National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Summary and Conclusions
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10061.
×

Page 23

References

Anderson, M.P. and Woessner, W.W. 1992 . Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.

Aquifer Storage and Recovery Issue Team. 1999. Assessment report and comprehensive strategy: a report to the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Working Group. [Online]. Available: http://www.sfrestore.org/teams/asr/documents/asrreport.htm [2000, November 17].

Bradbury, K.R. and Krohelski, J.T. 1999. A regional groundwater model as a tool for evaluating the impacts of urbanization. Geol. Soc. of Amer. Abstr. with Prog. 31(7): A-156.

Cacas, M.C., Ledoux, E., de Marsily, G., Tillie, B., Barbreau, A., Durand, E., Feuga, B., and Peaudecerf, P. 1990. Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: calibration and validation. 2. The transport model. Water Resources Res. 26 : 491-500.

CH2M Hill. 1989. Construction and resting of the aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) demonstration project for Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Report for the South Florida Water Management District.

General Accounting Office. 2000. Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: additional water quality projects may be needed and could increase costs. GAO/T-RCED-00-297.

Haight, R.G., Revelle, C.S., and Snyder, S.A. 2000. An integer optimization approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Operations Research 48 : (5) 697-708.

Johnston, R.H. and Bush, P.W. 1988. Summary of the hydrology of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and in parts of Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1403-A. Reston, Va.: U.S. Geological Survey.

Kindinger, J.L., Davis, J.B., and Flocks, J.G. 1999. Geology and evolution of lakes in north-central Florida. Environmental Geology 38: 301-323.

Kipp, K.L., Jr. 1997. Guide to the revised heat and solute transport simulator, HST3D--Version 2: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4157. Reston, Va.: U.S. Geological Survey.

Kwiatkowski, P. 2000a. ASR pilot projects for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). Presentation to the Committee on Restoration of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem (CROGEE). Miami, FL, October 19, 2000.

Kwiatkowski, P. 2000b. Draft meeting summary, Project Delivery Team meeting for Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro ASR pilot projects. West Palm Beach, FL, November 13,2000.

Landmeyer J.E., Bradley, P.M., and Thomas, J.M. 2000. Biodegradation of disinfection byproducts as a potential removal process during aquifer storage recovery. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36 : 861-867 Long, J.C. and Billeaux, D.M. 1987. From field data to fracture network modeling: an example incorporating spatial structure. Water Resources Res. 23 : 1201-1216 .

Matthews, K.B., Sibbald, A.R. and Craw, S. 1999. Implementation of a spatial decision support system for rural land use planning: integrating geographic information system and

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10061.
×

Page 24

environmental models with search and optimisation algorithms. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 23 : 9-26.

Miller, H.J. 1996. GIS and geometric representation in facility location problems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 10 : (7) 791-816.

Mirecki, J.E., Campbell, B.G., Conlon, K.J., and Petkewich, M.D. 1998. Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone clastic aquifer, Ground Water 36 : 394-403.

Murray, A.T., Church, R.L., Gerrard, R.A., and Tsui, W.S. 1998. Impact models for siting undesirable facilities. Papers in Regional Science 77 : 19-36.

National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Ground water recharge using waters of impaired quality. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Pyne, R.D.G. 1995. Groundwater recharge and wells: a guide to aquifer storage recovery. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers.

Reynolds, K.M., Jensen, M., Andreasen, J. and Goodman, I. 1999. Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 23 : 315-334.

South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2000. Everglades Consolidated Report. West Palm Beach, FL: SFWMD.

Thomas, J.M., McKay, W.A., Cole, E., Landmeyer, J.E., and Bradley, P.M. 2000. The fate of haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes in an aquifer storage and recovery program, Las Vegas, Nevada. Ground Water 38 : 605-614.

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1999. C&SF Restudy final integrated feasibility report and programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS). Jacksonville, FL: USACE.

Wagner, B.J. 1995. Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling. Rev. Geophys. Supp., p. 1021-1028.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10061.
×

Page 25

APPENDIXES

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10061.
×
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10061.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10061.
×
Page 25
Next: Appendix A: Workshop Agenda »
Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas Get This Book
×
 Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is a process by which water is recharged through wells to an aquifer and extracted for beneficial use at some later time from the same wells. ASR is proposed as a major water storage component in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), developed jointly by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The plan would use the Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA) to store as much as 1.7 billion gallons per day (gpd) (6.3 million m3/day) of excess surface water and shallow groundwater during wet periods for recovery during seasonal or longer-term dry periods, using about 333 wells. ASR represents about one-fifth of the total estimated cost of the CERP.

Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan examines pilot project from the perspective of adaptive assessment, i.e., the extent to which the pilot projects will contribute to process understanding that can improve design and implementation of restoration project components. This report is a critique of the pilot projects and related studies.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!