National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7. Calibration of the Long Form to ACS Output
Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×

Page 47

8

Conclusion

The thought pieces, discussant papers, and floor discussions all contributed to a productive interchange of ideas, with creative suggestions, not so much on how to resolve but rather on how to frame and provide perspectives to the many issues raised. Many of the questions raised have an empirical aspect, therefore answers will have to wait until more data are collected. The presenters provided key benefits in addressing the questions raised about alternative approaches and the underlying assumptions, illustrative methodologies used in comparable situations, and the advantages and disadvantages of these different methods.

One area of particular interest involved fund allocation programs, for which the ACS will provide increased opportunities for timely allocation of public funds at low levels of geographic aggregation. Participants argued for the importance of educating legislators about the unintended negative aspects of interactions of funding formulas and the distributional attributes of the estimates used in these formulas.

Participants generally agreed on the importance of the ACS, which under current plans (and assuming that the proposed budgets are realized) will become the main vehicle for collection of long-form-type data on a continuing basis. This potential role underscored the important issue as to who sets the policies for access to the ACS. That is, who will decide on the content of the ACS questionnaire, either as supplements, special subject modules, or as a series of screener questions to target specific groups, and at what cost? Will the ACS be treated similarly to other census surveys, that is, subject to Census Bureau constraints on data sharing, especially addresses of target groups of

Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×

Page 48

interest to other agencies, due to concerns about privacy and confidentiality? In effect, will the ACS have all of the characteristics of “census confidential” and the attendant problems of restricted access to microdata by outside agencies?

The question of how often to redesign household surveys on the basis of the updated ACS address list is also a policy matter, though it will have methodological features as well. Quality assurance and timing of the associated master address file updates are also important elements and therefore will require further attention.

In his concluding remarks as chair, John Rolph urged that this workshop be the first step in a continuing process of addressing the many statistical issues raised relative to undertaking the ACS. He said that the Committee on National Statistics would like to be as helpful as possible as the process of designing and fielding the ACS unfolds. Such activities might include committee-sponsored workshops focused on specific issues that need to be addressed at particular points in the design process. He invited the workshop participants to send in their ideas and suggestions for further activities.

Although the workshop was successful in generating valuable initial ideas and discussion on how to address some interesting and difficult methodological problems raised by the ACS, it is important to note that not all important methodological problems were raised. Several issues that were not raised or mentioned only briefly were: (1) additional approaches to combining information from the ACS, household surveys, and administrative records that could also be examined, especially variance component models; (2) methods to treat undercoverage in the ACS, particularly methods for using demographic analysis to address undercoverage in the ACS, and also to use the ACS to improve demographic analysis; (3) further examination of the issues raised through use of incompatible definitions in the ACS, the decennial census, and household surveys; (4) the development of estimates that (a) sum to estimates at higher levels of geographic aggregation and (b) more closely approximate direct estimates at higher levels of aggregation, along with the release of direct estimates at higher levels of aggregation—in the event that aggregate estimates are not constrained to (approximately) equal direct estimates (and also the release of direct estimates at lower levels of aggregation for analysis purposes); (5) the evaluation of the quality of the estimates from the ACS, especially given that no long form is planned after the 2000 census and therefore external evaluation opportunities will be very limited; (6) the need for specific ideas for developing models for borrowing strength from household surveys and administrative records to assist the ACS in the estimation of various outputs; (7) weighting ACS output to produce estimates that are consistent with the recognized estimates from existing household surveys; (8) using information from the ACS to develop models to effectively reduce the sample size requirements of existing household surveys and still produce estimates of

Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×

Page 49

the same quality; and (9) coordinating estimates between the ACS and the decennial census short-form in 2010, 2020, and so on for statistics that can be generated from the short-form items alone. These issues were at most touched on at the workshop.

In addition, as noted above, some of the issues that were discussed cannot be fully addressed until the full ACS is collected, and they may require more research. Examples include (1) the development of time-series combination-of-information models; (2) problems raised through the planned addition of questions to the ACS questionnaire, especially the effect on the quality of the information collected for the other questions; and (3) the formation of the model needed to calibrate the long form to the ACS.

This workshop helped to identify a number of interesting and important problems, many of which will have much broader application than the ACS. The workshop succeeded in making the attendees aware of these problems, and raising for discussion promising avenues for their solution.

Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×

Page 50

Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"8. Conclusion." National Research Council. 2001. The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10051.
×
Page 50
Next: Appendix: An Example of Combining Information »
The American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The American Community Survey (ACS), to be run by the Census Bureau, will be a large (250,000 housing units a month), predominantly mailout/mailback survey that will collect information similar to that on the decennial census long form. The development of this new survey raises interesting questions about methods used for combining information from surveys and from administrative records, weighting to treat nonresponse and undercoverage, estimation for small areas, sample design, and calibration of the output from this survey with that from the long form. To assist the Census Bureau in developing a research agenda to address these and other methodological issues, the Committee on National Statistics held a workshop on September 13, 1998. This report summarizes that workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!