References

AEDC (Arnold Engineering Development Center). 2000. Unfunded requirements list. Tullahoma, Tenn.: Arnold Engineering Development Center.

AIA (Aerospace Industries Association). 2000. Aerospace Facts and Figures 1999/2000. Washington, D.C.: Aerospace Industries Association.

AIA. 2001a. Aerospace Facts and Figures 2000/2001. Washington, D.C.: Aerospace Industries Association.

AIA. 2001b. Total U.S. aerospace sales for 1985 and 1997. Data provided to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, July 2, 2001.

Anderson, C.M. 2000. Air Force X vehicle technology. Briefing by C.M. Anderson, Chair, Space Platforms Defense Technology Area Panel, to AIAA X Vehicles Symposium, Capitol Hill Club, Washington, D.C., June 16.

Augustine, N.R. 1996. From industry…Acquisition reform: Dream or mirage? Army RD&A Bulletin 5:20.


BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 1999. Employment projections; employment, training, and earnings; education level search; percent change in total employment, 1998–2008. Available online at <http://stats.bls.gov/asp/oep/noeted/empeduc.asp> [April 24, 2001].

Boeing. 2000a. F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/fa18ef/fa18ef.htm> [February 9, 2001].

Boeing. 2000b. Presentation to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, Boeing, St. Louis, Mo. April 6.

Boeing. 2001a. F-15 Eagle fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/f15/f15.htm> [February 9, 2001].

Boeing. 2001b. C-17 Globemaster III fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/c17/c17.htm> [February 9, 2001].

Boeing. 2001c. 767 Tanker-Transport fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/767t-t/ > [February 9, 2001].


Capaccio, T. 2000. Pentagon enacting initiatives to boost defense industry. Defense Week, October 30:1.

Carlson, H.C. 2000. Air Force Research Laboratory technology vision. Briefing by H.C.Ruck, Chief Scientist, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., August 23.

CDM (Commission on Defense Management). 1986. A Formula for Action: A Report to the President on Defense Acquisition, April 1986. Commission on Defense Management. Ft. Belvoir, Va.: Defense Technical information Center.

CNN (Cable News Network). 2000. Aerospace industry eyes dot-com demise with glee. Available online at <http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/12/15/brain.drain.reut/index.html> [April 30, 2001].

Creedon, J.F. 2000. NASA Langley Research Center. Briefing by J.Creedon, Director, NASA Langley Research Center, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., March 9.

CSAF (Chief Scientist of the Air Force). 1999. Science and Technology Workforce for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief Scientist of the Air Force.


DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). 2000. Unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV). Available online at <http://www.darpa.mil/tto/programs/ucav.html> [March 28, 2001].

David, L. 2000. X-37: An orbital test bed sprouts wings. Aerospace America 38(6):39–43.

DDR&E (Director, Defense Research & Engineering). 2001. S&T budget figures provided to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, May 2.

Delaney, L.J. 1999. Leadership corner. Aerospace Acquisition 2000 2(3):2.

Douglass, J.W. 2000a. AIA. Briefing by J.W.Douglass, President, Aerospace Industries Association, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., January 27.

Douglass, J.W. 2000b. 106th Congress: Industry tallies major gains on aerospace issues. AIA Update 5(6):2.

DSB (Defense Science Board). 1999. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Acquisition Reform Phase IV, Subpanel on Research and Development. Ft. Belvoir, Va.: Defense Technical Information Center.

DSB. 2000a. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Human Resources Strategy. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

DSB. 2000b. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Preserving a Healthy and Competitive U.S. Defense Industry to Ensure Our Future National Security. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board.


Eash, J. 1998. Revolution in business affairs. Presentation by J.Eash, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Advanced Technology), to the Eighth PEO/ SYSCOM Commanders Conference, Fort Belvoir, Va., October 19–20.

