Page 158

References

Ahagen, H., T. Carlsson, K. Hallberg, and K. Andersson. 1999. The Oskarshamn model for public involvement in the siting of nuclear facilities. In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risk, Stockholm, June 13–17. K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult.

Ahearne, J. 1997. Radioactive waste: The size of the problem. Physics Today. Vol. 50. No. 6. Pp. 24–29. June.

Äikäs, T. 1999. Underground research facilities: Enhancing public confidence for geologic repositories. In Proceedings of the Conference on Geologic Repositories: Facing Common Challenges, Denver, Colo., October 31–November 3. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. Pp. 95–96.

AkEnd. 1999. Arbeitskreis Auswahlverfahren Endlagerstandorte [on-line]. Available at: http://www.akend.de .

Albrecht, S.L., R.G. Amey, and S. Amir. 1996. The siting of radioactive waste facilities: What are the effects on communities? Rural Sociology. Vol. 61. No. 4. Pp. 649–673. Winter.

Allen, P.T., and J. Marston. 1993. Public Information Campaign to Support a Proposed National Deep Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste. Interim Report to the European Commission. RI/93/PSY/003. Guildford, U.K.: Robens Institute of Health and Safety, University of Surrey.

Amy, Douglas J. 1987. The Politics of Environmental Mediation. New York: Columbia University Press.

Andersson, K. 1999. Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks. Stockholm, June 13–17, K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult.

ANDRA (National Agency for Radioactive Waste Management). 1998. International Workshop on Retrievability, Paris, November 25–27.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 158
Page 158 References Ahagen, H., T. Carlsson, K. Hallberg, and K. Andersson. 1999. The Oskarshamn model for public involvement in the siting of nuclear facilities. In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risk, Stockholm, June 13–17. K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. Ahearne, J. 1997. Radioactive waste: The size of the problem. Physics Today. Vol. 50. No. 6. Pp. 24–29. June. Äikäs, T. 1999. Underground research facilities: Enhancing public confidence for geologic repositories. In Proceedings of the Conference on Geologic Repositories: Facing Common Challenges, Denver, Colo., October 31–November 3. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. Pp. 95–96. AkEnd. 1999. Arbeitskreis Auswahlverfahren Endlagerstandorte [on-line]. Available at: http://www.akend.de . Albrecht, S.L., R.G. Amey, and S. Amir. 1996. The siting of radioactive waste facilities: What are the effects on communities? Rural Sociology. Vol. 61. No. 4. Pp. 649–673. Winter. Allen, P.T., and J. Marston. 1993. Public Information Campaign to Support a Proposed National Deep Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste. Interim Report to the European Commission. RI/93/PSY/003. Guildford, U.K.: Robens Institute of Health and Safety, University of Surrey. Amy, Douglas J. 1987. The Politics of Environmental Mediation. New York: Columbia University Press. Andersson, K. 1999. Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks. Stockholm, June 13–17, K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. ANDRA (National Agency for Radioactive Waste Management). 1998. International Workshop on Retrievability, Paris, November 25–27.

OCR for page 158
Page 159 Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). 1999. System Scenarios and Integration. ANL-9915. Chicago: ANL. Armour, A.M. (Ed). 1991. The Siting of Locally Unwanted Land Uses: Towards a Cooperative Approach. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Research (AECL). 1991. Moral and Ethical Issues Related to the Nuclear Fuel Waste Disposal Concept. Technical Record TR-549. COG-91-140. Chalk River, Ontario: SDDO-AECL Research. Avolahti, J., and J. Vira. 1999. Imaging the risks, risking the image: Social impact assessment of the final disposal facility. In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks, Stockholm, June 13–17, K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. Bacon, F. 1605. The Advancement of Learning. Quoted in Bartlett's Familiar Quotations. 16th edition. P. 178. 1992. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Balter, M. 2000. Tracking the human fallout from “mad cow disease.” Science. Vol. 289 . Pp.1452–1454. September 1. Barthe, Y., and C. Mays. [In press] Communication and information in France's underground laboratory siting process: clarity of procedure, ambivalence of effects. Journal of Risk Research. Bataille, C. 1993. Mission de Médiation sur l'Implantation de Laboratoires de Recherche Souterrains. Rapport au Premier Ministre. Paris: La Documentation Française. Battelle Northwest Laboratory (BNWL). 1974. High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Alternatives. 4 vol. BNWL-1900. Richland, Wash.: Pacific Northwest Laboratories. May. Benson, A. 2001. Information provided by U.S. DOE Yucca Mountain Project. E-mail from Allen Benson@notes.ymp.gov. March 3. Bernard, P. 1999. Comments made at DOE International Conference on Geologic Repositories: Facing the Challenge, Denver, Colo. November 1–2. Bernstein, P. 1996. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Blowers, A., and P. Leroy. 1994. Power, politics and environmental inequality: A theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of “peripheralisation.” Environmental Politics. Vol. 3. No. 2. Pp. 197–228. Summer. Blowers, A., D. Lowry, and B.D. Solomon. 1991. The International Politics of Nuclear Waste. New York: St. Martin's Press. Bonne, A., M. Raynal, P. Dyck, and K.W. Han. 1999. Factors of consideration for multinational approaches in spent fuel storage and radioactive waste disposal. In: Proceedings of European Nuclear Society Topseal '99, Antwerp, Belgium. Bredell, P.J., and H.D. Fuchs. 1996. An approach towards international high level waste management. In: Proceedings of 7th High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference. Las Vegas, Nev. Pp. 486–488. Bredell, P.J., and H. Fuchs. 1997. International cooperation with regard to regional repositories for radioactive waste disposal. International Atomic Energy Agency International Symposium on Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Reactor Strategies: Adjusting to New Realities. Vienna.

