| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 115
Appendix D
·eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
EMSP Overview and
HEW Research Program
The Department of Energy's EMSP was created in 1996 by the
1 04th Congress within the Energy and Water Development
Appropriations Act to stimulate basic research for environmental
cleanup of the nation's nuclear weapons complex. Congress directed
the department to "provide sufficient attention and resources to
longer-term basic science research which needs to be done to ulti-
mately reduce cleanup costs . . . develop a program that takes
advantage of laboratory and university expertise, and . . . seek new
and innovative cleanup methods to replace current conventional
approaches which are often costly and ineffective" (Congress, 1 996~.
The mission of the EMSP is the following:4
· develop a targeted, long-term basic research agenda to reduce
cleanup costs and risks to workers and the public;
· bridge the gap between broad fundamental research and
needs-driven applied technology; and
· serve as a stimulus for focusing the nation's science infrastruc-
ture on critical environmental problems.
Since its inception in 1996, the EMSP has awarded 306 research pro-
jects in seven environmental management problem areas, classified as
fol lows:
1 . H igh-level waste
2. Mixed and transu ran ic waste
~ Environmental Management Science Program Annual Report. FY 2000.
DOE/EM-05 69. [On I i ne] . Avai lable: http://emsp.em.doe.gov/pdfs/2000ann ual. pdf
[May 23, 2001 ].
A p p e n d i x D
115
OCR for page 116
3. Deactivation and decommissioning
4. Subsurface contamination
Spent nuclear fuel
Nuclear materials
Health, ecology, and risk
The year 2000 breakdown of EMSP funding by problem area are
shown i n Figu re D. 1 . A selection of the "most successfu I projects" as
defined by the EMSP, including eight projects that have been imple-
mented i nto the appl fed TEA program, is shown i n Sidebar D. 1 .
Office of Environmental Management
and the EMSP
The EMSP is a collaborative partnership between the EM and the
SC. The Office of Science and Technology (OST), within EM, and the
Office of Basic Science, within SC, manage the EMSP, and the DOE's
Idaho Operation Office administers it. The organization chart of the
EMSP is shown in Figure D.2. The OST provides the EM with basic
research, risk assessment, and technology development and deploy-
ment in nuclear weapons cleanup activities. The EMSP is in charge of
the basic research part of the OST program.
The EMSP research has explicit links to problem holders including
technical staff, managers, and stakeholder advisory groups at the sites.
The EMSP collaborates particularly closely with applied research and
development units within OST called "focus areas." The focus areas
FIGURE D. 1 Year 2000
breakdown of EMSP funding
by problem area. The total
funding through 2000
awards for the EMSP budget
Mixed Waste
has been $254.3 million. In 10%
2001 the total EMSP appro-
priations were $37 million.
SOURCE: DOE-
Environmental
Management Science
Program.
High-Level Waste
26%
Health/Ecology/ ~ Deactivation &
Risk Decommissioning
1 0% 8%
Subsurface
Contamination
~1 41 %
- - Nuclear Materials
3%
L Spent Nuclear Fuel
2%
H ~ G H - L E V E E W A S T E
OCR for page 117
SIDEBAR D.1 EMSP"SUCCESS STORIES'
As identified by the EMSP, examples of successful research projects within the HEW problem area (the
project identification number is shown in parenthesis) are the following:
Chemical Speciation of Strontium, Americium, and Curium in High Level Waste: Predictive
Modeling of Phase Partitioning During Tank Processing (HLW54621)*
On-Line Slurry Viscosity and Concentration Measure as a Real-Time Stream Characterization Tool
(HLW54890)
Quantifying Silica Reactivity in Subsurface Environments: Controls of Reaction Affinity and
Solute Matrix on Quartz and SiO2 Glass Dissolution Kinetics (HLW55042)*
Design and Synthesis of the Next Generation of Crown Ethers for Waste Separations
(HLW55087)*
An Alternative Host Matrix Based on Iron Phosphate Glasses for the Vitrification of Specialized
Nuclear Waste Forms (MW55110)
Acoustic Probe for Solid-Gas-Liquid Suspensions (HLW55179)
· Research Program to Investigate the Fundamental Chemistry of Technetium (HLW60296)
· New Silicotitanate Waste Forms: Development and Characterization (HLW60345)*
· Architectural Design Criteria for F-Block Metal Ion Sequestering Agents (MW54679)
· Supramolecular Chemistry of Selective Anion Recognition for Anions of Environmental
Relevance (MW54864)
The NOX System in Nuclear Waste (HLW55229)
Reactivity of Peroxynitrite: Implications for Hanford Waste Management and Remediation
(HLW59982)
New Anion-Exchange Resins for Improved Separations of Nuclear Materials (MW54770)
· Novel Miniature Spectrometer for Remote Chemical Detection (MW60231)
Foaming in Radioactive Waste Treatment and Immobilization Processes (HLW60143)*
Millimeter-Wave Measurements of High-Level and Low-Activity Glass Melts (HLW65435)*
· Rational Design of Metal Ion Sequestering Agents (HLW60362)*
· Precipitation and Deposition of Aluminum-Containing Phases in Tank Wastes (HLW65411)
*EMSP projects now integrated within TFA programs.
