| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 415
Paper Contributions
OCR for page 416
416 UNEQUAL TREATMENT: CONFRONTING RACIALAND ETHNIC DISPARITIESIN HEALTH CARE
cult to separate healthcare administration choices that harm poor people from those that harm
members of racial and ethnic minority groups. This is particularly true in the case of programs
such as Medicaid, where coverage is specifically aimed at the poor and medically indigent.
Second, even if U.S. lawmakers were to enact a totally reformed system that utilizes a
single payer with common coverage and payment rules, research from other nations suggests that
minority and poor residents nonetheless would continue to experience reduced healthcare access
and poorer health outcomes. The literature on disparities in healthcare access is replete with ex-
amples of disparate access to care and disparate utilization of health services. (Mayberry, 2000,
Lillie-Blanton et. al. 20001. The most recent example can be found in a 2001 Surgeon General's
report examining racial and ethnic disparities in the use of mental health services by members of
racial and ethnic minority groups, which speculates on the underlying causes of disparity in ac-
cess, utilization and quality and concludes that the principal factors are cost, poor services in
poor communities, cultural and communications barriers, fear of the health system, and general
overall problems in the relationship between patients and providers (Surgeon General, 20011.
This focus on provider/patient communication difficulties, fear of the system, and cultural isola-
tion in healthcare appear to be recurrent themes throughout the literature on healthcare dispari-
ties.
Furthermore, the evidence on disparate access to care even where insurance is technically
not a barrier is hardly unique to the United States. For example, studies of the apparently com-
mon practice of using government-sponsored community health clinics in nations with national
health systems typically point to the need for such service delivery interventions because of ac-
cess barriers related to race, ethnicity, culture and poverty (Hawkins et. al., 2000 Consequently,
even aggressive efforts to reduce discaritv-causin~ choices in the administration of healthcare
.L , ~ ,
. .. `. . .. . . . .. . . . .. . ...
financing programs could nonetheless continue to leave minority and low- income patients with
unequal access.
Third, even substantial incremental reforms that improve existing programs but leave
them in tact inevitably would leave millions of Americans dependent on sources of healthcare
financing that are perceived as other than "mainstream," and thus subject to the misapprehen-
sions that enrollment in "lesser" programs brings with it. The data reviewed for this study sug-
gest that incremental reforms would leave a racially and income-identifiable group of Ameri-
cans disproportionately enrolled in forms of healthcare financing that are less attractive to
healthcare providers because they cover less, pay less, and carry unpleasant connotations and
associations, such as bureaucratic hassles and the status of a "poor people's program." This
lesser form of coverage in effect validates on business grounds what may be underlying prejudi-
cial leanings on the part of members of the medical care industry.
Finally, and as noted at the outset, any assessment of the limitations of directly financed
public insurance programs such as Medicare and Medicaid must be read against a backdrop of
their extraordinary accomplishments over the past three and a half decades. Since their incep-
tion, Medicare and Medicaid have literally remade the American healthcare system for minority
Americans, opening access that previously had been denied. At the time of their enactment,
white Americans were hospitalized 27% more frequently than African Americans and members
of other minority groups, and in the case of elderly persons, the racial gap stood at 70%. By
1975, the gap had narrowed to 4% overall and 14% among the elderly (Davis and Schoen,
' At one time, dependence on Medicaid was viewed by health providers and policy makers as stigmatizing. As Medicare has become in-
creasingly complicated and overall payment has declined in relation to the overall cost of care, anecdotal evidence suggests that reliance on
Medicare (either alone or in combination with Medicaid) may be producing similar reactions within the health system.
OCR for page 417
Racial and Ethnic Disparities
in Diagnosis and Treatment:
A Review of the Evidence and a
Consideration of Causes
H. lack Geiger, M.D.
City University of New York Medical School
INTRODUCTION
At no time in the history of the United States has the health status of
minority populations African Americans, Native Americans and, more
recently, Hispanics, and several Asian subgroups equaled or even ap-
proximated that of white Americans. The health of all American racial
and ethnic groups has improved dramatically, particularly over the last
six decades, but the paired burdens of excess morbidity and decreased life
expectancy for people of color have been noted over several centuries and
have proved, even recently, to be stubbornly resistant to substantial
change (Byrd and Clayton, 2000; National Center for Health Statistics,
1998~. Two observations, some four decades apart, illustrate this persis-
tence of inequality. In his classic 1944 study of the role of race in American
life, Gunnar Myrdal noted that "Area for area, class for class, Negroes
cannot get the same advantages in the way of prevention and care of dis-
ease that whites can" (Myrdal, 1944~. In 1985, the Report of the Secretary's
Task Force on Black and Minority Health concluded that "Despite the
unprecedented explosion of scientific knowledge and the phenomenal
capacity of medicine to diagnose, treat and cure disease, Blacks, Hispan-
ics, Native Americans, and those of Asian/Pacific Islander heritage have
not benefited fully or equitably from the fruits of science or from systems
responsible for translating and using health sciences technology"
(USDHHS, 1985~. In 1995, the overall African-American mortality rate
was 60 percent higher than that of whites precisely what it had been in
1950 (Williams and Rucker, 2000; Williams, 1999~.
417
OCR for page 418
418
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
Classic public health doctrine holds that the major determinants of
population health status and the primary explanations of disparities
among population groups lie in the social, physical, and economic envi-
ronments, which in turn are determined by the larger society's norms,
values, social stratification systems and political economy (King, 1996;
Menefee, 1996~. The causes of these minority/white disparities in health
status have consistently been attributed to such variables as socioeco-
nomic status (especially income, lack of education, and unemployment);
lifestyle choices and behavioral risks; occupational and environmental
hazards, inferior housing, poor nutrition, and different cultural beliefs
about health and illness. There is evidence for all of these variables. An-
other explanation is lack of minority access to health care, particularly the
lack of either public or private health insurance, which has persisted de-
spite the introduction and expansion of such programs as Medicare and
Medicaid (Blendon et al., 1989; Weinick, Zuvekas, and Cohen, 2000~.
Two other variables frequently suggested as causative similarly re-
flect values and beliefs that are prevalent in the larger society and appear
with considerable frequency in the medical literature on disparities. The
first of these is the contention that there are biologically and genetically
distinct human races, and that "racial" biologic differences in susceptibil-
ity to, manifestations of, or therapeutic responses to specific diseases are
significant pathophysiologic contributors to health disparities. Such be-
liefs appeared frequently in l9th-century America as elaborate, pseudo-
scientific arguments for the inherent biological inferiority of African
Americans (Cartwright, 1851~. ~
today, however, despite the recognition
that "race" is a social rather than a meaningful biologic concept (Marks,
1995; Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi, and Piazzi, 1994; Witzig, 1996), arguments
about the medical importance of racial groupings continue to appear,
without pejorative intent and in highly sophisticated form (Wood, 2001;
Schwartz, 2001; Goodman, 2000~.