OCR for page 158
Page 160 Brewitz, W., T. Rothfuchs, F. Huertas, and B. Neerdael. 1999. In-situ testing of underground barrier systems in view of PA-relevant parameters. In: Proceedings of Euradwaste 1999, Luxembourg, November 15–18. EUR 19143. Pp. 282–296. Brown, R., H.R. Geerstsen, and R.S. Krannich. 1989. Community satisfaction and social integration in a boomtown: A longitudinal analysis. Rural Sociology. Vol. 54 . Pp. 568–586. Bullen, D. 1999. Impact of waste form on repository development. In Proceedings of the Conference on Geologic Repositories: Facing Common Challenges, Denver, Colo., October 31–November 3. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. P. 135. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA). 1998. Nuclear Fuel Waste Management and Disposal Concept (Seaborn Report). Report of the Nuclear Fuel Waste Management and Disposal Concept Environmental Assessment Panel. B. Seaborn (chairman). Canada: CEAA. February. Carlsson, T., K. Hallberg, K. Andersson, and H. Åhagen. 1999. The Political and Public Perspective on Radioactive Waste Management at Oskarshamn, Sweden. In: Proceedings of Euradwaste 1999, Luxembourg, November 15-18. EUR 19143. Pp. 80–86. Carter, L.J., and T.H. Pigford. 1999. Confronting the Paradox in Plutonium Policies. Issues in Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). 2000 Managing the Global Nuclear Materials Threat—Policy Recommendations. A Report of the CSIS Project on Global Nuclear Materials Management. Washington, D.C.: CSIS. January. Chalmers, J., D. Easterling, J. Flynn, C. Fowler, J. Gervers, R. Halstead, R.E. Kasperson, R. Krannich, H. Kunreuther, R. Little, C.K. Mertz, A. Mushkatel, K.D. Pijawka, P. Slovic, and J. Williams. 1993. State of Nevada Socioeconomic Studies of Yucca Mountain 1986–1992. NWPO-SE-056-93 . Carson City, Nev.: Nuclear Waste Project Office. June. Chapman, N.A., I.G. McKinley, M.E. Shea, and J.A. Smellie. 1990. The Pocos de Caldas Project: Summary and Implications for Radioactive Waste Management. SKB Technical Report TR-84-16. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. Charron S., H. Mansoux, and J. Brenot. 1999. Perception des Risques et de la Sécurité: Résultats du Sondage d'Octobre 1999. Note SEGR 99/116. Fontenay aux Roses: Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire. November. Cochran, T., and C. Paine. 1998. Proposal for Augmenting Funding for the Disposition of Russian Excess Plutonium. Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Defense Council. Côme, B., and N.A. Chapman (Eds.). 1986a. 1st Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting, Brussels, November 1985. CEC Nuclear Science and Technology Reports. EUR 10315. Luxembourg: Commission of European Communities. Côme, B., and N.A. Chapman (Eds.). 1986b. 2nd Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting, Interlaken, June. CEC Nuclear Science and Technology Reports. EUR 10671. Luxembourg: Commission of European Communities. Côme, B., and N.A. Chapman (Eds.). 1989. 3rd Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting, Snowbird, Utah, June 1988. CEC Nuclear Science and Technology Reports. EUR 11725. Luxembourg: Commission of European Communities.

OCR for page 158
Page 161 Côme, B., and N.A. Chapman (Eds.) 1991. 4th Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting and Pocos De Caldas Project Final Workshop. Pitlochry, Scotland, June 18–22, 1990. CEC Nuclear Science and Technology Reports. EUR 13014. Luxembourg: Commission of European Communities. Cook, B., J.L. Emel, and R.E. Kasperson. 1990. Organizing and managing radioactive waste as an experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Vol. 9. No. 3. Pp. 339–366. Summer. Curado, M.P., N.S. Costa, and S. Helou. 1991. Psychological aspects of the radiation aspects of the radiation accident in Goiânia: A general overview on victims and populations. In: The Medical Basis for Radiation-Accident Preparedness. Vol. III. The Psychological Perspective, R.C., Ricks, M.E. Berger, and F.M. O'Hara, Jr. (Eds.). New York: Elsevier. Cvetkovich, G., and R.E. Löfstedt (Eds.) 1999. Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London: Earthscan. Dejhonge, P. 1999. Funding for long-term storage. Comments made at the Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste through Geological Isolation, National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif. November 4—5. Dobbs, M. 2000. Washington Post. March 11. P. A13. Diamond, J. 1999. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Dreyfus, D.A. 1999. Comments on the status of U.S. policy for the long-term management of high-level radioactive waste. Presentation to the Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Through Geological Isolation, National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif., November 4–5. Drottz-Sjöberg, B.M. 1999. Divergent views on a possible nuclear repository in the community: Social aspects of decision-making. In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks, Stockholm, June 13–17. K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. Easterling, D., and H. Kunreuther. 1995. The Dilemma of Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Depository (Studies in Risk and Uncertainty). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Edelstein, M.R. 1988. Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure. Boulder, Colo.: Westview. English, M.R. 1992. Siting Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities. Chapter 3. New York: Quorum Books. English, M.R. 1999. Who are the stakeholders in environmental risk decisions?... How should they be involved? In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks, Stockholm, June 13–17, K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. European Commission (EC). 1998 OKLO Working Group. Proceedings of the First Joint EC-CEA Workshop on the OKLO-Natural Analogue Phase II Project Sites, Spain, June 18–20, 1997. EUR 18314. European Union (EU). 1999. Eurobarometer 50.0. Europeans and Radioactive Waste. Directorate General Education and Culture. Center for the Citizen. Public Opinion Analysis. Brussels. January 29.

