National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×

Page 1

Executive Summary

INTEGRATION OF COMMERCIAL AND MILITARY MANUFACTURING

More Than Just Commercial Off-the-Shelf

The integration of commercial and military manufacturing (ICMM) has been a subject of extensive debate and steadily increasing policy implementation in recent years. This integration can be defined as optimal use of the commercial manufacturing base to meet defense needs over the life cycle of a system. It encompasses a range of approaches, with commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) items at one extreme and products and processes unique to defense applications on the other. The intermediate approaches (shaded areas in Figure ES-1) are more complex, where defense needs are met with enhanced commercial products or by military products built in commercial or dual-use facilities.

The framework of Table ES-1 applies at the system, subsystem or assembly, and component levels. Commercial suppliers are willing to sell COTS products to the Depatrtment of Defense (DOD) using commercial practices supported by current policies. At the component level (particularly for electronics), defense contractors are increasingly using commercial components. Assemblies and sub-systems, however, are predominantly built on military-unique production lines. The opportunity for 2010 and beyond lies in increasing the use of the commercial production base at the assembly and subsystem levels. These opportunities exist across mechanical, optical, and electronic subsystems.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×

Page 2

Image: jpg
~ enlarge ~

FIGURE ES-1 Commercial-military integration framework.


A Compelling Military Need

The expected nature of combat in 2010 is driving DOD to a substantial transformation of its force structure. The new force will be more flexible, able to respond more rapidly, and better equipped to deal with an unpredictable threat. The transformation strategy implicitly relies on the rapid introduction of new technology and rapid industrial response for the replenishment of weapons, spare parts, and other consumables essential to readiness and sustainability. The fact that potential adversaries have easy access to commercial technology will compel DOD and defense contractors to excel at being the first to integrate militarily relevant commercial technology into defense systems. An effective and robust integration of commercial and military manufacturing can improve military acquisition capabilities and capacity dramatically. It is needed in both long-cycle processes—those that produce technological marvels whose need and costs have to be predicted 15–20 years in advance—and processes that respond rapidly to changing threats and make the latest technology available to the warfighter at substantially lower unit and life-cycle costs.

Opportunities Abound

This study reviewed several dozen examples of successful integration of commercial and military manufacturing, ranging from pilot projects to sustained initiatives across many types of products. A few salient examples are shown in Table ES-1. Military and commercial and dual-use manufacturers have demonstrated the ability to work together in many different ways using many business models. In almost all of these examples, however, an individual on the govern

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×

Page 3

TABLE ES-1 Examples of Successes in ICMM

Project

Results

DARPA/USAF miniature air-launched decoy (MALD)

Pushed the envelope to demonstrate that a high-performance, military-unique system could be developed from commercial sources

Motorola Communications Systems Division—JSTARS common ground station

Subcontracted 80% of circuit board production to commercial sources and realized higher quality and lower costs

Litton Amecom—NASA satellite control system

Used commercial standards, parts, and design practices to achieve cost reductions of 20–50%

USAF ManTech/TRW Military Parts from Commercial Lines Pilot Program

Demonstrated that electronic modules for the F-16 and RAH-66 could be redesigned for commercial manufacture and produced on a high-volume commercial line, with savings of 30–50% in cost and 90% in time from design release to production

USAF Electronic Systems Command-North—warning system unattended radar (AN/FPS-24)

Signal processor (ground environment) used commercial plastic encapsulated microcircuits to reduce costs by 85% and increase reliability (more than 6 million hours without failure)

USAF ManTech C-17 horizontal stabilizer outer torque box

Combined military and commercial production and achieved a 50% cost avoidance

M/A-COM Northrop Grumman ALQ-135 EW System

Commercial redesign for technology insertion reduced costs by 52%

ment side, and often one on the contractor side, had to make heroic efforts to use existing law and policy creatively to overcome barriers in common practice and culture. These barriers include the following:

  • The lack of a commercial knowledge base and the need for an acquisition workforce (including contracting officers) familiar with commercial practice;

  • Government acquisition provisions that commercial suppliers are unwilling to accept, including cost accounting, auditing, specialized specs and standards, procurement laws and socioeconomic provisions, intellectual property rights provisions, and logistics practices;

  • Acquisition and upgrade cycle times that are drastically misaligned with commercial cycles, including lengthy test and evaluation and requalification requirements;

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×

Page 4

  • Profit policies that discourage defense prime contractors from commercial outsourcing and push make/buy decisions toward "make"; and

  • Lack of institutionalized solutions that program managers can routinely use.

In addition to the encouragement provided by previous successes, several trends will increase the opportunities for integration of commercial and military manufacturing over the coming decade:

  • The emergence of a new $70 billion industry sector devoted to flexible electronics manufacturing services with capabilities suited to small-lot custom manufacturing for defense applications involving digital, analog, and microelectromechanical subsystems (MEMS);

  • Advances in precision automated manufacturing for small lots, with greatly improved flexibility to accommodate on-demand manufacturing of defense items;

  • Availability of technology for automated design, production, and in-line inspection and testing that, by 2010, will offer to electromechanical and MEMS devices a level of manufacturing flexibility and integration comparable to the production infrastructure for today's chips and boards;

  • Commercial upgrades to aging avionics, a major opportunity for ICMM because upgrading using mil-spec configurations is usually unaffordable and often impossible; and

  • Advances in the ability to share digital product data and business data in supply chains, with new efficiencies in rapid response manufacturing of the type needed by DOD.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations That Would Motivate Change

  • Vigorously pursue policy, incentives, and implementing guidelines for ICMM. Such policies would create metrics and incentives for ICMM and remove barriers. An example of an appropriate metric would be to assess commercial content based on bills of material. Some potential incentives include the following:

-Using source selection factors to assess trade-offs between commercial and military manufacturing,

-Instituting profit policies to make defense contractor use of commercial production a profitable and viable business decision, and

-Sharing any savings attributable to ICMM.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×

Page 5

  • Contract for life-cycle support and technology refreshment. Long-term contracts will create incentives for contractors to reduce costs, increase availability, and keep up with technology.

Recommendations That Would Enable Change

  • Establish a commercial acquisition academy to augment training and education. The academy would have a research component to develop best practices and case studies as well as a training component to incorporate commercial practices into military acquisition training and processes.

  • Fund and execute additional rapid-response demonstration programs to build a broad base of experience with ICMM. One obvious mechanism for this is the DOD ManTech program. Such demonstration programs could be an integral part of research programs in a commercial acquisition academy.

  • Increase DOD and defense sector awareness of planned and emerging commercial technologies and capabilities. Market awareness is critical and can be easier for the military as a unique customer than for commercial competitors.

  • Invest in research and development to increase the compatibility of military operating environments and commercially produced components.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×
Page 2
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×
Page 3
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×
Page 4
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2002. Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10336.
×
Page 5
Next: 1 Introduction »
Equipping Tomorrow's Military Force: Integration of Commercial and Military Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Owing to the expected nature of combat in 2010, U.S. military forces face a pressing need to transform themselves for rapid response to an unpredictable threat. Rapid advances in commercial technology (particularly in electronics), coupled with the easy access to commercial technology enjoyed by potential adversaries, will compel DOD and defense contractors to excel at integrating commercial technology into defense systems. This integration of commercial and military manufacturing (ICMM) has begun on a small scale. By 2010, it needs to increase substantially if U.S. forces are to retain a technological edge. This report assesses the opportunities for increased ICMM in 2010 and beyond, identifies barriers, and recommends strategies for overcoming them.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!