National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix B - Note on the Formation of Ozone and Secondary Fine Particulate Matter
Page 178
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

APPENDIX C
ANALYSIS OF THE CMAQ DATABASE

Harry S. Cohen, Ellicott City, Maryland

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) maintains a database on all projects funded under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program. The database provides information on type of project, location, funding level, and estimated emission reductions. Currently, the database covers the first 8 years of the CMAQ program (FY 1992–1999).

The following are provided in this appendix:

  • A description of the database,

  • A summary of what the data show about the types of projects funded and emission reductions,

  • An assessment of the usefulness of the database for this study, and

  • Recommendations for improvements to the database.

The FHWA CMAQ database for each fiscal year provides the following information on individual projects in each state:

  • A brief text description of the project;

  • Project type;

  • Amount obligated for the project in the fiscal year; and

  • Estimated emission reductions in kilograms per day for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM10).

Text descriptions, project type, and amount obligated are provided for all projects in the database. As discussed in more detail below, estimates of emission reductions are provided for many, but not all, projects.

The text descriptions in the database usually provide an indication of where in the state the project was located and the type of

Page 179
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

work involved. The locations may be specified in terms of a route designation, city, or county. Examples of these descriptions, selected at random from the database, are provided in the accompanying text box.

Examples of Project Descriptions from the CMAQ Database

Employee commute options—Bridgeport

Land use ordinance demo

Hawthorn Bridge—sidewalk improvement (CONSTR)

Construction funding for park-and-ride lot at MD108/MD32

Hillsborough County video surveillance system

Additional design cost for grade-separated interchange

Roadway/geometric/signal improvements

City of Wilmington signals

US-17N in Myrtle Beach, closed-loop signal system

Purchase of 40 large passenger buses

SORTA FY 1995 Clean Air Fare Subsidy

With regard to project type classifications, the program guidance document (FHWA 1992, 12–13)1 asks states to classify CMAQ projects as follows:

  • Transit: construction, equipment, or operating expenses for new and improved services and parking for transit services.

  • Other shared-ride: vanpool and carpool programs, parking for shared-ride services.

  • Highway/road (traffic flow):2 traffic management and control services, signalization projects, intersection improvements, and construction or dedication of high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes.

1

The most recent program guidance (FHWA 1999, 22) adds two new project categories— public–private partnerships and experimental pilot projects.

2

In the FY 1992 database, these projects are referred to as “highway/road”; in subsequent years, they are referred to as “traffic flow.”

Page 180
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
  • Demand management: employer trip reduction programs, transportation management plans, flexible work schedule programs, vehicle restriction programs.

  • Pedestrian/bike: trails, storage facilities, promotional activities.

  • Inspection and maintenance and other transportation control measures (not covered by the above categories).

The CMAQ project categories listed above are broad. For example, “traffic flow” includes both the construction of HOV lanes and the retiming of traffic signals. Similarly, “transit” includes both the purchase of alternative-fuel buses and the addition of parking spaces at a transit station.

States that have no nonattainment or maintenance areas are allowed to use their CMAQ funds for any project eligible for federal funding under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) or CMAQ. Also, other states receiving the minimum apportionment may use a portion of their CMAQ funds for any project eligible for federal funding under the Surface Transportation or CMAQ programs under certain circumstances.3 In the CMAQ database, these projects are designated as “STP/CMAQ.”

States are required to provide the amount of CMAQ funds obligated for each project (or project category where groups of projects are analyzed together) for the year, disaggregated by the categories of projects listed above. However, it appears that obligations in the CMAQ database are not reconciled with the CMAQ program obligations from the Federal Management Information System (FMIS). For example, according to FMIS, total obligations for CMAQ in FY 1997 were $807 million. Total FY 1997 obligations for all projects in the CMAQ database were $773 million. While the difference is small

3

CMAQ funds are apportioned to the states on the basis of the population in nonattainment and maintenance areas multiplied by a weighting factor. The weighting factor is based on the pollutant for which the area is in nonattainment and its severity. All states get a minimum apportionment whether or not they have nonattainment or maintenance areas. Those states without nonattainment or maintenance areas may use their minimum apportionment for any projects eligible under either the CMAQ program or the STP. In those minimum allocation states with nonattainment or maintenance areas where the CMAQ formula results in less than the minimum apportionment, the funds may be used in addition to the formula amount for any CMAQ- or STP-eligible project.

