring). A departmental system for balancing the development and evaluation of college teaching: A commentary on Cavanaugh. Innovative Higher Education 20(4), 241-248. Bernstein, D.J., and Quinlan, K.M. (Eds.). (1996, Spring). The peer review of teaching [Special issue]. Innovative Higher Education20(4). Bleak, J., Neiman, H., Sternman, C., and Trower, C. (2000). Faculty recruitment study: Statistical analysis report, August 2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green. Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Borgman, C.L., Bates, M.J., Cloonan, M.V., Efthimiadis, E.N., Gilliland-Swetland, A.J., Kafai, Y.B., Leazer, G.H., and Maddox, A.B. (1996). Social aspects of digital libraries. In Proceedings of the University of California Los Angeles-National Science Foundation Social Aspects of Digital Libraries Workshop, February 15-17, 1996. See <http://is.geis.ucla.edu/research/dl/index.html>. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. See <http://notes.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf>. Brand, M. (2000). Changing faculty roles in research universities: Using the pathways strategy. Change 32(6), 42-45. Braskamp, L., and Ory, J. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Brinko, K.T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: What is effective? Journal of Higher Education 64(5), 574-593. Brookfield, S.D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Buck, G.A., Hehn, J.G., and Leslie-Pelecky, D.L. (Eds.). (2000). The role of physics departments in preparing k-12 teachers. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.

OCR for page 128
Cambridge, B.L. (1996, Spring). The paradigm shifts: Examining quality of teaching through assessment of student learning. Innovative Higher Education 20(4), 287-298. Cambridge, B.L. (Ed.). (1997). Assessing impact: Evidence and action. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education. Cambridge, B.L. (1999, December). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Questions and answers from the field. AAHE Bulletin. See <http://www.aahe.org/Bulletin/dec99f2.htm>. Cambridge, B.L. (Ed.). (2001). Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Capelli, P. (Ed.). (1997). Change at work: Trends that are transforming the business of business. Washington, DC: National Policy Association. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Pew Forum on Undergraduate Learning. (2002). National survey of student engagement: The college student report. Menlo Park, CA: Author. See <http://www.indiana.edu/~nsse/l>. Cashin, W.E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. In M. Theall, and J. Franklin (Eds.), Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Cashin, W.E., and Downey, R.G. (1999). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation: Convergence with an overall instructor evaluation criteria. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, April, Washington, DC. Centra, J.A. (1973). Item reliabilities, the factor structure, comparison with alumni ratings. (Student Instructional Report, No. 3). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Centra, J.A. (1974). The relationship between student and alumni ratings of teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement 34(2), 321-326. Centra, J.A. (1975). Colleagues as raters of classroom instruction. Journal of Higher Education 46, 327-337. Centra, J.A. (1979). Determining faculty effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Centra, J.A. (1987). Faculty evaluation: Past practices, future directions. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development. Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Centra, J.A. (1994). The use of the teaching portfolio and student evaluations for summative evaluation. Journal of Higher Education 65(5), 555-570. Centra, J.A. (1998). The development of the student instructional report II, Higher Education Assessment Program. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Centra, J.A. (2001). A model for assessing the scholarship of teaching. Presentation at the 9th Annual American Association of Higher Education Conference on Faculty Roles and Rewards, February, Tampa, FL. Centra, J.A., and Creech, F.R. (1976). The relationship between student, teacher, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness.(Report No. PR-76-1). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Centra, J.A., and Gaubatz, N.B. (2000a). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education 70(1), 17-33. Centra, J.A., and Gaubatz, N.B. (2000b). Student perceptions of learning and instructional effectiveness in college courses, Higher Education Assessment Program. (Report No. 9). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Chandler, S. (1991).Issues in evaluating multiinstitutional models. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Symposium, Chicago. Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin 39,3-7. Chism, N.V.N. (1999). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook.Boston: Anker. Clark, J., and Redmond, M. (1982). Small group instructional diagnosis. (ERIC Ed. 217954). Seattle: University of Washington, Department of Biology Education. Cochran, K.F. (1997). Pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers’ integration of subject matter, pedagogy, students, and learning environments. Research Matters-to the Science Teacher,#9702. Cohen, P.A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research 51, 281-309.