The second suggestion is that racial and ethnic discrimination itself
may be an important contributor to health disparities, not merely through
the historic and persistent disadvantages it creates for minorities in the
American social structure, but also specifically through health provider
bias conscious or unconscious, individual or institutional. A rich litera-
ture attests to the persistence and prevalence of racist beliefs and discri-
minatory behaviors in contemporary American society (Steinhorn and
Diggs-Brown, 1999; Walter, 1998; Polednak, 1997; Massey and Denton,
1993; Hacker, 1992; Feagin, 1991; Farley and Allen, 1989~. There was lim-
ited quantitative evidence, however, for the view that such racial/ethnic
discrimination might occur frequently in medicine until the availability of
large administrative databases from Medicare, the Health Care Financing
Administration (HCFA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and
OCR for page 419
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 419
other sources initiated a growing stream of studies examining racial and
ethnic disparities in diagnosis and treatment. These studies clearly estab-
lished that whatever the causes, the experience of minorities within the
health care system differed from that of comparable whites across a broad
range of disease categories. The majority of these investigations focused
on African-American patients; data on Hispanics, Native Americans, and
Asian/Pacific Islanders were more limited.
In 1990, the American Medical Association (AMA) took formal note
of black-white disparities in health care. While emphasizing the probable
roles of socioeconomic status and sociocultural factors and noting the limi-
tations of many studies, the AMA also acknowledged that "Disparities in
treatment decisions may reflect the existence of subconscious bias....
The health care system, like all other elements of society, has not fully
eradicated this [racial] prejudice" (Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs,
1990~. Intense discussions of the early evidence and its possible causes,
however, were already underway. A search of the literature prepared for
the AMA's board of trustees covering only the articles, commentaries and
letters that appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association
and the New England Journal of Medicine from 1984 to 1994, filled 66
single-spaced pages (Board of Trustees Report 50-1, 1995~. The comments
of many physicians were heavily weighted toward denial. As van Ryn
has pointed out, such reluctance is understandable because the idea that
racial/ethnic bias might be operative conflicts with most physicians' con-
scious commitment to anti-discriminatory principles, their views of their
own behaviors, that of their peers and the institutions within which they
work, and the ethical commitments of medicine (van Ryn, 2001~.
Studies of racial/ethnic disparities in diagnosis and treatment prolif-
erated throughout the l990s and were characterized by increasingly so-
phisticated control or adjustment for such confounding variables as health
insurance status, income and education, severity or stage of disease, co-
morbidity, and hospital type and resources. They drew upon a wide vari-
ety of datasources, regional and multi-center collaborations, quality as-
surance investigations, and disease-specific investigations such as the
Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Relatively few were based on
detailed access to clinical records. The limitations of administrative data-
bases and retrospective methodologies usually precluded any evidence-
based identification of the causes of disparities. Explanations, which were
necessarily speculative in most cases, were drawn from the same repeti-
tive list of possibilities. They included patient choice or preference, un-
measured aspects of socioeconomic status, unmeasured clinical variables,
biological differences in disease manifestation or response to treatment,
minority cultural beliefs, lack of trust in the health care system, deficien-
cies in providers' cultural competence, and difficulties in cross-racial/
OCR for page 420
420
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
ethnic physician-patient communication, in addition to the possibility of
individual or institutional bias. In the late 1990s, concerns about racial/
ethnic bias and stereotyping appeared with increasing frequency in the
medical literature (Geiger, 1996, 1997; King, 1996; Smith, 1998; Williams
and Rucker, 2000) and began to be presented as issues of social justice
(McGary, 1999~. Recently, local governments and public health depart-
ments have conducted studies of racial/ethnic disparities and discrimina-
tion in health care institutions in their own areas (Twin Cities Metro Mi-
nority Health Assessment, 2001; Seattle and King County Public Health
Department, 2001~. At the federal level, Congressional legislation has spe-
cifically addressed issues of discrimination in health care, and a new Na-
tional Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities has been estab-
lished at the National Institutes of Health. Clearly, the problem of racial/
ethnic disparities in diagnosis and treatment is increasingly being viewed
as an important subset of the issue of achieving equity in health status
(Department of Health and Human Services, 2000) and as a particularly
troubling component of the problems of race and ethnicity in the larger
society.
It is in this context that systematic reviews of the relevant medical
literature may help to illuminate three key questions. Does the cumula-
tive weight of evidence establish that there are significant racial and ethnic
differences in diagnostic investigation and therapeutic recommendations
and actions, due at least in part to problems of bias and discrimination? If
so, do such differences in health care in turn contribute to the excess bur-
dens of morbidity, disability, impaired quality of life and premature mor-
tality that are already so well documented in studies of the health status
of minority populations? Finally, what can be determined about the mul-
tiple processes and causes of these differences? The answers may be help-
ful in addressing two additional questions: What are the needs for further
research, and what steps might be taken now to reduce or eliminate such
disparities?
The Present Review: Scope and Methods
This paper will present a sampling of findings from an ongoing re-
view of the medical literature on racial and ethnic differences in diagnosis
and treatment. Relevant studies were identified by searching Medline
and many other databases, including those maintained by HCFA, the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQj, and the HHS Of-
fice of Minority Health (OMH). Additional studies were identified
through references in published articles. A substantial number of dedi-
cated web sites relevant to issues of minority health, cultural competence
and health workforce diversity were examined, as were a wide variety of
OCR for page 421
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 421
reports from the Henry I. Kaiser Family Foundation, the Commonwealth
Fund, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the Na-
tional Medical Association (NMA), the Hispanic Medical Association
(HMA), and other organizations. Editorials, commentaries, and work-
shop and conference reports were also reviewed. In all, more than 600
bibliographic citations have been accumulated and organized primarily
by disease category. Topics include general medical care, coronary artery
and other cardiac disease, cancer, cerebrovascular disease, asthma, HIV/
AIDS, renal disease and renal transplantation, diabetes, mental health,
maternal and child health, ophthalmic disease, prevention, and a small
sampling of other disease categories. An effort was made to identify all
relevant studies comparing diagnosis and treatment by race or ethnicity,
including any that did not report significant disparities. Additional topics
include research methods and clinical trials, issues of trust and communi-
cation in the healthcare system, and medical education and cultural
competence.
A hard copy of each article was obtained from the library and exam-
ined for relevance, study design, appropriateness of data sources, ana-
lytic methods and control of potentially confounding variables, and origi-
nality. Each selected article was then reviewed by at least two people a
physician with epidemiologic training and a master's or doctoral level
epidemiologist or health services researcher. A detailed one- or two-page
annotation was then prepared, including not only the material usually
presented in the abstracts purpose, data sources, study design, methods
and results but also important details from the text such as the discus-
sions, the offered explanations, the acknowledged limitations, and any
statements of implications for policy or research. Initial support for this
work was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and sup-
port for what is now an ongoing effort has been provided by the Josiah
Macy, Jr., Foundation, the Commonwealth Fund, the Ford Foundation,
and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
This effort substantiates and extends the pioneering work of Mayberry
and his associates, who published the first detailed and comprehensive
review of the relevant medical literature (Mayberry, Mill, and Ofili, 2000~.