OCR for page 158
Page 162 European Union (EU) 2000. Organization of Radioactive Waste Management [on-line]. http://www.rmu-eu.org/en/index.asp. Fabryka-Martin, J.T., A.V. Wolfsberg, S.S. Levy, J.L. Roach, S.T. Winters, L.E. Wolfsberg, D. Elmore, and P. Sharma. 1998. Distribution of fast hydrologic paths in the unsaturated zone at Yucca Mountain. Proceedings: 8th Annual International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Ill. Pp. 93–96. Fiorino, D.J. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values. Vol. 15 . Pp. 226–243 . Flynn, J., W. Burns, C.K. Mertz, and P. Slovic. 1992. Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: Analysis of a structural model. Risk Analysis. Vol. 12. No. 3. Pp. 417–429. September. Flynn, J., P. Slovic, and C.K. Mertz. 1993. Decidedly different: Expert and public views of risks from a radioactive waste repository. Risk Analysis. Vol. 13. No. 6. Pp. 643–648 . December. Flynn, J., J. Chalmers, D. Easterling, R. Kasperson, H. Kunreuther, C.K. Mertz, A. Mushkatel, K.D. Pijawka, and P. Slovic. 1995. One Hundred Centuries of Solitude: Redirecting America's High-Level Nuclear Waste Policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Foster, K.R., P. Veccia, and M.H. Repacholi. 2000. Science and the precautionary principle. Science. May 12. Vol. 288 . Pp. 979-981. Friedman, S.M., K. Villamil, R.A. Suriano, and B.P. Egolf. 1996. Alar and apples: Newspapers, risk and media responsibility. Public Understanding of Science. Vol. 5. No. 1. Pp. 1–20. Gavela, R. 1999 Impacts of fuel cycle/waste form on repository development. In Proceedings of the Conference on Geologic Repositories: Facing Common Challenges, Denver, Colo., October 31–November 3. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. Pp. 125–126. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1989. Nuclear Waste: DOE's Management of Single-Shell Tanks at Hanford, Washington. GAO/RCED-89-157. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1998. Nuclear Waste: Understanding of Waste Migration at Hanford Is Inadequate for Key Decisions. GAO/RCED-98-80. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. March. Grunwald, A. 2000. Technology policy between long-term planning requirements and short-ranged acceptance problems. New challenges for technology assessment. In: Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st-Century Society, J. Grin and A. Grunwald (Eds.). New York: Springer. Hensing, I. 1996. Ansätze einer internationalen Entsorgung hochradioaktiver Abfälle. München: Oldenbourg Verlag. Hine, D.W., and R. Summers. 1996. Perceived risks of nuclear fuel waste disposal: Trust, compensation, and public acceptance in Canada. In: Proceedings: Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes, Winnipeg. September 16–19. Hinman, G.W., E.A. Rosa, R.R. Kleinhesselink, and T.C. Lowinger. 1993. Perceptions of nuclear and other risks in Japan and the United States. Risk Analysis. Vol. 13. No. 4. Pp. 499–455. August.

OCR for page 158
Page 163 Holling, C.S. (Ed.). 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York: Wiley. Hollister, C.D., and S. Nadis. 1998. Burial of radioactive waste under the seabed. Scientific American. Vol. 278. No. 1. Pp. 60–65. House of Lords. 1999. Management of Nuclear Waste. Report of the Select Committee on Science and Technology. Session 1998–1999 Third Report. London: The Stationery Office Limited. March. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1989. International Safeguards Aspects of Spent Fuel in Permanent Geological Repositories. EPR-13. Vienna: IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1993. Radioactive Waste Management Glossary. Vienna: IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1995a. International Co-operation on Nuclear Waste Management in the Russian Federation. Vienna: IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1995b. IAEA: Safety Fundamentals—The Principles of Radioactive Waste Management. Safety Series No. 111-F. Vienna: IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1995c. Requirements for the Safe Management of Radioactive Waste: Proceedings of a seminar held in Vienna, August 28–31 . IAEA-TECDOC-853. Vienna: IAEA. December. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1997a. Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. INFCIRC/546. Vienna: IAEA. December. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1997b. Issues in Radioactive Waste Management. 2nd Report of the Working Group on Principles and Criteria for Radioactive Waste Disposal. TECDOC 909. Vienna: IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1998. Technical, Institutional and Economic Factors Important for Developing a Multinational Radioactive Waste Repository . TECDOC-1021. Vienna: IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1999. Safety Requirements. Near Surface Disposal of Radioactive Waste. WS-R-1. Vienna: IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2000a. Radioactive Waste Management Profiles—Compilation of Data from the Waste Management Database. No. 3. Vienna: IAEA. April. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2000b. Retrievability of high-level waste and spent nuclear fuel: Proceedings of an international seminar organized by the Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and held in Saltsjöbaden, Sweden . IAEA Tecdoc 1187. Vienna. IAEA. December. Jacob, G. 1990. Site Unseen. The Politics of Siting a Nuclear Waste Repository. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC). 2000. H12: Project to Establish the Scientific and Technical Basis for HLW Disposal in Japan. Project Overview Report. JNC TN1410 2000-001. Tokai Mura: Japan. April. Jasper, J.M. 1990. Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

