Thomas, J. (1993). How students aged 16-19 learn to handle different interpretations of the past. Unpublished study, University of London Institute of Education, 1990–1993.

Torney-Purta, J. (1992). Dimensions of adolescents’ reasoning about political and historical issues: Ontological switches, developmental processes, and situated learning. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Walsh, P. (1992). History and love of the past. In P. Lee, J. Slater, P. Walsh, and J. White (Eds.), The aims of school history: The national curriculum and beyond. London, England: Tufnell Press.

Wertsch, J.V., and Rozin, M. (1998). The Russian revolution: Official and unofficial accounts. In J.F. Voss and M. Carretero (Eds.), International review of history education: Learning and reasoning in history, vol. 2. London, England: Woburn Press.

Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319-346.

Wineburg, S. (2000). Making historical sense. In P.N. Stearns, P. Seixas, and S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history. New York: New York University Press.

Wineburg, S., and Fournier, J. (1994). Contextualized thinking in history. In M. Carretero and J.F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement