National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5. Findings and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. A Modified Baseline Incineration Process for Mustard Projectiles at Pueblo Chemical Depot. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10181.
×

References

Battelle. 1999. Acid Digestion of Abandoned Chemical and Conventional Weapons. Battelle memo by M.Toomajian, R.Eureka, D.Taylor, and C.Myler. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

BRT (Business Roundtable). 1997. The Business Stake in Effective Project Systems. Construction Cost Effectiveness Task Force. Washington, D.C.: Business Roundtable.


CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1991. Organizing for Project Success. Austin, Tex.: Construction Industry Institute.

CII. 1994. Pre-Project Planning Handbook. Austin, Tex.: Construction Industry Institute.

Coughlin, M. 2000. Agent Freezing Model. Briefing by M.Coughlin, Science Applications International Corporation, to the working group of the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., November 30.

CR&E (Continental Research and Engineering). 2000. Pueblo MPF and PAS System Specifications. Report 00–049, Rev.1, October 8, 2000. Prepared by Continental Research and Engineering for the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.


EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Permit Modification Number C3–034. JACADS, EPA ID # TTO-570–090–001. Rev 0, Section B, page 1, July 11. San Francisco, Calif.: Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX.

EPA. 1999. MACT Rules, published in Federal Register, September 30. Available online at <http://www.epa.gov> or <http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a990930c.html>.


FFC (Federal Facilities Council). 1998. Government Industry Forum on Capital Facilities and Core Competencies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.


Jacobs Engineering. 2000. Modified Baseline Pueblo Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Basis of Design, Rev. B, October. Prepared for the Science Applications International Corporation by Jacobs Engineering. Document Control Number: AFC-J23–35P22786-P6–0001. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Jacobs Engineering.


Kaiser, J. 2000. Panel backs EPA dioxin assessment. Science 290(5494): 1071. Available online at <http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/290/5494/1071a>.


Megnia, J. 2000. PCD Commander’s Comments. Pueblo Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (PUCDF) Pre-Proposal Conference. Presentation 1811–6-11/30/00. December 5. Pueblo, Colo.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

Mitre. 1991. Comparative Assessment of Risk and Cost for Munitions Transport for On-Site Disposal in the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. May. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

MR&E (Maumee Research and Engineering). 1996. MPF Step-One Shut-down Study: 4.2 Inch Dowanol Filled Projectiles. MR&E Report No. 96048–1. Prepared for Raytheon Demilitarization Company by Maumee Research and Engineering, Inc., Northwood, Ohio.


NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Recommendations for the Disposal of Chemical Agents and Munitions. Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1996. Review of Systemization of the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility. Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1997. Risk Assessment and Management at Deseret Chemical Depot and the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility. Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1999a. Carbon Filtration for Reducing Emissions from Chemical Agent Incineration. Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1999b. Improving Project Management in the Department of Energy. Committee to Assess the Policies and Practices of the Department of Energy to Design, Manage, and Procure Environmental Restoration, Waste Management, and Other Construction Projects. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2000. Letter Report. A Review of the Army’s Public Affairs Efforts in Support of the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001. Occupational Health and Workplace Monitoring at Chemical Agent Disposal Facilities. Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. Forthcoming. Closure of the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal Facility. Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.


OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 1992. Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. OMB Circular No. A-94. October 29. Available online at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a094/a094.html>.

OMB. 1998. Preparing and Submitting Budget Estimates. OMB Circular

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. A Modified Baseline Incineration Process for Mustard Projectiles at Pueblo Chemical Depot. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10181.
×

No. A-11. July 19,2000. Available online at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a11/00toc.html>.

Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization (PMCD). 2000. PMCD Notice of Intent (NOI) for Pueblo. Federal Register, April 14. Vol. 65, No. 73, pp. 20140–41.


SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation). 1998. Quantitative Risk Assessments for the ANCDF, BGCDF, PBCDF, PUCDF, TOCDF and UMCDF. May 1998. CD-ROM prepared by Science Applications International Corporation for the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.


Thomas, T. 2001. Special Topics. Briefing by Timothy Thomas, Operations Division Chief, Office of the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, to the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program, Hermiston, Oreg. June 21.

Thompson, P. 2000a. Pueblo Modified Baseline Process: Project Status. Briefing by Peggy Thompson, Science Applications International Corporation, to the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program, Woods Hole, Mass., October 26.

Thompson, P. 2000b. Agent Access Equipment Status Update. Briefing by Peggy Thompson, Science Applications International Corporation, to the working group of the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., November 30.

