TABLE 3-1 Purposes of Quality Measures
|
Purpose |
Description |
|
Quality improvement |
Measures to provide information for health care institutions to reform or shape how care is provided |
|
Clinical assessment |
Measures to guide individual patient management |
|
Research |
Measures that assess the phenomenon of interest |
|
Accountability |
Measures that allow comparison of quality of care for the purposes of quality assurance or for consumer choice between health care institutions or practitioners |
|
SOURCE: Teno et al., 1999. |
|
TABLE 3-2 Areas of Emphasis Based on the Purpose of Quality Measure
|
|
Purpose of Measure |
|||
|
|
Clinical Assessment |
Research |
Improvement |
Accountability |
|
Audience |
Clinical staff |
Science community |
QI team and clinical staff |
Payers, public |
|
Focus of measurement |
Status of patient |
Knowledge |
Understand care process |
Comparison |
|
Confidentiality |
Very high |
Very high |
Very high |
Low |
|
Evidence base to justify use of measure |
Important; measure should have face validity from a clinical standpoint |
Builds on existing evidence to generate new knowledge |
Important |
Extremely important in that proposed domain ought to be under control of the institution |
|
Importance of psychometric properties |
Important to individual provider |
Extremely important to the research effort |
Important within specific setting |
Valid and responsive across multiple settings |
|
SOURCE: Adapted from Solberg et al. (1997) and Teno et al. (1999). |
||||
tions of the use of measurement tools, more stringent psychometric properties than are now employed must be put into measures that will be used for public accountability. In addition, there must be either normative or empirical research substantiating a claim that the construct being measured for public accountability is under the control of the health care institution.