Page 181
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

(less than 5 percent in FY 1997), it would nonetheless be desirable to avoid publishing two different estimates of CMAQ obligations for a fiscal year.

The committee investigated the desirability of using the FMIS database to obtain information about CMAQ projects, particularly programmatic detail. Limitations of that database, however, precluded this option.4

CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECTS

The project classification scheme used in the CMAQ database was expanded to examine the composition of the CMAQ program in more detail and to link program expenditures with specific types of projects for which data on cost-effectiveness are available in the literature. The categories and subcategories are as follows:

  • Transit

    • Alternative-fuel vehicles

    • Conventional fuel transit vehicles

    • Park-and-ride facilities

    • Station and bus stop improvements

    • Transit service expansion

    • Other transit improvements

  • Traffic flow

    • Congestion and incident management

    • HOV lanes

    • Traffic signal improvements

    • Traveler information

    • Turn lanes and other intersection improvements

    • Other traffic flow improvements

4

A comparison of CMAQ data compiled from FMIS by the Surface Transportation Policy Project for FY 1992–1997 and FHWA’s CMAQ database for the same years showed a significant undercount for many project categories. For example, in FMIS, bicycle and pedestrian projects that are part of larger improvements never appear as separate projects in the database. Hence FMIS represents a serious undercount of CMAQ-funded bicycle and pedestrian projects. Similarly, transit projects are undercounted—43 percent for FY 1992–1997 in the FHWA CMAQ database versus 32 percent in the FMIS database for the same period. Moreover, since the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, no data are collected on transit projects in FMIS, a critical omission for one of the most important CMAQ spending categories.

Page 182
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
  • Shared ride

    • Park-and-ride facilities

    • Other shared ride

  • Pedestrian/bicycle (no subcategories)

  • Demand management

    • Employee trip reduction

    • Other demand management

  • STP/CMAQ (no subcategories)

  • Other (and unclassifiable)

    • Alternative-fuel vehicles

    • Paving and sweeping to reduce PM

    • Rail freight

    • Vehicle inspection and maintenance

    • All other improvements

The project descriptions in the CMAQ database were used to assign projects to the above subcategories. Also, in cases where projects appear to have been misclassified, they were switched from one major category to another.5

In many cases, it was difficult to determine appropriate subcategories on the basis of project descriptions. For example, many of the project descriptions under “transit” were just the name of a transit agency or line. These were classified as “other transit improvements.” Similarly, many of the project descriptions under “traffic flow” were just the name of an intersection or highway. These were classified as “turn lanes and other intersection improvements,” even though it was possible that only traffic signal improvements were made at these intersections.

COMPOSITION OF THE CMAQ PROGRAM

Using the categories and subcategories listed above, Figure C-1 and Table C-1 show the composition of the CMAQ program for the 8-year period from FY 1992 to FY 1999.

5

Less than 1 percent of the project amounts that were originally classified as “transit,” “traffic flow,” and “pedestrian/bicycle” appear to have been misclassified. However, about 25 percent of the project amounts originally assigned as “demand management” were reassigned to other categories on the basis of the project description. Also, about 20 percent of the projects originally assigned as “STP/CMAQ” were reassigned to categories that were more descriptive of project type (mostly to “traffic flow” and “transit”).

Page 183
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-1 CMAQ spending priorities, FY1992–1999. (Source: FHWA CMAQdatabase.)

Page 184
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

TABLE C-1 CMAQ Obligations by Type of Project (FY 1992–1999)

Project Category and Subcategory

FY 1992–1999 Obligations

Millions of Dollars

Percent

Transit

 

 

Alternative-fuel vehicles

193

3.1

Conventional-fuel transit vehicles

800

12.7

Park-and-ride facilities

91

1.5

Station and bus stop improvements

302

4.8

Transit service expansions

456

7.2

Other transit improvements

937

14.9

Subtotal

2,780

44.1

Traffic flow

 

 

Congestion and incident management

508

8.1

HOV lanes

291

4.6

Traffic signal improvements

536

8.5

Traveler information

84

1.3

Turn lanes and other intersection improvements

295

4.7

Other traffic flow improvements

371

5.9

Subtotal

2,086

33.1

Shared ride

 

 

Park-and-ride facilities

85

1.4

Other shared ride

152

2.4

Subtotal

238

3.8

Pedestrian and bicycle

199

3.2

Demand management

 

 

Employee trip reduction

51

0.8

Other demand management

133

2.1

Subtotal

184

2.9

STP/CMAQ

338

5.4

Other (and unclassifiable)

 

 

Alternative-fuel vehicles

40

0.6

Paving and sweeping to reduce PM

55

0.9

Rail freight

23

0.4

Vehicle inspection and maintenance

264

4.2

All other improvements

94

1.5

Subtotal

476

7.6

Grand total

6,300

100.0

Page 185
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

Together, transit and traffic flow improvement projects accounted for slightly more than three-fourths (77 percent) of CMAQ obligations during the first 8 years of the program. These types of projects provide benefits in addition to emission reductions, such as time savings to highway and transit users. Types of projects for which most of the benefits are emission reductions or energy savings—alternative-fuel vehicles, paving and sweeping to reduce PM, and vehicle inspection and maintenance—account for only about 8 percent of CMAQ obligations.

Figure C-1 also shows the number of projects funded between FY 1992 and FY 1999 by project type. Slightly more than two-fifths (43 percent) of the projects were traffic flow improvements, but only one-fifth (21 percent) of the projects were transit related, compared with 44 percent when project value is the analysis criterion. The differences arise because the amount of obligations per project is not the same for each category. For example, in comparison with other CMAQ project categories, transit projects have relatively higher dollar obligations per project. Hence, transit represents a larger share of the CMAQ program when the program is analyzed by value of projects than when analyzed by numbers of projects.

Trends over Time

Table C-2 shows the composition of the CMAQ program by type of project for each fiscal year. This information is provided in graphical form in Figures C-2 through C-8. As suggested by the following observations, the composition of the CMAQ program has been changing over time.

Transit Projects (Figure C-2)

CMAQ obligations for all transit projects range from 34 percent in FY 1997 and FY 1998 to more than 50 percent in FY 1995 and FY 1999. These variations are due to the effects of a few large projects. In FY 1995, $76 million was obligated for the construction of a busway from downtown Pittsburgh to the airport and another $76 million for the purchase of rail cars for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s Market-Frankfort line. In FY 1999, $124 mil-

Page 186
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

TABLE C-2 CMAQ Obligations by Type of Project for Each Fiscal Year

Project Category and Subcategory

Percentage for Fiscal Year

Total

FY 1992

FY 1993

FY 1994

FY 1995

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

Transit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative-fuel vehicles

0.3

6.9

2.9

3.5

2.6

4.3

1.5

1.9

3.1

Conventional-fuel transit vehicles

17.8

11.1

17.1

15.5

9.5

9.3

8.7

14.2

12.7

Park-and-ride facilities

1.4

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.3

0.8

0.7

2.1

1.5

Station and bus stop improvements

9.4

3.6

2.3

4.6

5.4

4.5

5.2

5.5

4.8

Transit service expansions

0.0

6.4

4.3

13.3

6.8

2.2

1.8

13.5

7.2

Other transit improvements

20.9

18.1

12.6

13.1

14.2

13.1

15.9

15.4

14.9

Subtotal

49.8

48.6

40.6

51.2

39.8

34.1

33.8

52.6

44.1

Traffic flow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congestion and incident management

1.9

5.3

10.8

9.9

7.7

8.0

4.6

10.5

8.1

HOV lanes

23.5

0.8

0.8

2.4

8.7

7.8

1.8

1.8

4.6

Traffic signal improvements

5.7

7.4

9.6

8.5

12.0

10.7

8.8

4.7

8.5

Traveler information

0.8

6.4

1.8

0.7

0.2

0.6

1.1

0.4

1.3

Turn lanes and other intersection improvements

4.0

2.9

2.6

3.2

7.0

11.4

3.6

2.8

4.7

Other traffic flow improvements

0.1

4.5

9.8

4.6

2.6

4.8

15.0

4.9

5.9

Subtotal

36.0

27.2

35.3

29.4

38.2

43.3

35.0

25.2

33.1

Page 187
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

Shared ride

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Park-and-ride facilities

0.8

1.6

1.1

3.0

1.2

1.3

1.0

0.5

1.4

Other shared ride

2.1

4.0

3.1

2.0

1.6

1.7

2.7

2.5

2.4

Subtotal

2.9

5.6

4.2

5.0

2.8

3.1

3.7

2.9

3.8

Pedestrian and bicycle

3.0

3.0

2.2

1.5

4.0

4.9

4.4

2.7

3.2

Demand management

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee trip reduction

0.0

0.2

1.1

0.8

1.8

0.2

1.2

0.6

0.8

Other demand management

1.2

1.7

3.1

1.9

2.5

2.3

2.4

1.5

2.1

Subtotal

1.2

2.0

4.3

2.7

4.2

2.4

3.5

2.1

2.9

STP/CMAQ

6.6

6.8

6.3

3.5

5.2

6.1

7.9

3.3

5.4

Other (and unclassifiable)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative-fuel vehicles

0.0

0.5

0.8

1.5

0.0

1.3

0.6

0.0

0.6

Paving and sweeping to reduce PM

0.3

0.7

2.5

0.8

0.1

0.4

1.1

0.9

0.9

Rail freight

0.0

0.5

0.2

0.9

0.0

0.8

0.3

0.1

0.4

Vehicle inspection and maintenance

0.1

0.1

2.5

2.6

2.8

2.3

8.9

9.9

4.2

All other improvements

0.1

4.9

1.1

0.9

2.9

1.2

0.8

0.2

1.5

Subtotal

0.5

6.8

7.1

6.7

5.9

6.0

11.7

11.1

7.6

Grand total

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Page 188
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-2 Transit projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by fiscal year.

Page 189
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

lion was obligated for the Red Line in Los Angeles and $46 million for advanced automatic train control from Daly City to downtown Oakland.

Traffic Flow Projects (Figure C-3)
  • CMAQ obligations for all traffic flow projects exhibit no clear trend. They range from 25 percent of total CMAQ obligations in FY 1999 to 43 percent in FY 1997.

  • HOV lanes accounted for nearly 24 percent of all CMAQ obligations in FY 1992, when $74 million was obligated to California for this purpose. Over the next 7 years, HOV lanes accounted for less than 10 percent of all CMAQ obligations. In FY 1998 and FY 1999, they accounted for only about 2 percent of all CMAQ obligations.

Shared Ride Projects (Figure C-4)

Obligations for shared ride projects have ranged between about 3 and 6 percent of all CMAQ obligations from FY 1992 to FY 1999. During the last 4 years, obligations were near the low end of the range.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects (Figure C-5)

CMAQ obligations for pedestrian and bicycle projects range from 1.5 percent (in FY 1995) to 5 percent (in FY 1997), with no clear trend over time.

Demand Management Projects (Figure C-6)

Demand management projects have accounted for between 2 and 4 percent of total CMAQ obligations since FY 1993.

STP/CMAQ Projects (Figure C-7)

STP/CMAQ projects have accounted for between 3 and 8 percent of total CMAQ obligations, with no clear trend over time.

Other Projects (Figure C-8)

Obligations for vehicle inspection and maintenance projects have been increasing over time. In FY 1992 and FY 1993, these projects accounted for just 0.1 percent of all CMAQ obligations. In the next 4 years, they accounted for 2 to 3 percent of total CMAQ obligations.

Page 190
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-3 Traffic flow projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by fiscal year.

Page 191
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-4 Shared ride projectsas percentofall CMAQ obligations,by fiscal year.

Page 192
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-5 Pedestrian and bicycle projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by fiscal year.

Page 193
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-6 Demand management projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by fiscal year.

Page 194
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-7 STP/CMAQ projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by fiscal year.

Page 195
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-8 Other projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by fiscal year.

Page 196
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

In FY 1998 and FY 1999, they jumped to almost 10 percent of total CMAQ obligations.

Trends by DOT Region6

Table C-3 and Figures C-10 to C-16 show the composition of the CMAQ program for each of the 10 U.S. Department of Transportation regions. These data indicate that there are large differences across regions in how CMAQ funds are spent.

Transit Projects (Figure C-10)
  • Transit projects account for more than 44 percent of all CMAQ obligations in Regions 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, and 10. In the other four regions, transit projects account for less than 25 percent of all CMAQ obligations.

  • Projects involving conventional fuel transit vehicles range from less than 2 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Regions 6 and 8 to 26 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Region 3.

  • Transit park-and-ride projects range from less than 0.1 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Regions 4, 8, and 9 to 5 percent in Regions 1 and 10.

  • Transit station and bus stop improvements range from less than 1 percent of all CMAQ obligations in Regions 7 and 8 to 9 percent in Regions 1 and 2.

