National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$19.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine (2002)
Board on Life Sciences (BLS)
Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health (NBH)

Citation Manager

. "4. Opportunities for and Barriers to Progress in Stem Cell Research for Regenerative Medicine." Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
54
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine

accountability. If specific rules govern a field of research, such as the need for informed consent of research volunteers or the requirements for research subjects of both sexes or various ethnic groups, the review process considers whether the requirements have been met or, if not, whether sufficient justification is provided for deviating from them. In short, public funding engenders considerable opportunity for shaping the types of research that are approved. In general, privately funded investigators are subject to less oversight and review, although activities such as the pursuit of patents or marketing approvals from the Food and Drug Administration represent other mechanisms for oversight that are less relevant to basic research.

Page
54