OCR for page 158
Page 164 Jensen, K., and R. Ewing. 2001. The Okélobondo natural fission reactor, southeast Gabon: Geology, mineralogy, and retardation of nuclear-reaction products . GSA Bulletin. Vol. 113. No. 1. Pp. 32–62. January. Jensen, M., C.-M. Larsson, S. Norrby, and M. Westerlind. 1999. The regulator's stake in a multi-stakeholder process. In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks, K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm. June 13–17, Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. Juhlin C., T. Wallroth, J. Smellie, T. Eliasson, C. Ljunggren, B. Leijon, and J. Beswick. 1998. The Very Deep Hole Concept. Geoscientific Appraisal of Conditions at Great Depth. SKB report TR 98-05. Stockholm. KASAM (Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste). 1988. Ethical Aspects on Nuclear Waste—Some Salient Points Discussed at a Seminar on Ethical Action in the Face of Uncertainty in Stockholm, Sweden, September 1987 . Statens Kärnbränslenämnd. National Board for Spent Nuclear Fuel. SKN Report 29. April. KASAM (Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste). 1998. Nuclear Waste: State of the Art Reports. Swedish Official Report Series. Vol. 68. Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste. Kasperson, R.E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H.S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J.X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis. Vol. 8. No. 2. Pp. 177–187. June. Kasperson, R.E., D. Golding, and S. Tuler. 1992. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 48 . Pp. 161–187. Kates, R.W., and B. Braine. 1983. Locus, equity, and the West Valley nuclear wastes. In: Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management, R.E. Kasperson (Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, and Hain. Pp. 94–117. Kemp, R. 1990. Why not in my backyard? A radical interpretation of public opposition to the deep disposal of radioactive waste in the United Kingdom . Environment and Planning. Vol. A22 . Pp. 1239–1258. Kemp, R. 1992. The Politics of Radioactive Waste Disposal. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press. Kemp, R. 1999. Plenary remarks at the Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Through Geological Isolation, National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif., November 4–5. Kersting, A.B., D.W. Efurd, D.L. Finnegan, D.J. Rokop, D.K. Smith, and J.L. Thompson. 1999. Migration of plutonium in ground water at the Nevada Test Site. Nature. Vol. 397 Pp. 56–59. Khakhaev, B. N., L. A. Pevzner, and V. N. Kozyrev. 1995. Problem of Highly Active Waste Disposal. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation, Berlin, September 3–7. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Vol. 1 . Pp. 705–708. Kickmaier, W., and I. McKinley. 1997. A review of research carried out in European rock laboratories. Nuclear Engineering and Design. Vol. 176 . Pp. 75–81.

OCR for page 158
Page 165 Konikow, L.F., and R.C. Ewing. 1999. Is a probabilistic performance assessment enough? Ground Water. Vol. 37. No. 4. Pp. 481–482. July 1. Kraft, M.E., and B.B. Clary. 1993. Public testimony in nuclear waste repository hearings: A content analysis. In: Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens' Views of Repository Siting, R.E. Dunlap, M.E. Kraft, and E.A. Rosa. (Eds.). Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Kunreuther, H., W. Desvouges, and P. Slovic. 1988. Nevada's predicament: Public perceptions of risk from the proposed nuclear waste repository. Environment. Vol. 30. No. 8. Pp. 16–20 , 30–33. Kunreuther, H., K. Fitzgerald, and T.D. Aarts. 1993. Siting noxious facilities: A test of the facility siting credo. Risk Analysis. Vol. 13 . No. 3. Pp. 301–318. June. Laird, F.N. 1989. The decline of deference: The political context of risk communication. Risk Analysis. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 543–550. December. Lake, R. W. (Ed.). 1987. Resolving Locational Conflicts. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research. Lake, R. W. 1994. Negotiating local autonomy. Political Geography. Vol. 13. No. 5. Pp. 423–442. LaPorte, T.R. 1994. Large technical systems, institutional surprises, and challenges to political legitimacy. Technology in Society. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 269–288. LaPorte, T. 1999 Matters of public trust and institutional constancy: On achieving legitimacy when managing hazardous programs. Presentation to the Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Through Geological Isolation, National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif. November 4–5. Laverov, N. 1999a. Technical issues associated with geological disposal. In Proceedings of the Conference on Geologic Repositories: Facing Common Challenges, Denver, Colo. , October 31-November 3. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. Pp. 61–64. Laverov, N. 1999b. Comments made at the Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Through Geological Isolation, National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif. November 4–5. Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Lesbirel, S.H., and D. Shaw. 2000. Facility siting: Issues and perspectives. In: Challenges and Issues in Facility Siting, Proceedings of a Conference. Columbia Earthscape. Lesbirel, S.H. and D. Shaw (Eds.). New York: Columbia University Press [on-line]. Available at: http://wwwc.cc.columbia.edu/sec/dlc/earthscape/rr1frame.html. Lewis, H. W., R. J. Budnitz, H.J.C. Kouts, W.B. Lowenstein, W.D. Rowe, F. von Hippel, and F. Zachariasen. 1978. Risk Assessment Group to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Report NUREG/CR-0400. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Lidskog, R. 1997. From conflict to communication? Public participation and critical communication as a solution to siting conflicts in planning for hazardous waste. Planning Practice and Research. Vol. 12. No. 3. Pp. 239–249.

