|
Items in cart [0] |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
PAPERBACK PDF BOOK Free Resources |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 2
2
EDUCATION AND LEARNING TO THINK
teaching students the kinds of things that appear on these tests?
What about artistic creativity and interpretive skill, and the ability
to find and refine problems as well as to solve those others have set?
And, perhaps most troubling of all, do any of these "intellectuals'
concerns really have much to do with what the vast majority of
students will do in their work and personal lives after school? Do
the higher order skills needed on the job or in the exercise of one's
rights and duties as a citizen really depend on the kinds of abilities
educators and the academic community are discussing?
Mingled with the difficulty of defining higher order skills is the
troubling sense that there may, in fact, be little new to say about the
topic. Inevitably, we hear the question: Is there really anything new
about schools' trying to teach higher order skills? Haven't schools
always hoped to teach students to think critically, to reason, to solve
problems, to interpret, to refine ideas and to apply them in creative
ways? Most of us can remember a teacher who inspired us personally
in these directions, and schools everywhere include such aspirations
in their statements of goals. Nevertheless, we seem to agree that stu-
dents do not adequately learn these higher order abilities. Perhaps
the fact that our schools have been less than successful at meeting
these goals means that we have simply given up the old truths in
education. Perhaps if we went back to old-fashioned courses and old-
fashioned methods, the problem of teaching higher order skills would
be solved without further special attention. Or, more pessimistically,
perhaps we should conclude that decades of trying unsuccessfully to
teach higher order skills in school show that such goals are not reach-
able; perhaps higher order abilities develop elsewhere than in school,
and it would be wisest for schools to concentrate on the "basics,"
letting higher order abilities emerge later or under other auspices. To
consider these fundamental questions, we need a working definition
of higher order skills and an understanding of their historical role in
American schools.
HIGHER ORDER SKII14S: A WOR1LING DEFINITION
AND A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Thinking skills resist the precise forms of definition we have come
to associate with the setting of specified objectives for schooling.
Nevertheless, it ~ relatively easy to list some key features of higher
order thinking. When we do this, we become aware that, although
OCR for page 3
LA UREN B. RESNICK
3
we cannot define it exactly, we can recognize higher order thinking
when it occurs. Consider the following:
.
Higher order thinking is nonaigor~thmic. That is, the path of
action is not fully specified in advance.
.
Higher order thinking tends to be complex. The total path is
not "visible" (mentally speaking) from any single vantage point.
. Higher order thinking often yields multiple solutions each
with costs and benefits, rather than unique solutions.
. Higher order thinking involves n?`anced judgment and inter
.
.
pretation.
. Higher order thinking involves the application of multiple
criteria, which sometimes conflict with one another.
. Higher order thinking often involves uncertainty. Not every-
thing that bears on the task at hand is known.
Higher order thinking involves self-regulation of the thinking
process. We do not recognize higher order thinking in an individual
when someone else "calls the plays" at every step.
Higher order thinking involves imposing meaning, finding
structure in apparent disorder.
Higher order thinking is effortful. There is considerable men-
ta] work involved in the kinds of elaborations and judgments required.
.
.
This broad characterization of higher order thinking points to a
historical fact that is often overlooked when considering the school
curriculum, a fact that helps to resolve the question of what is new
about our current concerns. American schools, like public schools in
other industrialized countries, have inherited two quite distinct ed-
ucational traditions-one concerned with elite education, the other
concerned with mass education. These traditions conceived of school-
ing differently, had different clienteles, and held different goals for
their students. Only in the last sixty years or so have the two tradi-
tions merged, at least to the extent that most students now attend
comprehensive schools in which several educational programs and
student groups coexist. Yet a case can be made that the continu-
ing and as yet unresolved tension between the goals and methods of
elite and mass education produces our current concern regarding the
teaching of higher order skills.
If we exarn~ne the educational institutions aimed at the elite in
the population, today's higher order goals are nothing new. They
represent what might be called the "high literacy" strand in the
history of education (Resnick and Resnick, 1977~. Since there have
OCR for page 4
4
EDUCATIONAND LEARNING TO THINK
been books and writing, there also have been schools and related
institutions established to train an intellectual elite, drawn largely
from privileged social strata, in capabilities of reasoning, rhetoric,
mathematical and scientific thought, and other skills that today
carry the higher order label. These were state, private, and religious
institutions with, over the centuries, extremely varied ideas of how to
go about the educational task. All were highly selective institutions.
A minority of the population attended them, and this minority was
selected at least in part on the basis of a taste for academic learning
and the ability to perform well in a very special kind of institution.
In America, various Academies, some private and some public,
carried on this tradition through the nineteenth century and into
the twentieth. Until they began to be transformed early in this
century, even public high schools were in the academy mold. Only a
minority of young people attended or even thought of attending them.
There were entrance examinations. The curriculum was quite strictly
academic. Extensive writing, textual criticism, and the like were
expected. Although today we might not recognize nineteenth-century
academy curricula as promoting creative thinking or independent
problem solving, the elite academies expected to produce, and to a
considerable extent succeeded in producing, intellectual performance
beyond the ordinary.