  • Transit service expansions range from less than 3 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Regions 2, 6, 7, 8, and 10 to 16 percent in Region 1.

Traffic Flow Projects (Figure C-11)
  • Traffic flow projects range from about 10 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Region 10 and 19 percent in Region 1 to 52 percent in Region 4 and 57 percent in Region 6.

6

Figure C-9 is a map showing the states in each of the 10 U.S. Department of Transportation regions.

Page 197
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-9 U.S. Department of Transportation regions.

Page 198
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

TABLE C-3 CMAQ Obligations by Type of Project for Each Region (FY 1992–1999)

Project Category and Subcategory

Percentage for Region

Total

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Transit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative-fuel vehicles

1.0

2.0

1.7

1.6

4.6

2.6

0.0

0.3

5.9

4.1

3.1

Conventional-fuel transit vehicles

9.7

8.7

26.2

5.6

13.3

1.3

9.3

1.6

19.7

13.1

12.7

Park-and-ride facilities

4.9

0.4

2.3

0.0

3.4

0.5

0.4

0.0

0.0

5.2

1.5

Station and bus stop improvements

9.5

9.4

1.6

1.9

8.1

4.1

0.8

0.4

1.8

1.9

4.8

Transit service expansions

16.5

1.1

11.4

6.3

5.1

2.1

0.0

0.6

13.3

2.3

7.2

Other transit improvements

14.7

25.1

9.2

9.4

10.0

11.2

11.6

1.8

18.3

20.1

14.9

Subtotal

56.3

46.7

52.4

24.8

44.4

21.8

22.0

4.7

59.0

46.6

44.1

Traffic flow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congestion and incident management

3.1

5.9

4.8

13.7

7.9

22.8

9.0

4.6

6.4

0.8

8.1

HOV lanes

3.0

0.5

0.5

1.4

0.4

3.9

0.0

3.6

16.4

1.2

4.6

Traffic signal improvements

7.2

5.3

8.3

14.5

12.4

8.3

7.0

13.4

6.8

4.1

8.5

Traveler information

0.4

3.7

0.6

3.4

0.3

2.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

1.3

Turn lanes and other intersection improvements

3.5

5.3

4.4

12.5

4.5

8.0

7.4

3.5

0.8

0.4

4.7

Other traffic flow improvements

1.8

4.3

13.4

6.8

8.3

12.0

3.6

1.1

1.7

3.2

5.9

Subtotal

19.0

25.1

32.0

52.5

33.8

57.1

27.0

26.1

32.4

9.7

33.1

Page 199
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

Shared ride

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Park-and-ride facilities

2.0

0.9

5.4

0.2

0.6

1.8

0.5

2.0

0.3

1.2

1.4

Other shared ride

4.4

1.5

1.8

3.7

1.9

2.1

1.7

6.2

2.1

2.4

2.4

Subtotal

6.4

2.4

7.1

3.9

2.5

3.9

2.2

8.3

2.4

3.6

3.8

Pedestrian and bicycle

1.7

4.6

0.6

2.7

3.3

2.1

0.1

4.6

2.3

18.7

3.2

Demand management

Employee trip reduction

4.3

0.9

0.6

0.1

0.1

0.6

0.2

0.1

0.6

0.5

0.8

Other demand management

2.4

4.3

0.9

3.8

1.6

1.4

1.0

1.3

0.7

4.3

2.1

Subtotal

6.7

5.2

1.6

3.9

1.7

2.0

1.2

1.5

1.3

4.8

2.9

STP/CMAQ

2.6

2.5

2.7

8.6

0.0

10.2

29.5

48.2

0.9

2.5

5.4

Other (and unclassifiable)

Alternative-fuel vehicles

1.1

1.1

0.5

0.4

0.2

2.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.3

0.6

Paving and sweeping to reduce PM

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

10.3

4.5

0.6

8.8

0.9

Rail freight

1.2

1.5

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.4

Vehicle inspection and maintenance

3.2

10.4

1.4

1.6

11.8

0.1

0.6

0.6

0.0

2.0

4.2

All other improvements

1.8

0.6

1.8

1.6

2.2

0.4

7.1

1.5

0.9

2.9

1.5

Subtotal

7.3

13.6

3.7

3.6

14.3

2.9

18.0

6.6

1.7

14.1

7.6

Grand total

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Page 200
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-10 Transit projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by region.

