Items in cart [0] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK list:$41.50 Web:$37.35 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Free Resources Sign in to download PDF book and chapters PDF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States Risk and Decisions About Disposition of Transuranic and High-Level Radioactive Waste Other Related Titles A Strategic Vision for Department of Energy Environmental Quality Research and Development (2001) Board on Radioactive Waste Management (BRWM) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 108   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More Page 108 Front Matter (R1-R12) Executive Summary (1-11) 1. Introduction (12-22) 2. The Department of Energy's Environmental Quality Mission (23-39) 3. A Long-Term Vision for Department of Energy Environmental Quality Research and Development (40-70) 4. Achieving and Maintaining the Long Term Vision for Environmental Quality Research and Development (71-92) 5. The Level of Investment in Department of Energy Environmental Quality Research and Development (93-107) References (108-112) Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members (113-117) Appendix B: Participants List and Agenda for August Workshop (118-123) Appendix C: Summary of Previous Reviews of DOE's Environmental Quality Research and Development Portfolio (124-142) Appendix D: Descriptions of DOE's Environmental Quality Technical Categories (143-148) Appendix E: Descriptions of Related Research and Development Programs (149-159) Appendix F: Annotated Bibliography of Selected Recent National Research Council Reports (160-168) Appendix G: List of Acronyms and Abbreviations (169-170)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 108
REFERENCES WAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2001. Congressional Action on Research and Development in the FY 2001 Budget. Washington, D.C.: AAAS. Bjornstadt, D. J., D. W. Jones, M. Russel, K. S. Redus, and C. L. Dummer. 1998. Outcome-Oriented Risk Planning for DOE's Clean Up. JIEE 98-01. Knoxville, Tenn.: Joint Institute for Energy and the Environment. Bjornstadt, D.J, D. W. Jones, C. L. Dummer, and K. S. Redus. 2000. Investment-Oriented R&D Planning and Evaluation for DOE's Cleanup. JIEE 2000-02. Knoxville, Tenn.: Joint Institute for Energy and Environment. Bowonder, B. and S. Yadav. 1999. R&D Spending Patterns of Global Firms. Research-Technology Management. November-December: 44-55. Washington, D.C.: Industrial Research Institute. COSEPUP (Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy). 1993. Science, Technology, and the Government: National Goals for a New Era. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. COSEPUP. 1 999a. Capitalizing on Investments in Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. COSEPUP. 1999b. Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. COSEPUP. 2000. Experiments in International Benchmarking of U.S. Research Fields. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. CRESP (Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation). 1999. Peer Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Use of Risk in its Prioritization Process. December 15. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1995. Closing the Circle on the Splitting of the Atom. DOE/EM-0266 (reprinted 1996~. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 108

OCR for page 109
References 109 DOE. 1996. Taking Stock: A Look at the Opportunities and Challenges Posed by Inventories From the Cold War Era. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.19. DOE. 1997a. Linking Legacies: Connecting the Cold War Nuclear Weapons Production Processes to Their Environmental Consequences. DOE/EM-0319. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997b. U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Plan: Proving America with Energy Security, National Security, Environmental Quality, Science Leadership. DOE/PO-0053. September Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1998. Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0362. June. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy/Office of Environmental Management. DOE. 1999a. From Cleanup to Stewardship: A Companion report to Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0466. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1999b. Resolution on the Work Package Ranking System. Technology Development and Transfer Committee of Department of Energy Environmental Management Advisory Board. April 22. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000a. Energy Resources Research and Development Portfolio. Volume 1 of 4, February. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000b. Environmental Quality Research and Development Portfolio. Volume 2 of 4, February. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000c. National Security Research and Development Portfolio. Volume 3 of 4, February. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000d. Science Research and Development Portfolio. Volume 4 of 4, February. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000e. Status Report on Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0526. March. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000f. Strategic Plan: Strength Through Science, Powering the 21 St Century. DOE/CR-0070. September. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000g. Adequacy Analysis of the Environmental Quality Research and Development Portfolio. September. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000h. Environmental Management Advisory Board Letter Report on Adequacy Analysis. October. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000i. R&D Portfolio Analysis, Overview. Online. Available at: http://www.osti.gov/portfolio.