As indicated by the list of topics, the scope of the present effort was some-
what broader, as was the time frame. A few studies and commentaries,
mostly in the psychiatric literature, were found in the 1960s (Gross and
Herbert, 1969; Pasamanick 1963) and a small number of relevant publica-
tions appeared in the 1970s. The majority of articles selected for this re-
view, however, were published between 1980 and the first half of 2001.
Our purpose in the following sections is not to present an exhaustive
account or description of each annotation in every topic category, a task
that would require a much longer paper. Instead, a modest number of
OCR for page 422
422
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
studies, selected as representative of the most important findings, will be
described and discussed in the following section on general medical and
surgical care. This will give some sense of the data sources, study designs
and methods that are typical of the entire research effort. In subsequent
sections, an attempt will be made to present representative studies in each
of five disease categories. These examples from the literature review are
intended to document the multiplicity of factors, including but by no
means limited to individual and institutional bias, that contribute to racial
and ethnic disparities in diagnosis and treatment.
General Medical and Surgical Care
Perhaps the most useful data come from large-scale studies that ex-
amine racial/ethnic differences in the adequacy, intensity and quality of
diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for a wide range of clinical condi-
tions, in different hospital types and health care systems For example,
Kahn and her colleagues examined the quality of care provided to a na-
tionally representative sample of 9,932 elderly Medicare-insured benefi-
ciaries. The sample included patients who were black or from poor com-
munities and who had been hospitalized for congestive heart failure,
pneumonia, acute myocardial infarction or stroke, in one of 297 acute care
hospitals urban teaching, urban nonteaching, or rural in five states
(Kahn et al., 1994~. The study is noteworthy for its detailed examination of
clinical records, and its use of explicit quality criteria to assess the most
basic (not luxury) elements of care: history taking and physical examina-
tion, common diagnostic tests such as chemistries and chest X-rays, and
standard therapies such as diuretics and antibiotics. Because the care of
black and poor patients was found to be similar, the two groups were
combined in the analysis. When the experience of these patients was com-
pared with that of people who were white or more affluent, the quality of
care as measured by these fundamental indicators was found to be sig-
nificantly lower for the black and poor group. While quality of care was
best in urban teaching hospitals, the magnitude of the quality gap was
similar in all three hospital types. The authors noted that further research
is necessary to clarify whether sociocultural and educational incongruity
between providers and patients translates into misunderstandings about
patients' preferences and expectations, and to evaluate the extent to which
stereotyping, discrimination and bias exist in the hospital setting. They
concluded that "racial characteristics and poverty status also influence
the quality of care received by acutely ill, insured patients after they have
gained access to the hospital."
A number of similar studies examined black-white differences in the
use of selected specific procedures. Lee and colleagues reviewed the use
OCR for page 423
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 423
of both basic and sophisticated diagnostic tests and minor and major sur-
gical procedures, using claims data for Medicare beneficiaries in 10 states
and the District of Columbia who had both Part A and Part B coverage. A
subset of this sample was created by matching beneficiaries on the basis
of zipcode of residence to neutralize the effects of black-white differences
in provider access and regional practice patterns. Despite the adequacy of
health insurance coverage, black patients' utilization was substantially
weighted toward lower-cost procedures. The authors concluded that
"...providers appear to be giving less intensive care to otherwise similar
black Medicare beneficiaries" (Lee et al., 1997~. Similarly, McBean and
Gornick studied the use of 17 major diagnostic and therapeutic proce-
dures and found that black Medicare beneficiaries were much less likely
than whites to receive "referral-sensitive surgeries" (McBean and Gornick,
1994).
One of the largest studies reviewed more than 1.7 million hospital
discharge abstracts to examine use of major diagnostic and therapeutic
procedures in 77 disease categories in some 500 acute care hospitals
(Harris, Andrews, and Elixhauser,1997~. After controlling for patient age,
severity of illness, health insurance and hospital type, blacks were signifi-
cantly less likely than whites to receive a major therapeutic procedure in
almost half of the 77 disease categories. Again, in a five percent sample of
more than 1.2 million claims in a HCFA Medicare database, blacks were
found less likely than whites to receive 23 of 32 services, and the dispari-
ties were found even when patients were insured by both Medicare and
Medicaid, minimizing the confounding of race with financial barriers to
care (Escarce and Epstein, 1993~. In a study of racial variation in proce-
dures characterized as low, moderate or high physician discretion (Mort,
Weisman and Epstein, 1994), blacks were less likely to undergo even such
low-discretion (i.e., clinically urgent) procedures as appendectomy and
repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Disparities are not limited to Af-
rican Americans, however. After adjusting for socioeconomic status, a
study comparing experiences of Hispanic with non-Hispanic patients in
California, Florida, and New York found that Hispanics were less likely
to undergo major procedures in 38 percent of 63 different disease catego-
ries (Andrews and Elixhauser, 2000~. A similar pattern was found even
when very basic in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for
such common conditions as congestive heart failure and pneumonia were
examined (Ayanian et al., 1999a). Using explicit process criteria and after
adjustment, black Medicare patients were significantly less likely than
whites to receive adequate laboratory and other diagnostic tests or thera-
peutic drugs such as diuretics and antibiotics.
Most of the investigations described above are broad-brush studies.
Despite the consistency of their findings, and the indications that dispari-
OCR for page 424
424
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
ties may occur at every level of disease severity and at every stage of the
diagnostic and therapeutic process, they have the limitations described
previously. Most are retrospective, and cannot report information
gleaned directly from providers or patients. Most have limited access to
detailed clinical records, and so estimates of variables such as stage and
severity of disease are likely to be approximations. There are serious prob-
lems in controlling or adjusting adequately for socioeconomic status when
data on individual patient income, education or occupation are limited or
absent. Health insurance may fail to eliminate the financial barrier of
out-of-pocket expenses, which may affect both patient and provider
choices. And finally, these studies offer relatively little evidence on out-
comes such as disability or subsequent mortality.
These limitations underlie both the wide range and tentative nature
of the explanations that are offered for the findings of racial and ethnic
differences in care. The list is extraordinarily varied, but strikingly similar
across studies. As noted previously, researchers suggest patient choice or
preference; unmeasured socioeconomic variables; unmeasured clinical
variables; unspecified sociocultural factors and differences in health be-
liefs; and impaired physician-patient communication and interactions.
Also frequently mentioned are financial barriers and procedure costs as
disincentives to care; differences in provider type, practice patterns, refer-
ral patterns and hospital resources; and overuse of procedures for whites
rather than underuse for blacks. Yet, almost all the investigators also raise
the possibility of racial bias and discrimination by providers, sometimes
referring explicitly to racial and ethnic stereotyping. And many call for
further research specifically designed to resolve the unanswered ques-
tions of causation.
A number of general surgical and orthopedic studies present similar
findings. Blacks hospitalized in Maryland from 1985 to 1987 had lower
rates for discretionary orthopedic, vascular, and laryngeal surgeries; the
more discretionary the procedure, the lower the incidence among blacks.