Page 201
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-11 Traffic flow projects a spercent of all CMAQ obligations, by region.

Page 202
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
  • Turn lanes and other intersection improvements range from less than 0.5 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Region 10 to 12 percent in Region 4.

  • Traffic signal improvement projects range from 4 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Region 10 to 12 to 15 percent in Regions 4, 5, and 8.

  • Region 6 spends 23 percent of total CMAQ obligations on congestion and incident management projects. In most other regions, these projects account for less than 10 percent of total CMAQ obligations.

  • HOV lanes account for 16 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Region 9. In other regions, these projects account for less than 5 percent of total CMAQ obligations.

Shared Ride Projects (Figure C-12)

Regions 1, 3, and 8 spend 6 to 8 percent of total CMAQ obligations on shared ride projects. Other regions spend 2 to 4 percent of total CMAQ funds on these projects.

Pedestrian and Bicycle (Figure C-13)

Regions 3 and 7 spend less than 1 percent of total CMAQ obligations on pedestrian and bicycle projects. Region 10 spends 19 percent of total CMAQ obligations on these projects.

Demand Management (Figure C-14)

Demand management projects range from about 1 percent of total CMAQ obligations in Regions 7 and 9 to 7 percent in Region 1.

STP/CMAQ Projects (Figure C-15)

Regions 7 and 8 spend 30 and 48 percent, respectively, of CMAQ obligations on STP/CMAQ projects. In most other regions, these projects account for less than 3 percent of CMAQ obligations.

Other Projects (Figure C-16)
  • CMAQ obligations for paving and sweeping projects (to control PM10) are 10 percent in Region 7, 5 percent in Region 8, and 9 percent in Region 10. In all other regions, expenditures on these projects are less than 1 percent of CMAQ total obligations.

  • Regions 6, 7, 8, and 9 spend less than 1 percent of total CMAQ obligations on vehicle inspection and maintenance projects. Region 2 spends 10 percent of total CMAQ obligations on these projects.

Page 203
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-12 Shared ride projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by region.

FIGURE C-13 Pedestrian and bicycle projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by region.

Page 204
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-14 Demand management projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by region.

FIGURE C-15 STP/CMAQ projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by region.

Page 205
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

FIGURE C-16 Other projects as percent of all CMAQ obligations, by region.

EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CMAQ PROJECTS

The CMAQ program guidance document (FHWA 1992, 13) also requires states to provide estimates of emission reductions in kilograms per day for VOCs, NOx, CO, and PM10. Table C-4 shows the number of FY 1992–1999 projects with estimates of emission reductions for each project type. Excluding STP/CMAQ projects, which are in states that receive the minimum apportionment, emission estimates for at least one of the four pollutants are provided for almost 70 percent of all projects. Table C-5 shows percentages of FY 1992–1999 projects with estimates for each of the four pollutants. Almost 60 percent of the projects in the database have estimates of

Page 206
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

emission reductions for VOCs; however, only 5 percent have estimates for PM10.

Table C-6 shows percentages of projects with estimates for each of the four pollutants by fiscal year. In FY 1992, fewer than 20 percent of projects had estimates for VOCs. In the next year, this percentage jumped to almost 60 percent, and it remained at about this level for the next 5 years. Similar though somewhat more erratic patterns are seen for estimates of the other pollutants.

The units for reporting emission reductions in the CMAQ database—kilograms per day—present a problem in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of CMAQ projects. The cost-effectiveness of air quality improvement strategies is usually expressed in terms of cost per ton (or some other unit of weight) reduction in emissions. In fact, in the legislation calling for this study, Congress asked the committee to “assess the effectiveness, including the quantitative and nonquantitative benefits, of projects funded under the [CMAQ] program and include, in the assessment, an estimate of the cost per ton of pollution reduction.” Since project life (the period over which the emission reductions are expected to occur) is not given in the database, it is not possible to determine cost per ton reduced for the projects in the CMAQ database. To eliminate this problem in the future, it would be useful to ask states either to (a) report total emission reductions for a project rather than emission reductions per day, or (b) add information on project life to the database, so that total emission reductions can be calculated as the product of project life (in days) and emission reductions per day.7

Some problems were found in the treatment of those projects for which obligations in a given fiscal year did not cover the total cost of the project. For some of these projects, the estimated emission reductions were for the entire project, even though the obligations for that project in a given fiscal year accounted for only a small part

7

The second option may be more desirable because state implementation plans (SIPs) require information on estimated emission reductions in kilograms or tons per day. Thus, if an area wants to include a CMAQ-funded transportation control measure in a SIP and get credit, these data must be provided.

