TABLE 4.5 Summary of AHRQ Analyses of the Efficacy of Interventions to Modify Dietary Behavior Related to Cancer Risk: Dietary Fat Intake (percentage of energy from fat)
|
Outcome |
Number of Studies |
Median (range) |
|
Median differences in percentage change in dietary fat intake between intervention and control groups |
||
|
Total fat (% energy) |
33 |
–15.7 (–76.4 to –1.0) |
|
Total fat (grams/day) |
7 |
–38.0 (–74.0 to –15.9) |
|
Saturated fat (% energy) |
16 |
–14.5 (–41.9 to +0.5) |
|
Median differences in percentage change in total fat (% of energy) by population |
||
|
Risk Status |
|
|
|
General risk |
12 |
–8.0 (–27.9 to –1.0) |
|
High risk |
20 |
–20.0 (–76.4 to –3.5) |
|
Median differences in percentage change in total fat (% of energy) by intervention characteristics |
||
|
Social Support |
|
|
|
Yes |
7 |
–26.7 (–76.4 to –3.5) |
|
No |
26 |
–10.4 (–44.2 to –1.0) |
|
Interactions with food |
|
|
|
Yes |
7 |
–11.0 (–26.7 to –3.2) |
|
No |
26 |
–17.8 (–76.4 to –1.0) |
|
Goal Setting |
|
|
|
Yes |
18 |
–18.9 (–44.2 to –2.7) |
|
No |
15 |
–11.0 (–76.4 to –1.0) |
|
SOURCE: AHRQ, 2001a. |
||
fruit and vegetable consumption. In general, studies in these health settings allowed retrieval of information on additional biochemical measures, including total cholesterol levels, and more intensive dietary measures (e.g., 3-day food records) that are not as frequently retrievable in other settings. These settings also allowed ongoing monitoring of at-risk groups.
A paper published subsequent to publication of the literature review in the AHRQ Diet Report extended these findings by showing both reduced levels of dietary fat intake and increased levels of fruit and vegetable consumption after an individualized intervention delivered by personalized mailings, standard dietary information, and personalized phone calls (Kristal et al., 2000a).
In summary, behavioral interventions tested in health care settings can have a significant impact on the dietary intakes of participants. These settings allow the targeting of participants at risk for disease, who may be more willing to engage in behavioral change, and offer an ideal environment for the monitoring of individuals.