National Academies Press: OpenBook

Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop (2001)

Chapter: Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair

« Previous: Treatment Issues
Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×

Page 63

7

Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair

Joan Petersilia

This workshop represented an opportunity to highlight gaps in the knowledge about criminal victimization of people with developmental disabilities. I will try to summarize the gaps that were raised in the papers presented at the workshop and in the ensuing discussions. As this report makes dear, very little research has been done to date, so that the current state of knowledge on the victimization of individuals with disabilities is seriously inadequate. The areas covered in the workshop papers and discussion could be condensed into three major areas that require research: (1) determining the nature and scope of victimization of those with developmental disabilities; (2) addressing the needs of crime victims with developmental disabilities in the criminal justice system; and (3) developing and evaluating interventions to prevent the victimization of people with developmental disabilities and programs to assist those who are victimized to cope with the effects of victimization.

Research designed to answer the following questions would begin to fill the gaps in the knowledge about crime victims with developmental disabilities:

  • What is the nature and extent of the problem? What personal, behavioral, and developmental characteristics identify victims and perpetrators? What are the situational contexts? What are the impacts (e.g., physical, psychological) on victims with developmental disabilities or mental retardation?

Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×

Page 64

  • How does the formal criminal justice system respond to victims with developmental disabilities? What barriers to access and eligibility exist, and how can they be eliminated and system coordination be improved?

  • What lifestyle variables act as risk factors for personal and financial victimization? Potential risk factors that have been suggested include level and type of employment, transportation, living companions, type and size of residential living, and social activities.

  • How might one "predict" which persons with disabilities, in which settings, are at highest risk of victimization? This research would have very practical aims: to assist those who provide services to people with disabilities to identify those persons and settings at highest risk, so that prevention and personal safety programs can be better targeted, and again, to understand the barriers in the current formal response system that prevents more effective interagency collaboration in effectively responding to victims with disabilities.

  • What programs reduce the incidence of abuse and violence, and how might they best be implemented, evaluated, and funded?

Answering these questions would require a series of incremental research projects aimed at developing the required knowledge base. This endeavor would involve research devoted to survey methodology, research on the interaction of victims with developmental disabilities and the criminal justice system, research on treating victims with developmental disabilities, and research on preventing their victimization. I elaborate the needs in each of these areas.

SURVEY METHODOLOGY

First, research on survey methodology is important to answering the questions about the extent and nature of victimization of people with developmental disabilities. As McCleary and Wiebe pointed out in their paper, the following areas require attention:

  • Developing a sample frame. No sample frame currently used by state or federal agencies adequately covers persons with developmental disabilities. Research could investigate the use of government master lists (SSI, Medicare/Medicaid) as potential sample frames. Until an adequate

Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×

Page 65

    sample frame can be developed, determining rates of criminal victimization of persons with disabilities will remain problematic.
  • Specifying appropriate victimization items. Standard victimization items were written for populations of individuals with no disabilities and relate to existing crime categories (for example, UCR Part I crimes). To adequately tap the victimization of persons with developmental disabilities, survey items may need to be revised to represent victimization scenarios typical of victims with disabilities. Crimes against people with disabilities are often complex, for example, involving characteristics of several categories (robbery-assault, for instance), and the minor details of these crimes are often less important (and less obvious to the victim) than the major aspects. Although specifically designed victimization items may be required, items must be roughly comparable to categories of the National Crime Victimization Survey if comparisons to the U.S. population are to be made. For example, research could test various victimization items with people with developmental disabilities and compare the results to those using standard NCVS items.

  • Interview methods. Standard interview methods may not be appropriate for victims with developmental disabilities. Research on interview methods has been conducted in the domains of health (for example the Epidemiological Catchment Area Study and the National Comorbidity study) and education. Research could test ways of improving proxy respondent interviews and examine alternate methods, such as use of free drawing by the victims with developmental disabilities, and other methods that have been demonstrated to overcome communication barriers.

  • Interviewer training. A relatively large core of trained interviewers is needed for an effective victimization survey. Developing training will require substantial research. Historically, interviewer training has been an afterthought in victimization surveys, though again, it has been well studied in the health domain. The problems of the research project outlined can be solved only if the problems of training interviewers are integrated into the larger research questions.

INTERACTION WITH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

The second research area seeks to answer the questions about how the criminal justice system currently deals with victims with disabilities and how those dealings can improve. The following research suggestions come from the papers by Davis, Dinerstein, and Grattet and Jenness, respectively:

Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×

Page 66

  • Accommodations in law enforcement. Few research studies have been conducted to confirm which benefits, services, and programs are most effective for those with certain types of disabilities. For example, what community policing ideas work? Are there problem-solving techniques that allow for the introduction of, or use of, accommodations for people with developmental disabilities? What approaches are being tried by police and disability experts to assist victims, and how successful are they?

