The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Learning and Understanding: Improving Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in U.S. High Schools
American Federation of Teachers. (2001). Survey and analysis of teacher salary trends 1999. Washington, DC: Author.
American Youth Policy Forum. (2000). High schools of the millennium. Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, J.R., Greeno, J.G., Reder, L.M., & Simon, H.A. (1997). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher,29(4), 11-13.
Association of the Gifted and Talented. (1989). Standards for programs involving the gifted and talented. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Atanda, R. (1999). Do gatekeeper courses expand education options? Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Attewell, G. (2001). The winner-take-all high school: Organizational adaptations to educational stratification. Sociology of Education,74(4), 267-296.
Au, K.H., & Jordan, C. (1981). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution. In H. Trueba, G.P. Guthrie, & K.H. Au (Eds.), Culture in the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 139-152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Bachman, J.G., & Schulenberg, J. (1993). How part-time work intensity relates to drug use, problem behavior, time use, and satisfaction among high school seniors: Are these consequences or merely correlates? Developmental Psychology,29(2), 220-235.
Ballou, D. (1996). Do public schools hire the best applicants? The Quarterly Journal of Economics,III(1), 97-133.
Basham, P. (2001). Home schooling: From the extreme to the mainstream. Public Policy Sources, The Fraser Institute, (51).
Benbow, C.P., & Minor, L.L. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal, (23), 425-436.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning abilities: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Researcher,19, 598-622.
Berger, S.L. (1991). Differentiating curriculum for gifted students. (ERIC Digest Number E510). Reston, VA: Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children.
Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. (1996). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Patrick, H., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). Teaching for understanding. In B.J. Biddle, T.L. Good, & I.F. Goodson (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching,volume II (pp. 819-878). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Borko, H., Peressini, D., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., Yorker, C., Wooley, C., Hovermill, J., & Masarik, K. (2000). Teacher education does matter: A situative view of learning to teach secondary mathematics. Educational Psychologist,35, 193-206.
Bottoms, G. (1998). Things that matter most in improving student learning. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.