Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

LoginRegister

| Items in cart [0]

PAPERBACK
price:$34.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

Free Resources

Related Titles

Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas (2001)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format
Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.
Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book.
Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Citation Manager

. "References." Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

Please select a format:

Page
24


E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

Page 24

environmental models with search and optimisation algorithms. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 23 : 9-26.

Miller, H.J. 1996. GIS and geometric representation in facility location problems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 10 : (7) 791-816.

Mirecki, J.E., Campbell, B.G., Conlon, K.J., and Petkewich, M.D. 1998. Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone clastic aquifer, Ground Water 36 : 394-403.

Murray, A.T., Church, R.L., Gerrard, R.A., and Tsui, W.S. 1998. Impact models for siting undesirable facilities. Papers in Regional Science 77 : 19-36.

National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Ground water recharge using waters of impaired quality. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Pyne, R.D.G. 1995. Groundwater recharge and wells: a guide to aquifer storage recovery. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers.

Reynolds, K.M., Jensen, M., Andreasen, J. and Goodman, I. 1999. Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 23 : 315-334.

South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2000. Everglades Consolidated Report. West Palm Beach, FL: SFWMD.

Thomas, J.M., McKay, W.A., Cole, E., Landmeyer, J.E., and Bradley, P.M. 2000. The fate of haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes in an aquifer storage and recovery program, Las Vegas, Nevada. Ground Water 38 : 605-614.

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1999. C&SF Restudy final integrated feasibility report and programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS). Jacksonville, FL: USACE.

Wagner, B.J. 1995. Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling. Rev. Geophys. Supp., p. 1021-1028.