Erwin, S.I. 2001. Next-generation air-mobility concepts focus on efficiency. National Defense LXXXV(567):16–17.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 42
Review of the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense References AEDC (Arnold Engineering Development Center). 2000. Unfunded requirements list. Tullahoma, Tenn.: Arnold Engineering Development Center. AIA (Aerospace Industries Association). 2000. Aerospace Facts and Figures 1999/2000. Washington, D.C.: Aerospace Industries Association. AIA. 2001a. Aerospace Facts and Figures 2000/2001. Washington, D.C.: Aerospace Industries Association. AIA. 2001b. Total U.S. aerospace sales for 1985 and 1997. Data provided to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, July 2, 2001. Anderson, C.M. 2000. Air Force X vehicle technology. Briefing by C.M. Anderson, Chair, Space Platforms Defense Technology Area Panel, to AIAA X Vehicles Symposium, Capitol Hill Club, Washington, D.C., June 16. Augustine, N.R. 1996. From industry…Acquisition reform: Dream or mirage? Army RD&A Bulletin 5:20. BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 1999. Employment projections; employment, training, and earnings; education level search; percent change in total employment, 1998–2008. Available online at <http://stats.bls.gov/asp/oep/noeted/empeduc.asp> [April 24, 2001]. Boeing. 2000a. F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/fa18ef/fa18ef.htm> [February 9, 2001]. Boeing. 2000b. Presentation to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, Boeing, St. Louis, Mo. April 6. Boeing. 2001a. F-15 Eagle fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/f15/f15.htm> [February 9, 2001]. Boeing. 2001b. C-17 Globemaster III fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/c17/c17.htm> [February 9, 2001]. Boeing. 2001c. 767 Tanker-Transport fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/767t-t/ > [February 9, 2001]. Capaccio, T. 2000. Pentagon enacting initiatives to boost defense industry. Defense Week, October 30:1. Carlson, H.C. 2000. Air Force Research Laboratory technology vision. Briefing by H.C.Ruck, Chief Scientist, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., August 23. CDM (Commission on Defense Management). 1986. A Formula for Action: A Report to the President on Defense Acquisition, April 1986. Commission on Defense Management. Ft. Belvoir, Va.: Defense Technical information Center. CNN (Cable News Network). 2000. Aerospace industry eyes dot-com demise with glee. Available online at <http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/12/15/brain.drain.reut/index.html> [April 30, 2001]. Creedon, J.F. 2000. NASA Langley Research Center. Briefing by J.Creedon, Director, NASA Langley Research Center, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., March 9. CSAF (Chief Scientist of the Air Force). 1999. Science and Technology Workforce for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief Scientist of the Air Force. DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). 2000. Unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV). Available online at <http://www.darpa.mil/tto/programs/ucav.html> [March 28, 2001]. David, L. 2000. X-37: An orbital test bed sprouts wings. Aerospace America 38(6):39–43. DDR&E (Director, Defense Research & Engineering). 2001. S&T budget figures provided to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, May 2. Delaney, L.J. 1999. Leadership corner. Aerospace Acquisition 2000 2(3):2. Douglass, J.W. 2000a. AIA. Briefing by J.W.Douglass, President, Aerospace Industries Association, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., January 27. Douglass, J.W. 2000b. 106th Congress: Industry tallies major gains on aerospace issues. AIA Update 5(6):2. DSB (Defense Science Board). 1999. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Acquisition Reform Phase IV, Subpanel on Research and Development. Ft. Belvoir, Va.: Defense Technical Information Center. DSB. 2000a. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Human Resources Strategy. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. DSB. 2000b. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Preserving a Healthy and Competitive U.S. Defense Industry to Ensure Our Future National Security. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board. Eash, J. 1998. Revolution in business affairs. Presentation by J.Eash, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Advanced Technology), to the Eighth PEO/ SYSCOM Commanders Conference, Fort Belvoir, Va., October 19–20. Erwin, S.I. 2001. Next-generation air-mobility concepts focus on efficiency. National Defense LXXXV(567):16–17.