The differences were particularly marked for vascular surgery and were
attributed to lower rates of referral and access to specialty care (Gittelsohn,
Halpern, and Sanchez, 1991~. A large retrospective cohort study of ampu-
tation rates and leg-sparing surgery for peripheral vascular disease among
African-American and white Medicare beneficiaries found that among
both diabetics and nondiabetics, African Americans were significantly
more likely than whites to undergo amputations and significantly less
likely to receive lower-extremity arterial revascularization (Guadagnoli et
al., 1995~. A striking example of racially differential provision of advanced
technology was reported in the free-care VA system, in which both pro-
viders' financial incentives and patients' financial barriers are irrelevant
and the socioeconomic spectrum of patients is substantially narrowed.
OCR for page 425
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 425
Researchers examining a prospective clinical records file covering all VA
hospitals with operating rooms studied the use of laparoscopic versus
conventional open cholecystectomy (which has a much higher in-hospital
death rate) in the first four years after the introduction of the newer
method. After adjustment for age, coexisting disease, socioeconomic sta-
tus, and potentially confounding clinical characteristics, African Ameri-
cans were 32 percent less likely than whites to receive laparoscopic sur-
gery (Arozullah et al., 1999~. In several other studies, African Americans
were significantly less likely to receive total hip or total knee replacements,
although racial variation in disease incidence may account for some of the
differences (Harris and Sledge, 1990; Wilson, May, and Kelly, 1994; Baron
et al., 1996~.
A few studies reported particularly troubling outcomes. Hispanic pa-
tients with long bone fractures in one teaching hospital emergency room
were twice as likely as non-Hispanics to receive no medication for pain
(Todd, Samaroo, and Hoffman, 1993~. At least one study showed that mi-
nority outpatients with cancer were provided with inadequate analgesic
medication (Cleeland et al., 1997~. Elderly African-American, Hispanic,
Native Americans and Asian nursing home residents with cancer were also
less likely to receive pain medication (Bernabei et al., 1998~. Finally, in a
national sample of intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States, African-
American patients were found to receive significantly less treatment, less
technological monitoring, fewer laboratory tests and less life-supporting
treatments than whites in the first 24 hours in the ICU, after adjusting for
type and severity of illness, age, and hospital characteristics (Williams et al.,
1995~. However, the researchers noted no black-white difference in overall
ICU and hospital death rates.
Finally, studies of hormone replacement therapy provide some in-
sight into the contribution of physician-patient communication to differ-
ences in care. Post-menopausal African-American women were not only
less likely than white women to receive such treatment, but also less likely
to receive counseling from physicians or be offered the choice of replace-
ment therapy (Marsh et al., 1999; McNagney and Jacobson, 1997; Ganeson
and Norris, 2000~.
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
are the most intensively and elaborately studied topics among all stud-
ies of racial and ethnic differences in care. In the last 20 years close to
200 studies, reviews, editorials and commentaries have investigated or
discussed disparities in cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, coronary ar-
tery bypass surgery (CABG) and medical therapies such as the use of
OCR for page 444
444
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
Finally, the limitations of much of the research on disparities in race
and ethnicity underscore the need for prospective studies, with access to
detailed clinical records. This may be particularly important in under-
standing the variations in verbal and nonverbal physician-patient com-
munication in both race-concordant and race-discordant physician-patient
dyads. Further research is essential, but implementation of corrective rec-
ommendations now should not be held in abeyance.
The raw discrimination and blatant racism described by Myrdal
nearly six decades ago of relegating African Americans and other minor-
ity patients to all-black hospitals, charity wards, or the basement wards of
white hospitals have disappeared, but the scars of those past experiences
remain, and subtler forms of differential treatment have emerged (Myrdal,
1944~. As in other sectors of American society, the elimination of race/
ethnicity-based and class-based disadvantage in the health sector has al-
ways been an unsteady march, rather than a seamless record of uninter-
rupted progress. The documentation and further exploration of disparity
. . . . .
IS a step in an ongoing Journey.
REFERENCES
Abreu J. Conscious and unconscious African American stereotypes: Impact on first impres-
sion and diagnostic ratings by therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
1999;3:287-293.
Alexander GC, Schgal AR. Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women,
and the poor. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280:1148-1152.
Anderson KH, Mitchell JM. Differential access in the receipt of antiretroviral drugs for the
treatment of AIDS and its implications for survival. Archives of Internal Medicine.
2000;160:3114-3120.
Anderson MR, Mloscou S. Fulchon C, Neuspiel DR. The role of race in the clinical presenta-
tion. Family Medicine. 2001;33:430-434.
Andrews R. Elixhuaser A. Use of major therapeutic procedures: are Hispanics treated differ-
ently than non-Hispanic whites? Ethnicity ~ Disease. 2000;10:384-394.
Arozullah AM, Ferreira MR, Bennett RL, et al. Racial variation in the use of laporoscopic
cholecystectomy in the Department of Veterans Affairs medical system. Journal of the
American College of Surgeons. 1999;188:604-622.
Ayanian JZ, Udvarhelyi IS, Gatsonis CA, et al. Racial differences in the use of revas-
cularization procedures after coronary angiography. Journal of the American Medical
Association. 1993;269:2642-2646.
Ayanian JZ, Weissman IS, Chasan-Taber S. Epstein AM. Quality of care by race and gender
for congestive heart failure and pneumonia. Medical Care. l999a;37:1260-1269.
Ayanian JZ, Clearly PD, Weissman IS, Epstein AM. The effect of patients' preferences on
racial differences in access to renal transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine.
l999b;341:1661-1669.
Bach PB, Cramer LD, Warren JL, Begg CB. Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage
lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;341:1198-1205.
Ball JK, Elixhauser A. Treatment differences between blacks and whites with colorectal can-
cer. Medical Care 34. 1996;970-984.
OCR for page 445
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 445
Baron JA, Barrett J. Katz IN, Liang MH. Total hip arthroplasty: Use and select complications
in the U.S. Medicare population. American Journal of Public Health. 1996;86:70-72.
Barr DA. Racial differences in the use of cardiac catheterization. New England Journal of Medi-
cine. 2001;345:839-840.
Bassett MT, Krieger N. Social class and black-white differences in cancer survival. American
Journal of Public Health. 1986;76:1400-1403.
Bennett CL, Homer RD, Weinstein RA, et al. Racial differences among hospitalized patients
with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Miami and
Raleigh-Durham. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1995;155:1586-1592.
Benson PR. Factors associated with antipsychotic drug prescribing by southern psychia-
trists. Medical Care. 1983;21:639-654.
Bentley JR, Delfinoa RJ, Taylor TH, Stowe S. Anton-Culver H. Differences in breast cancer
stage at diagnosis between non-Hispanic white and Hispanic populations, San Diego
County 1988-1993. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 1998;50:1-0.
Bernabei R. Gumbassi G. Lapane K, et al. Management of pain in elderly patients with can-
cer. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279:1877-1882.
Bhopal R. Racism in medicine. British Medical Journal. 2001;322:1503-1504.
