Alternative Technologies to Replace Antipersonnel Landmines

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

LoginRegister

| Items in cart [0]

PAPERBACK
price:$42.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

Free Resources

Related Titles

Alternative Technologies to Replace Antipersonnel Landmines (2001)
Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems (CETS)

Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format
Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.
Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book.
Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Citation Manager

. "Appendix F: Signatories to the Ottawa Convention and Their Alternatives to Landmines." Alternative Technologies to Replace Antipersonnel Landmines. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

Please select a format:

Page
117


E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

Page 117

The following 30 countries have signed the convention but have not ratified it and, therefore, are not yet parties to the convention:

Algeria	Chile	Guinea-Bissau	Malta	Sudan
Angola	Cook Islands	Guyana	Marshall Islands	Suriname
Brunei Darussalam	Cyprus	Haiti	Poland	Ukraine
Burundi	Ethiopia	Indonesia	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	Uruguay
Cameroon	Gambia	Kenya	São Tomé e Principe	Vanuatu
Cape Verde	Greece	Lithuania	Sierra Leone	Zambia

The following countries had not signed the convention as of December 2000:

Afghanistan	D.R. Congo	Korea, North	Myanmar (Burma)	Sri Lanka
Armenia	Egypt	Korea, South	Nepal	Syria
Azerbaijan	Eritrea	Kuwait	Nigeria	Tonga
Bahrain	Estonia	Kyrgyzstan	Oman	Turkey
Belarus	Finland	Laos	Pakistan	Tuvalu
Bhutan	Georgia	Latvia	Palau	United Arab Emirates
Central African Republic	India	Lebanon	Papua New Guinea	United States of America
China	Iran	Libya	Russia	Uzbekistan
Comoros	Iraq	Micronesia	Saudi Arabia	Vietnam
Congo (Brazzaville)	Israel	Mongolia	Singapore	Yugoslavia
Cuba	Kazakhstan	Morocco	Somalia

REFERENCES

CDND (Canadian Department of National Defence). 1998. Ministers Announce Creation of Centre for Mine-Action Technologies, News Release, August 25, 1998. Available on line: http://www.dnd.ca/eng/archive/1998/aug98/centremat_n_e.htm.

Fredenburg, P.W. 1997. The banning of the antipersonnel landmine. Canadian Defence Quarterly 27(2): 5–9.

ICBL (International Campaign to Ban Landmines). 1999. Landmine Monitor Report 1999: Toward a Mine-Free World. Washington, D.C.: Human Rights Watch.

ICBL. 2000. Landmine Monitor Report 2000: Toward a Mine-Free World. Washington, D.C.: Human Rights Watch.

Metal Storm. 2000a. Landmine replacement a step closer to reality. Available on line: http://www.metalstorm-ltd.com/press_releases/july03-00.html.

Metal Storm. 2000b. Metal Storm secures Australian Army support for minefield replacement development programme. Available on line: http://www.metalstorm-ltd.com/press_releases/july07-00.html.

Roy, R.L., and S. Friesen. 1999. Historical Uses of Antipersonnel Landmines: Impact on Land Force Operations. Operational Research Division, Research Note 9906. Kingston, Ontario: Canadian Department of National Defence.