References

American Association of Universities. (2001). Assessing Quality of University Education and Research: Project Description. Available: http:www.aau.edu/issues/AQdescript.html. [October 23, 2001].

Anderson, J.R., Greeno, J.G., Reder, L.M., and Simon, H.A. (2000). Perspectives on Learning, Thinking, and Activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11-13.

Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


Bartscherer, P. (2001). The Pew Learning and Technology Program. Available: http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewHome.html. [May 28, 2001].

Bayard, J.P. (2000, June). What’s out There: Instructional Technology for College-Level STEM Instructors. Presentation at National Research Council Workshop on the Roles of Information Technology in Improving Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Education, held in Washington, DC, June 20-21.

Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.


Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.E. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. American Associate for Higher Education Bulletin 39(7), 3-7.


Dede, C. (2000). Emerging Influences of Information Technology on School Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 281-304.

Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, B., and Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory Immersion as a Modeling Environment for Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. In W. Feurzeig, and N. Roberts (Eds.), Computer modeling and simulation in science education. New York: Springer-Verlag.


Ellis, A., Seiter, D., and Yulke, S. (1999). Workshop on improving undergraduate education in the mathematical and physical sciences through the use of technology: Preliminary report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research. Available: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/teched99/report.htm. [May 23, 2001].


Felder, R.M. (1993). Reaching the Second Tier— Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 22(5), 286-90.

Felder, R.M. (1996). Matters of Style. American Society for Engineering Education Prism 6(4), 18-23.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 29
Enhancing Undergraduate Learning with Information Technology: A Workshop Summary References American Association of Universities. (2001). Assessing Quality of University Education and Research: Project Description. Available: http:www.aau.edu/issues/AQdescript.html. [October 23, 2001]. Anderson, J.R., Greeno, J.G., Reder, L.M., and Simon, H.A. (2000). Perspectives on Learning, Thinking, and Activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11-13. Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bartscherer, P. (2001). The Pew Learning and Technology Program. Available: http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewHome.html. [May 28, 2001]. Bayard, J.P. (2000, June). What’s out There: Instructional Technology for College-Level STEM Instructors. Presentation at National Research Council Workshop on the Roles of Information Technology in Improving Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Education, held in Washington, DC, June 20-21. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.E. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. American Associate for Higher Education Bulletin 39(7), 3-7. Dede, C. (2000). Emerging Influences of Information Technology on School Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 281-304. Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, B., and Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory Immersion as a Modeling Environment for Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. In W. Feurzeig, and N. Roberts (Eds.), Computer modeling and simulation in science education. New York: Springer-Verlag. Ellis, A., Seiter, D., and Yulke, S. (1999). Workshop on improving undergraduate education in the mathematical and physical sciences through the use of technology: Preliminary report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research. Available: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/teched99/report.htm. [May 23, 2001]. Felder, R.M. (1993). Reaching the Second Tier— Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 22(5), 286-90. Felder, R.M. (1996). Matters of Style. American Society for Engineering Education Prism 6(4), 18-23.

OCR for page 29
Enhancing Undergraduate Learning with Information Technology: A Workshop Summary Fletcher, J.D. (2001). Evidence for Learning from Technology-Assisted Instruction. In H.F. O’Neil and R. Perez (Eds), Technology applications in education: A learning view. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. Godleski, E. (1984). Learning Style Compatibility of Engineering Students and Faculty. In Proceedings, Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. American Society for Engineering Education/Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers, Philadelphia, PA. Hake, R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-75. Hanna, D.E. (2000). Higher education in an era of digital competition: Choices and challenges. Overland Park, KS: Atwood Publishing. Hilosky, A., Sutman, F., and Schmuckler, J. (1998). Is Laboratory-Based Instruction in Beginning College-Level Chemistry Worth the Effort and Expense? Journal of Chemical Education, 75(1), 100-104. Hughes Hallett, D. and Gleason, A. (1999). Calculus: Second edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A. (1998). Cooperative Learning Returns to College: What Evidence is there that it Works? Change, 30(4), 27-35. Laws, P.W. (1997). A New Order for Mechanics. In J.Wilson (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference on introductory physics course. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Laws, P.W., Braught, G., Buchan, G., Greenbaum, S., Oliver, G., and Ward, D. (2001). Workshop physics/activitybased physics. Available: http://physics.dickinson.edu/Physic…p_Physics/Workshop_Physics_Home.htm/. [May 21, 2001]. Large, A. (2001). Physics phlats: Home of studio physics I. Available: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/phys/Courses/studio_physics/physI/physImain.html/. [May 21, 2001]. Leonard, G.B. (1968). Education and ecstacy. New York: Dell Publishing Company. Lyon, G. R. (2001, March 8). Measuring Success: Using Assessments and Accountability to Raise Student Achievement. Statement of Dr. G. Reid Lyon, Chief, Child Development and Behavior Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. Subcommittee on Education Reform, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC. Macdonald, R.H. and Korinek, L. (1995). Cooperative Learning Activities in Large Entry-Level Geology Courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 43, 341-345. McDermott, L.C., Shaffer, P., and Somers, M. (1994). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An illustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine. American Journal of Physics, 62, 46-55. Millar, S., Bayard, J., Ehrmann, S., Jungck, J., McMartin, F., Molinaro, M. (2001). Learning through technology Web site. Available: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/cl1/ilt/default.asp/. [May 21, 2001]. Moore, G.A. and McKenna, R. (1999). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. New York: HarperBusiness. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Institute for Science Education. (2001). Field-tested learning assessment guide. Available: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/cl1/flag/start/. [May 5, 2001].