    Another question involves whether police have or can develop the resources to request an advocate who is familiar with the disability when questioning the victim, and whether such an approach improves interview outcomes. Alternatively, would it be more efficient to have specially trained officers who are familiar with developmental disabilities on the police force to assist in such situations? What would be the impact of creating a specialized program that consists of specially trained police, victim assistance staff, attorneys, probation/parole officers, and judges who all have specific training in developmental disabilities? Each of these approaches may be successful, but we cannot know that or determine which approach is best without evaluation research.

  • Accommodations in victim assistance agencies. Resources that are available to the public as victims of crime may be less available to those with developmental disabilities. The following victim assistance services could be considered when attempting to serve victims with disabilities: counseling, transportation to court, escorts to court, hearing enhancement devices in court, follow-along services to enable victims to understand court scheduling and proceedings, help with arranging medical treatment following victimization, alternative dispute resolution services, and access to individuals in environments such as nursing homes to monitor possible victimization. Researchers can begin to document where and how these types of accommodations are being provided among those with developmental disabilities and how effective they are in assisting those with developmental disabilities: for example, do they result in increased reporting and court appearances?

  • Accommodations in the courtroom. Research is needed on the ability of people with developmental disabilities to provide testimony in a court of law. What specific accommodations are both legally permissible and most useful in assisting victims with disabilities to be effective witnesses?

  • The use of hate crime legislation. A number of states have added disability of the victim as a condition that qualifies certain crimes for hate

Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×

Page 67

  • crime status. Research could evaluate the viability of the prosecution of violence against persons with disabilities as a hate crime, and whether special sentencing provisions permitted under most hate crime legislation serve as a deterrent.

PREVENTION AND TREATMENT

The final area of research concerns programs aimed at preventing the victimization of people with disabilities and treating those who experience victimization. The points below come from the papers by Sobsey and Calder, Baladerian, and Sullivan.

  • Mechanisms of victimization. The list of potential mechanisms that may contribute to the increased risk of abuse for people with developmental disabilities is long. More research is required to determine which of the mechanisms play a significant role and what other factors are important.

  • Evaluation of prevention efforts. Many advocacy organizations and criminal justice agencies are experimenting with programs to prevent the victimization of persons with disabilities. These efforts often involve training persons with developmental disabilities how to avoid dangerous situations. Evaluations of the effectiveness of such programs in reducing victimization are critical to ensuring the safety of people with developmental disabilities.

  • Development of treatment programs. Research on the needs of crime victims with developmental disabilities could help inform the development of appropriate treatment programs, which once developed must also be evaluated.

Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"Research Needs: Statement by the Workshop Chair." National Research Council. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10042.
×
Page 67
Next: References »
Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: Report of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $51.00 Buy Ebook | $40.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Although violent crime in the United States has declined over the past five years, certain groups appear to remain at disproportionately high risk for violent victimization. In the United States, people with developmental disabilities—such as mental retardation, autism, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and severe learning disabilities may be included in this group. While the scientific evidence is scanty, a handful of studies from the United States, Canada, Australia, and Great Britain consistently find high rates of violence and abuse affecting people with these kinds of disabilities.

A number of social and demographic trends are converging that may worsen the situation considerably over the next several years. The prevalence of developmental disabilities has increased in low-income populations, due to a number of factors, such as poor prenatal nutrition, lack of access to health care or better perinatal care for some fragile babies, and increases in child abuse and substance abuse during pregnancy. For example, a recent report of the California State Council on Developmental Disabilities found that during the past decade, while the state population increased by 20 percent, the number of persons with developmental disabilities in California increased by 52 percent and the population segment with mild mental retardation doubled.
Because of a growing concern among parents and advocates regarding possible high rates of crime victimization among persons with developmental disabilities, Congress, through the Crime Victims with Disabilities Awareness Act of 1998, requested that the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences conduct a study to increase knowledge and information about crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities that will be useful in developing new strategies to reduce the incidence of crimes against those individuals. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities summarizes the workshop and addresses the following issues:
(1) the nature and extent of crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities;
(2) the risk factors associated with victimization of individuals with developmental disabilities;
(3) the manner in which the justice system responds to crimes against individuals with disabilities; and
(4) the means by which states may establish and maintain a centralized computer database on the incidence of crimes against individuals with disabilities within a state.
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!