Specific restrictions on aviation will undoubtedly change in response to evolving security concerns. In all likelihood, elevated concerns over security will influence not only operations but also the kinds of technologies being funded and developed and how they are applied in both commercial and general aviation.
In light of these new aviation security concerns, a number of additional questions arise with regard to the Small Aircraft Transportation System (SATS) concept and the technological capabilities being pursued to advance it. Among them are the following:
Will more stringent pilot eligibility requirements and more complex, security-oriented operating environments further limit the number of people capable of and interested in becoming private pilots?
If more aircraft can be used at more airfields by more pilots, what steps can be taken to safeguard the airfields and prevent the misuse of aircraft?
Can a distributed system of air traffic management, coupled with a much larger population of private aircraft, be made compatible with the need for a centralized authority both to monitor traffic near sensitive areas and to ground aircraft quickly in an emergency (e.g., during a threat from multiple aircraft)?
If concerns over the safety and security of people and facilities on the ground prompt additional restrictions on the airspace over metropolitan areas, how will such restrictions affect the ability of SATS aircraft to serve the main market for air travel, that is, travel to and from urban areas?
As difficult as it is to foresee how today’s aviation system will adapt to security concerns, it is even more difficult to anticipate how future aviation technologies and systems will be influenced by such concerns. For example, certain capabilities, such as highway-in-the-sky navigation systems, could prove helpful in ensuring secure flight operations by providing a means for operators to report and adjust their flight plans on a more timely basis, fly their courses more accurately, and obtain updated information on restricted and prohibited airspace for safe and predictable course adjustments. Alternatively, technologies that make it easier to fly may allow more people to operate aircraft for illegal and illegitimate purposes.
The attacks of September 11 and their uncertain ramifications underscore the difficulty of making accurate predictions of change in the aviation sector. Other major developments in aviation in recent decades, from the precipitous decline in demand for new GA aircraft to the emergence of hub-and-spoke operations after deregulation (which have had major implications for the kinds of aircraft used by airlines and the demands placed on air traffic control), have occurred almost entirely unexpectedly. Other unanticipated changes will undoubtedly follow. The aviation sector has always been highly dynamic and dependent on aggressive technology research and development. Such characteristics make the sector unsuited to a high level of specificity in long-range planning.