Blendon RJ, Aiken LH, Freeman JE, Corey CR. Access to medical care for black and white
Americans: A matter of continuing concern. Journal of the American Medical Association.
1989;261:278-281.
Bloom SW. The Doctor and His Patient: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Free Press;
1965.
Blustein J. Arons RR, Shea S. Sequential events contributing to variations in cardiac revas-
cularization rates. Medical Care. 1995;33:864-880.
Board of Trustees. Board of Trustees Report 50-1. Chicago: American Medical Association;
1995.
Bosco LA, Gerstman BE, Tomita DK. Variations in the use of medication for the treatment of
childhood asthma in the Michigan Medicaid population, 1980 to 1986. Chest. 1993;104:
1727-1732.
Breen N. Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987
and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84:
62-67.
Burns RB, McCarthy EP, Freund KM, et al. Black women receive less mammography even
with similar use of primary care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1996;125:173-182.
Bush RA, Langer RD. The effects of insurance coverage and ethnicity on mammography
utilization in a postmenopausal population. Western Journal of Medicine. 1998;168:236-
240.
Butkus DE, Meydrich EF, Raju SS. Racial differences in the survival of cadaveric renal al-
lografts. Overriding effects of HLA matching and socioeconomic factors. New England
Journal of Medicine. 1992;327:883-885.
Byrd WM, Clayton CA. An American Health Dilemma. New York: Routledge; 2000.
Byrne C, Nedelman J. Luke RG. Race, socioeconomic status, and the development of end-
stage renal disease. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 1994;23:16-22.
Canto JG, Taylor HA, Rogers WJ, Sanderson B. Hilbe J. Barron HV. Presenting characteris-
tics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of non-black minorities in the national
registry of myocardial infarction 2. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;342:1094-1100.
Canto JG, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, et al. Relation of race and sex to the use of reperfusion therapy
in Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medi-
cine. 2000;342:1094-1100.
OCR for page 446
446
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
Carlisle DM, Leake ED, Shapiro MF. Racial and ethnic differences in the use of invasive
cardiac procedures among cardiac patients in Los Angeles County, 1986 through 1988.
American Journal of Public Health. 1995;85:352-356.
Cartwright SA. Report on the diseases and physical peculiarities of the Negro race. New
Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal. 1851;8:28-37.
Cavalli-Sforza L, Menozzi P. Piazza A. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994.
Chang SW, Kerlikowski K, Naploes-Springer A, Posner SF, Sickles EA, Perez-Stable EJ. Ra-
cial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.
Cancer. 1996;78:1395-1402.
Chen J. Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Wang Y. Krumholz HM. Racial differences in the use of
cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medi-
cine. 2001;344:1443-1449.
Chertow GM, Milford EL. Poorer graft survival in African-American transplant recipients
cannot be explained by HLA mismatching. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy.
1997;4:40-45.
Cleeland CS, Gonin R. Baez L, Lochrer P. Pandya KG. Pain and treatment of pain in minority
patients with cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Minority Outpatient
Pain Study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997;127:813-816.
Coker N. Racism in medicine: An agenda for change. London: King's Fund; 2001.
Collins CA, Williams DR. Segregation and mortality: The deadly effects of racism. Sociologi-
cal Forum. 1999;14:493-520.
Cooper GS, Yuan Z. Lindefeld CS, Rimm AA. Surgery for colorectal cancer: Race-related
differences in rates and survival among Medicare beneficiaries. American Journal of
Public Health. 1996;86:582-586.
Cooper GS, Yuan Z. Rimm AA. Racial disparity in the incidence and case-fatality of colorectal
cancer: Analysis of 329 United States counties. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Preven-
tion. 1997;6:283-285.
Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales HE, et al. Race, gender and partnership in the patient-
physician relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282:583-589.
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs AMA. Black-White disparities in health care. Journal
of the American Medical Association. 1990;263:2344-2346.
Dayal H. Power RN, Chen C. Race and socioeconomic status in survival from breast cancer.
Journal of Chronic Disease. 1982;35:675-683.
Delano BG, Macey L, Friedman EA. Gender and racial disparity in peritoneal dialysis pa-
tients undergoing kidney transplantation. American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
Journal. 1997;43:861-864.
DelBellow MP, Lopez-Larson MP, Santiello CA, Strakowski SM. Effects of race on psychiat-
ric diagnosis of hospitalized adolescents: A retrospective chart review. Journal of Child
and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 2000;11:95-103.
Devine PG. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;56:5-18.
Diehr P. Yergan J. Chu J. et al. Treatment modality and quality differences for black and
white breast cancer patients treated in community hospitals. Medical Care. 1989;27:942-
954.
Dominitz JA, Samsa GP, Landsman P. Provenzale D. Race, treatment and survival among
colorectal carcinoma patients in an equal-access medical system. Cancer. 1998;82:2312-
2320.
East MA, Peterson ED. Understanding racial differences in cardiovascular care and out-
comes: Issues for the new millennium. American Heart Journal. 2000;139~5~:764-766.
OCR for page 447
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 447
Easterbrook P. Keruly JC, Creagh-Kirk T. Richman D, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Racial and
ethnic differences in outcome in Zivoduvine-treated patients with advanced HIV dis-
ease. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991;266:2713-2718.
Eggers PW. Racial differences in access to kidney transplantation. Health Care Financing Re-
view. 1995;17:89-103.
EisenbergJM. Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians. Annals of Internal Medi-
cine. 1979;90:957-964.
Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, et al. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results
of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. Journal of the
American Medical Association. 1994;272:947-954.
Epstein AM, Ayanian JZ. Racial disparities in medical care. New England Journal of Medicine.
2001;344:1471-1473.
Escarce JJ, Epstein KR, Colby DC, Schwartz IS. Racial differences in the elderly's use of
medical procedures and diagnostic tests. American Journal of Public Health. 1993;83:948-
954.
Farley W. Allen AR. The Color Line and the Quality of Life in America. New York: Oxford
University Press; 1989.
Farrow DC, Hunt WC, Samet JM. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast
cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;326:1097-1101.
Feagin JR. The continuing significance of race: Antiblack discrimination in public places.
American Sociological Review. 1991;56:101-116.
Finucane TE, Carrese JA. Racial bias in presentation of cases. Journal of General Internal Medi-
cine. 1990;5:120-121.
Fiscella K, Franks P. Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: Addressing socioeconomic,
racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Journal of the American Medical Association.
2000;283:2579-2584.
Franks AL, May DS, Wenger NK, et al. Racial differences in the use of invasive coronary
procedures after acute myocardial infarction in Medicare beneficiaries. Ethnicity ~ Dis-
ease. 1993;3:213-220.
Freidson E. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York:
Dodd, Mead & Co.; 1973.
Gamble VN. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American
Journal of Public Health. 1997;87:1773-1778.
Ganeson KK, Teklehaimanot S. Norris K. Estrogen replacement therapy use in minority
postmenopausal women. Ethnicity ~ Disease. 2000;10:257-261.
Gaston RS, Ayres J. Dooley LG, Diethelm AG. Racial equity in renal transplantation: The
disparate impact of HLA-based allocation. Journal of the American Medical Association.
