National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$49.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act (2001)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix C Analyses of Soil, Plant, and Animal Communities for Mitigation Sites Compared with Reference Sites." Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
212
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


COMPENSATING FOR WETLAND LOSSES UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT

TABLE C–1 Analysis of Soil, Plant, and Animal Communities for Mitigation Sites Compared with Reference Sites

Component

Location

Sites

Years

Source/Notes

1. Soils

California

1

>22, if ever

Zedler and Callaway (1999); salt marsh

Organic matter/% carbon

Louisiana

30

>20

Turner et al. (1994); backfilled marsh

 

North Carolina

7

>17

Sacco et al. (1994); planted salt marsh

 

Illinois

2

>7

Mitsch and Flanagan (1996); fresh marsh

 

Oregon

1

>5

Gwin et al. (1990); fresh marshes

 

Pennsylvania

44

?

Bishel-Machung et al. (1996); fresh marsh

 

Metanalysis

19

≫10

Streever (2000); coastal dredged sites

 

South Carolina

2

>3

LaSalle et al. (1991); salt marsh

Macroorganic concentration

North Carolina

1

>3

Moy and Levin (1991); planted salt marsh from uplands

 

North Carolina

5–7

>25

Craft et al. (1988); Craft (2000)

Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentration

California

1

40+

Zedler and Callaway (1999); salt marsh

 

North Carolina

5

>30

Craft et al. (1988); salt marsh

 

Illinois

2

>7

Mitsch and Flanagan (1996); fresh marsh

Exchangeable ions

South Carolina

2

>3

LaSalle et al. (1991); salt marsh

Grain size

North Carolina

1

>3

Moy and Levin (1991); planted salt marsh from uplands

Nutrient cycling

Texas

3

>17

Montagna (1993)

Sulfide and nitrogen

California

1

>15

Zedler (1990)

Average of six soil indices

California

4

>5

Zedler and Langis (1991); salt marsh

Nutrient exchange

North Carolina

1

>5

Craft et al. (1991); salt marsh

2. Plants—trees

Ohio

10

>50

Niswander and Mitsch (1995); riparian wetland, simulation model

Plant cover

Atlantic and Gulf

68

5–7

Matthews and Minello (1994); literature review

 

Louisiana

30

>20

Turner et al. (1994); backfilled marsh

 

Oregon

1

3

Frenkel and Morlan (1990); hay farm restoration

Height and biomass

California

4

>5

Zedler and Langis (1991); salt marsh

 

California

1

>11, if ever

Zedler and Callaway (1999); salt marsh

 

North Carolina

1

5

Broome et al. (1986)

Page
212