Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel

REFERENCES CITED

Boomer, K.D., S.K.Baker, A.L.Boldt, M.D.Britton, L.E.Engelsman, J.D.Galbraith, J.S. Garfield, K.A.Giese, C.E.Golberg, B.A.Higley, K.J.Hull, L.J.Johnson, R.P. Knight, J.S.Layman, R.S.Marusich, R.J.Parazin, M.G.Piepho, E.J.Slaathaug, T.L.Waldo, and C.E.Worcester. 1991. Systems Engineering Study for the Closure of Single-Shell Tanks, Volumes 1–6—Draft A. Westinghouse Hanford Co. Report WHC-EP-0405 Draft A, Richland, WA.

Boomer, K.D., S.K.Baker, A.L.Boldt, J.D.Galbraith, J.S.Garfield, C.E.Golberg, B.A. Higley, L.J.Johnson, M.J.Kupfer, R.M.Marusich, R.J.Parazin, A.N.Praga, G.W. Reddick, J.A.Reddick, E.J.Slaathaug, L.M.Swanson, T.L.Waldo, and C.E. Worcester. 1993. Tank Waste Technical Options Report. Westinghouse Hanford Company report WHC-EP-0616 Revision 0, Richland, WA.


Chem-Nuclear Geotech, Inc. 1991. Technology Needs Assessment Final Report. U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Projects Office report, Grand Junction, CO.

Chem-Nuclear Geotech, Inc. 1993. Technology Needs Crosswalk Report, First Edition, Abridged Version. U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Field Office Report DOE/ID/12584–117Ed. 1, Grand Junction, CO.

Consortium for Environmental Risk Evaluation. 1995. Health and Ecological Risks at the U.S. Dept. of Energy’s Nuclear Weapons Complex: A Qualitative Evaluation. CERE Interim Risk Report.


Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. 1994. Recommendation 94–1 “Improved Schedule for Remediation in the Defense Nuclear Complex. Federal Register Vol. 59, No. 106, p. 28,848–28,850.


Hench, L.L, R.J.Charles, A.R.Cooper, R.C.Ewing, J.R.Hutchins, D.W.Readey, F.L. VerSnyder, and S.M.Widerhorn. 1979. The evaluation and selection of candidate high level waste forms. Alternative Waste Form Peer Review Panel Report No. 1, USDOE/TIC-10228 (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA).

Hench, L.L, R.J.Charles, A.R.Cooper, R.C.Ewing, J.R.Hutchins, D.W.Readey, F.L. VerSnyder, and S.M.Widerhorn. 1980. The evaluation and selection of candidate high level waste forms. Alternative Waste Form Peer Review Panel Report No. 2, USDOE/TIC-11219 (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA).

Hench, L.L, R.J.Charles, A.R.Cooper, R.C.Ewing, J.R.Hutchins, D.W.Readey, F.L. VerSnyder, and S.M.Widerhorn. 1981. The evaluation and selection of candidate