OCR for page 158
Page 166 Lidskog, R., and T. Litmanen. 1997. The social shaping of radwaste management. The case of Sweden and Finland. Current Sociology. Vol. 45. No. 3. Special Issue on Environmental Disruption and Social Change. July. Linklater C.M., Y. Albinsson, W.R. Alexander, I. Casas, I.G. McKinley, and P. Sellin. 1996. A natural analogue of high pH cement pore waters from the Maqarin area of Northern Jordan: Comparison of predicted and observed trace element chemistry of U and Se. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. Vol. 21 . Pp. 59–69. Linsley, G.S., and A. Fattah. 1994. The interface between nuclear safeguards and radioactive waste disposal: Emerging issues. IAEA Bulletin. Vol.36. No.2. P. 22. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. MacLean, D. (Ed.). 1986. Values at Risk. Towata, N.J.: Rowman and Allenheld. MacLean, D., and P. Brown (Eds.). 1983. Energy and the Future. Towata, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield. Matheron, G., and de Marsily, G. 1980. Is transport in porous media always diffusive? A counter-example. Water Resources. Research. Vol. 15. No. 5. Pp. 901–917. Mays, C. 1993. What they don't know can hurt us? In: Proceedings of SAFEWASTE ‘93. Paris: European Nuclear Society. Mays, C., and M. Poumadère. 1996. Uncertain communication: Institutional discourse in nuclear waste repository siting. In: Scientific Uncertainty and Its Influence on the Public Communications Process, G. Sublet, V. Covello, and T. Tinker (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer NATO Advanced Research Series. Mays, C., V. Richard, S. Bonnefous, and C. Marris. 1998. Risk Reporting in the French Print Media at Chernobyl's Tenth Anniversary. Note Technique SEGR 98-50. Fontenay-aux-Roses: Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire. McCombie, C. 1997. Multi-national repositories—Will their time come? Nuclear Engineering International. Pp. 30–32. July. McCombie, C. 1999a. Developments in the disposal of high-level radioactive wastes. Paper Presented at the Third Australian Uranium Summit, Darwin, March 30. McCombie, C. 1999b. Pangea: A proposed global solution for the disposal of unwanted nuclear materials. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Remediation (ICEM), Nagoya, Japan. McCombie, C. 1999c. Multinational repositories: A win-win disposal strategy. In: Proceedings of European Nuclear Society Topseal '99 Conference, Antwerp, Belgium. McCombie, C., and W. Kickmaier. 1999. Underground research laboratories: Their roles in demonstrating repository concepts and communicating with the public . In: Proceedings of Euradwaste 1999, Luxembourg, November 15–18. EUR 19143. Pp. 274–281. McCombie C., P. Zuidema, and I.G. McKinley. 1991. Sufficient validation—The value of robustness in performance assessment and system design—Validation of geosphere flow and transport models (Geoval). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Pp. 598–610.

OCR for page 158
Page 167 McKinley, I., and C. McCombie. 1995. Natural analogues—A look into the future. Radwaste Magazine. P. 46. November. Miller, I., J. Black, C. McCombie, D. Pentz, and P. Zuidema. 1999. High-isolation sites for radioactive waste disposal: A fresh look at the challenge of locating safe sites for radioactive repositories . In: Proceedings of Waste Management (WM99) Conference, Tucson, Ariz. Miller, W.M., R. Alexander, N. Chapman, I. McKinley, and J. Smellie. 1994. Natural analogue studies in the geological disposal of radioactive wastes. In: Studies in Environmental Science. Vol. 57. New York: Elsevier. Also published as Nagra Technical Report 93-03. Wettingen, Switzerland: Nagra. Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Resources (MEMR). 1990. Opting for Cooperation. Report of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Facility Siting Force. Ottawa, Canada. Morgan, M.G., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Munsberg, H. 2000. Frankreich und Russland planen ein internationales Atomendlager. Berliner Zeitung. February 21. Nagra. 1980. Feasibility study for large-diameter boreholes for the deep drilling concept. Technical Report NTB 80-04. Paris: Forex Neptune SA. Nagra. 1994. Traces of the future: A video film produced by Nagra with international sponsorship. Wettingen, Switzerland: Nagra. National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). 1997. Deciding for the Future: Balancing Risks, Costs, and Benefits Fairly Across Generations. A report by a panel of the National Academy of Public Administration for the U. S. Department of Energy. Washington D.C. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 1994. Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1957. The Disposal of Radioactive Waste on Land. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1966. Review of Radioactive Waste Disposal Technology Report to the Division of Reactor Development and Technology, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1972. An Evaluation of the Concept of Storing Radioactive Waste in Bedrock Below the Savannah River Plant Site. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1989a. The Nuclear Weapons Complex: Management for Health, Safety, and the Environment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1989b. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1990. Rethinking High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal: A Position Statement of the Board on Radioactive Waste Management . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 158
Page 168 National Research Council (NRC). 1994a. Building Consensus Through Risk Assessment and Management of the Department of Energy's Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1994b. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1995. Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1996a. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1996b. Nuclear Wastes: Technologies for Separations and Transmutation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1998. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: A Potential Solution for Disposal of Transuranic Waste. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2000a. Research Needs in Subsurface Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2000b. Improving Operations and Long-Term Safety of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). [In The Drama of the Commons. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global press] Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1984. Long-Term Radiation Protection Objectives for Radioactive Waste Disposal. Expert Group Report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1985. Technical Appraisal of the Current Situation in the Field of Radioactive Waste Management. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1988. Feasibility of Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste into the Seabed. Vol. 1. Overview of Research and Conclusions. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1991a. Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Review of Safety Assessment Methods. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1991b. Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Can Long-Term Safety Be Evaluated? A Collective Opinion of the Radioactive Waste Management Committee of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee of the International Atomic Energy Agency, endorsed by the Experts for the Communitye. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

