The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment
1996 Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
1999 Census 2000 Operational Plan Using Traditional Census-Taking Methods. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
2000 The Census 2000 Evaluation Program. Planning, Research, and Evaluation Division. Washington, D.C. (February 4).
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Congressional Members 2001 A Guide to Statistical Adjustment: How It Really Works. Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. (May 23, 2001).
U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members 2001a Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. (April).
2001b Final Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. (September).
U.S. General Accounting Office 1992 Decennial Census: 1990 Results Show Need for Fundamental Reform. GAO/GGD-92–94. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2000a 2000 Census—New Data Capture System Progress and Risks. GAO/AIMD-00–61. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. (February).
2000b 2000 Census—Status of Nonresponse Follow-up and Key Operations. GAO/T-GGD/ AIMD-00–164. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. (May 11).
Waite, Preston J., Sally M.Obenski, and Lisa E.Buckley 2001 2010 Census Planning: The Strategy. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Atlanta. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (August).
Warren, Robert 2001 New Census Data and INS Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population. INS Release. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Washington, D.C.
West, Kirsten K., and J.Gregory Robinson 2001 The Use of Demographic Benchmarks to Ensure Census Data Quality. Paper prepared for the International Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Stockholm. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. (May).
Wetrogan, Signe I., and Arthur R.Cresce 2001 ESCAP II: Characteristics of Census Imputations. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 22. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 12).
Word, David L. 1997 Who Responds/Who Doesn’t?: Analyzing Variation in Mail Response Rates During the 1990 Census. Population Division Working Paper No. 19. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
Wright, Tommy 2000 Sampling for follow-up of nonresponding households. Pp. 325–327 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.