develop technologies to address radioactive and hazardous waste
issues focusing on specific problems. For HLW-related research, the
EMSP closely collaborates with the TFA, which is concerned with
HEW in the tanks and processing operations.
Although they address the same problems, the TFA and EMSP pro-
grams are very different. The former has a short-term focus and aims
at applied research. The latter addresses the more fundamental issues
of underlying science and engineering technology and has a longer
time frame to develop new and original science. The EMSP also col-
A p p e n d i x D
117
OCR for page 118
1 1 ' 1
Under Secretary for Nuclear Security . . Under Secretary for . Support Staff
Office of
Science
- Advanced Scientific Computing Resources ~ Office of Science and Technology
- Fusion Energy Sciences
High Energy and Nuclear Physics
Basic Energy Sciences
- Biological & Environmental Research
Assistant Secretary for
Environmental Mananement
Idaho Operations Office
—Technology Development and Demonstration . Assistant Manager for Research & Development .
—Technology Application
—Long-Term Stewardship
—Basic and Applied Research
\
\
\
\
.1
EMSP
—Office of R&D Technical Support
—Energy R&D Division
—Environmental R&D Division
—Science Program Office
FIGURE D.2 EMSPorganiza- laborates with the Site Technical Coordinating Groups (STCGs) in
tion chars within the Office charge of compiling a list of science needs and communicating tech-
ofEnvironmental nology issues among site projects, technology providers, DOE sites,
Management.SOURCE: regulators, and other stakeholders.
DOE-Environmental A "science need," as defined by the EMSP, is a cleanup problem,
Management Science either now or in the future, that cannot be addressed practically with
Program. current knowledge or technology. In the past, science needs were
identified exclusively by stakeholder input. A stakeholder is anyone
with an interest in DOE activities or anyone who may be affected by
DOE activities. Previously, science needs for the EMSP2 were drawn
mainly from the STCGs and the focus areas. High-level waste
research needs were usual Iy identified by the TEA.
Figure D.3 illustrates the EMSP selection process for research
awards. From the identification of needs, the EMSP develops a solici
tation for research proposals among universities and national labora-
tories. Proposals undergo a two-step review. The first is for scientific
merit by an external panel of experts under the auspices of DOE's SC.
The second consists of an EM relevance review, performed in collabo-
ration with TEA staff to ensure that the research project has a high
potential to contribute, directly or indirectly, to the cleanup of the
sites. The projects are funded on a three-year basis, with the possibili-
ty of renewal. Renewals are also submitted to the same two-step com-
petitive peer review process.
2The EMSP needs database is accessible via the World Wide Web (at the URL
http://emsp .em.doe.gov).
H ~ G H - L E V E E W A S T E
118
OCR for page 119
NAS and other
advisory groups
FIGURE D.3 Process for the selection of EMSP research projects. Research needs are submitted by the Site Technical
Coordinating Groups (STCGs) and by the NationalAcademy of Sciences (NAS), among others. SOURCE: DOE-
Environmental Management Science Program.
A p p e n d i x D
119
Representative terms from entire chapter:
management science