OCR for page 158
Page 169 Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1994. Environmental and ethical aspects of long-lived radioactive waste disposal. In: Proceedings of an International Workshop, Paris, September. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1995a. The Environmental and Ethical Basis of Geological Disposal—A Collective Opinion of the NEA Radioactive Waste Management Committee . Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1995b. Future Human Actions at Disposal Sites. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 70 pp. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1996. Informing the Public About Radioactive Waste Management. Proceedings of an NEA Seminar, Rauma, Finland, June 13–15. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1997a. Lessons Learnt from Ten Performance Assessment Studies. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1997b. Regulating the long-term safety of radioactive waste disposal. In: Proceedings of Conference in Cordoba, Spain. January. Madrid: Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear. 337 pp. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1998. Radioactive Waste Management Programmes in OECD/NEA Member Countries. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1999a. Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Review of Developments in the Last Decade. NEA/RWM(99)6. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. October. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1999b. Progress Towards Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Where Do We Stand? An International Assessment. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1999c. Strategic Areas in Radioactive Waste Management. Committee on Radioactive Waste Management. NEA/RWM/DOC(99)5. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. March. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1999d. Confidence in the Long-Term Safety of Deep Geological Repositories. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 2000a. An International Database of Features, Events and Processes. Report and CD Rom. ISBN 96-64-18514-3. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 2000b Stakeholder Confidence and Radioactive Waste Disposal. Workshop Proceedings, Paris, August 28–31. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 2000c. Confidence in Models of Radionuclide Transport for Site-Specific Performance Assessments. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 2000d. Regulatory Reviews of Assessments of Deep Geological Repositories—Lessons Learnt. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

OCR for page 158
Page 170 Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (NWTRB). 1996. Disposal and Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Finding the Right Balance. Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy. March. Observer. 2000. Half-life in the wilderness. Page B2. June 25. Office Parlementaire d'Evaluation des Choix Scientifiques et Technologiques. 1990. Rapport sur la Gestion des Déchets Nucléaires à Haute Activité par C. Bataille. Paris: La Documentation Française. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1982. Managing Commercial High-Level Radioactive Waste. OTA-0-172. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. April. Okrent, D. 1999. On intergenerational equity and its clash with intragenerational equity and on the need for policies to guide the regulation of disposal of wastes and other activities posing very long-term risks. Risk Analysis. Vol. 19. No. 5. Pp. 877–901. October. O'Riordan, T., R. Kemp, and M. Purdue. 1988. Sizewell B: An Anatomy of the Inquiry. London: Macmillan. O'Sullivan, P., B. McKirdy, M. Askarieh, A. Bond, and S. Russell. 1999. Environmental impact assessment and geological repositories for radioactive waste. In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks. Stockholm June 13–17. K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. Parizek, R., P. Alford, and L. Reiter. 2000. China's High-Level Nuclear Waste Management Program. Trip Report. Arlington, Va.: Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board . January. Parker, F., A. Rybalchenko, V. Velichkin, K. Compton, V. Novikov, A. Pek, V. Malkovsky, and B. Sigaev. 1999. Analysis of long term consequences of deep well injection of liquid radioactive waste at the Mining Chemical Combine, Krasnoyarsk Krai. I. Normal Scenario. Geology of Ore Deposits [Russian journal with English translation], No. 6. Pp. 20–39. Parker, F., A. Rybalchenko, V. Velichkin, K. Compton, V. Novikov, A. Pek, V. Malkovsky, and B. Sigaev. 2000. Analysis of long term consequences of deep well injection of liquid radioactive waste at the Mining Chemical Combine, Krasnoyarsk Krai. II. Hypothetical scenarios. Geology of Ore Deposits [Russian journal with English translation]. No. 1. Pp.1–20. Peelle, E. 1994. Voluntary versus directed siting—Or somewhere in-between? In: High-Level Radioactive Waste Management. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference, Las Vegas, Nev. May 22–26. La Grange Park, Ill.: American Nuclear Society. Vol. 1. Pp. 201–212. Pellaud, B., A. Bonne, M. Raynal, and K.W. Han. 1999. Important factors for multinational radioactive waste repositories. In: Proceedings of Waste Management (WM99) Conference, Tucson, Ariz. Pentz, D. 1999. PANGEA: An international repository, plenary speech. In: Proceedings of Waste Management 1999 (WM99) Conference, Tucson, Ariz. Peterson, P.E. 1998. Post-closure repository safeguards—Comprehensive assessments of excavation methods. In: Proceedings of International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management '98, Las Vegas, Nev. Pp. 735–737.

