National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Promising Areas for Future Research
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×

Page 49

References

Abt Associates 1993 Prosecuting Criminal Enterprises: Federal Offenses and Offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Bayley, D. 1998 Policing in America: Assessment and prospects. In Ideas in American Policing. Washington DC: The Police Foundation.

Boland, B. 1998 Community prosecution: Portland's experience. In Community Justice: An Emerging Field, David Karp, Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefied.

Bureau of Justice Statistics 1998a Felony defendents in large urban counties, 1994. NCJ #167234, B.A. Reaves. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

1998b Prosecutors in State Courts, 1996 . NCJ #170092, C. DeFrances and G. Steadman. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

2000 Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, 1998. NCJ #180258. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Connors, E., T. Lundregan, N. Miller, and T. McEwen. 1996 Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Durkheim, Emile 1964 The Division of Labor in Society. Simpson Translation. New York: The Free Press.

Dwyer, J., P. Neufeld, and B. Scheck. 2000 Actual Innocence: Five Days to Execution and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted. New York: Doubleday.

Ford, D.A., and M.J. Regoli 1993 The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters: Process, problems, and effects. In Legal Responses to Wife Assault: Current Trends and Evaluation (Volume 127) , pp.151-157, N. Zoe Hilton, ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×

Page 50

Forst, B. 1995 Prosecution and sentencing. In Crime, Joan Petersilia and James Q. Wilson, eds. pp. 363-386. San Francisco: ICS.

1999 Prosecutions Coming of Age. Paper delivered to the Committee on Law and Justice, National Research Council, Workshop on Prosecution. American University.

Forst, B., and K. Brosi 1977 A theoretical and empirical analysis of the prosecutor. Journal of Legal Studies 6 : 177-191.

Gramckow, H., and E. Tompkins 1999 Enabling Prosecutors to Address Drug, Gang, and Youth Violence . Available: http:// www.ncjrs.org/html/ojjdp/jjbul9912-2/contents.html [accessed February 27, 2001].

Harcourt, B.E. 1998. Michigan Law Review 97(2).

Heymann, Philip 2001 The New Policing. Fordham Urban Law Journal 28(2).

Kennedy, D.M. 1999 Boston proves something can be done. Washington Post Outlook May 23.

Liebman, J., J. Fagan, and V. West 2000 A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995. Available: http://justice.policy.net/jpreport/ [accessed February 27, 2001].

Mammalian, C., and N. LaVigne 1999 The use of computerized crime mapping by law enforcement. Research Preview Series. National Institute of Justice. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Mann, K. 1992 Punitive civil sanctions: The middle ground between criminal and civil law. In The Yale Law Journal 101 : 1795-1873.

McCoy, C. 1998 Prosecution. In The Handbook of Crime and Punishment, Michael Tonry, ed. , pp. 457-473. New York: Oxford University Press.

1999 Authority and Legitimacy: Fundamental Research Questions about Prosecutorial Policies. Paper delivered to the Committee on Law and Justice, National Research Council, Workshop on Prosecution. Rutgers University.

Miller, M. 1996 Drug enforcement's double edged sword: An assessment of asset forfeiture programs. In Drugs, Crime, and Justice: Contemporary Perspectives , L. Gaines and P. Kraska, eds. , pp. 275-296. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

Moore, M., S. Estrich, D. McGillis, and W. Spelman 1985 Dangerous Offenders: The Elusive Target of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×

Page 51

National Institute of Justice 1999 What Every Law Enforcement Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Roth, J., and J. Ryan 2000 National Evaluation of the COPS Program–Title I of the 1994 Crime Act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Schroeder, W. 1996 Civil forfeiture: Recent Supreme Court cases. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 65 (10) : 28-32.

Sherman, L. 1998 Evidence-based policing. In Ideas in American Policing. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.

Sherman, L., and D. Weisburd 1995 General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly 12(4): 625-648.

Skogan, W. 1990 Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Cities. New York: Free Press.

Skogan, W., S.M. Hartnett, J. Dubois, J.T. Comey, K. Twedt-Ball, and J.E. Gudell 2000 Public Involvement: Community Policing in Chicago. National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Stephen, J.F. 1883 A History of the Criminal Law of England. New York: Garland Publishers.

Stith, K., and J. Cabranes 1998 Fear of Judging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stone, C., and N. Turner 1999 Politics, Public Service, and Professionalism: Conflicting Themes in the Invention and Evaluation of Community Prosecution. Paper delivered to the Committee on Law and Justice, National Research Council, Workshop on Prosecution. Vera Institute of Justice, New York.

Sullum, J. 1999 Prison conversion. Reason Online (August/September).

Tonry, M. 1991 Public prosecution and hydro engineering. Minnesota Law Review 75: 971.

Tumin, Z. 1990 Summary of Proceedings: Findings and Discoveries of the Harvard University Executive Session for State and Local Prosecutors at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, 1986-1990. Unpublished paper, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

U.S. Department of Justice 2001 Mission Statement of the U.S. Attorneys. Available: http://www.usdoj.gov/ usaos.html [accessed March 21, 2001].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×

Page 52

Vorenberg, J. 1981 Decent restraint ofprosecutorial discretion. Harvard Law Review 94 (May)(7): 1521-1573 .

Warchol, G. , and B. Johnson 1996 Guilty property: A quantitative analysis of civil asset forfeiture. American Journal of Criminal Justice 21: 61-81.

Wilson, J.Q., and G.L. Kelling 1989 Making Neighborhoods Safe. The Atlantic Monthly February.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10114.
×
Page 52
Next: Appendix A Workshop Agenda »
What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop Get This Book
×
 What's Changing in Prosecution?: Report of a Workshop
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This workshop arose out of the efforts of the Committee on Law and Justice to assist the National Institute of Justice in identifying gaps in the overall research portfolio on crime and justice. It was designed to develop ideas about the kinds of knowledge needed to gain a better understanding of the prosecution function and to discuss the past and future role of social science in advancing our understanding of modern prosecution practice. The Committee on Law and Justice was able to bring together senior scholars who have been working on this subject as well as current or former chief prosecutors, judges, and senior officials from the U.S. Department of Justice to share their perspectives. Workshop participants mapped out basic data needs, discussed the need to know more about recent innovations such as community prosecution, and discussed areas where one would expect to see changes that have not occurred. The resulting report summarizes these discussions and makes useful suggestions for learning more about prosecution.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!