Items in cart [0] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK list:$38.25 Web:$34.43 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Free Resources Sign in to download PDF book and chapters PDF Report Brief PDF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Confronting the Nation's Water Problems: The Role of Research Critical Needs for Research in Veterinary Science Other Related Titles National Capacity in Forestry Research (2002) Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 139   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Page 139 Appendix B BREAKOUT GROUP QUESTIONS Workshop on National Capacity in Forestry Research July 15 & 16, 1999 Lecture Room National Academy of Sciences 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 Breakout Session I July 15, 1999 1) Blue Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 2) Green Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 3) Red Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 4) Yellow Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? Breakout Session II July 16, 1999 1) Blue Group: Is there an adequate knowledge base? —Identify major gaps in the knowledge base needed for forestry research. 2) Green Group: Is there adequate research capacity? —Identify strengths and weaknesses of current research capacity 3) Red Group: Are there adequate interdisciplinary and scale applications? —Identify needed interdisciplinary and spatial applications and incentives. 4) Yellow Group: Are university curricula and programs adequate? —Identify strengths and weaknesses of university curricula and programs to provide researchers. Page 139 Front Matter (R1-R18) Executive Summary (1-13) 1. Need, Context, and Foundation for Forestry Research (14-22) 2. The Essential Knowledge Base for Forestry Issues (23-41) 3. Current Forestry-Research Capacity in the United States (42-81) 4. Preparing Forestry Scientists and Users of Forestry Science (82-104) 5. Capacity of Forestry-Research Organizations to Meet Future Research Needs (105-118) 6. Summary and Conclusions (119-127) References (128-135) Appendix A: Workshop Agenda (136-138) Appendix B: Breakout Group Questions (139-139) About the Authors (140-144)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 139
Page 139 Appendix B BREAKOUT GROUP QUESTIONS Workshop on National Capacity in Forestry Research July 15 & 16, 1999 Lecture Room National Academy of Sciences 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 Breakout Session I July 15, 1999 1) Blue Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 2) Green Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 3) Red Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 4) Yellow Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? Breakout Session II July 16, 1999 1) Blue Group: Is there an adequate knowledge base? —Identify major gaps in the knowledge base needed for forestry research. 2) Green Group: Is there adequate research capacity? —Identify strengths and weaknesses of current research capacity 3) Red Group: Are there adequate interdisciplinary and scale applications? —Identify needed interdisciplinary and spatial applications and incentives. 4) Yellow Group: Are university curricula and programs adequate? —Identify strengths and weaknesses of university curricula and programs to provide researchers.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

forestry issues