tation system (e.g., the air traffic control system) to improve operational efficiency
Urgent action is essential for several reasons:
Environmental issues are already interfering with the efficient operation of the U.S. air transportation system.
Air traffic is increasing.
Environmental standards are becoming more stringent.
Research and technology development takes a long time to change the face of commercial aviation.
New technology may take 10 years or more to be proven commercially acceptable and certified by the FAA for use on commercial aircraft. In addition, the production run on a successful aircraft may last for 15 to 20 years, and individual aircraft may have service lives of 25 to 35 years. As a result, it can take decades for a major technological improvement to show up in a majority of the commercial fleet unless it can be retrofitted into existing aircraft at reasonable cost.
Given the current funding available, the Committee on Aeronautics Research and Technology for Environmental Compatibility has concluded that federal research programs in noise reduction technology are focused appropriately. However, much remains to be done, and uncertainties persist in many areas. In collaboration with other stakeholders (such as manufacturers, airlines, airport authorities, local governments, nongovernmental organizations, and foreign regulatory bodies and researchers), NASA and the FAA should support research to resolve uncertainties in the following areas:
long-term atmospheric effects of aircraft emissions locally, regionally, and globally
reliable goals for noise and emissions reductions for each phase of flight
the optimum long-term strategy for improving the understanding of the many specific issues, including economic factors, associated with aircraft noise and emissions
Economic analyses must form a key element in much of the research in the above areas because economic incentives for providers and users of air transportation equipment and services are likely to be a key component of a successful long-term strategy.
NASA and other agencies should sustain promising research long enough to ensure that new technology developed by federal research programs is mature enough to warrant commercial development. This will require a balanced allocation of federal funds devoted to mitigating the environmental effects of aviation. In particular, federal expenditures to reduce noise should be balanced between abatement of noise at specific airports (e.g., through soundproofing of privately owned buildings located outside the airport perimeter) and the development of advanced aircraft technologies that will ultimately reduce aircraft noise globally.
Finding 1-2. Vigorous Action Required. Environmental concerns will increasingly limit the growth of air transportation in the 21st century unless vigorous action is taken to augment current research and technology related to the environmental impacts of aviation.
EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2002a. Energy Consumption by Source, 1949-2000 . Available online at <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/txt/tab0511.htm>.
EIA. 2002b. Petroleum Products Supplied by Type, 1949-2000. Available online at <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/txt/tab0103.htm>.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 1997. FAA Advisory Circular 36-1G. Noise Levels for U.S. Certificated and Foreign Aircraft. AEE-110. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration. Available online at <http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/MainFrame?OpenFrameSet>.
FAA. 2001. FAA Aerospace Forecasts Fiscal Years 2001-2012. March. Table I-2R. Washington, D.C.: FAA Office of Aviation Policy and Plans. Available online at <http://api.hq.faa.gov/foreca01/Table%20I-2R.pdf>.
GAO (General Accounting Office). 2000. Aviation and the Environment— Results from a Survey of the Nation’s 50 Busiest Commercial Service Airports. August. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office.
Henderson, Stephen C., and Upali K. Wickrama. 1999. Aircraft emissions: Current inventories and future scenarios. Table 9-10: Traffic projections and 5-year average growth rates from FESG [Forecasting and Economic Analysis Sub-Group]. IPCC Special Report on Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Available online at <http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/aviation/138.htm>.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 1999. Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lukachko, S., and I. Waitz. 2001. Environmental compatibility of aviation graphs. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gas Turbine Laboratory.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2002. Technology Goals and Objectives. Office of Aerospace Technology. Available online at <http://www.aerospace.nasa.gov/goals/index.htm>.
NRC (National Research Council). 1997. U.S. Supersonic Commercial Aircraft: Assessing NASA’s High Speed Research Program. Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 1998. The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 1999. A Review of NASA’s Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2001. Commercial Supersonic Technology: The Way Ahead. Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NSTC (National Science and Technology Council). 1995. Goals for a National Partnership in Aeronautics Research and Technology. Washington, D.C.: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available online at <http://www.ostp.gov/html/aero/cv-ind.html>.
Prather, Michael, and Robert Sausen. 1999. Potential climate change from aviation. Table 6-2: Emissions, atmospheric concentrations, radiative forcing, and climate change (global mean surface temperature) projected for the years 1990, 2000, 2015, 2025, and 2050 using IPCC’s [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s] IS92a and the aviation scenarios from Tables 6-1 and 6-3. IPCC Special Report on Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Available online at <http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/aviation/068.htm#tab61>.