National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7. Findings and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10387.
×

References

Andersen, K.P., and E. Ursin. 1977. A multispecies extension to the Beverton and Holt theory of fishing, with accounts of phosphorus circulation and primary production. Meddelelser 7:319-435.


Clark, C. 1966. Marine reserves and the precautionary management of fisheries. Ecological Applications 6(2):369-370.


Greenberg, E.V.C. 1993. Ocean fisheries, P. 376 in Sustainable Environmental Law, Campbell-Mohn, C., B. Breen, and J.W. Futrell (eds.).


H. John Heinz III Center for Science Economics and the Environment. 2000. Fishing Grounds: Defining a New Era for American Fisheries Management. Island Press. 256 p.

Hogarth, W.T. 2002. Testimony to the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, January 15, 2002.

Hollowed, A.B., N. Bax, R. Beamish, J. Collie, M. Fogarty, P. Livingston, J. Pope, and J.C. Rice. 2000a. Are multispecies models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:707-719.

Hollowed, A.B., J.N. Ianelli, and P.A. Livingston. 2000b. Including predation mortality in stock assessments: a case study for Gulf of Alaska walleye pollock. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:279-293.


Kammer, R.G. 2000. An Independent Assessment of the Resource Requirements for the National Marine Fisheries Service. A report to the Deputy Under Secretary, NOAA and the Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service. 38 p.


Link, J.S. 2002a. Ecological considerations in fisheries management: When does it matter? Fisheries 27:10-17.

Link, J.S. 2002b. What does ecosystem-based fisheries management mean? Fisheries 27: 18-21.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10387.
×

Livingston, P.A., and J. Jurado-Molina. 2000. A multispecies virtual population analysis of the eastern Bering Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:294-299.

Musick, J.A., M.M. Harbin, S.A. Berkeley, G.H. Burgess, A.M. Eklund, L. Findley, R.G. Gilmore, J.T. Goblen, D.S. Ha, G.R. Huntsman, J.C. McGovern, S.J. Parker, S.G. Poss, E. Sala, T.W. Schmidt, G.R. Sedberry, H.Weeks, and S.G. Wright. 2000. Marine, estuarine, and diadromous fish stocks at risk of extinction in North America (exclusive of Pacific salmonids). Fisheries 25:6-30.


National Fisherman. 2002. Editor’s Log. National Fisherman 82(9):4.

National Academy of Public Administration. 2002. Courts, Congress, and Constituencies: Managing Fisheries by Default.

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 1999. Ecosystem-based Fishery Management. A Report to Congress. National Marine Fisheries Service, Ecosystems Principles Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, NMFS, April 1999.

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2001a. Report to Congress, Status of Fisheries of the United States. January. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/Status%20of%20Fisheries%202000.pdf.

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2001b. Marine Fisheries Stock Assessment Improvement Plan . Report of the National Marine Fisheries Service National Task Force for Improving Fish Stock Assessment. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-56, 69 p., 25 appendices.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1999. Our living oceans. Report on the status of U.S. living marine resources, 1999. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-41. 301 p.

National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Improving the Management of U.S. Marine Fisheries. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1996a. The Bering Sea Ecosystem. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1996b. Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1998a. Improving Fish Stock Assessments. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1998b. Review of the Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1999a. Sharing the Fish: Toward a National Policy on Individual Fishing Quotas. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1999b. Sustaining Marine Fisheries. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1999c. The Community Development Quota Program in Alaska. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 2000a. Improving the Collection Management and Use of Marine Fisheries Data. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 2000b. Recruiting Fishery Scientists: Workshop on Stock Assessment and Social Science Careers. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10387.
×

National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Marine Protected Areas: Tools for Sustaining Ocean Ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 2001. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2000 (NSF 00-327).

Pikitch, E.K., D.L. Erickson, and J.R. Wallace. 1988. An evaluation of the effectiveness of trip limits as a management tool. Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center. Processed Report No. 324 (88-27).


Rogalski, W. 1980. The unique federalism of the regional councils under the Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976. B.C. Environmental Affairs Law Review 9:163.


Sissenwine, M.P., and N. Daan, 1991. An overview of multispecies models relevant to management of living resources. ICES Marine Science Symposium 193:6-11.


Working Group on Re-Evaluation of Biological Reference Points for New England Groundfish. 2002. Re-evaluation of biological reference points for New England groundfish. Northeast Fish. Sci. Cent. Ref Doc. 02-04; 395 p.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10387.
×
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10387.
×
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10387.
×
Page 71
Next: Cases Cited »
Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service Get This Book
×
 Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

NMFS has a difficult and complex task in managing U.S. marine fisheries. Despite some successes, too many stocks continue to decline. Over the past decade, several problems have been identified that have contributed to the current dissatisfaction with how marine fisheries are managed. This dissatisfaction is evident from the large number of lawsuits filed by the fishing industry and environmental organizations. One central problem is overfishing. Overfishing issues have been discussed in a series of NRC reports, and these reports identify overcapitalization, and technological and gear improvements as some of the causes. The reports recommend ways to stem these problems and to advance the practice of fishery science at NMFS. This report reiterates some of these recommendations, and makes new recommendations to enhance the use of data and science for fisheries management.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!