OCR for page 158
Page 171 Petterson, J.S. 1988. Perception vs. reality of radiological impact: The Goiânia model. Nuclear News. Vol. 3. No. 14. Pp. 84–90. November. Pharr, S.J., and R.D. Putnam (Eds.). 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Poumadère, M. 1991. The credibility crisis. In: Chernobyl: A Policy Response Study, B. Segerstahl (Ed). Berlin: Springer Verlag. Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee (RWMAC). 1999. The Establishment of Scientific Consensus on the Interpretation and Significance of the Results of Science Programs into Radioactive Waste Disposal. Rotterham, U.K.: DETR Publications. April. Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee (RWMAC). Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (ACSNI). 1995. Site Selection for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities and the Protection of Human Health. Report of a Study Group Drawn from Members of the Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee and the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations. Rotterham, U.K.: DETR Publications. March. Reif, K., and A. Melich. 1992. Eurobarometer 33.0: The Single European Market: Eastern Europe. Conducted Spring 1990, by INRA (Europe), Brussels. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR References Number 9518. Spring 1990. Reif, K., and A. Melich. 1993 Eurobarometer 35.0: Foreign Relations, the Common Agricultural Policy, and Environmental Concerns. Conducted Spring 1991, by INRA (Europe), Brussels. Second ICPSR. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR References Number 9697. Spring 1991. Reif, K., and A. Melich. 1995. Eurobarometer 39.1: Energy Policies, Biotechnology, and Genetic Engineering. Conducted by INRA (Europe), Brussels. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR References Number 6196 May–June 1993. Reif, K., and E. Marlier. 1997. Eurobarometer 43.1: International Trade and Radiation Protection. Conducted by INRA (Europe), Brussels. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. ICPSR References Number 6839. April–May 1995. Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann (Eds.) 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Rice, E.E., and C.C. Priest. 1981. An overview of nuclear waste disposal in space. In: The Technology of High-Level Nuclear Wastes, P.L. Hofmann. (Ed.). Vol. 1. DOE/TIC-4621. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: U.S. DOE Technical Information Center. Pp. 370–386. Richardson, P.J. 1998. A review of benefits offered to volunteer communities for siting nuclear waste facilities. Stockholm: Swedish National Co-ordinator for Nuclear Waste Disposal (M 1996:C) [on-line]. Available at: http://www.radgiv-karnavf.gov.se/publikat/incitame.htm .

OCR for page 158
Page 172 Rosa, E.A., and W.R. Freudenburg. 1993. The historical development of public reactions to nuclear power: Implications for nuclear waste policy. In: Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens' Views of Repository Siting, R.E. Dunlap, M.E. Kraft, and E.A. Rosa (Eds.). Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Rosa, E.A., R.E. Dunlap, and M.E. Kraft. 1993. Prospects for public acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository in the United States: Summary and implications. In: Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens' Views of Repository Siting, R.E. Dunlap, M.E. Kraft, and E.A. Rosa (Eds.). Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Sandman, P.M., P.M. Miller, B.B. Johnson, and N.D. Weinstein. 1993. Agency communication, community outrage, and perception of risk: Three simulation experiments. Risk Analysis. Vol. 13. No. 6. Pp. 585–599. December. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB). 1993. Earning Public Trust and Confidence: Requisites for Managing Radioactive Wastes. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. November. Shapira, J.P. 1999. Is partitioning and transmutation (P&T) an alternative to geological disposal? Presentation to the Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Through Geological Isolation. National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif. November 4–5. Short, J.F., Jr. 1999. Characterizing and Managing Environmental and Technological Risks: Some Requirements for a New Paradigm. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy. Vol. 7 . Pp. 325–355. Sjöberg, L. 1996, Risk perceptions by politicians and the public. Rhizikon Research Report. No. 23. Stockholm: Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics. Sjöberg, L. and B.M. Drottz-Sjöberg. 1994. Risk perception of nuclear waste: Experts and the public. Rhizikon Risk Research Report. No. 16. Stockholm: Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics. December. Sjöberg, L., B. Jannsson, B. Brenot, L. Frewer, A. Prades, and A. Tønnessen. 2000. Risk perception in commemoration of Chernobyl: A cross-national study. Rhizikon Risk Research Report. No. 22. Stockholm: Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics. February. Sloan, W.M. 1993. Site Selection for New Hazardous Waste Management Facilities. WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No 46. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Slovic. P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science. Vol. 236. Slovic, P. 1992. Perceptions of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: Theories of Risk, Risk, D. Golding and S. Krimsky (Eds.). New York: Praeger. Pp. 117–152. Slovic, P. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis. Vol. 13. No. 6. Pp. 675–682. December. Slovic, P., S. Lichtenstein, and S. Fischhoff. 1979. Images of disaster: Perception and acceptance of risks from nuclear power. In: Energy Risk Management, G. Goodman and W. Rowe (Eds.). London: Academic. Pp. 223–245.

