|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 35
The Age of Expert Testimony: Science in the Courtroom - Report of a Workshop
8
Epilogue: Science and the Law— Toward Common Ground
“. . . science can sometimes get it wrong. . . . Science is not always value-free, and most importantly, . . . when lawyers accept the validity of an established scientific paradigm uncritically, they do risk making the same mistake as scientists.”
—Michael Hoeflich
Several scientists and engineers who had served as expert witnesses concluded by urging their colleagues to enter the courtroom—both for their own education and to assist in this communication process. Several experts emphasized that the courtroom is one forum where scientists can help raise the public’s understanding of science and the ways in which it underlies many aspects of modern life.
OCR for page 36
The Age of Expert Testimony: Science in the Courtroom - Report of a Workshop
This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page 37
The Age of Expert Testimony: Science in the Courtroom - Report of a Workshop
Appendixes
OCR for page 38
The Age of Expert Testimony: Science in the Courtroom - Report of a Workshop
This page in the original is blank.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
established scientific