OCR for page 110
110 A Strategic Vision for DOE Environmental Quality R&D DOE. 2000j. Review of the Department of Energy's Laboratory-Directed Research and Development Program. External Members of the DOE Laboratory Operations Board. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000k. Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan. Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee, Subcommittee on Long-Term Planning for Nuclear Energy Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 20001. Report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board's Panel on Emerging Technological Alternatives to Incineration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000m. Environmental Management Science Program Fiscal Year 2000-2004 Multi-Year Program Plan. DOE/ID-10730. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2000n. The Office of Science and Technology Work Package Ranking System. March. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2001 a. The Role and Status of Basic Science in Accomplishing the Department of Energy's Environmental Management Mission. Environmental Management Advisory Board. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 2001 b. A Renort to Conaress on Lona-Term Stewardshio. . ~ _ DOE/EM-0563. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. Fischoff, B. 2000. Scientific management of science? Policy Sciences 33~1):73-87. GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). 1996. Energy Management: Technology Development Program Taking Action to Address Problems. GAO/RCED-96-184. July. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. GAO. 1998. Further Actions Needed to Increase the Use of Innovative Cleanup Technologies. GAO/RCED-98-249. September. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisNVorld Energy Congress). 1995. Global Energy Perspectives to 2050 and Beyond. Laxenburg, Austria, 106 pp. Jenni, K. E., M. W. Merkofer, and C. Williams. 1995. The rise and fall of a risk-based priority system: Lessons Learned from DOE's Environmental Restoration Priority System. Risk Analysis 15~3~:397- 410. Kaiser-Hill. 2000. Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Programmatic Risk Management Plan: A Plan to Identify, Prioritize, and Mitigate Risks to Project Schedule and Cost. Denver, Colo.: Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C.

OCR for page 111
References 111 NRC (National Research Council). 1990. Rethinking High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1995. Nuclear Wastes: Technologies for Separations and Transmutation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1996a. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: A Potential Solution for the Disposal of Transuranic Waste. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1996b. The Hanford Tanks: Environmental Impacts and Policy Choices. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1997. Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program: Final Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1998. Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs: The Department of Energy's Office of Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1999a. Decision Making in the U.S. Department of Energy's Environmental Management Office of Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1999b. Groundwater and Soil Cleanup: Improving Management of Persistent Contaminants. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1999c. An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management, with an Example from the Hanford Site Tanks. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1999d. Alternative High-Level Waste Treatments at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000a. Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000b. From Research to Operations in Weather Satellites and Numerical Weather Prediction. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000c. Research Needs in Subsurface Science: U.S. Department of Energy's Environmental Management Science Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000d. Long-Term Research Needs on Radioactive High-Level Waste at Department of Energy Sites: Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000e. Long-Term Research Needs in Deactivation and Decommissioning at Department of Energy Sites: Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000f. Alternatives for High-Level Waste Salt Processing at the Savannah River Site. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 112
112 A Strategic Vision for DOE Environmental Quality R&D NRC. 2000g. Alternative High-Level Waste Treatments at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000h. Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Remediation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000i. Improving Operations and Long-Term Safety of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000j. Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2001. Disposition of High-Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators 2000. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation. NWTRB (Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board). 1999. NWTRB Viewpoint Fact Sheet: What is the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board? January. NWTRB. 2000. Letter Report to the U.S. Congress and the Secretary of Energy. December. Washington, D.C. OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1991. Complex Cleanup: The Environmental Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production, OTA-0-484. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. OTA.1993a. Dismantling the Bomb and Managing the Nuclear Materials, 1-16. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. OTA. 1993b. Hazards Ahead: Managing Cleanup Worker Health and Safety at the Nuclear Weapons Complex, 1-3. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Probst, K. N. and McGovern, M.H. 1998. Long-Term Stewardship and the Nuclear Weapons Complex: The Challenge Ahead. Center for Risk Assessment, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. U.S. House of Representatives. 2000. Incinerating Cash: The Department of Energy's Failure to Develop and Use Innovative Technologies to Clean Up the Nuclear Waste Legacy. October. Washington, D.C.: U.S. House of Representatives. WAG (Washington Advisory Group). 1999. Management Subsurface Contamination: Improving Management of the Department of Energy's Science and Engineering Research on Subsurface Contamination. December 17. Washington D.C. White House. 1999. Strategic Plan to Implement Executive Order 13101: Greening the Government Through Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Federal Acquisition. March 12. Washington, D.C.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

environmental quality