OCR for page 128
Collis, B., and Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London, UK: Kogan Page. Cooper, J., and Robinson, P. (1998). Small-group instruction: An annotated bibliography of science, mathematics, engineering and technology resources in higher education (Occasional Paper #6). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education. Coppola, B.P., and Smith, D.H. (1996). A case for ethics. Journal of Chemical Education 73,33-34. Coppola, B.P., Ege, S.N., and Lawton, R.G. (1997). The University of Michigan undergraduate chemistry curriculum 2— Instructional strategies and assessment. Journal of Chemical Education 74,84-94. Coppola. B.P., and Jacobs, D. (2002). Is the scholarship of teaching and learning new to chemistry? In M.T. Huber, and S. Morreale (Eds.), Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground . Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Cornell University. (1993). Teaching evaluation handbook. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Office of Instructional Support. Cross, K.P., and Steadman, M.H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Daffinrud, S.M., and Herrera, O.L. (2000). Evaluation methods and findings: The Field-Tested Learning Assessment Guide (FLAG) final report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, LEAD Center. Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. Davis, B.G. (1988). Sourcebook for evaluating teaching. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Office of Educational Development. Davis, B.G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Diamond, R.M., and Adams, B.E. (Eds.). (1995). The disciplines speak: Rewarding the scholarly, professional, and creative work of faculty. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Diamond, R.M., and Adams, B.E. (Eds.). (2000). The disciplines speak II: More statements on rewarding the scholarly, professional, and creative work of faculty. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Diamond, R.M., and Gray, P.J. (1998). 1997 National Study of Teaching Assistants. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Center for Instructional Development. Doherty, A., Riordan, T., and Roth, J. (Eds.). (2002). Student learning: A central focus for institutions of higher education. (A report and collection of institutional practices of the Student Learning Initiative.) Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College Institute. Dougherty, A. (1999). Just-in-time, teaching using Web feedback to guide learning and teaching. See <http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~doughera/talks/ets9912/>. Doyle, M.P. (Ed.). (2000). Academic excellence: The role of research in the physical sciences at undergraduate institutions.Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation. Drucker, A.J., and Remmers, H.H. (1951). Do alumni and students differ in their attitudes toward instructors? Journal of Educational Psychology 42(3), 129-143. Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C.A., and Allred, S. (1997). Innovation in large lectures: Teaching for active learning through inquiry. BioScience 47(9), 601-607. Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., and Quinlan, K. (1991). The teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship in teaching.Washington, DC: The American Association for Higher Education. Ehrmann, S.C. (2000, November/December). On the necessity of grassroots evaluation of educational technology: Recommendations for higher education. See <http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/assessment/2000-11.asp>. Ehrmann, S.C. (In press). Technology and educational revolution: Ending the cycle of failure. Liberal Education. See draft <http://www.tltgroup.org/resources/V_Cycle_of_Failure.html>. Emerson, J.D., Mosteller, F., and Youtz, C. (2000). Students can help improve college teaching: A review and an agenda for the statistics profession. In C. R. Rao, and G. Szekely (Eds.), Statistics for the 21st century. New York: Marcel Dekker.