Historically, it must be stressed, the academies did not treat
education of the full population of young people as within their
purview. Schools for the masses arose from different roots and
are a much more recent phenomenon in the history of education.
Mass education derives from a "low literacy tradition (Resnick and
Resnick, 1977) aimed at producing minimal levels of competence
in the general population. It originated in Europe in Reformation
and counter-Reformation efforts to produce a literate, catechism-
and bible-reading population. During the nineteenth century, mass
schooling was adopted as part of a new national agenda in coun-
tries that were just beginning to form citizen armies and to impose
common language ant] culture on their populations. In the United
States, village and township schools were established early, probably
reflecting radical Protestant traditions as well as new definitions of
citizenship appropriate to the new nation. Throughout the nine-
teenth century, this nation knew levels of school attendance ancI
literacy ahead of most other countries, despite the continuing flow
of poor and poorly educated immigrants. As cities began to grow,
OCR for page 5
LA UREN B. RESNICK
s
massive urban school systems grew as well. Only racial minorities
were systematically excluded or separated within the schools.
The mass education system that evolved under these circum-
stances focused largely on elementary schooling, and rather sharp di-
visions between elementary and secondary education persisted. This
distinction was apparent both in who went to school and in what
was taught. Almost everyone went to elementary school, although
a limited number finished the entire eight-year course. Only a few
went to high school or its equivalent. The elementary schools served
the masses and concerned themselves with basic skills of reading and
computation, with health and citizenship training, and the like. Rou-
tinized performance rather than creative and independent thought
was stressed. Mass education was, from its inception, concerned
with inculcating routine abilities: simple computation, reading pre-
dictable texts, reciting religious or civic codes. It did not take as
goals for its students the ability to interpret unfamiliar texts, create
material others would want and need to read, construct convincing
arguments, develop original solutions to technical or social problems.
The political conditions under which mass education developed en-
couraged instead the routinization of basic skills as well as the stan-
dardization of teaching and education institutions. Standardization
was a means of ensuring that at least minimal curriculum standards
would be met, that teachers would be hired on the basis of com-
petency for the job rather than political or familial affiliation, and
that those responsible for the expenditure of public funds could ex-
ercise orderly oversight over the educational process. Standardized
testing was one of the methods developed to exercise oversight and
centralizer! control of the schools (Resnick, 1980~.
Early in the twentieth century, the institutional division between
routine-oriented elementary schools and secondary academies in the
high literacy tradition began to dissolve. Responding to changing
economic and social conditions, more and more young people began
to seek high school education, and educators gradually began to treat
secondary education of a much larger and more varied population as
being their proper concern. The secondary schools were over the next
decades to become the mass institutions the elementary schools had
been. The growth of this new secondary school population marked
the beginning of a debate that continues even today. This debate
concerns what the appropriate curriculum ought to be for secondary
schools designed to serve everyone. The terms of the debate were set,
OCR for page 6
6
EDUCATION AND LEARNING TO THINK
in great part, by a National Education Association (NEA) commis-
sion report entitled The Cardinal Principles of Secondary Education
(Bureau of Education, 1918~. The report provided a theory and
ideology for the place of a vocationally oriented curriculum in the
high school as part of a diversified secondary program adapted to
different types of students. This represented a clear challenge to the
older ideology that organized the high school curriculum around a
common core of the traditional liberal disciplines.
The tension between vocationaTism and traditional disciplines
as the center of the high school program has never been resolved.
Responding to post-WorId War II manpower needs, the 1950s and
early 1960s saw a greater emphasis on traditional disciplines, espe-
cially mathematics and science. Yet political and social pressures
from many quarters sustainer] the demand for vocational training
and other programs designed to keep students in school as Tong as
possible. Other developments in the later 1960s and 1970s led to a
near-complete abandonment of the traditional core curriculum, even
for students who had been its traditional consumers. Schools con-
tinued to require academic courses, but the requirements were often
minimal and course content focused increasingly on application and
practical topics-often replacing more traditional, demanding mate-
riaI. Written composition and other activities that engaged higher
order skills all but disappeared from the curriculum.
The eject of all of this has been to reduce, and sometimes to drive
out of existence, the high literacy goals that had been the focus of the
academies and their preparatory institutions. Yet the taste for such
goals has survived and can be seen in recent efforts to revive interest
in higher order skills teaching. This revival, however, takes place in
an educational and social context that dictates an extension of high
literacy goals to a much broader segment of the population than has
ever before been considered capable of such learning. Today, we are
committed to educating all Americans in the secondary schools and
a large proportion (higher than in any other country in the worId)
in some form of postsecondary institution. These students' educa-
tional needs cannot be met by traditional vocational programs that
no longer prepare students for productive participation in an increas-
ingly diversified economic environment. Employers today complain
that they cannot count on schools arid colleges to produce young
people who can move easily into more complex kinds of work. They
seem to be seeking general skills such as the ability to write and speak
effectively, the ability to learn easily on the job, the ability to use
Representative terms from entire chapter:
order skills