OCR for page 42
Review of the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense Etter, D.M. 2000. S&T/engineering challenges and insights. Briefing by D.M.Etter, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Science and Technology), to Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., April 4. EWC (Engineering Workforce Commission). 2001. Engineering and technology degrees, 2000. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Engineering Societies. GAO (General Accounting Office). 1997. Trends in DOD Spending, Industrial Production, and Competition. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office. Harbison, J.R., T.S.Moorman, M.W.Jones, and J.Kim. 2000. Booz-Allen & Hamilton Viewpoint: U.S. defense industry under siege—An agenda for change. Available online at <http://www.bah.com/viewpoints/defenseindustry.html > [December 11, 2000]. Hastings, D. 2000. S&T/engineering personnel challenges and insights. Briefing by D.Hastings, Co-director, MIT Technology and Policy Program, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., April 4. Heeter, E., and S.Kosiak. 2000. FY01 defense appropriations conference bill, July 28. Available online at <http://www.csbaonline.com/> [May 16, 2001]. Heil, M. 2000. Presentation by M.Heil, Commander, Arnold Engineering Development Center, to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, Arnold Engineering Development Center, Tullahoma, Tenn. October 12. Johnson, C.J. 1995. Martin Marietta’s CEO Norm Augustine speaks to Program Manager. Program Manager 24(2):2–6. JSF PO (Joint Strike Fighter Program Office). 2001a. JSF Program white paper. Available online at <http://www.jast.mil/html/jsfwhitepaper.htm> [February 9, 2001]. JSF PO. 2001b. The affordable solution—JSF. Available online at <http://www.jast.mil/html/progbriefs.htm> [February 9, 2001]. Kennedy, M., and M.Lorell. 2000. Project Air Force. Briefing by M.Kennedy and M.Lorell, RAND Corporation, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., January 27. LAI (Lean Aerospace Initiative). 1996a. 1996 LAI Government PM Survey. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lean Aerospace Initiative. LAI. 1996b. 1996 LAI Contractor PM Survey. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lean Aerospace Initiative. LM (Lockheed Martin Company). 2000. F-16 Fighting Falcon fact sheet. Available online at <http://www.lockheedmartin.com/factsheets/product16.html> [February 9, 2001]. LM. 2001. F-22 program overview. Available online at <http://www.lmasc.lmco.com/f22/mgoview.html> [February 9, 2001]. LMAC (Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company). 2000. Presentation to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Fort Worth, Tex., February 25. LMSS (Lockheed Martin Space Systems). 2000. Presentation to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, Colo., April 18. London, J.R. 2000. Pathfinder Program. Briefing by J.R.London, Manager, Technology Evaluation Department, to AIAA X Vehicles Symposium, Washington, D.C., June 16. Lorell, M.A. 1995. Bomber R&D Since 1945. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Lorell, M.A., and H.P.Levaux. 1998. The Cutting Edge: A Half Century of U.S. Fighter Aircraft R&D. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Lorell, M., J.Lowell, M.Kennedy, and H.P.Levaux. 2000. Cheaper, Faster, Better? Commercial Approaches to Weapons Acquisition. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Lyles, L.L. 1999. Achieving cycle time reductions. Aerospace Acquisition 2000 2(3):1. McNutt, R. 1998. Reducing DoD Product Development Time. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lean Aerospace Initiative. Morrocco, J.D. 2001. U.K. antes up $2.8 billion for JSF. Aviation Week & Space Technology 154(4):33. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1999. Report of the Rotorcraft Subcommittee. Unpublished report from meeting at NASA Ames Research Center, August 24–25, 1999. NASA Aero-Space Technology Advisory Committee. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, Code R. NASA. 2000. Report on Project Management in NASA by the Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation Board, March 13, 2000. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Northrop Grumman. 2000. Presentation to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, Northrop Grumman, Arlington, Va., August 23. NRC (National Research Council). 1983. The Influence of Computational Fluid Dynamics on Experimental Aerospace Facilities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1988. Review of Aeronautical Wind Tunnel Facilities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1992. Future Aerospace Ground Test Facility Requirements for the Arnold Engineering Development Center. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1999. Recent Trends in U.S. Aeronautics Research and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2001. Aging Avionics in Military Aircraft. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2000. Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 1998, 1999, 2000. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation. NSF. 2001. Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 1999, 2000, 2001. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation. OASD (PA) (Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs)). 2000. OASD (PA) Press release, December 26, 2000. Available online at <http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2000/c12262000_ct766–00.html> [February 9, 2001]. OUSD (AT&L) (Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisitions, Logistics, and Technology)). 2000. The Road Ahead: Accelerating the Transformation of DoD Acquisition and Logistics Processes and Practices. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisitions, Logistics, and Technology). Paul, R. 2000. Science and Technology Workforce for the 21st Century (STW-21). Briefing by R.Paul, Commander, Air Force Research Laboratory, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., March 10. Reinsh, B. 2000. Testimony from Bill Reinsh, Department of Commerce, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, June 7. Ruck, H. 2000. AFRL in the FYDP. Briefing by H.Ruck, Associate Director, Directorate of Plans and Programs, Air Force Research Laboratory, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., August 23.

OCR for page 42
Review of the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense Seffers, G.I. 2000. Finding a way to fix the brain drain. Federal Computer Week, July 31. Available online at <http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2000/073l/mgt-drain-07–31–00.asp> [October 31, 2000]. Shelton, G. 2000. Attracting talent in the defense industry. Briefing by G. Shelton, Vice President, Raytheon Missile Systems, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., April 4. Smith, P.G., and D.G.Reinertsen. 1995. Developing Products in Half the Time. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Stewart, J.D. 2000. AFMC workforce reshaping. Briefing by J.D.Stewart, Executive Director, Air Force Materiel Command, to the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., April 5 . Stone, E. 2000. Presentation by E.Stone, Director, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., February 23. Thompson, L.B. 2000. Into the night: The fin-de-siecle defense industry. Briefing by L.B.Thompson, chief operating officer, Lexington Institute, to Lockheed Martin, Arlington, Va., January 18. USAF (United States Air Force). 2000a. CSAF displays confidence in, commitment for V-22, press release, June 28, 2000. Available online at <http://www.af.mil/news/Jun2000/n20000628_000986.html> [February 9, 2001]. USAF. 2000b. Biographies of senior Air Force acquisition personnel. Available online at <http://www.af.mil/news/biographies/> [February 21, 2001]. USD(C) (Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)). 2000a. RDT&E Programs (R-l), February 2000. Washington, D.C.: Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). USD(C). 2000b. National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2001, March 2000. Washington, D.C.: Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). USN (United States Navy). 1999. V-22A Osprey. Available online at <http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/factfile/aircraft/air-v22a.html> [February 9, 2001]. Velocci, A.L. 2001. Defense acquisition reform a hot issue, despite past failures. Aviation Week & Space Technology 154(9):65–66. Venneri, S. 2000. Presentation by S.Venneri, Associate Administrator, NASA Office of Aerospace Technology, to fact-finding subcommittee of the Committee on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Engineering Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and the Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., March 8. Wall, R. 2000. USAF readies strategy for increased F-22 buy. Aviation Week & Space technology 153(21):30–31. Womack, J.P., and D.T.Jones. 1996. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.