OCR for page 128
Emert, J. W., and Parish, C. R. (1996). Assessing concept attainment in undergraduate core courses in mathematics. In T.W. Banta, J. P. Lund, K.E. Black, and F.W. Oblander (Eds.), Assessment in practice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Ewell, P.T. (1991). To capture the ineffable: New forms of assessment in higher education. Review of Research in Education 17, 75-125. Feldman, K.A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers and courses: What we know and what we don’t. Research in Higher Education 9, 199-242. Feldman, K.A. (1984). Class size and college students’ evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look. Research in Higher Education 21(1):45-116, September. Feldman, K.A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators and external (neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education 30, 137-189. Feldman, K.A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II-Evidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34(2), 151-211. Fisch, L. (1998). AD REM: Spotters. The national teaching and learning forum. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. Fosnot, C. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Freedman, R.L.H. (1994). Open-ended questioning. New York: Addison Wesley. French-Lazovik, G. (1981). Documentary evidence in the evaluation of teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 73-89).Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Gabel, D.L. (Ed.) (1994). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning.New York: Macmillan. Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R., and Smith, B. (1990). Learning communities: Creating connections among students, faculty, and disciplines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gaff, J.G., Pruitt-Logan, A.S., and Weibl, R.A. (2000). Building the faculty we need: Colleges and universities working together. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Gardiner, L., Anderson, C., and Cambridge, B. (Eds.). (1997). Learning through assessment: A resource guide for higher education. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Gavin, R. (2000). The role of research at undergraduate institutions: Why is it necessary to defend it? In M.P. Doyle (Ed.), Academic excellence: The role of research in the physical sciences at undergraduate institutions (pp. 9-17).Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation. Gilmore, G.M., Kane, M.T., and Naccarato, R.W. (1978). The generalizability of student ratings of instruction: Estimation of teacher and course components. Journal of Educational Measurement 15(1), 1-13. Glassick, C.E., Huber, M.T., and Maeroff, G.I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Goheen, R.F. (1969). The human nature of a university. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Golde, C.M., and Dore, T.M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts. Gray, J., Diamond, R.M., and Adam, B.E. (1996). A national study on the relative importance of research and undergraduate teaching at colleges and universities.Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Center for Instructional Development. Greene, E. (2000, June 23). Some colleges pay students to go to class—to evaluate teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A18. Greenspan, A. (2000). The economic importance of improving math-science education. Testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce, Washington, DC. See <http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/2000/20000921.htm>. Grouws, D.A. (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan. Herron, J.D. (1996). The chemistry classroom: Formulas for successful teaching. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics 55, 440-454.

OCR for page 128
Hestenes, D., and Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory. Physics Teacher 33(8), 502-506. Heterick, R., and Twigg, C. (1999). Lectures are not cheap! See <http://www.center.rpi.edu/LForum/LM/Sept99.html>. Huber, M.T. (1999). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching: Reflections on the Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.Paper presented at the 7th International Improving Student Learning Symposium Improving Student Learning Through the Disciplines, Menlo Park, CA. Huber, M.T. (2001, July/August). Balancing acts: Designing careers around the scholarship of teaching. Change, 21-29. Huber, M.T., and Morreale, S. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1995). From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching, a project workbook.Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1996). Making teaching community property: A menu for peer collaboration and peer review. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1998). The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning.Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Indiana University. (2000). The college student experiences questionnaire. See <http://www.indiana.edu/~cseq/cseq_content.htm>. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author. See <http://www.iteawww.org/TAA/STLstds.htm >. Ireton, M.F.W., Manduco, C.A., and Mogk, D.W. (1996). Shaping the future of undergraduate earth science education: Innovation and change using an earth system approach. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Books. Joint Policy Board for Mathematics. (1994). Recognitions and rewards in the mathematical sciences. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society. Katz, J., and Henry, M. (1988). Turning professors into teachers: A new approach to faculty development and student learning.New York: Macmillan. Keig, L., and Waggoner, M.D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report #2). Washington, DC: George Washington University. Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (1997). Returning to our roots: The student experience. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic duty. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. King, P.M., and Kitchener, K.S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Koon, J., and Murray, H.G. (1995). Using multiple outcomes to validate student ratings of overall teacher effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education 66(1), 61-81. Kremer, J. (1990). Constant validity of multiple measures in teaching, research, and service and reliability of peer ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 213-218. Lambert, L.M., and Tice, S.L. (Eds.). (1992). Preparing graduate students to teach: A guide to programs that improve undergraduate education and develop tomorrow’s faculty. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Landis, C.R., Ellis, A.B., Lisenky, G.C., Lorenz, J.K., Meekder, K., and Wamser, C.C. (Eds.). (2001). Chemistry concept tests: A pathway to interactive classrooms.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Lederman, N.G., and O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education 74,225-239.