1993;270:1352-1356.
Geiger HJ. The Social Responsibility of the Physician. Scientific Monthly. 1957;85:89-94.
Geiger HJ. Race and health care an American dilemma. New England Journal of Medicine.
1996;335:815-816.
Geiger HJ. Racism resurgent: Building a bridge to the 19th century. American Journal of Public
Health. 1997;87:6-7.
Giles WH, Anda RF, Casper ML, et al. Race and sex differences in rates of invasive cardiac
procedures in US hospitals. Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Ar-
chives of Internal Medicine. 1995;155:318-324.
Gillum R. Cerebrovascular disease morbidity in the United States, 1970-1983: Age, sex, re-
gion, vascular surgery. Stroke. 1986;17:656-660.
Gillum RF. Epidemiology of carotid endarterectomy and cerebral angiography in the U.S.
Stroke. 1995;26:1724-1728.
OCR for page 448
448
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
Gittelsohn AM, Halpern J. Sanchez RL. Income, race, and surgery in Maryland. American
Journal of Public Health. 1991;81:1435-1441.
Goff DC, Nachaman MZ, Ramsey DJ, Meyer PS, LaBarthe DR. A population-based assess-
ment of the use and effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy: The Corpus Christi Heart
Project. Annals of Epidemiology. 1995;5:171-178.
Goodman HA. Why genes don't count (for racial differences in health). American Journal of
Public Health. 2000;90:1699-1702.
Gorelick PB, Caplan LR, Hier DB, Parker SL, Patel D. Racial differences in the distribution of
anterior circulation occlusive disease. Neurology. 1984;34:54-59.
Gorelick PB. Cerebrovascular disease in African Americans. Stroke. 1998;29:2656-2664.
Gornick ME, Eggers PW, Reilly TW. Effects of race and income on mortality and use of
services among Medicare beneficiaries. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;335:791-
799.
Graham NMH, Jacobson LP, Kuo V, Chmiel JS, Morgenstern H. Zucconi SL. Access to
therapy in the multicenter AIDS cohort study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1994;27:
1003-1012.
Gross H. Herbert M. The effects of race and sex on variation of diagnosis and disposition in
a psychiatric emergency room. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases. 1969;148:638-642.
Gross CR, Kase CS, Mohr JP, Cunningham SC, Baker WE. Stroke in South Alabama: Inci-
dence and diagnostic features a population-based study. Stroke. 1984;15:249-255.
Guadagnoli E, Ayanian JZ, Gibbons G. McNeil BJ, LoGerfow FW. The influence of race on
the use of surgical procedures for treatment of peripheral vascular disease of the lower
extremities. Archives of Surgery. 1995;130:381-386.
Haas J. Weissman JS, Cleary PD, et al. Discussion of preferences for life-sustaining care by
persons with AIDS: Predictors of failure in patient-physician communication. Archives
of Internal Medicine. 1993;153:1241-1248.
Hacker A. Two Nations: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, Unequal. New York: Ballantine
Books; 1992.
Hamilton J. Multicultural health care requires adjustments by doctors and patients. Cana-
dian Medical Association Journal. 1996;155:585-587.
Hannan EL, Kilbum HJ, O'Donnell JF, et al. Interracial access to selected cardiac procedures
for patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease in New York State. Medical Care.
1991;29:430441.
Hannan EL, van Ryn M, Burke J. et al. Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/
ethnicity and gender among patients who Ar~ AnnronriAt~ fr~r ~llrs'~rv .~orial .9riPnrP
and Medicine. 1999;50:813-828.
~rr- ~r--~ -~--~
Harris WH, Sledge CB. Total hip and total knee replacement. New England Journal of Medi-
cine. 1990;323:801-807.
Harris DE, Andrews R. Elixhauser A. Racial and gender differences in use of procedures for
black and white hospitalized adults. Ethnicity ~ Disease. 1997;7:91-102.
Hegarty V, Burchett BM, Gold DT, Cohen MJ. Racial differences in use of cancer prevention
services among older Americans. Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 2000;48:735-
740.
Held PJ, Pauly MV, Bovberg RR, Newmann J. Salvatierra OJ. Access to kidney transplanta-
tion. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences? Archives of Inter-
nal Medicine. 1988;148:2594-2600.
Hemingway H. Saunders D, Parsons I. Social class, spoken language and pattern of care as
determinants of continuity of care in maternity services in east London. Journal of Public
Health Medicine. 1997;19:156-161.
OCR for page 449
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 449
Hemingway H. Crook AM, Feder G. et al. Underuse of coronary revascularization proce-
dures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. New England
Journal of Medicine. 2001;344:645-654.
Henderson LJ. Physician and patient as a social system. New England Journal of Medicine.
1935;212:819-823.
Hilton JL, von Hippel W. Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology. 1996;47:237-271.
Homer RD, Oddone EZ, Matchar DB. Theories explaining racial differences in the utiliza-
tion of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for cerebrovascular disease. Milbank
Quarterly. 1995;73:443-462.
Hsia DC, Mosoe LM, Krushat M. Epidemiology of carotid endarterectomy among Medicare
beneficiaries. Stroke. 1998;29:346-350.
Institute of Medicine. The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs
for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press; 1999.
Jacobs EA. Racial differences in the use of cardiac catheterization. New England Journal of
Medicine. 2001;345:839.
Joseph CLM, Havstad SL, Ownby DR, Johnson CC, Tilley BC. Racial differences in emer-
gency department use persist despite allergist visits and prescriptions filled for anti-
inflammatory medications. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 1998;101:484490.
Kahn KL, Pearson ML, Harrison ER, et al. Health care for black and poor hospitalized Medi-
care patients. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;271:1169-1174.
Kales HC, Blow FC, gingham CR, Copeland CA, Mellow AM. Race and inpatient psychiatric
diagnosis among elderly veterans. Psychiatric Services. 2000a;5:795-800.
Kales HC, Blow FC, gingham CR, Copeland LA, Mellow AM. Race, psychiatric diagnosis,
and mental health care utilization in older patients. American Journal of Geriatric Psychia-
try. 2000b;8:301-309.
Kanuha VK. The impact of sexuality and race/ethnicity on HIV/AIDS risk among Asian
and Pacific Island American (A/PIA) gay and bisexual men in Hawaii. AIDS Education
and Prevention. 2000;12:505-518.
Kasiske BL, London W. Ellison MD. Race and socioeconomic factors influencing early place-
ment on the kidney transplant waiting list. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
1998;9:2141-2147.
Katz SJ, Hofer TP. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal
coverage. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;272:530-534.
King G. Institutional racism and the medical/health complex: a conceptual analysis. Ethnicity
~ Disease. 1996;6:30-46.
Klassen AC. The relationship between patients' perspectives on disadvantage and discrimi-
nation and listing for kidney transplantation. American Journal of Public Health. 2001;(in
press).
Klonoff EA, Landrine H. Do blacks believe that HIV/AIDS is a government conspiracy
against them? Preventive Medicine. 1999;28:451-457.