OCR for page 158
Page 173 Slovic, P., M. Layman, and J.H. Flynn. 1991a. Risk perception, trust, and nuclear waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment. Vol. 33 . Pp. 6–11 , 28–30. August. Slovic, P., M. Layman, N. Kraus, J. Flynn, C. Chalmers, and G. Gesell. 1991b. Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis. Vol. 11. No. 4. Pp. 683–696. Slovic, P., J. Flynn, and M. Layman. 1991c. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science. Vol. 254 . Pp.1603–1607. Slovic, P., M. Layman, and J.H. Flynn. 1993. Perceived risk, trust and nuclear waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain. In: Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens' Views of Repository Siting, R E Dunlap, M.E. Kraft, and E. Rosa (Eds.). Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Slovic, P., J. Flynn, C.K. Mertz, M. Poumadère, and C. Mays. 2000. Nuclear power and the public: A comparative study of risk perception in France and the United States. In: Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies, O. Renn, and B. Rohrmann (Eds.). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press. Smellie, J.A.T. (Ed.). 1998. Maqarin Natural Analogue Study: Phase III. SKB Technical Report TR-98-04. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. Smellie, J.A.T., F. Karlsson, and R. Alexander. 1997. Natural analogue studies: Present status and performance assessment implications. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. Vol. 26 . Pp. 3–17. Smith, K.R. 1988. Perceptions of risks associated with nuclear power. Energy Environment Monitor. Vol. 4. No. 1. Pp. 61–70. March. Söderman, E. 1997. Controlled Long-Term Storage in CLAB. Report R-98-17. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. [in Swedish]. Stirling, A. 1999. On science and precaution in the management of technological risk. Seville: European Commission Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. EUR 19056 EN, May [on-line]. Available at: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/eur19056en.pdf. Stockholm Environment Institute. 1999. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Radioactive Waste Disposal: Health and Environmental Criteria and Standards, Stockholm, August 31–September 4, 1999. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute. Stoffle, R.W., M.W. Traugott, J.V. Stone, P.D. McIntyre, F.V. Jensen, and C.C. Davidson. 1991. Risk perception mapping: Using ethnography to define the locally affected population for a low-level radioactive waste storage facility in Michigan. American Anthropologist. Vol. 93 . Pp. 611–635. Suzuki, A. 1998. The End of the Cold War and the Emerging Nuclear Era: Global Peace Project. Conference on Global Nuclear Materials and Management. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Washington, D.C.: December 4. Suzuki, A. 2000a. Global Peace Initiative: A Proposal of International Collaboration for a More Comfortable and Healthier Nuclear Future. East Asia Nuclear Cooperation Meeting on Spent Fuel Storage and Disposal. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (sponsor). Las Vegas: March 7–9. Suzuki, A. 2000b. Strategic view on back end of nuclear fuel cycle. Flexibility and transparency are the key. In: Workshop for Asia Nuclear Experts on Transparency in Back End of

OCR for page 158
Page 174    the Fuel Cycle. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Albuquerque and Carlsbad, N.M. Pacific Forum and Sandia National Laboratories. July 24–27. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB). 1992. Project on Alternative Systems Study (PASS). Final Report. SKB-93-04. Stockholm: SKB. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB). 2000. The Deep Borehole Disposal Concept. Contents and Scope of an R&D Program for Comparison with the KBS-3 Method. SKB report R-00-28. Stockholm. [in Swedish]. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI). 1996. SKI SITE-94 Deep Repository Performance Assessment Project. SKI Report 96:36. Swedish Statute Book (SFS). 1977. No. 140. Stockholm. Swiss Federal Council of Ministers. 1979. Federal Government Ruling on the Atomic Act 1978. Tanaka, Y. (Ed.) 1996. The Japanese and Advanced Technology. Seikeido Publishing Company. [in Japanese]. Taylor, T. 1995. Solar disposal of radioactive wastes and plutonium. Presentation at Board on Radioactive Waste Management. Thegerström, C., and S. Engström. 1999. Experiences from risk communication in the siting of a geological repository for high level waste in Sweden. In: Proceedings, Valdor: Values in Decisions on Risks, Stockholm: June 13–17. K. Andersson (Ed.). Stockholm: Karinta Konsult. Tombs, F. 1999. Closing remarks at Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Through Geological Isolation, National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif. November 4–5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 1997. Linking Legacies: Connecting the Cold War Nuclear Weapons Production Processes to Their Environmental Consequences. DOE/EM-0319. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management, DOE. January. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 1998a. Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0362. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management, DOE. June. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 1998b. Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain, Total System Performance Assessment. DOE/RW-0508. Vol. 3. North Las Vegas, Nev.: DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office. December. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 1999a. A Roadmap for Developing Accelerator Transmutation of Waste (ATW) Technology. DOE/RW-0519. Washington, D.C.: DOE. October. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 1999b. Groundwater/Vadose Integration Project: Background Information and State of Knowledge. DOE/RL-98-48. Vol. II. Richland, Wash.: DOE. Richland Operations Office. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 2000. Total System Description: Waste Description [on-line]. Available at: http://www.rw.doe.gov/techrep/tsd/ tsd.htm .

OCR for page 158
Page 175 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1999. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 197. Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada. In: Federal Register. August 27. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). 1998. Draft Regulations for the disposal of high-level radioactive wastes in the proposed geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA. Draft proposed to CFR PART 63. 1998. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). 1999. Statement concerning high-level waste management presented by Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission to the Sub-committee on Energy and Power, Committee on Commerce, United States House of Representatives. February 10. Varjoranta, T. 1999. Regulatory issues: How safe is safe? Regulators' goals, approaches and challenges. In: Proceedings of Euradwaste 1999, Luxembourg, November 15–18. EUR 19143. Pp. 31–40. Vyner, H.M. 1988. Invisible Trauma: The Psychosocial Effects of the Invisible Environmental Contaminants. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books. Walker, D. 1999a. Appendix K. Yucca Mountain Environmental Impact Statement. Las Vegas, Nev.: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, U.S. DOE. Walker, D. 1999b. Comments made at Workshop on Disposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Through Geological Isolation, National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, Calif. November 4–5. Walton R.D., and G.A. Cowan. 1975. Relevance of nuclide migration at Oklo to the problem of geologic storage of radioactive waste. In: The Oklo Phenomenon. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. Pp. 499–507. Weart, S. 1988. Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Weinberg, A.M. 1994. The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer. New York: Springer Verlag. INTERNET ADDRESSES The internet addresses of organizations that were sources of many of the reports listed as references are given below. They will be useful for finding the listed reports as well as new information. European Union http://www.rwm-eu.org International Atomic Energy Agency http://www.iaea.org Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD http://www.nea.fr

OCR for page 158
Page 176 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management http://www.rw.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy Yucca Mountain Project http://www.ymp.gov U.S. National Academies Press http://www.nap.edu U.S. Nuclear Waste Technology Review Board http://www.nwtrb.gov