OCR for page 128
Lederman, N.G., Schwartz, R.S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., and Bell, R.L. (In press). Preservice teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: an intervention study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. Licata, C.M., and Morreale, J.C. (1997). Posttenure review: Policies, practices, precautions. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Licata, C.M, and Morreale, J.C. (2002). Posttenure faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Liebowitz, W.R. (1999, October 22). Course evaluations proliferate on the Web—to the chagrin of many professors. Chronicle of Higher Education,A59. Light, R.L. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Lloyd-Jones, R. (1977). Primary trait scoring. In C. Cooper, and L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Loacker, G. (Ed.). (2001). Self-assessment at Alverno College by Alverno College faculty. Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College. Lopez, R.E., and Schultz, T. (2001). Two revolutions in k-8 science education. Physics Today 54(9), 45-49. See <http://www.physicstoday.org/pt/vol-54/iss-9/current.html>. Lovitts, B., and Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs. Academe 86(6), 44-50. Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the techniques of teaching. (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. MacGregor, J., Cooper, J., Smith, K., and Robinson, P. (2000). Strategies for energizing large classes: From small groups to learning communities. (No. 81). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Marsh, H.W. (1982). Validity of students’ evaluations of college teaching: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 264-279. Marsh, H.W. (1987). Student evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11, 253-388. Marsh, H.W., and Roche, L.A. (1993). The use of student evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 30(1), 217-251. Marsh, H.W., and Roche, L.A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity or innocent bystander? The Journal of Educational Psychology 92(1), 202-228. Mathematical Association of America. (2000). Guidelines for programs and departments in undergraduate mathematical sciences. Washington, DC: Author. See <http://www.maa.org/guidelines/guidelines.html>. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. McCormick, A.C. (2001). (Ed.). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education, 2000 edition.Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie. McKeachie, W.J. (1979, October). Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe 384-397. McKeachie, W.J., Pintrich, P.R., Lin, Y., Smith, D.A.F., and Sharma, R. (1990). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post-Secondary Teaching and Learning. McKeachie, W.J. (1999). McKeachie’s teaching tips, strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. (10th Ed.). New York: Houghton-Mifflin. McNeal, A.P., and D’Avanzo, C.D. (Eds.) (1997). Student active science: Models of innovation in college science teaching.Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace. Menges, R., and Svinicki, M. (Eds.). (1991). College teaching: From theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Millar, S.B. (Ed.). (1998). Indicators of success in postsecondary SMET education: Shapes of the future. (Synthesis and Proceedings of the Third Annual National Institute for Science Education Forum). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H., and Novak, J.D. (Eds.). (2000). Assessing science understand

OCR for page 128
ing: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Mullin, R. (2001). The undergraduate revolution: Change the system or give incrementalism another 30 years? Change 33(5), 54-58. Murnane, R.J., and Levy, F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy. New York: Free Press. Murray, H.G. (1983). Low inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology 71, 856-865. Murray, H.G., Rushton, P.J., and Paunonen, S.V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 250-261. Murray, H.G, Gillese, E., Lennon, M., Mercer, P., and Robinson, M. (1996). Ethical principles in university teaching.Vancouver, BC: The Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. See <http://www.umanitoba.ca/academic_support/uts/stlhe/Ethical.html>. Naftulin, D.H., Ware, J.E., and Donnelly, F.A. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education 48, 630-635. Narum, J. (1995). Structures for science: A handbook on planning facilities for undergraduate natural science communities (Vol. III). Washington, DC: Project Kaleidoscope. National Academy of Sciences. (1997). Preparing for the 21st century: The education imperative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9537.html>. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualification of public school teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2001). Measuring up 2000: The state-by-state report card for higher education. San Jose, CA: Author. See <http://www.highereducation.org>. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Institute for Science Education. (2001a). Learning through technology. Madison, WI: Author. See <http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/cl1/ilt/>. National Institute for Science Education. (2001b). Field-tested learning assessment guide. Madison, WI: Author. See <http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/cl1/flag/>. National Institute for Science Education. (2001c). Cooperative learning. See <http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/CL1/CL/>. National Research Council. (1991). Moving beyond myths: Revitalizing undergraduate mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/1782.html>. National Research Council. (1995a). Engineering education: Designing an adaptive system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4907.html>. National Research Council. (1995b). Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4935.html>. National Research Council. (1996a). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html>. National Research Council. (1996b). From analysis to action. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9128.html>. National Research Council. (1996c). The role of scientists in the professional development of science teachers.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/2310.html>. National Research Council. (1997a). Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5287.html>. National Research Council. (1997b). Adviser, teacher, role model, friend: On being a mentor to students in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Research Council. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5789.html>.