Kressin NR, Petersen LA. Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiovascular proce-
dures: review of the literature and prescription for further research. Annals of Internal
Medicine. 2001;135:352-366.
Kushnick L. Racism, the National Health Service, and the health of black people. Interna-
tional Journal of Health Services. 1988;18:457-470.
Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Mitchell J. Swanson FH, Edwards MS. Influence of socioeconomic
and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer.
Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279:1801-1807.
OCR for page 450
450
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
Leape LL, Hilborne LH, Bell R. Kanberg C, Brook RH. Underuse of cardiac procedures: Do
women, ethnic minorities, and the uninsured fail to receive needed revascularization?
Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;130:183-192.
Lee AJ, Gehlbach S. Hosmer DW, Riti M, Baker CS. Medicare treatment differences for blacks
and whites. Medical Care. 1997;35:1173-1189.
Levy DR. White doctors and black patients: Influence of race on the doctor-patient relation-
ship. Pediatrics. 1985;75:639-643.
Lowe M, Kerridge IH, Mitchell KR. 'These sorts of people don't do very well': Race and
allocation of health care resources. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1995;21:356-360.
Mackenzie S. Scientific silence: AIDS and African Americans in the medical literature. Ameri-
can Journal of Public Health. 2000;90:1145-1146 [letter].
Macrae CN, Milne AB, Bodenhauser GV. Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek in-
side the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66:3347.
Mandelblatt IS, Gold K, O'Malley AS, et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening among
multiethnic women: Role of age, health, and source of care. Preventive Medicine. 1999;28:
418-425.
Marks J. Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race and History. New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.;
1995.
Marsh JV, Brett KM, Miller LC. Racial differences in hormone replacement therapy prescrip-
tions. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;93:1999-1003.
Masi R. Multiculturalism, medicine and health. Canadian Family Physician. 1989;35:537-639.
Massey DS, Denton NA. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993.
Mayberry RM, Mili F. Ofili E. Racial and ethnic differences in access to medical care. Medical
Care Research and Review. 2000;57, Suppl 1:108-145.
Maynard C, Fisher LD, Passamanick ER, et al. Blacks in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study:
Risk factors and coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1986;74:64-71.
McBean AM, Gornick M. Differences by race in the rates of procedures performed in hospi-
tals for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Care Financing Review. 1994;15:77-90.
McGary H. Distrust, social justice, and health care. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. 1999;66:
236-240.
McNagny SE, Jacobson TA. Use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy by Afri-
can-American women. The importance of physician discussion. Archives of Internal
Medicine. 1997;157:1337-1342.
Menefee LT. Are black Americans entitled to equal health care? A new research paradigm.
Ethnicity ~ Disease. 1996;6:56-68.
Mickelson JK, Blum CM, Geraci JM. Acute myocardial infarction: Clinical characteristics,
management and outcome in a metropolitan VA medical center teaching hospital. Jour-
nal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997;29:915-925.
Moore RD, Stanton D, Gopalan R. Chaisson RE. Racial differences in the use of drug therapy
for HIV disease in an urban community. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;330:763-
768.
Mort EA, Weisman JS, Epstein AM. Physician discretion and racial variation in the use of
surgical procedures. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1994;154:761-767.
Mukherjee W. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in bipolar patients: A multiethnic comparison.
American Journal of Psychiatry. 1983;14:1571-1574.
Myrdal G. An American Dilemma. Vol 1. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers; 1944.
Narva K, Stiles S. Kaarp S. Turak A. Access of Native Americans to renal transplantation in
Arizona and New Mexico. Blood Purification. 1996;14:293-304.
OCR for page 451
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 451
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, and Socioeconomic Status and Health
Chartbook. Hyattsville, MD.: U.S.DHHS [U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser-
vices] Washington, DC; 1998.
Naumberg EH, Franks P. Bell B. Gold M, Engerman J. Racial differences in the identification
of hypercholesteremia. Journal of Family Practice. 1993;36:424-430.
Ness J. Aronow WS. Prevalence of coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, peripheral arte-
rial disease, and coronary revascularization in older African-Americans, Asians,
Hispanics, whites, men, and women. American Journal of Cardiology. 1999;84:932-933,
A-937.
Nightingale E, Hannibal K, Geiger HI, Hartmann L, Lawrence R. Spurlock J. Apartheid medi-
cine: Health and human rights in South Africa. Journal of the American Medical Associa-
tion. 1990;264:2097-2102.
Oddone EZ, Homer RD, Monger ME, Matchar DB. Racial variation in the rates of carotid
angiography and endarterectomy in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack.
Archives of Internal Medicine. 1993;153:2781-2786.
Oddone EZ, Homer RD, Diers T. et al. Understanding racial variation in the use of carotid
endarterectomy: The role of aversion to surgery. Journal of the National Medical Associa-
tion. 1998;90:25-33.
Oddone EZ, Homer RD, Sloane R. et al. Race, presenting signs and symptoms, use of carotid
artery imaging, and appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1999;30:1350-
1356.
Office of Minority Health. Closing the Gap: The U.S. and U.K. Collaborate on Minority Health.
Washington, DC: Office of Minority Health, DHHS; March 1997.
Okelo S. Taylor AL, Wright IT, Gordon N. Mohan G. Lesnefsky E. Race and the decision to
refer for coronary revascularization. The effect of physician awareness of patient
ethnicity. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001;38:698-704.
O'Malley AS, Mandelblatt J. Gold K, Cagney KA, Kerner J. Continuity of care and the use of
breast and cervical cancer screening services in a multiethnic community. Archives of
Internal Medicine. 1997;157:1462-1470.
Optenberg SA, Thompson IM, Friedricks P. Wojcik B. Stein CR, Kramer B. Race, treatment
and long-term survival from prostate cancer in an equal-access medical care delivery
system. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995;274:1599-1605.
Ozminkowski RJ, White AJ, Hassol A, Murphy M. Minimizing racial disparity regarding
receipt of a cadaver kidney transplant. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 1997;30:856-
858.
Pasamanick B. Some misconceptions concerning differences in the racial prevalence of men-
tal disease. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1963;33:72-86.
Peterson ED, Wright SM, Daley J. et al. Racial variation in cardiac procedure use and sur-
vival following acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jour-
nal of the American Medical Association. 1994;271:1175-1180.
Peterson ED, Shaw LK, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Mark DB. Racial variation in the
use of coronary revascularization procedures: Are the differences real? Do they matter?
New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;336:480486.
Polednak AP. Segregation, Poverty, and Mortality in Urban African Americans. New York: Ox-
ford University Press; 1997.
Polednak AP. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;342:517-518 [letter].
Ramsey DJ, Goff DC, Wear ML, Laborthe DR, Nichaman NE. Sex and ethnic differences
in use of myocardial revascularization procedures in Mexican-Americans and non-
Hispanic whites: The Corpus Christi Heart Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
1997;50:603-609.
OCR for page 452
452
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
Rathore S. Berger AK, Weinfurt KP, et al. Race, sex, poverty and the medical treatment of
acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Circulation. 2000a;102:642-648.
