National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$38.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

National Capacity in Forestry Research (2002)
Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix B: Breakout Group Questions." National Capacity in Forestry Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
139
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Page 139

Appendix B BREAKOUT GROUP QUESTIONS

Workshop on National Capacity in Forestry Research

July 15 & 16, 1999

Lecture Room

National Academy of Sciences

2101 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20418

Breakout Session I

July 15, 1999

    1) Blue Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research?
    2) Green Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research?
    3) Red Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research?
    4) Yellow Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research?

Breakout Session II

July 16, 1999

    1) Blue Group: Is there an adequate knowledge base?

    —Identify major gaps in the knowledge base needed for forestry research.

    2) Green Group: Is there adequate research capacity?

    —Identify strengths and weaknesses of current research capacity

    3) Red Group: Are there adequate interdisciplinary and scale applications?

    —Identify needed interdisciplinary and spatial applications and incentives.

    4) Yellow Group: Are university curricula and programs adequate?

    —Identify strengths and weaknesses of university curricula and programs to provide researchers.

Page
139

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 139
Page 139 Appendix B BREAKOUT GROUP QUESTIONS Workshop on National Capacity in Forestry Research July 15 & 16, 1999 Lecture Room National Academy of Sciences 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 Breakout Session I July 15, 1999 1) Blue Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 2) Green Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 3) Red Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? 4) Yellow Group: What are critical forestry issues and priorities for forestry research? Breakout Session II July 16, 1999 1) Blue Group: Is there an adequate knowledge base? —Identify major gaps in the knowledge base needed for forestry research. 2) Green Group: Is there adequate research capacity? —Identify strengths and weaknesses of current research capacity 3) Red Group: Are there adequate interdisciplinary and scale applications? —Identify needed interdisciplinary and spatial applications and incentives. 4) Yellow Group: Are university curricula and programs adequate? —Identify strengths and weaknesses of university curricula and programs to provide researchers.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

forestry issues