Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 168
B
Information-Gathering Meetings
Presentations Given During First Committee Meeting
(April 1 1-12, 2000, Richland, Washington)
Background (Gerald Boyd, Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department
of Energy [DOE], Office of Science and Technology [via
telephone])
Hanford Site history (Roy Gephart, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
[PNNL])
Hanford Site vision and future (Mike Thompson, Acting Program
Manager, GroundwaterNadose Zone Office, DOE Richland)
Overview of the Groundwater/\/adose Zone Integration Project (Michael
Graham, Bechtel Hanford)
Overview of the Hanford Site science and technology (S&T) program
(Mark Freshley and John Zachara, PNNL)
Overview of the activities of the Integration Program Expert Panel (IPEP)
(Ed Berkey, Concurrent Technologies Corporation, IPEP Chair)
Comments from stakeholders, regulators, and Tribal Nations
Presentations Given During Second Committee Meeting
(June 28-3O, 2000, Richland, Washington)
What is the end-state vision for the Hanford Site, and what decisions
need to be made to achieve this vision? (Harry Boston, DOE
Richland; Mike Hughes, Bechtel-Hanford)
Discussion of R&D needs and S&T plan (John Zachara and Mark
Freshley, PNNL)
Comments from stakeholders, regulators, and Tribal Nations
168
OCR for page 169
169
Information-Gathering Meetings
Presentations Given During Third Committee Meeting
(September 6-8, 2000, Richland, Washington)
River, groundwater-river interface, and risk (Roger Dirkes, Amoret Bunn,
Integration Project [IPl)
Characterization of systems and inventory (includes inventory, monitoring,
characterization, and data management) (Bruce Ford, Charley
Kincaid, IP)
System Assessment Capability: Definition and development and
description of current activities and future plans (Bob Bryce, IP)
Comments from stakeholders, regulators, and Tribal Nations
Field Trip to Hanford Site
(Wednesday, September 6, 2000)
Gab/e Mountain:
Geology-Hydrogeology
Nuclear fuel cycle, operations, and waste disposal history
Cleanup plans
100-H Area:
Decontamination and decommissioning (D&D); environmental
restoration activities; Columbia River and salmon spawning
grounds.
100 D Area:
Chromium plume and in situ red ox passive barrier
100 N Area:
. .
Strontium-90 plume and treatment operations
Field Lysimeter Test Facility
Z trenches (carbon tetrachloride site)
SX Tank Farm
Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) (Hanford
sand facies and elastic dikes)
B. BX, and BY Tank Farms (single shell)
BY Cribs (200-BP-1 )
Hanford Engineered Barrier (Hanford Cap)
Vadose zone transport field study site (Sisson and Lu site) and
ILAW
OCR for page 170
170
Science and Technology for Environmental Cleanup
Presentation Given During Fourth Committee Meeting
(November 1-3, 2000, Irvine, California)
Update on the integration project (Michael Graham, Bechtel Hanford;
Mark Freshley, PNNL)
Fifth Committee Meeting
(January 18-19, 2001, Irvine, California)
No presentations were given at this meeting.
Presentations Given During Sixth Committee Meeting
(March 28-30, 2001, Washington, D.C.)
Integration Project update (Michael Graham, Bechtel Hanford)
S-SX field investigations (Tony Knepp, Office of River Protection)
Science and technology contributions to S-SX field investigations (John
Zachara, PNNL)
Representative terms from entire chapter:
mark freshley