OCR for page 128
National Research Council. (1998a). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6336.html>. National Research Council. (1998b). Developing a digital national library for undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5952.html>. National Research Council. (1999a). Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6453.html>. National Research Council. (1999b). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6488.html>. National Research Council. (1999c). Global perspectives for local action: Using TIMSS to improve U.S. mathematics and science education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9723.html>. National Research Council. (1999d). Myths and tradeoffs: The role of tests in undergraduate admissions.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9632.html>. National Research Council. (2000a). Building a workforce for the information economy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9830.html>. National Research Council. (2000b). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9832.html>. National Research Council. (2000c). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853.html>. National Research Council. (2000d). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9596.html>. National Research Council. (2000e). LC21: A digital strategy for the Library of Congress. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9940.html>. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10019.html>. National Research Council. (2002a). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of science and mathematics in U.S. high schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10129.html. National Research Council. (2002b). Scientific research in education.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. See <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10236.html>. National Science Board. (2000). Science and engineering indicators—2000. Arlington, VA: Author. See <http://www.nsf.gov/search97cgi/vtopic>. National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. (NSF 96-139). Arlington, VA: Author. See <http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf96139>. National Science Foundation. (1998). Information technology: Its impact on undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. (NSF 98-82). Arlington, VA: Author. See <http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9882>. Neff, R.A., and Weimer, M. (Eds.). (1990). Teaching college: Collected readings for new instructors. Madison, WI: Magna. Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Nyquist, J.D., Abbott, R.D., Wulff, D.H., and Sprague, J. (Eds.). (1991). Preparing the professoriate of tomorrow to teach: Selected readings in TA training. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

OCR for page 128
Ory, J.C. (2000). Teaching evaluation: Past, present, and future. In K.E. Ryan (Ed.), Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision for the future: New directions in teaching and learning (pp. 13-18).San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Osterlind, S.J. (1989). Constructing test items. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Overall, J.U., and Marsh, H.W. (1980). Students’ evaluations of instruction: A longitudinal study of their stability. Journal of Educational Psychology 72, 321-325. Palomba, C.A., and Banta, T.W. (1999). Assessment essentials, planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Perry, R.P., and Smart, J.C. (Eds.). (1997). Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice. New York: Agathon Press. Pescosolido, B.A., and Aminzade, R. (Eds.). (1999). The social worlds of higher education: Handbook for teaching in a new century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Pike, G.R. (1995). The relationship between self-reports of college experiences and test scores. Journal of Research in Higher Education 36(1), 1-21. Project Kaleidoscope. (1991). What works, building natural science communities: A plan for strengthening undergraduate science and mathematics (Vol 1).Washington, DC: Author. Project Kaleidoscope. (1994). What works, leadership: Challenges for the future (Vol. II). Washington, DC: Author. Project Kaleidoscope. (1998). Shaping the future of undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering and technology education: Proceedings and recommendations from the PKAL day of dialogue.Washington, DC: Author. See <http://www.pkal.org/template2.cfm?2c_id=301>. Reis, R.M (1997). Tomorrow’s professor: Preparing for academic careers in science and engineering. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press. Remmers, H.H. (1934). Reliability and halo effect on high school and college students’ judgments of their teachers. Journal of Applied Psychology 18, 619-630. Rice, R.E., Sorcinelli, M.D., and Austin, A.E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation.Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Root, L.S. (1987). Faculty evaluation: Reliability of peer assessments of research, teaching, and service. Research in Higher Education 26, 71-84. Rosenthal, R. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft. Rothman, F.G., and Narum, J.L. (1999). Then, now, and in the next decade: A commentary on strengthening undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering and technology education. Washington, DC: Project Kaleidoscope. See <http://www.pkal.org/news/thennow100.html>. Rust, E. (1998). Business cares about math and science achievement. In Business Coalition for Education Reform, The formula for success: A business leader’s guide to supporting math and science achievement (pp. 11-14). Washington, DC: National Alliance for Business. Sanderson, A., Phua, V.C., and Herda, D. (2000). The American faculty poll. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. Sands, R.G., Parson, L.A., and Duane, J. (1991). Faculty mentoring faculty in a public university. Journal of Higher Education 62, 174-193. Schwartz, C. (1983).ABC’s of teaching with excellence: A Berkeley compendium for teaching with excellence. See <http://teaching.berkeley.edu/compendium/>. Scriven, M. (1981). Summative teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation 58, summer. Seldin, P. (1991). The teaching portfolio.Boston: Anker. Seldin, P. (1998, March). How colleges evaluate teaching: 1988 vs. 1998. AAHE Bulletin 3-7. Seymour, E. (In press). Tracking the processes of change in U.S. undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Shapiro, N.S., and Levine, J.H. (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

OCR for page 128
Shipman, H.L. (2001). Hands-on science, 680 hands at a time. Journal of College Science Teaching 30(5), 318-321. Shore, B.M., et al. (1986). The teaching dossier: A guide to its preparation and use.Montreal: Canadian Association of University Teachers. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher 15, 4-14. Shulman, L.S. (1993). Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude. Change 25(6), 6-7. Shulman, L. (1995). Faculty hiring: The pedagogical colloquium—three models. AAHE Bulletin 47(9), 6-9. Siebert, E.D., and McIntosh, W.J. (Eds.). (2001). College pathways to the science education standards.Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. Sorcinelli, M.D. (1999). The evaluation of teaching: The 40-year debate about student, colleague, and self-evaluations. In B.A. Pescosolido, and R. Aminzade (Eds.), The social worlds of higher education: Handbook for teaching in a new century (pp. 195-205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Sorcinelli, M.D. (2000). Principles of good practice: Supporting early career faculty. Guidance for deans, department chairs, and other academic leaders.New Pathways II Project Forum on Faculty Roles and Rewards. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. See <http://www.aahe.org/ffrr/principles_brochure.htm>. Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., and Donovan, S.S. (1998). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis (Research Monograph No. 11). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education. Suskie, L. (Ed.). (2000). Assessment to promote deep learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. See <http://www.aahe.org/catalog/iteminfo.cfm?itemid=1&itemid=127&g=t>. Suter, L., and Frechtling, J. (2000). Guiding principles for mathematics and science education research methods: Report of a workshop. (NSF 00-113). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. See <http://nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf00113>. Svinicki, M., and Menges, R. (Eds.). (1996). Honoring exemplary teaching. New directions for teaching and learning. (No. 65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Uno, G.E. (1997). Handbook on teaching undergraduate science classes: A survival manual. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Walvoord, B.F., and Anderson, V.J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Wergin, J. (1994). The collaborative department: How five campuses are inching toward cultures of collective responsibility.Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Wergin, J., and Swingen, J.N. (2000). Departmental assessment: How some campuses are effectively evaluating the collective work of faculty. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Wright, J.C., Millar, S.B., Kosciuk, S.A., Penberthy, D.L., Williams, P.H., and Wampold, B.E. (1998). A novel strategy for assessing the effects of curriculum reform on student competence. Journal of Chemical Education 75,986-992. Wyckoff. S. (2001). Changing the culture of undergraduate science teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching 30(5), 306-312. Zimpher, N. (1998).Ten changing demands on college teachers in the future.Presented at Changing Demands on College Teachers: A Conference for Teaching Support Providers, April 27, Columbus, Ohio. See <http://www.acs.ohio-state.edu/education/ftad/Publications/ten-nancy.html>.