Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
The Notional Chollenge in
Computer Science ond
Tech nology
National Research Council
Computer Science and Technology Board
Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources
National Research Council
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C. 1988
OCR for page R1
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing
Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils
of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the
Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were
chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to
procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the
National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute
of Medicine.
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society
of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the
furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon
the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has
a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical
matters. Dr. Frank Press is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter
of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers.
It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with
the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government.
The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at
meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior
achievements of engineers. Dr. Robert M. White is president of the National Academy
of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of
Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the
examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts
under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional
charter to be an adviser to the federal government and upon its own initiative, to identify
issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Samuel O. Thier is president of the
Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was established by the National Academy of Sciences
in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's
purposes of furthering knowledge and of advising the federal government. Functioning in
accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the
principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National
Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the
scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both
Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Frank Press and Dr. Robert M. White are
chairman and vice-chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.
~ _
Support for this project was provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (grant no. N00014-87-G-0082), the National Science Foundation (grant no.
CCR-8619362), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant no. DCR-
8619362), the Department of Energy (grant no. DE-FG-05-87ER25029), and the Office
of Naval Research (grant no. N00014-87-G-0110~. Additional funding wan received from
IBM, Hewlett Packard, Cray, and Digital Equipment Corporation.
Cover: aTwo Men on Edge" by Harold Cohen (19883. Photograph by Becky Cohen
(1988~. Painting from a drawing generated by the artist's artificial intelligence computer
program, AARON. 90~ X 118~. Collection of Joseph F. Traub and Pamela McCorduck.
Available from
Computer Science and Technology Board
2101 Constitution Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20418
Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R1
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD
JOSEPH F. TRAUB, Columbia University, Chairman
STEVE CHEN, Supercomputer System, Inc.
MICHAEL L. DERTOUZOS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
EDWARD A. FEIGENBAUM, Stanford University
SAMUEL H. FULLER, Digital Equipment Corporation
RONALD L. GRAHAM, AT&T Bell Laboratories
ROBERT E. KAHN, Corporation for National Research Initiatives
LEONARD KLEINROCK, University of California, Los Angeles
DAVID J. KUCK, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
JOSHUA LEDERBERG, The Rockefeller University
ROBERT W. LUCKY, AT&T Bell Laboratories
ROBERT M. METCALFE, 3Com Corporation
RA] REDDY, Carnegie-Mellon University
MARY SHAW, Carnegie-Mellon University
WILLIAM J. SPENCER, Xerox Corporation
ANDRIES VAN DAM, Brown University
SHMUEL WINOGRAD, IBM Corporation
IRVING WLADAWSKY-BERGER, IBM Corporation
MARJORY S. BLUMENTHAL, Staff Director
MEG KNEMEYER, Staff Associate
DONNA F. ALLEN, Administrative Secretary
· - ~
111
OCR for page R1
COMMISSION ON PHYSICAL SCIENCES,
MATHEMATICS, AND RESOURCES
NORMAN HACKERMAN, Robert A. Welch Foundation,
Chairman
GEORGE F. CARRIER, Harvard University
DEAN E. EASTMAN, IBM, T.~. Watson Research Center
MARYE ANNE FOX, University of Texas
GERHART FRIEDLANDER, Brookhaven National Laboratory
LAWRENCE W. FUNKHOUSER, Chevron Corporation (retired)
PHILLIP A. GRIFFITHS, Duke University
J. ROSS MACDONALD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CHARLES J. MANKIN, Oklahoma Geological Survey
PERRY L. MCCARTY, Stanford University
JACK E. OLIVER, Corned University
JEREMIAH P. OSTRIKER, Princeton University Observatory
WILLIAM D. PHILLIPS, MaDinckro~t, Inc.
DENIS J. PRAGER, MacArthur Foundation
DAVID M. RAUP, University of Chicago
RICHARD 3. REED, University of Washington
ROBERT E. STEVERS, University of Colorado
LARRY L. SMARR, National Center for Supercomputing
Applications
EDWARD C. STONE, JR., California Institute of Technology
KARL K. TUREKIAN, Yale University
GEORGE W. WETHERILL, Carnegie Institution of Washington
IRVING WLADAWSKY-BERGER, IBM Data Systems Division
RAPHAEL G. KASPER, Executive Director
LAWRENCE E. MCCRAY, Associate Executive Director
1V
OCR for page R1
Preface
The Computer Science and Technology Board of the National
Research Council was established in m-1986 to identify and analyze
issues associated with developing, producing, and using computers.
This report is the first to be issued by the board itself: it summa-
rizes the initial deliberations of the board and serves as a platform
from which the board can now begin to launch projects with a nar-
rower focus in such areas as computer networking, high-performance
computing, computer security, software, education, and the compet-
itiveness of the U.S. computer sector.
The report in hand combines a description of the most promising
technological thrusts in the field of computer science and technology
with a statement of concern about the health of the field and a call
for greater and more effective unplementation of computer network-
ing. A major investment in infrastructure is needed to enhance the
nation's productivity and competitiveness across all fields. The re-
port's description of computer science and engineering highlights the
significance of technological innovations made possible by computer
science in the recent past and identifies promising future directions
and potential obstacles.
The report is aimed at people in government, industry, and
academia who are concerned about the future of computing technol-
ogy as a critical area of national strength, particularly at a time when
America's position in other areas is in apparent decline. The report
v
OCR for page R1
is addressed particularly to members of the policymaking commu-
nity, as they consider decisions that will influence the growth of the
field of computer science and technology and future applications of
computers and communications.
The report owes its existence to the devoted persistence of board
member Michael L. Dertouzos, who first gave the report shape and
then, on the basis of group discussions and raw material from the
other members of the board, shepherded it through the numerous
drafts and additional discussions that preceded its final form.
Joseph F. Daub
Chairman, Computer Science
and Technology Board
V1
OCR for page R1
Contents
PART I THE CHALLENGE
1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
2 THE PROMISE OF TECHNOLOGY
Machines, Systems, and Software, 10
Artificial Intelligence, 12
Theoretical Computer Science, 13
Conclusion, 13
3 THE PROMISE OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Information Networks, 14
Uses of Information Networks on a National Scale, 17
4 A UNIQUE INNOVATION ENGINE
How and Why the Engine Has Worked Well, 22
The Research Infrastructure, 24
Why the Engine May Not Run Smoothly
in the future, 26
5 RECOMMENDATIONS
Improve and Expand Information Networking, 32
Support Fundamental Advances in
Computer Science and Technology, 33
·e
V11
3
7
14
22
31
OCR for page R1
PART II THE SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND
TECHNOLOGIES
6 MACHINES, SYSTEMS, AND SOFTWARE
Multiprocessor Systems, 41
Distributed Systems, 43
Software and Programming, 46
7 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sensory Computing, 51
Expert Systems, 53
Deeper Cognitive Systems, 56
Robotics, 57
8 THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
Computational Complexity, 61
Algorithms and Their Analysis, 62
Semantics and Languages, 62
Cryptology, 63
REFERENCES
·e—
V111
41
51
60
64