Thompson, P. 2000c. Cost Evaluation of One vs. Two Metal Parts Furnaces. Memorandum by Peggy Thompson, Science Applications International Corporation to Om Handa, Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization staff, July 18.

Thompson, P. 2000d. Secondary Waste—Modified Baseline PUCDF. Briefing by Peggy Thompson, Science Applications International Corporation, to the working group of the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., November 30.

Tomanek, W. 2000a. One vs. Two MPFs. Briefing by Woltek Tomanek, Science Applications International Corporation, to the working group of the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., November 30.

Tomanek, W. 2000b. Throughput Analysis. Briefing by Woltek Tomanek, Science Applications International Corporation, to the working group of the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., November 30.


U.S. Army. 1992. RCRA Trial Burn Report for HD—Mustard Ton Containers—Metal Parts Furnace at the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System. United Engineers and Constructors, December 16. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 1997. A Guide to Risk Management Policy and Activities. Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization report 176–009, January. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 1999a. Status of Agent Destruction at JACADS and TOCDF as of 21 July. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 1999b. JACADS Metal Parts Furnace 4.2-inch HD Mortar Projectiles Trial Burn Report. Vol. I, Exhibit 1. MPF Agent HD Trial Burn Emissions Compliance Summary. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 2000a. Pueblo Chemical Depot Enhanced Baseline Facility. Report prepared for the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization by Dr. Richard S.Magee, April. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 2000b. Applying Lessons Learned: The Conceptual Mustard Projectile Only Demilitarization Facility. A paper by the Chief, PMCSD Operations Team, JACADS Site Project Manager, and the PMCSD Operations Team Operational Analysis Group Leader. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 2000c. Responses to NRC Questions on the Modified Base Line Process for Pueblo, October 4. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 2000d. Pueblo Modified Baseline Decision Brief. Prepared by Science Applications International Corporation, Jacobs, Maumee, and El Dorado Engineering, for the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization. Document Presentation 1651, July 28. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 2000e. Fact Sheet: The Colorado Citizens Advisory Commission. Prepared by the Pueblo Community Outreach Office, June. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 2001a. Responses to Additional NRC Questions, March 14. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

U.S. Army. 2001b. Summary of January 18, 2001, Decision Meeting on Pueblo Modified Baseline Process. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.


Venkatadri, W. 2000. Pueblo Modified Baseline. Briefing by Wojtek Venkatadri, Science Applications International Corporation, to the working group of the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program, July 31. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.


Webster, B. 2000. Metal Parts Furnace Overview. Briefing by Buddy Webster, Continental Research and Engineering, to the working group of the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md. November 30.

Williams, B., A.Vallie, H.Suen, S.Rzasa, and S.Brown. 1999. Perceived Attributes of Disposal Technologies among Residents Living near the U.S. Army’s Chemical Weapons Stockpile Sites: A Hierarchical Linear Model. Available online at <www-pmcd.apgea.army.mil/graphical/PI/SU/index.html>.

WIPT (Working Integrated Process Team). 2000a. Environmental Working Integrated Process Team meeting minutes, June 21–22. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

WIPT. 2000b. Environmental Working Integrated Process Team meeting minutes, July 25–26. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

WIPT. 2000c. Environmental Working Integrated Process Team meeting minutes, August 28–29. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. A Modified Baseline Incineration Process for Mustard Projectiles at Pueblo Chemical Depot. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10181.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. A Modified Baseline Incineration Process for Mustard Projectiles at Pueblo Chemical Depot. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10181.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. A Modified Baseline Incineration Process for Mustard Projectiles at Pueblo Chemical Depot. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10181.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2001. A Modified Baseline Incineration Process for Mustard Projectiles at Pueblo Chemical Depot. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10181.
×
Page 38
Next: Appendix A: Description of Pueblo Chemical Stockpile »
A Modified Baseline Incineration Process for Mustard Projectiles at Pueblo Chemical Depot Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States has maintained a stockpile of chemical warfare agents and munitions since World War I. The Army leadership has sought outside, unbiased advice on how best to dispose of the stockpile. In 1987, at the request of the Under Secretary of the Army, the National Research Council (NRC) established the Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program (Stockpile Committee) to provide scientific and technical advice and counsel on the CSDP. This report is concerned with the technology selection for the Pueblo site, where only munitions containing mustard agent are stored. The report assesses a modified baseline process, a slightly simplified version of the baseline incineration system that was used to dispose of mustard munitions on Johnston Island. A second NRC committee is reviewing two neutralization-based technologies for possible use at Pueblo. The evaluation in this report is intended to assist authorities making the selection. It should also help the public and other non-Army stakeholders understand the modified baseline process and make sound judgments about it.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!