Page 207
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

TABLE C-4 Projects with Any Estimates of Emission Reductions (FY 1992–1999)

Type of Project

Quantitative Estimates of Emission Reductions for One or More Pollutants

Yes

No

Total Projects

Transit

1,119

490

1,609

Traffic flow

2,207

999

3,206

Shared ride

550

190

740

Pedestrian/bicycle

469

231

700

Demand management

319

165

484

STP/CMAQ

336

336

Other

265

234

499

Grand total

4,929

2,645

7,574

Percentage

65

35

100

Total without STP/CMAQ

4,929

2,309

7,238

Percentage

68

32

100

TABLE C-5 Projects with Estimates for Each Pollutant by Project Type (FY 1992–1999)

Type of Project

Total Projects

Percent of Projects with Quantitative Estimates of

VOCs

CO

NOx

PM10

Transit

1,609

62.5

38.2

51.5

7.5

Traffic flow

3,206

65.6

35.7

40.0

1.1

Shared ride

740

66.2

38.6

52.7

6.1

Pedestrian/bicycle

700

56.7

40.3

46.0

7.7

Demand management

484

63.0

35.7

52.1

5.8

STP/CMAQ

336

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Other

499

34.5

19.4

26.1

18.2

Grand total

7,574

59.0

34.3

42.3

4.9

Page 208
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

TABLE C-6 Projects with Estimates for Each Pollutant by Fiscal Year

Fiscal Year

Total Projects

Percent of Projects with Quantitative Estimates of

VOCs

CO

NOx

PM10

1992

182

19.2

18.7

14.8

3.3

1993

778

59.3

33.3

27.8

5.9

1994

980

63.3

36.5

42.7

4.4

1995

1,072

61.8

41.1

44.9

5.0

1996

1,258

56.7

29.7

35.1

4.0

1997

1,178

63.2

37.0

50.4

5.6

1998

1,052

58.2

33.6

45.3

5.5

1999

1,074

58.1

31.8

51.3

4.7

All Years

7,574

59.0

34.3

42.3

4.9

of the cost of the project.8 This problem can lead to an underestimate of cost per ton of pollution reduced. To eliminate this problem in the future, it would be useful if the total cost of a project were included in the database (including costs in all years whether covered by CMAQ or other funding sources), along with CMAQ obligations for the project in the fiscal year.

The analysis requirements in the CMAQ program guidance for projecting emission reductions are very flexible. States are not required to use a specific methodology in estimating emission reductions. Further, states are not required to provide documentation of key input factors (e.g., reductions of vehicle miles or changes in emission rates) used in developing estimates of emission reductions. As a result, users of the CMAQ database have difficulty evaluating the basis for estimates of emission reductions. Also, the lack of a standard methodology decreases the level of confidence for comparisons of emission reductions and cost-effectiveness across project types and states.

8

Many projects are implemented using CMAQ funds from more than one fiscal year. Frequently, these projects appear in the CMAQ databases for different years with identical estimates of emission reductions, even when the amount of funds in each year differs greatly.

Page 209
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

SUMMARY AND AUTHOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS

The following are the key findings from the review of the composition of the CMAQ program:

  • Slightly more than 75 percent of obligations during the first 8 years of the CMAQ program have been for traffic flow and transit improvement projects. These types of projects provide benefits beyond emission reductions, such as time savings to highway and transit users. Types of projects for which most of the benefits are emission reductions or energy savings—alternative-fuel vehicles, paving and sweeping to reduce PM, and vehicle inspection and maintenance—account for only about 8 percent of CMAQ obligations.

  • There are large year-to-year changes in the distribution of CMAQ obligations among different types of projects. The patterns of these changes do not indicate any clear trends. However, it appears that obligations for HOV projects are decreasing while obligations for vehicle inspection and maintenance projects are increasing.

  • There are large differences across regions in the composition of the CMAQ program. For example, transit project obligations range from about 5 to nearly 60 percent of total CMAQ obligations, depending on the region. Traffic flow projects range from about 10 to nearly 60 percent of total CMAQ obligations, also depending on the region.