Rathore SS, Lenert LA, Weinfurt KP, et al. The effects of patient sex and race on medical
student ratings of quality of life. American Journal of Medicine. 2000b;108:561-566.
Rosenfield S. Race differences in involuntary hospitalization: Psychiatric vs. labeling per-
spectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1984.;25:14-23.
Ryan C. Effects of racial stereotypes on judgment of individuals: The moderating role of
perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology. 1996;32:71-
103.
Sabatini S. Influence of gender and race on therapeutic options for ESRD patients. American
Journal of Kidney Diseases. 1997;30:856-858.
Satariano ER, Swanson GM, Moll PP. Nonclinical factors associated with surgery received
for treatment of early-stage breast cancer. American Journal of Public Health. 1992;82:195-
198.
Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W. et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians' recom-
mendations for cardiac catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:618-
626.
Schwartz RS. Racial profiling in medical research. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;244:
1392-1393.
Seattle and King County Public Health Department. Report on Racial and Ethnic Discrimina-
tion in Health Care Settings. [Online]. Available: http://www.metrokc.gov/health/
news/0102401.htm. [Accessed March 15, 2001]. 2001.
Sedlis SP, Fisher VJ, Tice D, et al. Racial differences in performance of invasive cardiac pro-
cedures in a Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Journal of Clinical Epidemi-
ology. 1997;50:899-901.
Shinagawa SM. The excess burden of breast carcinoma in minority and medically under-
served communities. Cancer. 2000;88:1217-1223.
Sleath B. Svarstad B. Roter D. Patient race and psychotropic prescribing during medical
encounters. Patient Education and Counseling. 1998;34:227-238.
Smith DB. Addressing racial inequities in health care: Civil rights monitoring and report
cards. Health Politics, Policy and Law. 1998;23:75-105.
South-Paul JE. Racism in the examination room: Myths, realities, and consequences. Family
Medicine. 2001;33:473-475.
Stangnor C, McMillan D. Well-learned stereotypes are resistant to discomfirmation. Psycho-
logical Bulletin. 1992;111:42-61.
Steinhorn L, Diggs-Brown B. By the Color of Our Skin: The Illusion of Integration and the Reality
of Race. New York: Dutton; 1999.
Stone PH, Thompson B. Anderson HV, et al. Influence of race, sex, and age on management
of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: The TIMI III registry. Jour-
nal of the American Medical Association. 1996;275:1104-1112.
Stone VE, Mauch MY, Steger KA. Provider attitudes regarding participation of women and
persons of color in AIDS clinical trials. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
and Human Retrovirology. 1998;19:245-253.
Strakowski SM, Lonczak HS, Sax KW, et al. The effects of race on diagnosis and disposition
from a psychiatric emergency service. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1995;56:101-107.
Taylor AJ, Meyer GS, Morse RW, Pearson CE. Can characteristics of a health care system
mitigate ethnic bias in access to cardiovascular procedures? Experience from the Military
Health Services System. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997;30:901-907.
Todd KH, Samaroo N. Hoffman JR. Ethnicity as a risk factor for inadequate emergency
department analgesia. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;269:1537-1539.
OCR for page 453
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 453
Trock B. Rimer BK, King E, Balshem A, Christinzio CS, Engstrom PF. Impact of an HMO-
based intervention to increase mammography utilization. Cancer Epidemiology Bio-
markers Prevention. 1993;2:151-156.
Twin Cities Metro Minority Health Assessment Project. Closing the Gap: A Public Health
Report on Health Disparities.[Online] Available:http://www.mncounties.org/metro-
plan/MinHealth.htm. [Accessed March 25, 2001]. 2001.
Udvarhelyi IS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in the Medicare
population. Process of care and clinical outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Asso-
ciation. 1992;268:2530-2536.
U.S. DHHS. Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health. Washington, DC:
U.S. DHHS; 1985.
U.S. DHHS. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: U.S.
DHHS; 2000.
van Ryn M, Burke J. The effect of patient race and socioeconomic status on physicians' per-
ceptions of patients. Social Science and Medicine. 2000;50:813-828.
van Ryn M. The Implications of Social Cognition Research and Theoryfor the Provider Contribution
to Race/Ethnicity Disparities in Health Care. Commissioned paper prepared for the Physicians
for Human Rights Committee on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment in
the U.S. Health Care System. Washington, DC: Physicians for Human Rights; 2001.
Velanovich V, Yood MU, Bawle U. et al. Racial differences in the presentation and surgical
management of breast cancer. Surgery. 1999;125:375-379.
Wailoo K. Crying in the city of the blues: sickle cell anemia and the politics of race and health.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2001.
Waitzkin H. Information giving in medical care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior.
1985.;26:81-101.
Wailer J. Face to Face: The Changing State of Racism Across America. New York: Plenum Press;
1998.
Weinick RM, Zuvekas SH, Cohen JW. Racial and ethnic differences in access to and use of
health care services, 1977 to 1996. Medical Care Research and Review. 2000;57(Suppl 1~:36-
54.
Weisse CS, Sorum PC, Sanders KN, Syat BL. Do gender and race affect decisions about pain
management? Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001;16:211-217.
Weitzman S. Cooper L, Chambless L, et al. Gender, racial, and geographic differences in
the performance of cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for hospitalized
acute myocardial infarction in four states. American Journal of Cardiology. 1997;79:722-
726.
Whaley AL. Racism in the provision of mental health services: a social-cognitive analysis.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1998.;68:47-57.
Whittle J. Conigliaro J. Good CB, et al. Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiac pro-
cedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs medical system. New England Journal of
Medicine. 1993;329:621-627.
Williams JF, Zimmerman TE, Wagner DP, Hawkins M, Knaus WA. African-American and
white patients admitted to the intensive care unit: Is there a difference in therapy and
outcome? Critical Care Medicine. 1995;23:626-636.
Williams DR. African-American health and the role of the social environment. Journal of
Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 1998;75:300-321.
Williams DR. Race, SES and health: The added effects of racism and discrimination. Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999;896:173-188.
Williams DR, Rucker TD. Understanding and addressing racial disparities in health care.
Health Care Financing Review. 2000;21:75-90.
OCR for page 454
454
UNEQUAL TREATMENT
Wilson MG, May DS, Kelly JJ. Racial differences in the use of total knee arthroplasty for
osteoarthritis among older Americans. Ethnicity ~ Disease. 1994;4:57-67.
Witzig R. The medicalization of race: scientific legitimization of a flawed social construct.
Annals of Internal Medicine. 1996;125:675-679.
Wood AJ. Racial differences in the response to drugs pointers to genetic differences. New
England Journal of Medicine. 2001;244:1393-1395.
Yood MU, Johnson CC, Blunt A, et al. Race and differences in breast cancer survival in a
managed care population. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1999;91:1487-1491.
Young TK, Reading J. Elias B. O'Neil JD. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada's First Nation:
Status of an epidemic in progress. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2000;163:561-
566.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
ethnic disparities