National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Executive Summary
Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1996. Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10229.
×

INTRODUCTION

The Committee on Remediation of Buried and Tank Wastes of the National Research Council (NRC) has been in existence since early 1993 to provide scientific and technical oversight and evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Restoration (EM-40) program of remediation activities within the Defense Nuclear Waste Complex contaminated with radioactive and mixed wastes. During this period, committee members have spent considerable time reviewing various aspects of the DOE/EM-40 program, concentrating on technical issues within the tank and buried waste purview of the committee’s charter. Although receiving good response to requests for information in the form of technical documents, briefings, and site visits, the committee has been frustrated in its attempts to review programs and planning documents because of what appears to be a continuous state of change and redirection by DOE/EM-40. The committee has observed a lack of sufficient progress toward DOE’s remediation goals, it has observed inefficiency, and it believes that stated goals are in many cases not correctly formulated. The committee has observed that many in the public, government organizations, and the DOE complex share these perceptions.

To be sure, the scale and technical complexity of DOE’s clean-up mission pose difficult management challenges. Private companies have had difficulties in planning and controlling remediation of former plant sites that are smaller and less technically challenging than the major DOE facilities. Other federal and state agencies with clean-up responsibilities, in particular the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Defense, have also been criticized for confusion and inefficiency. But the judgment of the committee, a group with widely varied experience in federal and state agencies and commercial organizations, is that the DOE/EM-40 performance falls short, not only of the ideal, but of the standard of reasonable effectiveness set by other organizations in both the public and private sectors.

During its study, the committee has been searching for the causes of the lack of progress in environmental remediation. Although the committee is not sure that it could ever identify a single root cause—indeed almost surely there is more than one—it has developed a working hypothesis that may form a useful framework for both analysis and follow-up action. In this report the committee outlines the pattern of organizational behavior that it has observed, describes a number of general symptoms of the problem, and discusses some examples that illustrate how these symptoms reflect this pattern.

If the committee’s hypothesis is correct, a fundamental reexamination of the situation is called for at the highest level so that progress can be made on the important technical work to be done—something that is not always the case today—even though DOE remains an organization that values the best science and engineering and attracts outstanding technical talent to its endeavors.

Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1996. Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10229.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1996. Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10229.
×
Page 3
Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1996. Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10229.
×
Page 4
Next: Working Hypothesis »
Barriers to Science: Technical Management of the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Program Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!