Three problems limit the usefulness of the database in estimating the cost-effectiveness of CMAQ projects in providing emission reductions:

  • Emission reductions are stated in kilograms per day, and project lives are not given. Accordingly, it is not possible to determine the total amount of emission reductions attributable to a project.

  • For some projects in the database, it appears that emission reductions are reported for the entire project, whereas obligations in a given fiscal year account for only a part of the cost of the project. This problem can lead to an underestimate of the cost per ton of achieving emission reductions.

  • Little is known about the data, methods, and assumptions used in estimating emission reductions. As a result, it is difficult to

Page 210
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×

compare the cost-effectiveness of different types of CMAQ projects in different states.

To address these problems, it is the author’s recommendation that FHWA ask states to

  1. Add information on project life to the database, so that total emission reductions can be calculated for project cost-effectiveness analyses; and

  2. Report total cost for a project (including costs in all years whether covered by CMAQ or other funding sources), along with CMAQ obligations for the project in the fiscal year.

FHWA also should consider ways of addressing problems due to inconsistent data, methods, and assumptions in estimating emission reductions, without imposing unreasonable reporting burdens on states.

REFERENCES

Abbreviation

FHWA Federal Highway Administration

FHWA. 1992. Further Guidance on the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ Program). U.S. Department of Transportation, Oct. 16.

FHWA. 1999. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program Under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21): Program Guidance. U.S. Department of Transportation, April.

Page 178
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 178
Page 179
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 179
Page 180
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 180
Page 181
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 181
Page 182
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 182
Page 183
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 183
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 184
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 185
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 186
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 187
Page 188
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 188
Page 189
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 189
Page 190
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 190
Page 191
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 191
Page 192
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 192
Page 193
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 193
Page 194
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 194
Page 195
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 195
Page 196
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 196
Page 197
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 197
Page 198
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 198
Page 199
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 199
Page 200
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 200
Page 201
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 201
Page 202
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 202
Page 203
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 203
Page 204
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 204
Page 205
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 205
Page 206
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 206
Page 207
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 207
Page 208
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 208
Page 209
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 209
Page 210
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C - Analysis of the CMAQ Database." Transportation Research Board. 2002. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10350.
×
Page 210
Next: Appendix D - Interview Guide and Site Visit Results »
The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264 Get This Book
×
 The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience -- Special Report 264
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

TRB Special Report 264 - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: Assessing 10 Years of Experience recommends that Congress retain the sole federal surface transportation program that funds projects to reduce pollution and traffic congestion in areas that must comply with national air quality standards.

The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program was enacted as part of the surface transportation legislation authorized in 1991 to provide support for projects that would aid local efforts to meet the strict new federal deadlines imposed by the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990. CMAQ was included in the reauthorization of surface transportation legislation in 1998 for another 6 years, and funding for this period was set at $8.1 billion. In the 1998 legislation, Congress also requested an evaluation of the effectiveness of the program and the cost-effectiveness of the projects funded by the program.

CMAQ funds are focused primarily on the transportation control measures (TCMs) contained in the 1990 CAAA (with the exception of vehicle scrappage programs, which have not been permitted). TCMs are strategies whose primary purpose is to lessen the pollutants emitted by motor vehicles by decreasing highway travel (for example, bicycle, pedestrian, and some transit projects) and to encourage more efficient facility use (for example, projects focused on ridesharing and on traffic flow improvements, such as signal timing). In addition, CMAQ funds may be used for projects that reduce vehicle emissions directly, such as through vehicle inspection and maintenance programs and purchase of alternative-fueled transit vehicles. In the spirit of the legislation that originally authorized the program, decisions about project selection are made at the local level, usually by or through the local metropolitan planning organization.

After reviewing the limited information available about these types of projects, the committee that evaluated the CMAQ program concluded that, when compared on the sole criterion of tons of emissions reduced per dollar spent, strategies aimed directly at emissions reductions—such as emissions and fuel standards for new vehicles, well-structured inspection and maintenance programs, and vehicle scrappage programs—are more cost-effective than the typical CMAQ TCMs, which tend to depend on changes in behavior. A few behaviorally based TCMs, however, such as pricing and regional ridesharing, compare favorably with vehicle- and fuel-based strategies. The committee recommended that the CMAQ program be continued, in part because it is a "funded" rather than an "unfunded" mandate. The committee also called for a focus of future projects on reductions in emissions with the largest public health consequences and for improved evaluation of project effectiveness.

Special Report 264 Summary

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!