| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 70
Page 70
References and Bibliography
NOTE: Papers prepared for the Committee on National Statistics—marked by an asterisk (*)—are available from the committee, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20418.
Adams, J., and
A. Burnam
1995
Federal block grants: What do statisticians have to contribute? In
Window on Washington,
Constance F. Citro, Ed.
Chance
8(4):
40-42.
Barro, S.M.
1993
Federal Policy Options for Improving the Education of Low-Income Students.
Volume III,
Countering Inequity in School Finance.
Santa Monica, CA
:
RAND
.
Bixby, L.E.
1977
Statistical Data Requirements in Legislation.
Report prepared for the Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
Blumberg, L.,
J. Holahan, and
M. Moon
1993
Options for Reforming the Medicaid Matching Formula.
Washington, DC
:
The Urban Institute
.
Break, G.F.
1980
Financing Government in a Federal System.
Studies of Government Finance: Second Series.
Washington, DC
:
The Brookings Institution
.
Burnham, M.A.,
P. Reuter,
J.L. Adams,
A.R. Palmer,
K.E. Model,
J.E. Rolph,
J.Z. Heilbrunn,
G.N. Marshall,
D. McCaffrey,
S.L. Wenzel, and
R.C. Kessler
1997
Review and Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Block Grant Allotment Formula.
RAND Drug Policy Research Center, MR-533-HHS.
Santa Monica, CA
:
RAND
.
Center for Governmental Research
1980
Formula Evaluation Project: Final Report.
Report to the National Science Foundation.
Rochester, NY
:
Center for Governmental Research
.
OCR for page 71
Page 71
Center for Urban and Regional Study
1975
Alternative Formulas for General Revenue Sharing.
Report to the National Science Foundation.
Blacksburg, VA
:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
.
Ellett, C.
1976
A study of data requirements for population-based formula grants.
Statistical Reporter
77:
48-57.
1978
Analysis of the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) Formula, Volume I: Executive Summary.
Annandale, VA
:
JWK International Corporation
.
Fay, R.E., and
R.A. Herriot
1979
Estimates of income for small places: An empirical Bayes application of James-Stein procedures to census data.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
78:
269-277.
Ghosh, M., and
J.N.K. Rao
1994
Small-area estimation: An appraisal.
Statistical Science
8(1):
55-93.
Goodnough, A.
2001
New York City is shortchanged in school aid, state judge rules.
The New York Times,
January 11.
Maurice, A.J., and
R.P. Nathan
1982
The census undercount: Effects on federal aid to cities.
Urban Affairs Quarterly
17(3):
251-284.
Moskowitz, J.,
S. Stullich, and
B. Deng
1993
Targeting, Formula, and Resource Allocation Issues: Focusing Federal Funds Where the Needs Are Greatest.
A Supplemental Volume to the National Assessment of the Chapter I Program.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Department of Education
.
Nathan, R.
1980
The politics of printouts: The use of official numbers to allocate federal grants-in-aid.
Pp. 331-342 in
The Politics of Numbers,
W Alonso and
P. Starr, Eds.
New York
:
Russell Sage Foundation
.
National Research Council
1980
Estimating Population and Income of Small Areas.
Panel on Small-Area Estimates of Income and Population, Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
1995
Measuring Poverty: A New Approach.
Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance Concepts,
C.F. Citro and
R.T. Michael, Eds.,
Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
1997
Small-Area Estimates of Children in Poverty, Interim Report I, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations.
Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas,
C.F. Citro,
M.L. Cohen,
G. Kalton, and
K.K. West, Eds.,
Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
1998
Small-Area Estimates of Children in Poverty, Interim Report 2, Evaluation of Revised 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations.
Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas,
C.F. Citro,
M.L. Cohen, and
G. Kalton, Eds.,
Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
1999a
Small-Area Estimates of Children in Poverty, Interim Report 3, Evaluation of Revised 1995 County and School District Estimates for Title I Allocations.