OCR for page 29
Enhancing Undergraduate Learning with Information Technology: A Workshop Summary National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999a). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999b). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, M.S. Donovan, J.D. Bransford, and J.W. Pellegrino (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999c). Funding a revolution: Government support for computing research. Committee on Innovations in Computing and Communications: Lessons from History. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1999d). Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Committee on Undergraduate Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2001a). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2001b). Science, evidence, and inference: Report of a workshop. Committee on Scientific Principles in Education Research, L. Towne, R. Shavelson, and M. Feuer, (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Science Foundation. (2000). Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/scindoo/start.htm. [May23, 2001]. Phipps, R. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Poole, B.J. and Kidder, S.Q. (1996). Making Connections in the Undergraduate Laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(1), 34-36. Project Kaleidoscope. (1991). What works. Leadership: Challenges for the future. Volume II. Washington, DC: Author. Project Kaleidoscope. (1998). Shaping the future of undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering and technology education: Proceedings and recommendations from the PKAL day of dialogue. Washington, DC: Author. Rogers, E.M. (1982). Diffusion of innovation. New York: McMillan. Russell, T.L. (2001). The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center. Schwartz, A. (2000, June). How to think about the future; looking at certainties and uncertainties, forces and drivers. Presentation at National Research Council Workshop on the Roles of Information Technology in Improving Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, held in Washington, DC, June 20-21. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Shneiderman, B. (1998a). Educational Journeys on the Web Frontier, EDUCOM Review, 33(6), November/December. Available: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/html/erm9861.html. [July 5, 2001]. Shneiderman, B. (1998b). Relate-Create-Donate: A teaching/learning philosophy for the cyber-generation. Computers & Education, 31, 25-39. Shneiderman, B. (2000, June). Pedagogic Strategies for Applying Educational Technology: Relate-

OCR for page 29
Enhancing Undergraduate Learning with Information Technology: A Workshop Summary Create-Donate. Presentation at National Research Council Workshop on the Roles of Information Technology in Improving Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Education, held in Washington, DC, June 20-21. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Relate-Create-Donate. Available: http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/relate_create_donate. [July 5, 2001]. Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., and Donovan, S. (1997). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education. Students of Dr. Ben Shneiderman. (2000). Student HCI online research experiments. Available: http://www.otal.umd.edu/SHORE2000/. [July 5, 2001]. Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don’t. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation. Watson, S.B. and Marshall, J.E. (1995). Effects of Cooperative Incentives and Heterogeneous Arrangement on Achievement and Interaction of Cooperative Learning Groups in a College Life Science Course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 291-299. Web-Based Education Commission. (2000). The power of the internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Report to the President and the Congress of the United States . Available: http://www.webcommission.org. [May 21, 2001]. Wisher, R., Champagne, M., Pawluk, J., Eaton, A., Thornton, D., and Curnow, C. (1999). Training through distance learning: An assessment of research findings. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute. Wright, J.C. (1996). Authentic Learning Environment in Analytical Chemistry using Cooperative Methods and Open-Ended Laboratories in Large Lecture Courses. Journal of Chemistry Education, 73(9), 827-832.