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 21
Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program REFERENCES CITED Boomer, K.D., S.K.Baker, A.L.Boldt, M.D.Britton, L.E.Engelsman, J.D.Galbraith, J.S. Garfield, K.A.Giese, C.E.Golberg, B.A.Higley, K.J.Hull, L.J.Johnson, R.P. Knight, J.S.Layman, R.S.Marusich, R.J.Parazin, M.G.Piepho, E.J.Slaathaug, T.L.Waldo, and C.E.Worcester. 1991. Systems Engineering Study for the Closure of Single-Shell Tanks, Volumes 1–6—Draft A. Westinghouse Hanford Co. Report WHC-EP-0405 Draft A, Richland, WA. Boomer, K.D., S.K.Baker, A.L.Boldt, J.D.Galbraith, J.S.Garfield, C.E.Golberg, B.A. Higley, L.J.Johnson, M.J.Kupfer, R.M.Marusich, R.J.Parazin, A.N.Praga, G.W. Reddick, J.A.Reddick, E.J.Slaathaug, L.M.Swanson, T.L.Waldo, and C.E. Worcester. 1993. Tank Waste Technical Options Report. Westinghouse Hanford Company report WHC-EP-0616 Revision 0, Richland, WA. Chem-Nuclear Geotech, Inc. 1991. Technology Needs Assessment Final Report. U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Projects Office report, Grand Junction, CO. Chem-Nuclear Geotech, Inc. 1993. Technology Needs Crosswalk Report, First Edition, Abridged Version. U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Field Office Report DOE/ID/12584–117Ed. 1, Grand Junction, CO. Consortium for Environmental Risk Evaluation. 1995. Health and Ecological Risks at the U.S. Dept. of Energy’s Nuclear Weapons Complex: A Qualitative Evaluation. CERE Interim Risk Report. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. 1994. Recommendation 94–1 “Improved Schedule for Remediation in the Defense Nuclear Complex. Federal Register Vol. 59, No. 106, p. 28,848–28,850. Hench, L.L, R.J.Charles, A.R.Cooper, R.C.Ewing, J.R.Hutchins, D.W.Readey, F.L. VerSnyder, and S.M.Widerhorn. 1979. The evaluation and selection of candidate high level waste forms. Alternative Waste Form Peer Review Panel Report No. 1, USDOE/TIC-10228 (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA). Hench, L.L, R.J.Charles, A.R.Cooper, R.C.Ewing, J.R.Hutchins, D.W.Readey, F.L. VerSnyder, and S.M.Widerhorn. 1980. The evaluation and selection of candidate high level waste forms. Alternative Waste Form Peer Review Panel Report No. 2, USDOE/TIC-11219 (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA). Hench, L.L, R.J.Charles, A.R.Cooper, R.C.Ewing, J.R.Hutchins, D.W.Readey, F.L. VerSnyder, and S.M.Widerhorn. 1981. The evaluation and selection of candidate

OCR for page 21
Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program high level waste forms . Alternative Waste Form Peer Review Panel Report No. 3, USDOE/TIC-11472 (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA). Johnson, M.E., M.L.Grygiel, P.A.Baynes, J.P.Bekemeier, B.D.Zimmerman, and M.B. Triplett. 1993. Tank Waste Decision Analysis Report. Westinghouse Hanford Company report WHC-EP-0617 DRAFT, Richland, WA. National Research Council. 1992. Comments on Draft Systems Engineering Study for Closure of Hanford Single-Shell Tanks. Panel to Review Planned DOE Disposal of Radioactive Waste in Single-Shell Tanks at Hanford, Washington, DC. National Research Council. 1994. Letter from R.J.Budnitz, Chairman, Committee on Remediation of Buried and Tank Wastes, to T.P.Grumbly, Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, concerning the Committee’s perspectives on systems analysis methods as applied to the tank remediation program at the Hanford Reservation. Washington, DC. National Research Council. 1995. Safety of the High-Level Uranium Ore Residues at the Niagara Falls Storage Site, Lewiston, New York. Committee on Remediation of Buried and Tank Wastes, Washington, DC. Pacific Northwest Laboratory. 1993. Hanford Integrated Planning Process: 1993 Hanford Site-Specific Science and Technology Plan. U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Report DOE/RL-93–38. Richland, WA. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on Alternative Futures for the Department of Energy National Laboratories. 1995. Alternative Futures for the Department of Energy National Laboratories. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Energy. 1986. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Long-Term Management of the Existing Radioactive Wastes and Residues at the Niagara Falls Storage Site. Report DOE/EIS-0109F (DE86008418), Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Energy. 1987. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic and Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs report DOE/EIS-0113 (5 volumes), Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Energy. 1994. Proposed Plan for Remedial Actions at Operable Unit 4 DOE/EIS-0195D: Fernald Environmental Management Project, Fernald, Ohio. Fernald Field Office, Fernald, OH.

OCR for page 21
Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program U.S. Department of Energy. 1995a. Estimating the Cold War Mortgage: The 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report. Office of Waste Management Report DOE/EM-0232, Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Energy. 1995b. Risks and the Risk Debate: Searching for Common Ground, “The First Step”. Office of Environmental Management Draft Report, Washington, DC. Washington State Department of Ecology, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and United States Department of Energy. 1994. Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, Fourth Amendment. Report 89–10 Rev. 3. Westinghouse Hanford Company. 1994 (June 23). Hanford Site Systems Engineering Management Plan, Revision 0. Richland, WA.

OCR for page 21
Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program This page in the original is blank.