ter and EPA's proposed schedule for regulatory implementation of the new standards (Table 1.1), Congress mandated and appropriated substantial funds for EPA to conduct a major research program to reduce the scientific uncertainties. It also directed the EPA administrator to arrange for the NRC to provide independent guidance for planning the research program and monitoring its implementation. Specifically, the committee was charged to assess research priorities, and develop a conceptual research plan, and monitor research progress made over the 5 years 1998-2002 toward improved understanding of the relationships among airborne PM, its various sources, and its effects on public health.
TABLE 1.1 EPA's Review and Implementation Timetable for Particulate-Matter Standardsa
|
Past Actions |
|
|
1971 |
EPA issues TSP NAAQS |
|
1979-1987 |
Criteria and standards are reviewed |
|
1987 |
EPA issues PM10 NAAQS |
|
1994-1997 |
Criteria and standards are reviewed |
|
1997 |
EPA issues PM2.5 and revised PM10 NAAQSs |
|
1999 |
EPA designates areas as “unclassifiable” regarding attainment of NAAQS for PM2.5 |
|
1998-2000 |
PM2.5 monitors are placed nationwide |
|
Planned Actions |
|
|
1998-2003 |
PM2.5 monitoring data to be collected nationwide |
|
2002 |
EPA will complete 5-year scientific review of PM2.5 standards, leading to possible revision |
|
2002-2005 |
EPA will designate nonattainment areas for PM2.5 |
|
2005-2008 |
States will submit implementation plans for meeting PM2.5 standard. |
|
2012-2017 |
States will have up to 10 years and two 1-year extensions to meet PM2.5 standards |
|
a The impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on this timetable is unknown. That decision is pending at the time of completion of this report. |
|