Panel on Estimates
OCR for page 72
Page 72
of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas,
C.F. Citro and
G. Kalton, Eds.,
Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
1999b
Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance: Issues and Perspectives.
Committee on Education Finance,
H.F. Ladd,
R. Chalk, and
J.S. Hansen, Eds.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
2000a
Small-Area Income and Poverty Estimates: Priorities for 2000 and Beyond.
Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas,
C.F. Citro and
G. Kalton, Eds.,
Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
2000b
Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Evaluation of Current Methodology.
Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas,
C.F. Citro and
G. Kalton, Eds.,
Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
Orland, M.E.
1988
Relating school district resource needs and capacities to Chapter I allocations: Implications for more effective service targeting.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
10(1):
23-36.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
2000
Effect of Census 2000 Undercount on Federal Funding to States and Local Areas, 2002-2012.
Washington, DC
:
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
.
Schirm, A.L.
1995
State Estimates of Infants and Children Income Eligible for the WIC Program in 1992.
Washington, DC
:
Mathematica Policy Research
.
Smith, W., and
A. Parker
*
2000
An Overview of Formulas for Allocation of Funds.
Paper prepared for the Workshop on Formulas for Allocating Program Funds, Committee on National Statistics, April 26-27, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Spencer, B.
1980a
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Data Used to Allocate Funds.
New York
:
Springer
.
1980b
Implications of equity and accuracy for undercount adjustment: A decision-theoretic approach.
Pp. 204-216 in
Conference on Census Undercount: Proceedings of the 1980 Conference.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Census Bureau
.
1982a
Technical issues in allocation formula design.
Public Administration Review
42:
524-529.
1982b
Concerning dubious estimates of the effects of census undercount adjustment of federal aid to cities.
Urban Affairs Quarterly
18:
145-148.
1985
Avoiding bias in estimates of the effect of data error on allocations of public funds.
Evaluation Review
9:
511-518.
Stanford Research Institute
1974
General Revenue Sharing Data Study.
Menlo Park, CA
:
Stanford Research Institute
.
Straf, M.
1981
Revenue allocation by regression: National Health Service Appropriations for Teaching Hospitals.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A
144(1):
80-84.
Stutzer, M.
1981
Parametric Properties of Tax Effort Revenue Sharing.
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Document SR-86.
OCR for page 73
Page 73
U.S. General Accounting Office
1983
Changing Medicaid Formula Can Improve Distribution of Funds to States.
GAO/GGD-83-27.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
1991
Formula Programs—Adjusted Census Data Would Redistribute Small Percentage of Federal Funds to States.
GAO/GGD-92-12.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
1991
Medicaid—Alternatives for Improving the Distribution of Funds.
GAO/HRD-91-66FS.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
1996
Federal Grants Design Could Help Federal Resources Go Further.
AIMD-97-7.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
1997
School Finance—State Efforts to Reduce Funding Gaps Between Poor and Wealthy Districts.
GAO/HEHS-97-31.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
1998
School Finance—State and Federal Efforts to Target Poor Students.
GAO/HEHS-98-36.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
1999
Formula Grants: Effects of Adjusted Population Counts on Federal Funding to States.
GAO/HEHS-99-69.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
U.S. General Services Administration
1998
1998 Formula Report to the Congress.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. General Services Administration
.
U.S. Office of Statistical Policy and Standards
1978
Report on Statistics for Allocation of Funds.
Statistical Policy Working Paper 1.
Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Subcommittee on Statistics for Allocation of Funds.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Department of Commerce
.
Zaslavsky, A., and
A. Schirm
*
2000
Interaction Between Survey Estimates and Federal Funding Formulae.
Paper presented at the Workshop on Formulas for Allocating Program Funds, Committee on National Statistics, April 26-27, National Research Council. Washington, DC.
OCR for page 74
Page 74
Representative terms from entire chapter:
county estimates
